[ANN] 🟢 GrandpaGreen (GGREEN) 8% rewards from each transaction on Polygon

[CryptorClub]

[Forwarded from Green Exchange Challenge]
Hello, GREEN community. A lot of time ago we post last news. Today we want to introduce something unique in Matic(Polygon) network, that exclusively posted in Bitcointalk forum after our group in Telegram https://t.me/crytalk

We create type of token that becomes popular on Binance Smart Chain. Its a some kind of Baby tokens with automatic tax and reflections(dividends) to its holders. We made GrandpaGreen (GGREEN) token with reflection in two cryptocurrencies and tax for marketing on each trade:
✅ 4% rewards in GREEN to support its growth (Minimum 1000 tokens needs to hold)
✅ 4% rewards in WETH to stabilize its own value (Minimum 10 000 tokens needs to hold)
✅ 2% automatically added as liquidity to the pool
✅ 2% goes to our wallet for marketing, buyback and burn, and other expenses for promotion

So in total there is 12% tax when you buy and sell, that is deducted automatically and sends rewards directly in your wallets.

We made tests on Polygon Mainnet because no possibility to do it in testnet and buy some tokens on our wallets. Right now its extremely cheap, so will no more better time to get in.
500+ MATIC added to liquidity

Lets grow our community and launch this Rocket 🚀

Contract: 0x68CaF7335aA11188D9d91E1c9a5ab73a6de827bE
Exchange: https://quickswap.exchange/#/swap?inputCurrency=ETH&outputCurrency=0x68caf7335aa11188d9d91e1c9a5ab73a6de827be
Chart: https://polygon.poocoin.app/tokens/0x68caf7335aa11188d9d91e1c9a5ab73a6de827be
Explorer: https://polygonscan.com/token/0x68caf7335aa11188d9d91e1c9a5ab73a6de827be#tokentxns

Telegram: https://t.me/crytalk

Bounty topic here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5373675

Faucet with free 100 000 GGREEN tokens every hour published as smart contract.
https://polygonscan.com/address/0x6d12915e425caa0d99e611a7b4c7425bc79931c8

Watch how to use it in our Telegram group https://t.me/greencoinexchange/417

We started new project https://the-forum.net
A lot of requests regarding "forum" every day users searching.
We planning to cover ~400 000 requests with topics on "The Forum".
Is good base to build global GREEN community.

Right now each topic you start and each post you made (over 50 symbols)
you've got 1000 GrandpaGreen Tokens on your forums balance,
that can be withdrawed to Polygon. (Beta testing available)

Join now! Let's build global green community,
grow GREEN and GrandpaGreen tokens together.
https://the-forum.net

[nira09]

Sorry, but it seems that this kind of project has started to be abandoned by the market, Investors are getting smarter in choosing projects, preferring long-term projects rather than gambling with meme tokens and tokens that have anonymous teams.
You need to showcase your team and set up a good ecosystem for your project.

[CryptorClub]

Sorry, but it seems that this kind of project has started to be abandoned by the market, Investors are getting smarter in choosing projects, preferring long-term projects rather than gambling with meme tokens and tokens that have anonymous teams.
You need to showcase your team and set up a good ecosystem for your project.

Hello nira09. Happy to see your answer and advice. I see, that is no such interest as before, investors really more carefull.
We are long term project definitely.
This GGREEN tax token was minted as supported satellite for created earlier GREEN (launched in 2018. Token made on ethereum, than bridged to Polygon) ANN topic here. 4% rewards is paying in these currency
Its trade history you may find here:
https://info.quickswap.exchange/token/0x8a4001fd666be272605c56bb956d11a46200db81
or here:
https://polygon.poocoin.app/tokens/0x8a4001fd666be272605c56bb956d11a46200db81

We made not so wonder distribution and 99% still on our wallet. Anyway 3.5+ years clean reputation even with this fact.
Its one man project at this moment and post team not ready as post a fake team, as some marketers advise to us.

[nimogsm]

 the idea of dividends is no longer new, and as correctly indicated in the topic, investors have become smarter and no one wants to spend money on questionable projects.And it is very accurately said that no one will believe you without a team, since anonymous projects are not very popular.

