Jamie Dimon asks, “How do we know Bitcoin supply ends in 21 million”?

[Kakmakr]

Well, he obviously do not know what "Peer review" means and that it is globally applied by developers that work on Crypto currencies. Just imagine a competitor Alt coin developer, finding a mistake or lie like this.... they will have a field day with a thing like that. (proving that Bitcoin developers were lying)  

The competition between Alt coin developers are fierce and all of them want to dethrone bitcoin as the King of Crypto currencies. 

This idiot have been trying to bad mouth Bitcoin for years and every time he has been left with a red face, when his false statements has been exposed.  

Who can remember this ==> https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/09/jamie-dimon-says-he-regrets-calling-bitcoin-a-fraud.html

[Wind_FURY]

Well, he obviously do not know what "Peer review" means and that it is globally applied by developers that work on Crypto currencies. Just imagine a competitor Alt coin developer, finding a mistake or lie like this.... they will have a field day with a thing like that. (proving that Bitcoin developers were lying)  

Plus it’s not entirely anything regarding the code, if you can check it or not/really there or not. It’s actually how the whole system works, partly, and how the 21 million supply cap is there. Jamie Dimon simply didn’t do his homework in my opinion.

[ph111]

Looks like he doesn't know what "open source" means. It's funny when some stupid people are trying to convince somebody else about crypto scam but without even knowing much how it actually works

[Wind_FURY]

Looks like he doesn't know what "open source" means. It's funny when some stupid people are trying to convince somebody else about crypto scam but without even knowing much how it actually works

He simply didn’t do his homework in researching how Bitcoin “CAN” change its consensus rules. I believe anyone who understood the basics of the incentive structure or the “why” the whole system has been working, can play devil’s advocate and make a convincing debate.