How you choose projects for investment

[isaac_clarke22]

~

It is either the project was marketed badly, or the "team" is not legitimate at all.
Even with such active users, if those numbers are not going to reach the global, it is limiting itself to get the potential investors as imagine how many crypto holders are now there around the world.

[budlo]

Hello!
I want to know how you choose projects for investment?
At the moment I'm focusing on the Near Protocol.
I bought it back in early April and don't miss the chance to mention it.
What did I focus on when choosing it for investment?

1. Team (most of the famous developers worked in google and facebook)
2. Strong community (more than 100k on Twitter and a very strong forum)
3. Own blockchain (develop their own structure with their own EVM and cross-chain)
4. Solving existing problems in cryptocurrency (high fees, transaction processing speed, scalability)

This is a very brief description. At the moment I am faced with the choice to add a few more such projects to myself. Share your knowledge.

You have good criteria for choosing a project and i totally agree with most of them.
I also have Near in my portfolio and I like how the project is developing. I think there will be no rapid growth as it was with Solana but i think that the project will survive the bear market and this is the main criterion for me.

[cvasy]

These are all valid points you made. But however, having a project with its own Blockchain is not a deal-breaker for me. Why? Because you have some coins with their own blockchains like Vectorium, which is just plain shitcoin with no value while you have tokens like Uniswap on Ethereum blockchain, which has much more values placed on its token.

Vectorium is a completely invalid failed project so needless to say, and that's also despite Vectorium's lack of popularity in cryptocurrencies, because it really is a very bad failed project, in contrast to other projects that also have their own Blockchain with basic values

[Kelvinid]

I understand that most of us are looking to gain assurance but unfortunately, it is really hard to see it even the top leading coins can't provide that thing. Even with that kind of market situation we've found a way to make it possible.

1.market cap
2.trading volume
3.use case

These things I'd look at first. Well, it takes time to do the search but it was not that hard if we love doing this and the fact that we look for assurance (or at least), there is no way we get tired of doing this otherwise, we just fail in the end.

[fileo]

I choose the project with IDO in trusted decentralized exchange. From there I can gather information if the project has potential or nothing. Then definitely I will visit the website and their community to observe how's going on. I chose the project that I determined will gonna give me good future from holding. It is given that the top ranking are good choice for investment sometimes new tokens are also good as long as legit and potential.

[gabbie2010]

Hello!
I want to know how you choose projects for investment?
At the moment I'm focusing on the Near Protocol.
I bought it back in early April and don't miss the chance to mention it.
What did I focus on when choosing it for investment?

1. Team (most of the famous developers worked in google and facebook)
2. Strong community (more than 100k on Twitter and a very strong forum)
3. Own blockchain (develop their own structure with their own EVM and cross-chain)
4. Solving existing problems in cryptocurrency (high fees, transaction processing speed, scalability)

This is a very brief description. At the moment I am faced with the choice to add a few more such projects to myself. Share your knowledge.

Before venturing into any investment, you should always conduct an extensive research to lessen the risk of getting scammed or losing your money. Carefully analyze the project's mission and vision. Check out its white paper, roadmap, and affiliations. They must have a dedicated, legit, and transparent team. A positive community that supports the project is very important as well. I have taken into account the above criteria, that's why I feel secured holding some top-performing cryptocurrencies in my portfolio including this undervalued gem called Stakenet XSN.

Project whitepapers must reveal some insightful details about the project, while a thorough research will give details of whether the developers tried to clone another previous project, of course these are valid points that an investor must take into cognisance before investing in any project, cryptocurrencies market is very competitive hence it will take a lot of effort by the developers with a strong team to make an impact in the market else the project will fail, solving some problems isn't enough because there are lots of project like Tron that solved high cost of transaction, speed etc yet are trying to make impact in the market.

[Cadaver20]

First of all, I would like to thank you personally because you have presented four very powerful methods. The four methods you have mentioned are undoubtedly very effective

Yeah, OP mentioned some very good points here. But if you read the comments on this topic, you will know some more important points. These will be very helpful in your future investment.

[Hannahanto]

Hello!
I want to know how you choose projects for investment?
At the moment I'm focusing on the Near Protocol.
I bought it back in early April and don't miss the chance to mention it.
What did I focus on when choosing it for investment?