[CryptorClub]

the idea of dividends is no longer new, and as correctly indicated in the topic, investors have become smarter and no one wants to spend money on questionable projects.And it is very accurately said that no one will believe you without a team, since anonymous projects are not very popular.

Thanks for review too. I agree, that new project is less attractive on the start when no team published. Anyway as we describe before, that our previous one is live more than 3.5 years and still working to be better. Also no published team is not so important, when you see positive chart, what is possible with not fresh idea with dividends.

Buy/Sell action ->
tax for marketing -> promotion
more attention ->
more buy/sell actions ->
more dividends
=
growth

and again.

This our main strategy for this satellite token.

Reputation for these 3.5+ years is clean. I lose more personal money than earn on GREEN project and most revenue from exchange is added to liquidity.

About team and open its profiles. I'm able to it, when team will be hired. For these, need cap or positive trend.

I believe that me is less dangerous than traders, that buys this token cheap. Than dump price at any time.
By the way, there is implement anti-whale feature with maximal tokens for one account 2B (is less than 2%).

[holydarkness]

the idea of dividends is no longer new, and as correctly indicated in the topic, investors have become smarter and no one wants to spend money on questionable projects.And it is very accurately said that no one will believe you without a team, since anonymous projects are not very popular.

Thanks for review too. I agree, that new project is less attractive on the start when no team published. Anyway as we describe before, that our previous one is live more than 3.5 years and still working to be better. Also no published team is not so important, when you see positive chart, what is possible with not fresh idea with dividends.

Buy/Sell action ->
tax for marketing -> promotion
more attention ->
more buy/sell actions ->
more dividends
=
growth

and again.

This our main strategy for this satellite token.

Reputation for these 3.5+ years is clean. I lose more personal money than earn on GREEN project and most revenue from exchange is added to liquidity.

About team and open its profiles. I'm able to it, when team will be hired. For these, need cap or positive trend.

I believe that me is less dangerous than traders, that buys this token cheap. Than dump price at any time.
By the way, there is implement anti-whale feature with maximal tokens for one account 2B (is less than 2%).

True that your previous project has been around for about three and a half years, but that doesn't instantly translates as a clean reputation, because no reputation doesn't necessarily equal to clean. Your last "serious" discussion was with TimeTeller around two years ago, and from that point forward the thread were mostly just attended by you bumping your own thread,. Previously, the other 32 pages before that, are mostly filled by users enrolling your airdrop, which TnC got more and more... weird by time, like:

Dear members. We very happy, for your activity. We receive 300+ registrations on exchange with passive activity, that's why

we change rules of 5$ Bonus

From now, you need to make deposit with at least 1000 DOGEs
to receive coupon on 5$

Thanks for understanding.

And how about these? How are these an indicator for clean reputation?

By the way we open Dice game and Ponzi scheme for GRN full node wallets owners. Welcome for test:
https://dice.greencoin.space/ (Up to 190% win rate, transaction creates in next block)
https://ponzi.greencoin.space/ (105% cashback, when next user make transaction)

Full node wallet you may download here https://github.com/CryptorClub/GreenCoin/releases

If your referred user makes deposit on ~60$.

Referred user get 50$ coupon.
You get 25$ coupon.

Deposited sum not withdrawable.
You and all other users may withdraw on this stage GRN or USD coupons.

Users above me asked for team details, not a team quantity. Their point is on the annonimity, not the numbers of people behind it. If you feel one-manned team is enough, then by all means please proceed to reveal yourself as the sole dev. I am sure people are more than happy to know you and only you rather than not knowing anything.

[CryptorClub]

the idea of dividends is no longer new, and as correctly indicated in the topic, investors have become smarter and no one wants to spend money on questionable projects.And it is very accurately said that no one will believe you without a team, since anonymous projects are not very popular.

Thanks for review too. I agree, that new project is less attractive on the start when no team published. Anyway as we describe before, that our previous one is live more than 3.5 years and still working to be better. Also no published team is not so important, when you see positive chart, what is possible with not fresh idea with dividends.

Buy/Sell action ->
tax for marketing -> promotion
more attention ->
more buy/sell actions ->
more dividends
=
growth

and again.

This our main strategy for this satellite token.

