Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 04:22:06 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: 1660s or 6600XT  (Read 79 times)
CrossroadBTC (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 14


View Profile
October 03, 2021, 07:05:01 AM
 #1

I can get gtx1660super at 350$ right now but a friend is telling me to get AMD 6600xt instead, anyone using this AMD for RVN? Cos I'm also preparing for ETH2.0 incase that comes to reality, also the AMD price is more higher than 1660 super

If you see garbage posts (off-topic, trolling, spam, no point, etc.), use the "report to moderator" links. All reports are investigated, though you will rarely be contacted about your reports.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
deedeeranged
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 325
Merit: 42


View Profile
October 03, 2021, 04:42:56 PM
 #2

I can get gtx1660super at 350$ right now but a friend is telling me to get AMD 6600xt instead, anyone using this AMD for RVN? Cos I'm also preparing for ETH2.0 incase that comes to reality, also the AMD price is more higher than 1660 super

Look at youtube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYew10Lx91NaP52EwwT5z3A/videos or https://www.youtube.com/c/SebsFinTechChannel/videos for how the RX 6600 XT's perform with RVN.
Looper_U
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 369
Merit: 16

$CYBERCASH METAVERSE


View Profile
October 03, 2021, 05:08:55 PM
 #3

I got my 1660 supers at 420$ per one, 350$ is very good if you can get them and hashrate wise the difference isn't much between 6600XT and 1660s only 3-4MH will be missed

swogerino
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3150
Merit: 1234


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile
October 03, 2021, 06:41:53 PM
 #4

For RVN the 6600 XT is better,as it can do 13.9-14 Mhsh while the 1660s can only do 11 Mhsh at best,also the power consumption is lower in the 6600 XT and it also performs the same or just a bit better in Ethereum/Ethereum Classic compared with 1660s but with better power consumption.It is a much newer production compared to the 1660s so it is only natural that it is a better card overall compared to the 1660s.

..Stake.com..   ▄████████████████████████████████████▄
   ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄            ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██  ▄████▄
   ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██  ██████
   ██ ██████████ ██      ██ ██████████ ██   ▀██▀
   ██ ██      ██ ██████  ██ ██      ██ ██    ██
   ██ ██████  ██ █████  ███ ██████  ██ ████▄ ██
   ██ █████  ███ ████  ████ █████  ███ ████████
   ██ ████  ████ ██████████ ████  ████ ████▀
   ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██
   ██            ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀            ██ 
   ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀
  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███  ██  ██  ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ██████████████████████████████████████████
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█  ▄▀▄             █▀▀█▀▄▄
█  █▀█             █  ▐  ▐▌
█       ▄██▄       █  ▌  █
█     ▄██████▄     █  ▌ ▐▌
█    ██████████    █ ▐  █
█   ▐██████████▌   █ ▐ ▐▌
█    ▀▀██████▀▀    █ ▌ █
█     ▄▄▄██▄▄▄     █ ▌▐▌
█                  █▐ █
█                  █▐▐▌
█                  █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄
▄█▀       ▐█▌       ▀█▄
██         ▐█▌         ██
████▄     ▄█████▄     ▄████
████████▄███████████▄████████
███▀    █████████████    ▀███
██       ███████████       ██
▀█▄       █████████       ▄█▀
▀█▄    ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄  ▄▄▄█▀
▀███████         ███████▀
▀█████▄       ▄█████▀
▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀
..PLAY NOW..
waggy459
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 41
Merit: 2


View Profile
October 03, 2021, 06:42:23 PM
 #5

Given the edge the 6600xt looks to have in raven hashing I’d bias toward that maybe 60/40. But even so I’d consider getting a mix of both if you are building a rig or farm.

Also take a look at even a 3060 v2 LHR, I’ve had one for a while and it hashes great on rvn 21.5 mh at 113 watts.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!