[PAUSED] Blackjack.fun Signature Campaign | Up to $130/wk | $400k Mnthly Contest

[KingsDen]

Whatever decision sujonali1819 will render I will respect it, but I would like to suggest just cutting the payout to $60 and so they can retain all of us,

Rethink your calculation, my friend. If there are 29 participants that can get paid a maximum of $100, that makes $2900 per week. If sujonali1819 is thinking of reducing to 10 participants, he has been given a weekly budget of approximately $1000. 29 participants multiplied by $60 is $1,740. Therefore, not everyone will be able to stay in the campaign if the payout is cut to $60 per participant.

Seeing this information now, I am able to recieve the notification because I have worked with Suj in this campaign.

Reducing the pay to $60 even if it works will not be a good thing to the campaign. Though it might go well with the participants. This is because if the pay is reduced to $60, this campaign will stop being a high pay campaign like Best_Change, KB8, Livecasino.io, FortuneJack and others. The result will be participants leaving and joining the campaign weekly, which was obviously how the campaign was before the big change was announced.
The best decision would be to downside the participants and hopefully everything will bounce back and the decision would be reverted to favour everyone.

[1714624228]

1714624228

[ralle14]

There is a big changes could be happen tomorrow. Team said to me to minimise the campaign for a while. So I have to make the big changes in this campaign. So I have decided make this campaign for maximum 10 participants. Now please help me, how I should process this changes? Don't take any decision personally. You are all good to me.

When it comes to picking the participants, it's probably best to have some form of criteria.

No matter what the results are in the upcoming change, surely all of us will understand it as you've been a great manager to us with all the updates and stuff.

[Poker Player]

Seeing this information now, I am able to recieve the notification because I have worked with Suj in this campaign.

Reducing the pay to $60 even if it works will not be a good thing to the campaign. Though it might go well with the participants. This is because if the pay is reduced to $60, this campaign will stop being a high pay campaign like Best_Change, KB8, Livecasino.io, FortuneJack and others. The result will be participants leaving and joining the campaign weekly, which was obviously how the campaign was before the big change was announced.
The best decision would be to downside the participants and hopefully everything will bounce back and the decision would be reverted to favour everyone.

Good point. I think this is key and has been missed in the ongoing discussion.

[bitbollo]

Hey Guys!
There is a big changes could be happen tomorrow. Team said to me to minimise the campaign for a while. So I have to make the big changes in this campaign. So I have decided make this campaign for maximum 10 participants. Now please help me, how I should process this changes? Don't take any decision personally. You are all good to me.

I will update the spreadsheet tomorrow and will remove some participants to short the campaign for 10 users.

Hopefully campaign will be back to normal in near future. Thank you.

Has the management already evaluated other solutions, likewise... reduce the amount paid per post or the total number of posts paid?

generally speaking @OP this is a difficult choice to make because there are several factors to keep in mind.

from my personal point of view... quality in the forum is "measured" by merits and it's the only "valuable" fact to be keep in mind.
users who write quality posts are "rewarded" in this way and in general this type of evaluation is used to understand "who spams" or creates "valuable contents".

I would use this criteria (example merit in the last 120 days/full history of merits) to understand who creates content of a certain level = more people read its contents = more visibility to the signature....

Only true if the merits that you get is from the gambling thread and not on other thread that is not related on gambling because this campaign is a Casino and you know how hard to get merit on gambling board.

it was 3 years since you wrote a message on the forum!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=720626;sa=showPosts;start=0
I think there are more interesting topics to discuss after 3 years of absence, since they do not concern you directly... don't you think?

I know that is really hard produce quality content not only in the "gambling" section but in the whole forum! 

[coin-investor]

Seeing this information now, I am able to recieve the notification because I have worked with Suj in this campaign.

Reducing the pay to $60 even if it works will not be a good thing to the campaign. Though it might go well with the participants. This is because if the pay is reduced to $60, this campaign will stop being a high pay campaign like Best_Change, KB8, Livecasino.io, FortuneJack and others. The result will be participants leaving and joining the campaign weekly, which was obviously how the campaign was before the big change was announced.
The best decision would be to downside the participants and hopefully everything will bounce back and the decision would be reverted to favour everyone.

Good point. I think this is key and has been missed in the ongoing discussion.

I'm on what the majority and the administrator will decide it's just an option meant to keep those who wants to stay I will respect the management decision, especially Sujon's decision I hope there will be more campaigns coming these weeks so we can still have additional income on this hard times.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

Hey Guys!
So I have decided make this campaign for maximum 10 participants. Now please help me, how I should process this changes? Don't take any decision personally. You are all good to me.

Don't reduced the pay as you could lose some high quality members that other high playing campaign will be willing to accept if open slots are announced or new campaign are launched so instead stick to your initial decision of reducing the participants. Times like this are hard for CM as any decision you make in your selection could be misinterpreted but I believe you'll do what's best for the company and not let your emotions get the best of you.

I'll be withdrawing my participation in the campaign not because I was offered any slot in other ongoing campaign but just to reduced the work load of you chosing participants to keep. If the campaign wants to increase slots in the future and I'm not occupied I'll apply but for now there are other qualified members and I think I'm among the newly accepted participants so other should have an edge to continue the advertisement. Goodluck to all participants and thanks for the opportunity to work with you sujonali.

[Xiestar]

Hey Guys!
There is a big changes could be happen tomorrow. Team said to me to minimise the campaign for a while. So I have to make the big changes in this campaign. So I have decided make this campaign for maximum 10 participants. Now please help me, how I should process this changes? Don't take any decision personally. You are all good to me.

I will update the spreadsheet tomorrow and will remove some participants to short the campaign for 10 users.