Reputation for these 3.5+ years is clean. I lose more personal money than earn on GREEN project and most revenue from exchange is added to liquidity.

About team and open its profiles. I'm able to it, when team will be hired. For these, need cap or positive trend.

I believe that me is less dangerous than traders, that buys this token cheap. Than dump price at any time.
By the way, there is implement anti-whale feature with maximal tokens for one account 2B (is less than 2%).

True that your previous project has been around for about three and a half years, but that doesn't instantly translates as a clean reputation, because no reputation doesn't necessarily equal to clean. Your last "serious" discussion was with TimeTeller around two years ago, and from that point forward the thread were mostly just attended by you bumping your own thread,. Previously, the other 32 pages before that, are mostly filled by users enrolling your airdrop, which TnC got more and more... weird by time, like:

Dear members. We very happy, for your activity. We receive 300+ registrations on exchange with passive activity, that's why

we change rules of 5$ Bonus

From now, you need to make deposit with at least 1000 DOGEs
to receive coupon on 5$

Thanks for understanding.

And how about these? How are these an indicator for clean reputation?

By the way we open Dice game and Ponzi scheme for GRN full node wallets owners. Welcome for test:
https://dice.greencoin.space/ (Up to 190% win rate, transaction creates in next block)
https://ponzi.greencoin.space/ (105% cashback, when next user make transaction)

Full node wallet you may download here https://github.com/CryptorClub/GreenCoin/releases

If your referred user makes deposit on ~60$.

Referred user get 50$ coupon.
You get 25$ coupon.

Deposited sum not withdrawable.
You and all other users may withdraw on this stage GRN or USD coupons.

Users above me asked for team details, not a team quantity. Their point is on the annonimity, not the numbers of people behind it. If you feel one-manned team is enough, then by all means please proceed to reveal yourself as the sole dev. I am sure people are more than happy to know you and only you rather than not knowing anything.

Hello. I understand your interest. Open my name is necessary for trust for you.

The quotes you mentioned is regarding GRN coin times (sha-256), all GRNs with no value was converted to GREEN (with filled liqudity) and some users successfully swapped on ETH in ethereum than on polygon blockchains.
We planned this swaps(to recover all GRNs to GREEN) one month only, while node of GRN still runned. All participants with GRN was filled with GREENs.

The changing rules - is just a decision not spend money from my pocket. All previous members get their bonus as mentioned before.

Game with dice and ponzi - was completely fail experiment with 1-2 users and transactions below $0.00001

Its history exist - its history has no problems - its clean.

[aruldaroy]

the idea of dividends is no longer new, and as correctly indicated in the topic, investors have become smarter and no one wants to spend money on questionable projects.And it is very accurately said that no one will believe you without a team, since anonymous projects are not very popular.

True they will definitely think again about joining a project whose team is unclear,
Even the most popular projects they still think long to invest.

[CryptorClub]

the idea of dividends is no longer new, and as correctly indicated in the topic, investors have become smarter and no one wants to spend money on questionable projects.And it is very accurately said that no one will believe you without a team, since anonymous projects are not very popular.

True they will definitely think again about joining a project whose team is unclear,
Even the most popular projects they still think long to invest.

3.5+ years was spent on parallel token, that still not bring any money for me by itself!

I understand that community will be more sure if team will be visible. Lack of published team also reason, why token still not in CG, etherscan and polygonscan.
When team will be hired, it will be published including me.

I'm sure that need at least three team members for next round: Marketer, Social(Community) manager, Main developer.
Me with these three members will be published, when its will be available to hire them.

Than web/android/ios designer, seo manager and context traffic manager, team lead.

[holydarkness]

Hello. I understand your interest. Open my name is necessary for trust for you.

The quotes you mentioned is regarding GRN coin times (sha-256), all GRNs with no value was converted to GREEN (with filled liqudity) and some users successfully swapped on ETH in ethereum than on polygon blockchains.
We planned this swaps(to recover all GRNs to GREEN) one month only, while node of GRN still runned. All participants with GRN was filled with GREENs.

The changing rules - is just a decision not spend money from my pocket. All previous members get their bonus as mentioned before.