1. Team (most of the famous developers worked in google and facebook)
2. Strong community (more than 100k on Twitter and a very strong forum)
3. Own blockchain (develop their own structure with their own EVM and cross-chain)
4. Solving existing problems in cryptocurrency (high fees, transaction processing speed, scalability)

This is a very brief description. At the moment I am faced with the choice to add a few more such projects to myself. Share your knowledge.

I think you have a point here... I myself always make research on projects before investing on them. About this project you mentioned "NEAR Protocol" I've been following up with them for a while for about 6months now if am not mistaken. Saw the dip at $2 and now is about $8 even got to new ath of 11.8usd. I support every single word you say about them the project has a great tesm to be precise and the ecosystem has more potential than we see from outside.

[goinmerry]

Hello!
I want to know how you choose projects for investment?
At the moment I'm focusing on the Near Protocol.
I bought it back in early April and don't miss the chance to mention it.
What did I focus on when choosing it for investment?

1. Team (most of the famous developers worked in google and facebook)
2. Strong community (more than 100k on Twitter and a very strong forum)
3. Own blockchain (develop their own structure with their own EVM and cross-chain)
4. Solving existing problems in cryptocurrency (high fees, transaction processing speed, scalability)

This is a very brief description. At the moment I am faced with the choice to add a few more such projects to myself. Share your knowledge.

That's already a good factor to be considered. You can apply that to all projects. It's common for us to check those to give us a view of the project or coin if really serious and active. But the reality is, we don't have any assurance that even we saw projects like that, they are not expected to fall, rugpull, downtrend, or turned into scam soon.

That's where the part now of accepting the risks and rely on your luck that everything will be good in the long run.

[adzino]

-snip-

1. Team (most of the famous developers worked in google and facebook)
2. Strong community (more than 100k on Twitter and a very strong forum)
3. Own blockchain (develop their own structure with their own EVM and cross-chain)
4. Solving existing problems in cryptocurrency (high fees, transaction processing speed, scalability)

This is a very brief description. At the moment I am faced with the choice to add a few more such projects to myself. Share your knowledge.

1. Projects can create a "fake" team with excellent academic achievements. Make sure to know that the person actually exists. On other hand, just because they worked in google or facebook doesn't mean they are going to create the best project.

2. Lol twitter followers can be bought. There are projects that are doing very good with small communities. Don't overlook those.

3. There can be good projects that are built over other networks.

4. This one is the most important one. We don't need new projects that has nothing new to offer.

[TheUltraElite]

Most projects talk about solving a problem in the crypto sphere but in reality they do not do such. The point is that majority of the projects assume something as a problem while in reality it might not be one - they got their point and they sold their tokens to newbies and therefore they scammed some newbies off their previous bitcoins.

Hence even after going through all the above four point, one can come across a scam project or a to-be-failure project. The point is not to identify them to find the good one, but to avoid any such project and focus on already known methods of investment.

A project that actually solved problems is bitcoin. Period.

[rika0223]

Hello!
I want to know how you choose projects for investment?
At the moment I'm focusing on the Near Protocol.
I bought it back in early April and don't miss the chance to mention it.
What did I focus on when choosing it for investment?

1. Team (most of the famous developers worked in google and facebook)
2. Strong community (more than 100k on Twitter and a very strong forum)
3. Own blockchain (develop their own structure with their own EVM and cross-chain)
4. Solving existing problems in cryptocurrency (high fees, transaction processing speed, scalability)

This is a very brief description. At the moment I am faced with the choice to add a few more such projects to myself. Share your knowledge.

If I were to choose a project that has maximum control by the project manager, the project manager is very influential on the investment project, and the most important thing in choosing a project for investment is the cohesiveness of the team in the project, because every investment project created must have a team. strong and the right goals or plans for the masses will come, every choose a good investment project we must see a good team for the success of the project

[Oneandpure]

Better try to invest with launchpad coin listed on Binance only than participant with new ICO project, right now many new project without clearly about road map when coin listing and open selling on the market. They only focus with how to make sold out on pre sale but after coin success sold not understand yet to list on bigger exchange market, I stop for investing with ICO project and now waiting with launchpad coin on Binance.

