[open] Restart of 1xBit signature campaign - new signatures and more spots!

[galambo]

look I don't to extend the line but people who apply in the Campaign in general know that they will have to wear the signature if they're accepted.

You were accepted, Your name was in the spreadsheet along with your other Alts -

CryptoCraze11, RankerCan, Coinism, and others.

You must have had checked the spreadsheet for the accounts above if not for galambo.

If you haven't then why did you apply in the first place? The other campaign that pays the same rate you're getting here? and had a short duration compared to this one here, Probably a mistake?

You also didn't consider that payment for your week4 of this campaign but shamelessly started asking for your payment when you were payed extra 40$.

Like i said accept the facts and move on rather than trying to prove that you're innocent (which you're not at least not in my eyes). Maybe Manager1xBit will give you a second chance.
But you made me write this post so who knows what his decision will be.

Thank you again.

Look you have made a mistake but you are such a shameless guy that you are not accepting it rather putting the blame on other shoulders. Accept that you didn't checked who is wearing signature and who is not
You left your campaign and came all the way here to stop my reward and get your bucks back. Since you have no other way to hide your mistake.
Hope won't see your face again here. Next time please manage the campaign in your senses not while you are drunk.
Thank you again for all the hassle.

[1714232116]

1714232116

[1714232116]

1714232116

[1714232116]

1714232116

[1714232116]

1714232116

[1714232116]

1714232116

[Trojane]

Re applying again

Name:Trojane
Post count: 102 including this one
Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile
Bitcoin wallet address:

@manager1xbit

Please kindly consider my reapplication, i have been promoting free of charge for a while now . thanks in advance

Bitcoin address: 32gZzmTxfAJMpCaS9mW4qZLPrd8jLrWuG7

[lulumiya]

Bitcointalk Username: lulumiya
Bitcointalk Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=242323;sa=summary
Rank: full Member
Merit: 104
Last Post Count: 798
BTC address: bc1qndkvtpkqkfx6gxnnvejunxqjjf9s4xvgq5qaz8

[Tumanggor]

Thanks @1xBit for the sixth-week payout

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/eabf8f6f4e722b0f6e94f478e28bfd9ccba33d50f73ad86e84234b0c2dde1f66

[PochJvb]

Thanks @1xBit for the sixth-week payout

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/eabf8f6f4e722b0f6e94f478e28bfd9ccba33d50f73ad86e84234b0c2dde1f66

is this campaign active or close?

[JollyGood]

Such a sad state of affairs.... the lure of earning anything from  $20 - $100 per week to promote the 1xbit scammers is enough for some to jump on the signature campaign bandwagon.

[Poker Player]

Such a sad state of affairs.... the lure of earning anything from  $20 - $100 per week to promote the 1xbit scammers is enough for some to jump on the signature campaign bandwagon.

$100 per week is not bad at all. It is in line with the second best paying signature campaign, which would be the Best Change one. Now there are two more at those levels. This one pays that money for advertising a known scam site and then there is Stake.com, which with its posting requirements does not exactly encourage quality posts.

With $100 a week there are families in the third world who eat, and if you live in the first world and have a stable job, it is a good extra source of income. I guess that's why a lot of people end up advertising the site. If they paid a lot less, there would be a lot less people willing to destroy their reputation on the forum to advertise for them.

[Cryptock]

Such a sad state of affairs.... the lure of earning anything from  $20 - $100 per week to promote the 1xbit scammers is enough for some to jump on the signature campaign bandwagon.

$100 per week is not bad at all. It is in line with the second best paying signature campaign, which would be the Best Change one. Now there are two more at those levels. This one pays that money for advertising a known scam site and then there is Stake.com, which with its posting requirements does not exactly encourage quality posts.

With $100 a week there are families in the third world who eat, and if you live in the first world and have a stable job, it is a good extra source of income. I guess that's why a lot of people end up advertising the site. If they paid a lot less, there would be a lot less people willing to destroy their reputation on the forum to advertise for them.

From what I observed, there were only a few participants who had a neutral trust. Most of the accounts involved in the campaign already had a red trust before, sometimes for very silly reasons, but this excluded them from participating in other campaigns.

Just take a look on this post:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339884.msg57513554#msg57513554

[JollyGood]

You are right $100 per week is a significant amount of money in the third world but as with the previous 1xbit signature campaign it might be another case of a puppeteer controlling various accounts that are all trying to enrol therefore a certain amount of the campaign fees are going to one person.

