1xBit campaign is starting again.

[Poker Player]

For the reason that I don't want newbie or other low rank user will have the idea to buy there just like what lovesmayfamilis point out. I will give you just a hint, You can easily see it when you search Bitcointalk Account for Sale.

That's enough. I've seen the website. But I still don't see the point of trying to "hide" something that is easily found by googling "bitcointalk accounts for sale".

Also, the second result that comes up is this one from bitcointalk:

BITCOINTALK ACCOUNTS FOR SALE. VERY CLEAN ACCOUNTS. ESCROW.

We do not make it easier or more difficult for those who want to buy an account by putting the link here. And both the one selling here and the one on the other site have a bad reputation.

[Fullcoinese]

BITCOINTALK ACCOUNTS FOR SALE. VERY CLEAN ACCOUNTS. ESCROW. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5335715.0)

Account sales also occur at the thread Indonesian local.

junior member, member, full and senior (red trust).
Harga Junior: 1.5 jt
Member: 6.5 juta
Full -- NEGO
telegram: https://t.me/Rudy1993

HARGA RED TRUST
1. Full Member: 4 jt
2. Senior: 6 jt
konfirm silakan ke telegram: @rudy1993

If calculated in the form of US Dollar. estimated selling price account
1. Jr. Member : $106
2. Member : $462
3. Full Member: $284
4. Senior Member: $426

[lovesmayfamilis]

The topic has shifted to the other side.

I'm not sure that we can expose all purchased accounts, although even a blind person can guess that a long sleep and sudden awakening is not a coincidence when there is an opportunity to participate in some interesting, according to cheaters, "project"
For example, bounty. Rangers Protocol Check how many high ranked accounts with a long break in a publication from Indonesia are participating there

[logfiles]

Many times they has launched their signature campaign. Many people are tagged due to promoting the signature. But they are not stopping yet. So what is the end ? How they could be stopped.

The fact that they are relaunching the campaign and changing terms over and over again means that it's not pulling the results they expected. They will eventually give up after wasting some money. The reputation is still as bad as before.
Yobit and cryptotalk also tried so hard but in the end, they just realized it was a waste of time

[Stalker22]

Many times they has launched their signature campaign. Many people are tagged due to promoting the signature. But they are not stopping yet. So what is the end ? How they could be stopped.

The fact that they are relaunching the campaign and changing terms over and over again means that it's not pulling the results they expected. They will eventually give up after wasting some money. The reputation is still as bad as before.
Yobit and cryptotalk also tried so hard but in the end, they just realized it was a waste of time

Well, as they say, better late than never.
They've already stopped holding competitions in games and rounds, and I'm not even sure if their "honest" review campaign is still running. So, I hope you're right and that the scammer will run out of money very soon.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

I agree that's not perfect use of trust system. We simply don't have alternative effective ways how to deal with users who promote scams.

Scams are not moderated by the forum and unfortunately even if it's clear scams like Yobit and 1xBit. It's sad that our hands are not free.
On the other hand I do not think they care about the tag so sending out red tags do not do any change. Perhaps other campaign could count it but we always have choice of leaving what type of feedback we want to send.

I'm not even sure if their "honest" review campaign is still running.

It was a good joke after all.

[_BlackStar]

Turn on the flag for each participant of the 1xbit campaign, is that allowed? If possible, I would really like to support it.

I have previously tagged all participants who signed up for the 1xbit campaign. I know those tags won't show up because I'm not a DT, but this will give me a bit of information that all of them can't be trusted.

[Stalker22]

Turn on the flag for each participant of the 1xbit campaign, is that allowed? If possible, I would really like to support it.

I have previously tagged all participants who signed up for the 1xbit campaign. I know those tags won't show up because I'm not a DT, but this will give me a bit of information that all of them can't be trusted.

Do not worry about it. Members who are not on DT can also give a red tag, it will not show up under "trusted feedback" but one day, when someone includes you in the DT network, your tags will have full effect. As for creating flags, I do not think that is appropriate in this case.

[logfiles]

Turn on the flag for each participant of the 1xbit campaign, is that allowed? If possible, I would really like to support it.

The negative feedback is enough.

Flags are only effective if someone created a topic or an ANN advertising a scam service.

As of now, the scam signature participants are just making posts and not creating ANNs advertising the service. So no need to worry. If any of them created a topic shilling 1xbit. Then a flag would also be appropriate.

I have previously tagged all participants who signed up for the 1xbit campaign. I know those tags won't show up because I'm not a DT, but this will give me a bit of information that all of them can't be trusted.

If there are any scam signature advertisers who were not tagged by any DT member. Just let me know. I will do the honors.

[_BlackStar]

If there are any scam signature advertisers who were not tagged by any DT member. Just let me know. I will do the honors.

Thanks for your offer, I'll let you know when I find it. I'm not too worried about my tags for those ^{[1xbit participants]} which currently don't show up because some DTs have tagged them before. About the flag I'm asking about, it doesn't matter if it's not needed at the moment.

[borovichok]

Turn on the flag for each participant of the 1xbit campaign, is that allowed? If possible, I would really like to support it.

Supporting flag is not allowed although the red tagging is too much but it just okay too, it send a loud message to any manager who may want to work with them in the future to know that the user behind the account is ready to do anything for few cents.  

I have previously tagged all participants who signed up for the 1xbit campaign. I know those tags won't show up because I'm not a DT, but this will give me a bit of information that all of them can't be trusted.

One day you will become DT, this shouldn't stop you from tagging what you feel is wrong that's my advice to you.

