Really implementation and development of Web3.0

[cryptoknows]

Now, one way or another, due to the fast-growing segment of DeFi and NFT, the issue of implementing web3.0 and a faster blockchain is more acute than ever.
We all understand that the leading platforms were created with the support of Ethereum, but after this year, a lot of solutions to the problem of the Ethereum network for third-party applications appeared on the market. For example, Solana and its huge development in this area. Thanks to their blockchain, the project was able to break into a leading position. But everyone remembers the case of disabling their blockchain, which casts doubt on the work of their system and decentralization. But still, such a cross-chain project caused a real furor and was like a fresh breath of air for many crypto enthusiasts.

Let's put together in one sheet the most famous projects that are able to build the Internet of the future with their blockchain.

Ethereum - one way or another, today's project network is loaded so much that many users do not have the strength to endure the eternal change in the Gas price and other interruptions in working with transactions. Will Ethereum 2.0 change anything? I think not. After all, we have been promised to do this for a very long time, and ethereum has managed to breed real competitors during this time

ADA, Solana, Polkadot, Matic, Near Protocol. These projects already have technological solutions and a blockchain capable of processing tens of thousands of transactions per second, low fees and easy integration among developers.
As for the actual development of web3.0,
I recently heard the news that Opera Browser will implement the Near Protocol blockchain, which directly affects the implementation of smart contracts on the Internet. In addition, the Rainbow Bridge function will be available, which will allow you to transfer erc-20 tokens to the Near ecosystem.

This is just the tip of the iceberg of this huge toolkit for introducing smart contracts and blockchain technologies to the Internet, what do you think about this? Will Ethereum 2.0 remain a monopolist in this area, or will the network no longer be able to catch up with the fast-growing cross-chain market, because Matic currently has more active addresses than Ethereum.

There is a reason to think seriously.

[Devifajarina]

Now, one way or another, due to the fast-growing segment of DeFi and NFT, the issue of implementing web3.0 and a faster blockchain is more acute than ever.
We all understand that the leading platforms were created with the support of Ethereum, but after this year, a lot of solutions to the problem of the Ethereum network for third-party applications appeared on the market. For example, Solana and its huge development in this area. Thanks to their blockchain, the project was able to break into a leading position. But everyone remembers the case of disabling their blockchain, which casts doubt on the work of their system and decentralization. But still, such a cross-chain project caused a real furor and was like a fresh breath of air for many crypto enthusiasts.

Let's put together in one sheet the most famous projects that are able to build the Internet of the future with their blockchain.

Ethereum - one way or another, today's project network is loaded so much that many users do not have the strength to endure the eternal change in the Gas price and other interruptions in working with transactions. Will Ethereum 2.0 change anything? I think not. After all, we have been promised to do this for a very long time, and ethereum has managed to breed real competitors during this time

ADA, Solana, Polkadot, Matic, Near Protocol. These projects already have technological solutions and a blockchain capable of processing tens of thousands of transactions per second, low fees and easy integration among developers.
As for the actual development of web3.0,
I recently heard the news that Opera Browser will implement the Near Protocol blockchain, which directly affects the implementation of smart contracts on the Internet. In addition, the Rainbow Bridge function will be available, which will allow you to transfer erc-20 tokens to the Near ecosystem.

This is just the tip of the iceberg of this huge toolkit for introducing smart contracts and blockchain technologies to the Internet, what do you think about this? Will Ethereum 2.0 remain a monopolist in this area, or will the network no longer be able to catch up with the fast-growing cross-chain market, because Matic currently has more active addresses than Ethereum.

There is a reason to think seriously.

Ethereum 2.0 is a development from before, so many additions are made to improve what they don't have, but Ethereum will continue to be the monopolist around this place, while Matic is different from ethereum, although the way to use it is easier and cheaper, but Matic is not can provide fast transactions like ethereum, if you compare the two, then ethereum is still the choice for now.