Game with dice and ponzi - was completely fail experiment with 1-2 users and transactions below $0.00001

Its history exist - its history has no problems - its clean.

I failed to see how and why the "variant" of the token I'm talking about and quoted matters. Just like your ponzi, what matters and proven by the quoted texts is not whether your "experiments" failed or not, it's about your post history and the intentions behind it.

You claimed to be a clean project, but you tried to lure investors into a ponzi scheme, where we all know the last person will suffers loss, as well as being very discouraged by the forum.

Please amuse and inform me, what's your definition of a clean reputation?

I understand that community will be more sure if team will be visible. Lack of published team also reason, why token still not in CG, etherscan and polygonscan.
When team will be hired, it will be published including me.

[...]

Tell me, why is it so crucial for you to have a team of few people before you can reveal yourself? What's the difference between unveiling yourself now with later on when --or if-- you get a team.of three? You can always make the other 2 reveal themselves later upon joining you. If revealing yourself now rather than later would eradicate the worries of your community, and if you really honest, clean, and serious wirh the project, wouldn't it be a very cheap price worth paying for?

[CryptorClub]

Hello. I understand your interest. Open my name is necessary for trust for you.

The quotes you mentioned is regarding GRN coin times (sha-256), all GRNs with no value was converted to GREEN (with filled liqudity) and some users successfully swapped on ETH in ethereum than on polygon blockchains.
We planned this swaps(to recover all GRNs to GREEN) one month only, while node of GRN still runned. All participants with GRN was filled with GREENs.

The changing rules - is just a decision not spend money from my pocket. All previous members get their bonus as mentioned before.

Game with dice and ponzi - was completely fail experiment with 1-2 users and transactions below $0.00001

Its history exist - its history has no problems - its clean.

I failed to see how and why the "variant" of the token I'm talking about and quoted matters. Just like your ponzi, what matters and proven by the quoted texts is not whether your "experiments" failed or not, it's about your post history and the intentions behind it.

You claimed to be a clean project, but you tried to lure investors into a ponzi scheme, where we all know the last person will suffers loss, as well as being very discouraged by the forum.

Please amuse and inform me, what's your definition of a clean reputation?

The truth is any token, any coin, any stock and even Fiat - is Ponzi, sir. ) I'm clear with myself to name things as it is. What is also clear, that the code of those dice and ponzi was open sourced and each person can view it.

[CryptorClub]

Faucet with free 100 000 GGREEN tokens published as smart contract.
https://polygonscan.com/address/0x6d12915e425caa0d99e611a7b4c7425bc79931c8

Watch how to use it in our Telegram group https://t.me/greencoinexchange/417

[holydarkness]

Hello. I understand your interest. Open my name is necessary for trust for you.

The quotes you mentioned is regarding GRN coin times (sha-256), all GRNs with no value was converted to GREEN (with filled liqudity) and some users successfully swapped on ETH in ethereum than on polygon blockchains.
We planned this swaps(to recover all GRNs to GREEN) one month only, while node of GRN still runned. All participants with GRN was filled with GREENs.

The changing rules - is just a decision not spend money from my pocket. All previous members get their bonus as mentioned before.

Game with dice and ponzi - was completely fail experiment with 1-2 users and transactions below $0.00001

Its history exist - its history has no problems - its clean.

I failed to see how and why the "variant" of the token I'm talking about and quoted matters. Just like your ponzi, what matters and proven by the quoted texts is not whether your "experiments" failed or not, it's about your post history and the intentions behind it.

You claimed to be a clean project, but you tried to lure investors into a ponzi scheme, where we all know the last person will suffers loss, as well as being very discouraged by the forum.

Please amuse and inform me, what's your definition of a clean reputation?

The truth is any token, any coin, any stock and even Fiat - is Ponzi, sir. ) I'm clear with myself to name things as it is. What is also clear, that the code of those dice and ponzi was open sourced and each person can view it.

An interesting topic, really, as it's been brought numerous times by many people from different projects and sides, and I've given myself a lot of time to think about this. I have to say, I'm somewhat agree that some token and coin is a ponzi, but it doesn't mean every coin is.