[SmokerFace]

I know those tags won't show up because I'm not a DT, but this will give me a bit of information that all of them can't be trusted.

One day you will become DT, this shouldn't stop you from tagging what you feel is wrong that's my advice to you.

Smokerface: @Community please take it lightly  


_BlackStar: I've tagged the participants.
borovichok: That's cool
_BlackStar: But i'm no DT so it's useless
borovichok: Don't stop, You'll be DT one day.
_BlackStar: Sugar, Tea, Rum  

[examplens]

Smokerface: @Community please take it lightly  


_BlackStar: I've tagged the participants.
borovichok: That's cool
_BlackStar: But i'm no DT so it's useless
borovichok: Don't stop, You'll be DT one day.
_BlackStar: Sugar, Tea, Rum  

you keep doing the same thing again. After your thread Apology to Nutildah (whether or not you have convinced us of sincerity), you try to belittle others again.
why are you doing that?
whether it is a condition for participation in 1xbit sig. campaign? (somehow your negativity coincides with wearing their signature)

you will add that to your sense of humour, but you didn't create a reputation as a fun person. Especially not after everything you've written against other users.

[SmokerFace]

Smokerface: @Community please take it lightly  


_BlackStar: I've tagged the participants.
borovichok: That's cool
_BlackStar: But i'm no DT so it's useless
borovichok: Don't stop, You'll be DT one day.
_BlackStar: Sugar, Tea, Rum  

you keep doing the same thing again. After your thread Apology to Nutildah (whether or not you have convinced us of sincerity), you try to belittle others again.
why are you doing that?
whether it is a condition for participation in 1xbit sig. campaign? (somehow your negativity coincides with wearing their signature)

you will add that to your sense of humour, but you didn't create a reputation as a fun person. Especially not after everything you've written against other users.

I don't know how you linked that apology thread here,
But in short, I'd say - That apology letter to Nutildah was for my behavior towards him/her.
I clearly said I won't do that to him/her again but never mentioned I won't be sacrificing lambs for my own amusement if they come for it themselves.
It had nothing to do with 1xbit participating, I'm just doing it for my own amusement, I'll drop out of here in case other members find it annoying,

3 DT members say and I won't be part of this thread! (excluding U)

Edit: Oh BlackStar did tag me, but sad he's invisible in my trust list, Maybe it's time i add him to my trust list,
@BlackStar i got you man

[GowithMi_GMAT]

Missed 1 

Bitcointalk username: Goldade
Bitcointalk profile url: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=942753
Rank: Full Member
Current Post Count (including this one): 1142
Btc address: bc1qywv7c8m3pn7kq7f4dvgsc264z8q0mtc63mw422

[Poker Player]

Missed 1 

Bitcointalk username: Goldade
Bitcointalk profile url: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=942753
Rank: Full Member
Current Post Count (including this one): 1142
Btc address: bc1qywv7c8m3pn7kq7f4dvgsc264z8q0mtc63mw422

Done. Just keep telling us. I don't follow the thread, but I will leave negative trust to all those who wear the signature, although as I said before, if someone changes their mind quickly and removes the signature, I am willing to change the tag.

I have referenced an archive link. I'm going to get into the habit of doing it this way from now on. That way, even if they delete the original post, you can see what they wrote.

[GowithMi_GMAT]

Done. Just keep telling us. I don't follow the thread, but I will leave negative trust to all those who wear the signature, although as I said before, if someone changes their mind quickly and removes the signature, I am willing to change the tag.

I have referenced an archive link. I'm going to get into the habit of doing it this way from now on. That way, even if they delete the original post, you can see what they wrote.

The last few days I deliberately didn't update this thread And I waiting for the list of accepted participants in week #1. I will always update this thread when I find a new entrant list.

[virasog]

Done. Just keep telling us. I don't follow the thread, but I will leave negative trust to all those who wear the signature, although as I said before, if someone changes their mind quickly and removes the signature, I am willing to change the tag.

I have referenced an archive link. I'm going to get into the habit of doing it this way from now on. That way, even if they delete the original post, you can see what they wrote.

The last few days I deliberately didn't update this thread And I waiting for the list of accepted participants in week #1. I will always update this thread when I find a new entrant list.

I was also closing checking the spreadsheet once the first week of the new campaign was over. I had seen that many new members applied in the campaign but they did not accepted them in this week, means they have not added any new member in the campaign. First they reduced the pay and now they not accepting more participants suggest they are running out of funds and soon may disappear from this forum.

[Stalker22]

Done. Just keep telling us. I don't follow the thread, but I will leave negative trust to all those who wear the signature, although as I said before, if someone changes their mind quickly and removes the signature, I am willing to change the tag.

I have referenced an archive link. I'm going to get into the habit of doing it this way from now on. That way, even if they delete the original post, you can see what they wrote.

The last few days I deliberately didn't update this thread And I waiting for the list of accepted participants in week #1. I will always update this thread when I find a new entrant list.

I was also closing checking the spreadsheet once the first week of the new campaign was over. I had seen that many new members applied in the campaign but they did not accepted them in this week, means they have not added any new member in the campaign. First they reduced the pay and now they not accepting more participants suggest they are running out of funds and soon may disappear from this forum.

I'm not sure if they're actually running out of funds or not, considering their affiliation with the 1XBET casino they probably have a substantial budget, I'm guessing their gimmicks here aren't delivering the results they expected. Anyway, whatever the case, I will be happy when they finally disappear from the scene.

[LoyceV]

considering their affiliation with the 1XBET casino

Note that 1xBET is not the same as 1xBit! The former is (as far as I know) legit, the latter is a scam.