While blockchain has smart contracts and technologies that enable token transfers at ERC 20 that are closely tied to this, there are both positives and negatives to the results of using anything in the crypto space, depending on how we can minimize the risk caused by anything.

[rosebrand]

Ethereum 2.0 is a development from before, so many additions are made to improve what they don't have, but Ethereum will continue to be the monopolist around this place, while Matic is different from ethereum, although the way to use it is easier and cheaper, but Matic is not can provide fast transactions like ethereum, if you compare the two, then ethereum is still the choice for now.

While blockchain has smart contracts and technologies that enable token transfers at ERC 20 that are closely tied to this, there are both positives and negatives to the results of using anything in the crypto space, depending on how we can minimize the risk caused by anything.

No doubt ethereum will continue being the monopolist over other networks but will continue having complications which will eventually trouble users of the ETH network and this is what have really brought the rise of ETH competitors, and even the ETH 2.0 hasn't even shown any much effect, but well I think in all of the projects mentioned above Near protocol seems to be unique among all, instead of being a competitor! They more like a compliment to ETH which is they render support to the short coming of the ETH network.

[minime0105]

Now, one way or another, due to the fast-growing segment of DeFi and NFT, the issue of implementing web3.0 and a faster blockchain is more acute than ever.
We all understand that the leading platforms were created with the support of Ethereum, but after this year, a lot of solutions to the problem of the Ethereum network for third-party applications appeared on the market. For example, Solana and its huge development in this area. Thanks to their blockchain, the project was able to break into a leading position. But everyone remembers the case of disabling their blockchain, which casts doubt on the work of their system and decentralization. But still, such a cross-chain project caused a real furor and was like a fresh breath of air for many crypto enthusiasts.

Let's put together in one sheet the most famous projects that are able to build the Internet of the future with their blockchain.

Ethereum - one way or another, today's project network is loaded so much that many users do not have the strength to endure the eternal change in the Gas price and other interruptions in working with transactions. Will Ethereum 2.0 change anything? I think not. After all, we have been promised to do this for a very long time, and ethereum has managed to breed real competitors during this time

ADA, Solana, Polkadot, Matic, Near Protocol. These projects already have technological solutions and a blockchain capable of processing tens of thousands of transactions per second, low fees and easy integration among developers.
As for the actual development of web3.0,
I recently heard the news that Opera Browser will implement the Near Protocol blockchain, which directly affects the implementation of smart contracts on the Internet. In addition, the Rainbow Bridge function will be available, which will allow you to transfer erc-20 tokens to the Near ecosystem.

This is just the tip of the iceberg of this huge toolkit for introducing smart contracts and blockchain technologies to the Internet, what do you think about this? Will Ethereum 2.0 remain a monopolist in this area, or will the network no longer be able to catch up with the fast-growing cross-chain market, because Matic currently has more active addresses than Ethereum.

There is a reason to think seriously.

I think the problems eth 2.0 is hoping to fix has already been fixed by Near Protocol,matic, ada and solana, although solana have had its fair share of downside since during September there was a time their blockchain was turned off and no transaction could go through, personally I think eth 2.0 is irrelevant but still good since it can help people who still have assets in Ethereum Network, because of their delay to deliver users have already moved to other leading blockchains like Matic, Near Protocol, BSC and ADA, amongst all these Near Protocol is the youngest blockchain here, since in this crypto space for just a year and judging by it has been able to achieve in a couple of months, its only a matter of time before it joins these platforms at the top.

[Capt00]

I assume that Ethereum will continue to be the holding  over other networks, but that it will continue to have issues that will eventually cause users of the ETH network to become frustrated, and that this is what has really fueled the rise of ETH competitors, even though Ethereum 2.0 hasn't had much of an impact. Although eth 2.0 is no longer relevant, it is nevertheless beneficial since it can assist those who still have assets in the Ethereum Network but have moved to other top blockchains due to their inability to produce.