In ponzi, it's guaranteed that the earlier participants gets the benefit while the last person suffers the damage. In investments, where price fluctuates, the first person holding a token doesn't translates they're guaranteed a profit. Projects go ATL with price under the initial price, and people who "join" during this period could reap benefits than people who joined earlier at a higher price.

Now, keeping the ponzi topic aside for a while, as you keep insisting that you held a reputation, please inform us, what achievement do all of your projects achieve for the last three and a half years?

[CryptorClub]

Hello. I understand your interest. Open my name is necessary for trust for you.

The quotes you mentioned is regarding GRN coin times (sha-256), all GRNs with no value was converted to GREEN (with filled liqudity) and some users successfully swapped on ETH in ethereum than on polygon blockchains.
We planned this swaps(to recover all GRNs to GREEN) one month only, while node of GRN still runned. All participants with GRN was filled with GREENs.

The changing rules - is just a decision not spend money from my pocket. All previous members get their bonus as mentioned before.

Game with dice and ponzi - was completely fail experiment with 1-2 users and transactions below $0.00001

Its history exist - its history has no problems - its clean.

I failed to see how and why the "variant" of the token I'm talking about and quoted matters. Just like your ponzi, what matters and proven by the quoted texts is not whether your "experiments" failed or not, it's about your post history and the intentions behind it.

You claimed to be a clean project, but you tried to lure investors into a ponzi scheme, where we all know the last person will suffers loss, as well as being very discouraged by the forum.

Please amuse and inform me, what's your definition of a clean reputation?

The truth is any token, any coin, any stock and even Fiat - is Ponzi, sir. ) I'm clear with myself to name things as it is. What is also clear, that the code of those dice and ponzi was open sourced and each person can view it.

An interesting topic, really, as it's been brought numerous times by many people from different projects and sides, and I've given myself a lot of time to think about this. I have to say, I'm somewhat agree that some token and coin is a ponzi, but it doesn't mean every coin is.

In ponzi, it's guaranteed that the earlier participants gets the benefit while the last person suffers the damage. In investments, where price fluctuates, the first person holding a token doesn't translates they're guaranteed a profit. Projects go ATL with price under the initial price, and people who "join" during this period could reap benefits than people who joined earlier at a higher price.

Now, keeping the ponzi topic aside for a while, as you keep insisting that you held a reputation, please inform us, what achievement do all of your projects achieve for the last three and a half years?

I'm happy that my info is make you think. Also you have strong interest in this discussion. Few years ago I've seen such kind of posts like posts of opponents, and right now is just science discussion. Thank you for that!

Money is unfair in any case, in my opinion. The only thing I've used it still, because I'm still social human, what is live in commerce world(society) and believe that we can grow as a social to new level. GGREEN token and part of GREEN (that not distributed) has not value as industrial, entrepreneurship or humans work as value. I see its value of hype (not hype as high yield but hype as trend of growing interest. Finally interest = money) right now.

What I propose - is to make this hype 📈 and spend part of turnover on matter things, that can be discussed in our Green community.

I like work of Jacque Fresco - $10M spent to advertise his youtube channel as education for English speaking audience will be great as one of thing, that can be done.
https://www.youtube.com/user/thevenusprojectmedia

I like 1Billiion trees project like... needs to see, which of them has a real result.

I like works of 100% waste processing.

I like renewable energy projects.

What about GREEN value - the liqudity, that you seen here, is made from fees from exchanges on greencoin.online ~42%, SEO results and sold advertising on greencoin.life ~42%, and one investor ~16%

[holydarkness]

I'm happy that my info is make you think. Also you have strong interest in this discussion. Few years ago I've seen such kind of posts like posts of opponents, and right now is just science discussion. Thank you for that!

LOL. Please don't flatter yourself. Your info didn't make me think or opened my eyes about the schrödinger cat of ponzi, I've given it a thought and conclusion before i even stumbled upon your... insight.

Money is unfair in any case, in my opinion. The only thing I've used it still, because I'm still social human, what is live in commerce world(society) and believe that we can grow as a social to new level. GGREEN token and part of GREEN (that not distributed) has not value as industrial, entrepreneurship or humans work as value. I see its value of hype (not hype as high yield but hype as trend of growing interest. Finally interest = money) right now.