If stake.com or any other casino/gaming website that have almost zero allegations against them decide to have almost no requirement to get paid - they should not be evaluated on the same merit as known scammers. If some campaign managers choose to hire members based on their rank/name/forum etiquettes or other criteria over their quality of posts then that is their prerogative.

Apart from trying to get posts out there with the 1xbit banner I cannot see what criteria the 1xbit scammers would have in choosing signature campaign participants when some are deep red with double figures in negative trust.

Such a sad state of affairs.... the lure of earning anything from  $20 - $100 per week to promote the 1xbit scammers is enough for some to jump on the signature campaign bandwagon.

$100 per week is not bad at all. It is in line with the second best paying signature campaign, which would be the Best Change one. Now there are two more at those levels. This one pays that money for advertising a known scam site and then there is Stake.com, which with its posting requirements does not exactly encourage quality posts.

With $100 a week there are families in the third world who eat, and if you live in the first world and have a stable job, it is a good extra source of income. I guess that's why a lot of people end up advertising the site. If they paid a lot less, there would be a lot less people willing to destroy their reputation on the forum to advertise for them.

[Stalker22]

You are right $100 per week is a significant amount of money in the third world but as with the previous 1xbit signature campaign it might be another case of a puppeteer controlling various accounts that are all trying to enrol therefore a certain amount of the campaign fees are going to one person.
~

You are right. I see that many of these participants are still on the 1xbit payroll.
In other words, 1xbit knowingly pays cheaters, which makes it clear that the whole "campaign" is fake.

7 Accounts Connected

   
1.ninkdwi        September 25, 2017, 09:22:49 AM   Rangers
2.Alanaz     September 26, 2017, 02:05:13 PM    1xBit.com
3.izsara        September 25, 2017, 09:38:20 AM    1xBit.com
4.bekti3        September 25, 2017, 09:26:14 AM   1xBit.com
5.terrorJR     December 12, 2016, 11:21:58 PM   1xBit.com
6.agg2702     March 08, 2017, 02:28:24 PM   Rangers
7.herurist     May 24, 2017, 06:25:22 AM   1xBit.com
8.Sterbens        July 05, 2016, 02:36:32 PM   Duelbits   

[Decrypted]

I love to watch your pain in a$$  

[og kush420]

You are right $100 per week is a significant amount of money in the third world but as with the previous 1xbit signature campaign it might be another case of a puppeteer controlling various accounts that are all trying to enrol therefore a certain amount of the campaign fees are going to one person.

There is even a thread against you that you are using your position for personal revenge. The irony is that you still holding DT slot. I am promoting this project because they pay me what they have promised and my judgement is based on what I have experienced. You people are just following multiple newbies account that are created by one person.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5229023.0

[CDC AP]

The spreadsheet has been updated but i have not got the funds yet....any one got ??

[galambo]

The spreadsheet has been updated but i have not got the funds yet....any one got ??

I too didn't got the funds. 1xManager can you please check this issue.

[RILWAN]

The spreadsheet has been updated but i have not got the funds yet....any one got ??

I too didn't get the funds. 1xManager can you please check this issue.

Payment time has not expired so why complain here, when you take part in a campaign learn to read the rules.

[galambo]

The spreadsheet has been updated but i have not got the funds yet....any one got ??

I too didn't get the funds. 1xManager can you please check this issue.

Payment time has not expired so why complain here, when you take part in a campaign learn to read the rules.

You got it wrong my friend. I am not complaining rather I was just requesting manger to have a look at this issue. I do agree with you that payment timeline has not expired, so better to wait more. I do have trust in 1xbit manager, they are paying for last 7 weeks will do that this time also. Thank you

[Tumanggor]

Thanks @1xBit for the eighth-week payout

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/ff3d91b9ef6436e90d7bede5293820aa0b2af0cb8079c934a741fe7b63a9a51f

~

Don't hide it, fellas, your sentence shows that you are a little worried

1xBit never unpaid us while we were all in their campaign, this shows that they are very professional and trustworthy

[JollyGood]

What sort of candidates would a signature campaign painted in red attract?

[mm2543363580]

What sort of candidates would a signature campaign painted in red attract?

Have a life Jolly and try to enjoy and let others enjoy. You are the main person who is giving negative trust to participants of this campaign. The acquisitions are made by newbie account created by same person. There is a thread where 1xBit team is resolving issues of people who are affected try to go there and solve your problem.

[Tumanggor]

thanks @1xBit for the ninth-week payout

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/e88d43afee81959b5ad5a709597bb6c9377681d20965954dc64d2aa56df41fbb