1xBit campaign is starting again.

[GowithMi_GMAT]

October 27, 2021
Bounty Manager : Manager1xBit -9
BOUNTY : [open] Restart of 1xBit signature campaign - new signatures and more spots!

Weekly payouts increased from before, of course allowing many new apps or participants register on the 1xBit campaign!
There are several lists of participants that have not been marked
November 04, 2021

Spreadsheet Bounty 1xBit has updated.
D-LAW and Newslifebtc are still promoting the 1xbit.
new participant list : Goldade
1. Bitcointalk name: D-law -1
Bitcointalk profile URL : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3358680;sa=summary
Rank: member

2. Btctalk name: mm2543363580 -2
Btctalk URL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=155420
Rank: Full Member

3. Btctalk name: Gosgosking -2
Btctalk URL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3348633
Rank : member

4. Bitcointalk name: Newlifebtc -1
Bitcointalk URl: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3300239;sa=summary
Rank: member

5. Btctalk name: japones
Btctalk URL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2840840
Rank: Member

6. Bitcointalk Username: kingangel -2
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=162172
Rank: Member

7. Bitcointalk Username: HUSTLER -3
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=94488
Rank: Member

8. Bitcointalk Username: Shagnasty -2
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=64822
Rank: Member

9. Bitcointalk Username: StLucifer -2
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=65672
Rank: Member

10. Bitcointalk username: Goldade -1
Bitcointalk profile url: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=942753
Rank: Full Member

November 08, 2021
Bounty Manager : CryptoGoonie -2
BOUNTY : [1xBit.com] - CSGO: PGL MAJOR 2021 - Signature Campaign [OPEN]

1. Bitcointalk Username:  Fritwakky -1
Bitcointalk profile url: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=460553
Rank: Full Member

2. Bitcointalk Username: TheEconomists -1
Bitcointalk profile url: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1949818
Rank: Member

3. Bitcointalk Username: Trojane -1
Bitcointalk profile url: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3360818
Rank: Member

[Poker Player]

I've tagged atm only those who are wearing the signature. Will tag the missing ones if they wear it in the future.

Number 4 is missing the profile number:

4. Bitcointalk name: Newlifebtc
Bitcointalk URl: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile
Rank: member

Anyway, I suppose more people will tag them.

[NeuroticFish]

Pretty sad. I see very old accounts too. Hacked/sold? Possibly.
Else I'd expect that an user - especially if created in 2013 - would check campaign manager's trust feedback before joining.

1. Bitcointalk name: D-law

At least this user doesn't have the signature; I guess that he may stay "under observation" until he does.

I've tagged atm only those who are wearing the signature. Will tag the missing ones if they wear it in the future.

Great job! As DT2 your tag already makes the things visible.

[GowithMi_GMAT]

I've tagged atm only those who are wearing the signature. Will tag the missing ones if they wear it in the future.
Number 4 is missing the profile number:

Thanks for your quick action, newlifebtc profile number has been updated. but sadly he already deleted signatures on his profile including Japones and D-low

Pretty sad. I see very old accounts too. Hacked/sold? Possibly.
Else I'd expect that an user - especially if created in 2013 - would check campaign manager's trust feedback before joining.

There is a possibility between being sold/hacked/accidentally/or maybe there are other reasons. But after I wrote this thread several participants deleted signatures, including Westinhome have realized the error.

[Poker Player]

I've tagged atm only those who are wearing the signature. Will tag the missing ones if they wear it in the future.
Number 4 is missing the profile number:

Thanks for your quick action, newlifebtc profile number has been updated. but sadly he already deleted signatures on his profile including Japones and D-low

If anyone else deletes the signature in a short period of time I will change the feedback from negative to neutral. I don't think it is necessary to be angry with someone who makes a mistake, realizes it and corrects the action quickly.

[YOSHIE]

Pretty sad. I see very old accounts too. Hacked/sold? Possibly.
Else I'd expect that an user - especially if created in 2013 - would check campaign manager's trust feedback before joining.

Which account do you mean, if you are aiming for an account named: @kingangel, created in 2013, @kingangel, not on terrace/for sale, but he is included in the most Alt list on this forum, all classified as the oldest accounts.

I give examples and proof of addresses used by:@kingangel, linked to the account below.

1. Ridi
2. juliepower

Proof:

Hello I want to apply for the article writing job.....

Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=162172
Payment method: BTC
Payment Address:  bc1qszptzdkpj6z28y7j6fl0rh5llupqalcq40es4q

[ Archive ]

User: Ridi
Position to Apply: Member
Posts Start: 199 (including this post)
Address: bc1qszptzdkpj6z28y7j6fl0rh5llupqalcq40es4q

[ Archive ]

User: juliepower
Position to Apply: Member
Posts Start: 167
Address: bc1qszptzdkpj6z28y7j6fl0rh5llupqalcq40es4q

[ Archive ]


When viewed from the ETH address used by: @Ridi and @juliepower, also linked to an account named:@goku19

Proof:

Forum Username: juliepower
Rank : Member
Participated Campaigns: Signature Campaign
Bep20 address:  0x70AFB7E6e6552d92871dc1A11Cf25Fe8C614097E

[ Archive ]

Post by: Ridi

Forum Username: Ridi
Participated Campaigns: signature campaign
BEP-20 Wallet Address: 0x70AFB7E6e6552d92871dc1A11Cf25Fe8C614097E

[ Archive ]

Forum Username: goku19
Telegram Username: @Lordshiva
Participated Campaigns: Signature Campaign
BEP20 Wallet Address: 0x70AFB7E6e6552d92871dc1A11Cf25Fe8C614097E

[ Archive ]

From the proof above the actual parent account: @kingangel, it's below.

5 Accounts Connected:

mishra1994
hakanbalta577
subham1
Lordshiva
goku19

Possible Connected Account:
mishra1994u

I think they know about the situation of 1xBit gambling sites and the ugliness in this forum, but they knowingly, continue to apply in the 1xBit campaign, well-deserved warnings (red).

[NeuroticFish]

Which account do you mean, if you are aiming for an account named: @kingangel, created in 2013, @kingangel, not on terrace/for sale, but he is included in the most Alt list on this forum, all classified as the oldest accounts.

I was referring to mm2543363580 (2013), kingangel (2013), StLucifer (2012), Shagnasty (2012). All are very old and have small number of posts. Quite a.. pattern.
I didn't know about kingangel, but I'm not surprised at all.

I think they know about the situation of 1xBit gambling sites and the ugliness in this forum, but they knowingly, continue to apply in the 1xBit campaign, well-deserved warnings (red).

Yeah, that was my hunch too.

[smartaction]

Edit

BOUNTY : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5367666.0
Weekly payouts increased from before, of course allowing many new apps or participants register on the 1xBit campaign!
There are several lists of participants that have not been marked

Good job mate.. I have tag them. I am not a DT member. that's why my tag will work as a negative feedback. my tag will not displayed.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

It's now like a game. 1xBit will come around, offer the shit posters a good amount of money, they will wear their signature and start trolling around. In the current Feedback system I don't think giving red tag is a good practice, but surely we all can leave neutral and alert good projects not to hire them.

If anyone else deletes the signature in a short period of time I will change the feedback from negative to neutral. I don't think it is necessary to be angry with someone who makes a mistake, realizes it and corrects the action quickly.

I will be leaving neutral to all these accounts above.

[LoyceV]

BOUNTY : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5367666.0

Interesting Rules:

Negative trust is not allowed<sup>*

*</sup>users with negative trust for promoting 1xBit can apply

I'm doing my part: I removed one of their posts from my self-moderated topic (only because of their signature).

[ScamViruS]

Weekly payouts increased from before, of course allowing many new apps or participants register on the 1xBit campaign!

1xbit is bringing signature campaign and some members are ready to join their signature campaign. Because 1xbit's budget is a good amount, which leads to many participants who are interested in wearing 1xbit signature. 1xbit does not take any steps to resolve the allegations against 1xibt, and on the other hand they run a signature campaign in this forum! So those who will join 1xbit's signature campaign need to be tagged until they resolve all the complaints.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Pretty sad. I see very old accounts too. Hacked/sold? Possibly.

Maybe, but I didn't see many Legendary accounts applying.  I did see that SmokerFace applied, even though he has negative trust that has nothing to do with being associated with the 1xbit campaign (one of the campaign's exceptions to the no-negative trust rule).  Ugh.

It's unbelievable to see so many members applying, even though they've got to know that they're going to get negged all to hell because of it.  They might get accepted to the 1xbit campaign, but good luck to them trying to join another one once it ends.

One other thing that's striking is how low the rates are for sig campaigns these days (at least if 1xbit's campaign is typical).  I guess the days of being able to earn 0.XXXXBTC/post are over, and payment is pegged to USD--and it's a small amount of $ even for Legendary members.  $100/week is pretty damn low if you ask me.

[2double0]

Pretty sad. I see very old accounts too. Hacked/sold? Possibly.

Maybe, but I didn't see many Legendary accounts applying.  I did see that SmokerFace applied, even though he has negative trust that has nothing to do with being associated with the 1xbit campaign (one of the campaign's exceptions to the no-negative trust rule).  Ugh.