What I propose - is to make this hype 📈 and spend part of turnover on matter things, that can be discussed in our Green community.

I like work of Jacque Fresco - $10M spent to advertise his youtube channel as education for English speaking audience will be great as one of thing, that can be done.
https://www.youtube.com/user/thevenusprojectmedia

I like 1Billiion trees project like... needs to see, which of them has a real result.

I like works of 100% waste processing.

I like renewable energy projects.

What about GREEN value - the liqudity, that you seen here, is made from fees from exchanges on greencoin.online ~42%, SEO results and sold advertising on greencoin.life ~42%, and one investor ~16%

Sorry, but... for these part, I might need your insight and guidance. What's the point of those sentences and how are they related to my question about your clean reputation?

[CryptorClub]

LOL. Please don't flatter yourself. Your info didn't make me think or opened my eyes about the schrödinger cat of ponzi, I've given it a thought and conclusion before i even stumbled upon your... insight.

nothing to say

Sorry, but... for these part, I might need your insight and guidance. What's the point of those sentences and how are they related to my question about your clean reputation?

...about GREEN value - the liqudity, that you seen here (https://info.quickswap.exchange/token/0x8a4001fd666be272605c56bb956d11a46200db81), is made from fees from exchanges on greencoin.online ~42%, SEO results and sold advertising on greencoin.life ~42%, and one investor ~16%

its loaded to quickswap for a long time, before it was on ethereum. 84% of that balance is my personal result (+ result from growing crypto price)


Graph since May. Looks natural, no? Because no critical manipulations.

[holydarkness]

Sorry, but... for these part, I might need your insight and guidance. What's the point of those sentences and how are they related to my question about your clean reputation?

...about GREEN value - the liqudity, that you seen here (https://info.quickswap.exchange/token/0x8a4001fd666be272605c56bb956d11a46200db81), is made from fees from exchanges on greencoin.online ~42%, SEO results and sold advertising on greencoin.life ~42%, and one investor ~16%

its loaded to quickswap for a long time, before it was on ethereum. 84% of that balance is my personal result (+ result from growing crypto price)

Graph since May. Looks natural, no? Because no critical manipulations.

I think... I understand your message wrongly, were you saying that 84% of the trade happened on that graph were from your own result, as in your own trade? And, not necessarily a separate topic, what is the daily volume of those graph?

I think you understand wrongly with what I'm trying to learn by asking about your reputation. What I wanted to know is your achievements, milestones, or development of the projects for the last three and a half years.

[CryptorClub]

Sorry, but... for these part, I might need your insight and guidance. What's the point of those sentences and how are they related to my question about your clean reputation?

...about GREEN value - the liqudity, that you seen here (https://info.quickswap.exchange/token/0x8a4001fd666be272605c56bb956d11a46200db81), is made from fees from exchanges on greencoin.online ~42%, SEO results and sold advertising on greencoin.life ~42%, and one investor ~16%

its loaded to quickswap for a long time, before it was on ethereum. 84% of that balance is my personal result (+ result from growing crypto price)

Graph since May. Looks natural, no? Because no critical manipulations.

I think... I understand your message wrongly, were you saying that 84% of the trade happened on that graph were from your own result, as in your own trade? And, not necessarily a separate topic, what is the daily volume of those graph?

I think you understand wrongly with what I'm trying to learn by asking about your reputation. What I wanted to know is your achievements, milestones, or development of the projects for the last three and a half years.

84% from all liquidity, that added is not trading result. Its result from fees on greencoin.online exchange and advertising on greencoin.life rest was made from matic, eth, btc price growth,
About volume I confused because links to professional tools was given in the first post and in post, that you quote. In average its 1000$ daily.

Development of greencoin.life greencoin.online sites is achievement

As I understand, that I'm duplicating all info, that was given before.

[holydarkness]

Sorry, but... for these part, I might need your insight and guidance. What's the point of those sentences and how are they related to my question about your clean reputation?

...about GREEN value - the liqudity, that you seen here (https://info.quickswap.exchange/token/0x8a4001fd666be272605c56bb956d11a46200db81), is made from fees from exchanges on greencoin.online ~42%, SEO results and sold advertising on greencoin.life ~42%, and one investor ~16%

its loaded to quickswap for a long time, before it was on ethereum. 84% of that balance is my personal result (+ result from growing crypto price)

Graph since May. Looks natural, no? Because no critical manipulations.