[imstillthebest]

Better try to invest with launchpad coin listed on Binance only than participant with new ICO project . I stop for investing with ICO project and now waiting with launchpad coin on Binance.

ico's are old and only few projects conducts them today maybe because people have lost their trust in ico's while on the other hand binance is one of the top companies right now so they are careful on picking projects so that it wont affect the repuation that they already built .
 binance still warns about the risk of crypto investing  .

right now many new project without clearly about road map when coin listing and open selling on the market. They only focus with how to make sold out on pre sale but after coin success sold not understand yet to list on bigger exchange market,

listing on bigger exchanges is not easy . there are projects that has a roadmap but still fails  .
 i think its all about the willingness and the trustworthiness of the project .

[rozak]

Better try to invest with launchpad coin listed on Binance only than participant with new ICO project . I stop for investing with ICO project and now waiting with launchpad coin on Binance.

ico's are old and only few projects conducts them today maybe because people have lost their trust in ico's while on the other hand binance is one of the top companies right now so they are careful on picking projects so that it wont affect the repuation that they already built .
 binance still warns about the risk of crypto investing  .

especially now with the trend of DeFi and NFT projects that are now doing IDO a lot.
after the ICO was abandoned by investors, now many investors are entering into new projects on IDO which are carried out on several platforms that have good reputations. and the results are enough to make many investors profit.
we have to believe and follow the trends that have changed. binance is one of the best platforms that is constantly upgrading development and making trends according to market needs. investors like this.

[dhemasm]

1. Team (most of the famous developers worked in google and facebook)
2. Strong community (more than 100k on Twitter and a very strong forum)
3. Own blockchain (develop their own structure with their own EVM and cross-chain)
4. Solving existing problems in cryptocurrency (high fees, transaction processing speed, scalability)

This is a very brief description. At the moment I am faced with the choice to add a few more such projects to myself. Share your knowledge.

It's already good step before choosing project to invest but i will advice some suggestion too.
-Partners, On the current market it was very important since most project out there was business-oriented so always make sure it's backed by some good VC or Partners
-Concept, Most project out there it's just an another copycat so it's good choice to seek some new concept and look for the long term potential too.
-Tokenomics, Transparent token circulation and funding allocation it's another important stuff to check before invest on any project

[indah rezqi]

Choosing a project by considering the Team of the project as the first for me was in accordance with what I did. For me, the team that manages the project is very important to pay attention to because the success or failure of the project really depends on the hard work, honesty and openness of the team in developing the project.

[budlo]

Choosing a project by considering the Team of the project as the first for me was in accordance with what I did. For me, the team that manages the project is very important to pay attention to because the success or failure of the project really depends on the hard work, honesty and openness of the team in developing the project.

Of course having a good team in the project is very important it is also worth paying attention to the fact that the command code is open. This allows us to understand the project and not just trust the developers who write the code.

[beerlover]

Team members is only one facet to look at but we have seen a lot of projects here with solid team and yet, they still ended up bad.
What I have seen here is that if the project has already working use case with many users on board.
Not because they were asked to install the app or service because of some rewards, but actually using it in their daily life.
If there are active users, the platform can sustain its presence in the market. But if only selected few can benefit from it, would be hard to maintain such platform.

Team members is the least important part if you ask me, I have zero clue who started uniswap, maybe it is known and they became famous but I still have zero idea, don't know even a single member of uniswap team, and the only person I know regarding ETH is vitalik, nobody else, and BNB is just CZ, let's look at others that are big, no idea who the members on ADA team are, or Doge, or SOL and so forth neither.

I did not checked any of that and yet they became big, are they as famous as vitalik and satoshi? They are probably not since I am here every day and still don't know who they are, which means teams do not matter.

The intentions of the teams do matter though, if they are scammers then they will scam you, but if not then the talent matters but in the end coins only go up when the community makes it viral, ADA has been around for years and suddenly in the past few months it became big, all due to going viral. So it is not really that much of a big deal.

[Galley]

I always choose an active community, the dev teams should always be in their social media platform so whenever there are some questions or queries of their investors they can easily answer them. I am also looking for valid identity of the project team, this is important for you to make sure that the project is legit. You should also look for the long-term plan of the project and that is the most important.

Projects do not always represent their team, but this does not mean that the project may have any fraudulent inclinations. We know projects that have become very successful at the same time, without advertising their team. But we also know projects in which the team was visible and communicated with the community, and then a seemingly successful project turned out to be a scam. Therefore, as an option, it is worth paying attention to this, but this factor is not critical when considering projects.