Hopefully campaign will be back to normal in near future. Thank you.

Has the management already evaluated other solutions, likewise... reduce the amount paid per post or the total number of posts paid?

generally speaking @OP this is a difficult choice to make because there are several factors to keep in mind.

from my personal point of view... quality in the forum is "measured" by merits and it's the only "valuable" fact to be keep in mind.
users who write quality posts are "rewarded" in this way and in general this type of evaluation is used to understand "who spams" or creates "valuable contents".

I would use this criteria (example merit in the last 120 days/full history of merits) to understand who creates content of a certain level = more people read its contents = more visibility to the signature....

Only true if the merits that you get is from the gambling thread and not on other thread that is not related on gambling because this campaign is a Casino and you know how hard to get merit on gambling board.

it was 3 years since you wrote a message on the forum!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=720626;sa=showPosts;start=0
I think there are more interesting topics to discuss after 3 years of absence, since they do not concern you directly... don't you think?

I know that is really hard produce quality content not only in the "gambling" section but in the whole forum!  

Not positng doesn't mean I'm not updated. I'm an ETH holder since 2016.

You can start counting all your merits from gambling board to disproves my opinion. Since you join on this campaign how much merit you get on gambling board?

[Smartvirus]

I have completed faith in the managers decision, he has  thus far managed the campaign so well and would do the most for the campaign still. Which ever way it turns, the campaign comes first.

Good luck everyone!

[Maslate]

I've been in this campaign for a while, was one of the members that were removed when they reduce participants and were able to come back when they start adding new participants, so the decision of the management is not new to me, and I'm willing to accept whatever the decision is. 

I like working with you guys, so I hope that the management will not push their decision to reduce the number of participants, stick with the same group, and just reduce the post requirement per week, that way sujonali1819 will not have a hard time choosing the members that will remain in the campaign.   

[cabron]

The goal is to advertise and make blackjack.fun visible to anyone browsing the forum. I think its not just yhe merits that matter but the users who created threads and users who usually replies in the first page of threads.  Jusy my thoughts though.

Normally, non members of the forum and even forum members don't read replies in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th pages. Seem the behavior of browsers.  Just my thoughts again. 😁  Quantity matters too,The more the merrier.

[bitbollo]

Not positng doesn't mean I'm not updated. I'm an ETH holder since 2016.
....

Yes sure and in 3 years of absence you're just replying in a topic regarding a signature campaign where you're not involved.

you HODLER of an alt-account not alt-coin LMAO!

[sujonali1819]

Round 54 spreadsheet is updated and sent to the owner. You guys should be paid today.

Btw it was very tough to choose only 10 among 29 participants. But I have selected the best 10 from my side. I don't know how you will react to my decision but I think you all will take it easy. It's always my pleasure to work with you. Hopefully, we will work together in near future in this campaign or in other campaigns managed by me. At last, I will ask you guys please don't take the decision personally. What I am doing/did all are by thinking of the project well.



CryptopreneurBrainboss I have selected you for the next journey. If you still don't want to continue please let me know.


Chosen participants
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1c3TqgcXRXY1I22qq-uYAS3SujM7vCtfvQgPmVpsiSf0/edit#gid=817064003[/s]




Regards
sujonali1819

[Wind_FURY]

Round 54 spreadsheet is updated and sent to the owner. You guys should be paid today.

Btw it was very tough to choose only 10 among 29 participants. But I have selected the best 10 from my side. I don't know how you will react to my decision but I think you all will take it easy. It's always my pleasure to work with you. Hopefully, we will work together in near future in this campaign or in other campaigns managed by me. At last, I will ask you guys please don't take the decision personally. What I am doing/did all are by thinking of the project well.

It's OK, and it's not your fault. Don't be concerned with how other people react, or might react.

[Wiwo]

Regards
sujonali1819

Cheers @sujanaki1819 quality management now and ever, good luck to everyone, and let's keep the positivity high.

[Xiestar]

Not positng doesn't mean I'm not updated. I'm an ETH holder since 2016.
....

Yes sure and in 3 years of absence you're just replying in a topic regarding a signature campaign where you're not involved.

you HODLER of an alt-account not alt-coin LMAO!

It's funny how you react like that while neglecting my argument that I point out.  What a pity. 

The result is in your favor. No need to be a clown. 

[sujonali1819]

Guys, sorry to say that team wants to pause the campaign for now. Just they let me know when they check my pm of sending updated sheet.
The campaign is now paused.

[blackjack.fun]

Guy's

Thank you all for amazing partnership! We will roll out with v3.0 with new strategy, signature and new campaign. Meanwhile we decided to pause the current campaign. I hope you all liked our partnership. Today is the payment day.

So stay tuned for news.

Warm regards,
Blackjack.fun

[arallmuus]

Guys, sorry to say that team wants to pause the campaign for now. Just they let me know when they check my pm of sending updated sheet.
The campaign is now paused.

Thanks for all those solid weeks managing this campaign 

[coin-investor]

Guys, sorry to say that team wants to pause the campaign for now. Just they let me know when they check my pm of sending updated sheet.
The campaign is now paused.

Thank you so much for all the over 25 weeks in this campaign you managed, this is the longest campaign I've been it's worth it, great manager, great team, generous payment, and great casino, may you have more campaigns to manage, and to Blackjack.fun good luck to the success of  v3.0.

[fiulpro]

Thank you for the amazing weeks, I was not only able to take care of myself during the war from the payment which was undeniably amazing, but I was also able to study while having this campaign as a side job.
Wish you guys all the best for the future endeavours, hopefully the campaign would be active soon !!

Cheers 🥂