I think... I understand your message wrongly, were you saying that 84% of the trade happened on that graph were from your own result, as in your own trade? And, not necessarily a separate topic, what is the daily volume of those graph?

I think you understand wrongly with what I'm trying to learn by asking about your reputation. What I wanted to know is your achievements, milestones, or development of the projects for the last three and a half years.

84% from all liquidity, that added is not trading result. Its result from fees on greencoin.online exchange and advertising on greencoin.life rest was made from matic, eth, btc price growth,
About volume I confused because links to professional tools was given in the first post and in post, that you quote. In average its 1000$ daily.

Development of greencoin.life greencoin.online sites is achievement

As I understand, that I'm duplicating all info, that was given before.

Ahh, I see now. So by "personal results", you're referring to the liquidity provided and funded by the project itself. And for daily volume, pardon the cluelessness, I am exre rarely use DEX and that was the first time I went to quickswap, so the cluelessness should be understandable. [1]

As for development, the irony is you feeling you duplicating info and still failed to provide the exact information asked although the question is quite clear. If I have to be more specific, this is the point I wanted to know:

On your GREEN ANN thread, you made these milestones below,



And three years after, an update of achieved milestones are on what the next images show. I am divided between if you had an outdated info on yout website, or... none of the initial achievement are actually achieved.



So please re-inform us, what achievement --aside from launching websites-- do you get from the past three and a half years to support your claim of clean reputation?


[1] On a completely different and unrelated topic, exploring quickswap lead me to a fake telegram group attempting a phising, please be warned, everyone.

[LinksMe.ga]

Ahh, I see now. So by "personal results", you're referring to the liquidity provided and funded by the project itself. And for daily volume, pardon the cluelessness, I am exre rarely use DEX and that was the first time I went to quickswap, so the cluelessness should be understandable. [1]

As for development, the irony is you feeling you duplicating info and still failed to provide the exact information asked although the question is quite clear. If I have to be more specific, this is the point I wanted to know:

On your GREEN ANN thread, you made these milestones below,

https://i.ibb.co/87TJNsm/Proposed-milestone-1.jpg https://i.ibb.co/HhMW91v/Proposed-milestone-2.jpg

And three years after, an update of achieved milestones are on what the next images show. I am divided between if you had an outdated info on yout website, or... none of the initial achievement are actually achieved.

https://i.ibb.co/89QVD3D/Updated-milestone.jpg https://i.ibb.co/LrygPVh/Updated-milestone.jpg

So please re-inform us, what achievement --aside from launching websites-- do you get from the past three and a half years to support your claim of clean reputation?


[1] On a completely different and unrelated topic, exploring quickswap lead me to a fake telegram group attempting a phising, please be warned, everyone.

CryptorClub can't answer right now, so I will answer.
The original group of QuickSwap in Telegram is https://t.me/QuickSwapDEX
I ask to join Green Exchange group in telegram also. https://t.me/crytalk

After researching uniswap I feel less sense to use CEXes in future. Liquidity can load any person at any time, and at anytime withdraw (with his revenue from each swap 0.3% that was done during this time), using transactions to smart contracts directly. Web user interface, that you see - is just interface. If tomorrow something happens with Uniswap/Quickswap domain names - you will have access to smart contract with another user interface or send commands to ETH/Polygon blockchain directly.

Roadmap is really outdated, none of SEO milestones wasn't reached, because was not filled cap, even ridiculous 50$
SEO was really easy on that moment with stable money-flow (1500$ monthly)
We was at TOP3 with such keywords:
crypto exchange online
instant cryptocurrency exchange
and many other keywords

on that keywords, that on screenshot we was at TOP30, so it was easy to be on top3 with (50-100)$ monthly budget on each keyword.

Right now SEO is more difficult and more expensive. Without stable money-flow (from $10k monthly) no sense to start go to TOP again.

P.S. My opinion, that focus on clean reputation from member with nickname holydarkness a little bit sharp, you don't think so? (I understand that percent of scams is around 50/50 in crypto)