Can I reward extra credit ''Free Spin'' to my signature campaign participants?

[sujonali1819]

Hey, Hope you are doing well guys. I am thinking to launch a Signature campaign where People will get fixed BTC as normal what we see in any signature campaign. But this time I want to give some extra Free Spin reward to the participants to make them more happy. For example after reaching the Fixed 20/25 posts weekly , who will make more post will get xx spin per post. This is possible and it's allowed in this forum.

Thanks in advance , and I am waiting for your constructive answer about this.

[1714646510]

1714646510

[1714646510]

1714646510

[bL4nkcode]

AFAIK there's no forum rules that prohibits this kind of reward, but this will somewhat force sigcamp participants to make more post which might end up to spam.
If your team will only give to those xx quality posters in every week/round just like other campaigns who gives extra payment e.g. extra $25 to those xx quality posters then it would be much better.

[icopress]

AFAIK there's no forum rules that prohibits this kind of reward, but this will somewhat force sigcamp participants to make more post which might end up to spam.

There will be no problem with this if the manager chooses quality posters, ^{[there are tons of ways to raise the bar for participants]}. In addition, after a couple of weeks ^{[or before acceptance]}, the campaign manager will easily be able to check how the activity of a particular user has changed (to know if the choice was successful and who really deserves additional rewards).

[LoyceV]

I'd say giving "Free Spins" as a reward on top of a Bitcoin payment should be treated the same as giving a bonus in Bitcoin to the top posters. Just like "Free Spins" are allowed in Games and Rounds, as long as they pay in Bitcoin.

who will make more post will get xx spin per post.

May I suggest to give the bonus to the best posters instead? Quality over quantity

[Poker Player]

who will make more post will get xx spin per post.

May I suggest to give the bonus to the best posters instead? Quality over quantity

I second the motion, although ultimately it's up to sujonali1819, obviously. As a previous participant of a campaign that paid little, especially at low tiers and one that pays quite well, with bonuses for the best posters, I can attest that being paid well, and having the possibility of bonuses, motivates you to write better. It's not that you go from being a shitposter to an exceptional poster, but it encourages you to put some extra energy into what you write.

[dkbit98]

But this time I want to give some extra Free Spin reward to the participants to make them more happy.

I guess this is some campaign for gambling website so that would be just fine and nothing against the rules, but I don't think it's a good idea to reward someone just for writing more posts that could be worthless.
Maybe it's better if you could do a random draw for Free Spin winner, or reward someone who wrote the best quality posts for that week.

[Little Mouse]

Nothing wrong with that but I don’t think you should add bonus for more post as LoyceV suggested. It will create unnecessary spam instead of quality post. Better you make it for the best poster
I don’t know what's the exact purpose is but I believe you are trying to get more post weekly from the participants. From my experience with campaign manager, most only post the exact amount as campaign requires for qualify. Free spin would barely attract quality users who would post more than the required regardless of the requirement.

[hilariousandco]

It should be fine. Other campaigns and promos in the past have offered bonuses off site etc.

[The Cryptovator]

It should be fine. Other campaigns and promos in the past have offered bonuses off site etc.

This is the perfect answer, so there shouldn't problem with forum rules.
But I think there is the possibility to drop down your campaign quality due to over-post. Participants might try to spam once you offer free spin after filling weekly requirements. I think it would be better if you give a free spin to top merit earners. So Participants will encourage to make more quality post and get merits.

[sheenshane]

But I think there is the possibility to drop down your campaign quality due to over-post. Participants might try to spam once you offer free spin after filling weekly requirements. I think it would be better if you give a free spin to top merit earners. So Participants will encourage to make more quality post and get merits.

I tend to agree, just like what yahoo did on the Bustadice Signature campaign. 
The top 5 merit earners will receive an extra bonus on their casino account and I think free spin or something extra $ bonus given is similar.

@hilariousandco's answer above might enlighten you now, for sure you have been satisfied with this answer.

[LoyceV]

The top 5 merit earners will receive an extra bonus on their casino account and I think free spin or something extra $ bonus given is similar.

That gives Merit a monetary value, which could be abused. I don't like the idea that certain users may earn money from the Merit I send them, it could lead to motives being questioned.

[sujonali1819]

Thank You all for your valuable answer. I already got the point what I should do. You all are suggested to give the extra reward to the quality poster instead of most poster. So I will obviously do that. I am very satisfied with your answer and the hesitation about forum rules also cleared. Thanks Again.

* I am locking this topic now.