Hands changed of that account pretty much before it applied for betking? So when already given a negative, who cares! He deletes and reposts to save his time, man! He is a billionaire and can't just go on posting like that here forever! (sarcasm)

It's unbelievable to see so many members applying, even though they've got to know that they're going to get negged all to hell because of it.  They might get accepted to the 1xbit campaign, but good luck to them trying to join another one once it ends.

Money can buy happiness, here it can buy 1xbit some users who don't care about their profiles but those rates. Points out that many of them being cheaters and if they manage to enroll more than 3 or 5 accounts in that campaign, even those low rates will get them their yearly expenditure worth money (depens on their belonging country).

$100/week is pretty damn low if you ask me.

Uhmm, those were the days when BTC0.00075 were being paid per post, missing them?  kidding   

[LTU_btc]

One other thing that's striking is how low the rates are for sig campaigns these days (at least if 1xbit's campaign is typical).  I guess the days of being able to earn 0.XXXXBTC/post are over, and payment is pegged to USD--and it's a small amount of $ even for Legendary members.  $100/week is pretty damn low if you ask me.

For Chipmixer member, I agree, it's low rates . But in general, $100 for Legendary isn't bad. In average, most campaigns paying somewhere between $50-$80 for Legendary. Yeah, there is one campaign offering $130, while another giving just $20/week for Legendary.
On the other hand, $100 for 1xbit participants isn't something special, considering ruining their reputation and that they won't be able to join other campaigns in future.
But agree, it was good times for participants when payment rates where fixed in BTC without converting it to USD value.

It's now like a game. 1xBit will come around, offer the shit posters a good amount of money, they will wear their signature and start trolling around. In the current Feedback system I don't think giving red tag is a good practice, but surely we all can leave neutral and alert good projects not to hire them.

Why it's not good practice? Red tag will stop them from joining other campaigns in future and maybe they will think twice before starting to promote 1xbit.

[2double0]

It's now like a game. 1xBit will come around, offer the shit posters a good amount of money, they will wear their signature and start trolling around. In the current Feedback system I don't think giving red tag is a good practice, but surely we all can leave neutral and alert good projects not to hire them.

Why it's not good practice? Red tag will stop them from joining other campaigns in future and maybe they will think twice before starting to promote 1xbit.

If given a negative feedback to them, sure it will stop them from participating in future signature campaigns (some campaigns allow negative feedback users so far) but how and why will the need for them thinking twice will arise when they will not be left capable of promoting any projects later? I agree with Bitcoingirl on a very slight part of giving neutral because there are 'or may be' some good users who will be left a red tag and will have their account's future opportunities seized from them. I would give a negative to the members who took part again in their new campaign but not the newer ones, I will give them one last chance with a neutral. Though, if 1xbit's signature is not needed on the forum, I think admins should step in like they did in yobit's matter and banned them from advertising here.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

$100/week is pretty damn low if you ask me.

Make it 4 weeks and it becomes $400 a week. Spam the forum with shitpost, and $400 is easy. It seems low to you since you are in a campaign which is paying up to $300 a week but when the forum average signature campaigns are paying even $50 a week, $100 a week seems very decent to me.

Why it's not good practice? Red tag will stop them from joining other campaigns in future and maybe they will think twice before starting to promote 1xbit.

Feedback positive and negative are only good use case when you are doing a trade with other party. It used to be leaving feedback for anything even for a statement you do not like but since theymos added flag system and updated the concept of new feedback system back two years ago (more or less) the perception has changed.

[LoyceV]

$100/week is pretty damn low if you ask me.

It's always nice to put this into perspective: there are many countries in which the average income is (much) less than $100 per week.

[NeuroticFish]

$100/week is pretty damn low if you ask me.

If you compare with the current "market" for signature campaigns, you'll see that many offer less than that, fixed, per week: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=615953.0
Then, as said, "low" depends (too) much on the user's home country.

But I do agree, however: it is "damn low" if you take into account that you'll ruin a not-bad-at-all account's future for 100$/week in a campaign that surely won't be here for ever (i.e. long enough).
And I'll come back to my original "hunch": it also depends on how much these accounts costed, since I am not convinced that it's the original owners who apply there.

[dkbit98]

Do we really need to have one more topic about 1xBit campaign?
There is already one or more created by JollyGood so in this way it looks to me that we are only giving them more free advertisement.
As the saying goes - there is no such thing as bad publicity.

[mindrust]

$100/week is pretty good money if you already have a fucked up account. Otherwise it is not worth getting your account ruined because you won't be able to join other "legit" campaigns in the future.

Those who have effed accounts should pile in here. Free money.

This campaign is just like real life. You can make good money by providing CP or selling drugs but if you get caught, you'll rot in a jail cell while most legit common jobs won't make shit.