Bounty Cheater Caught || At least 4 accounts connected

[naim027]

Hi guys. I just Found a Bounty Cheater. He Owns 4 Account here in Bitcointalk. And He used all of his accounts for bounty campaigns.

At least two of his account participated in the same Bounty campaign. I know it's too late. but, the community deserves to know them.

Main Profile link: bright4mech Member
Alt 1 - brightology Jr. Member
Alt 2 - Chelsea2021 Newbie
Alt 4 - Crypto Bright Newbie

ETH Address: 0x686a1Da514673eb8fF3bF9B281F5958C23DcA1eB
Telegram: @bright4mech @Chelsea4crypto @@CryptoBrighton
TWitter: https://twitter.com/bright4mech , https://twitter.com/imecharles96 ,

Edit:
* They Participated in the Same Campaign. Click on the Quotes and it will redirect you to the campaign thread.
* Check their Telegram username And ETH Address. Both used @bright4mech and 0x686a1Da514673eb8fF3bF9B281F5958C23DcA1eB
* Look at their Forum name: it's a bright Gang. brightology, bright4mech, Crypto Bright.

Proof:









At least two of his account has participated in the same bounty campaign.

Telegram Username: @bright4mech
Twitter Url: https://twitter.com/bright4mech
wallet Address: 0x686a1Da514673eb8fF3bF9B281F5958C23DcA1eB

twitter username: @bright4mech
twitter url: https://twitter.com/imecharles96
ETH: 0x686a1Da514673eb8fF3bF9B281F5958C23DcA1eB

#Proof of Authentication
Forum Username: Chelsea2021
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2903198
Telegram Username: Chelsea4crypto
Participated Campaigns: Twitter,Facebook,Telegram Campaign
ETH Wallet Address:  0x686a1Da514673eb8fF3bF9B281F5958C23DcA1eB

This is his latest bounty perticipation:

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username: Crypto Bright
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2903200
Telegram Username: @CryptoBrighton
Participated Campaigns: Article
Bep-20 Wallet Address:  0x686a1Da514673eb8fF3bF9B281F5958C23DcA1eB

[naim027]

Here is three more Account Owned By the same Person.

Momena1795 , Bas120 , Network40

ETH Address: 0xb5724110BcE7Eee3dF8512AEFFC8C143D20ddFf7
Telegram: @Sompakhanom, @Network4000

Proof:

Pruf of Registration###
Bitcointalk username: Bas120
Bitcointalk profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3191237
Telegram username: @Sompakhanom
Participant campaign's: Twitter
BSC-20 wallet address: 0xb5724110BcE7Eee3dF8512AEFFC8C143D20ddFf7

##Pruf of Registration
Bitcointalk username: Network 40
Bitcointalk profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3364565
Telegram username@Network4000
Participant campaign's: TikTok
BEP20 wallet address: 0xb5724110BcE7Eee3dF8512AEFFC8C143D20ddFf7

 

[Little Mouse]

Instead of saying they participated in same bounty campaign, can you provide proof? I couldn’t exactly find our where they abuse campaign with multiple account. How did I miss lol? Share the proof with relevant link. That would be good to evaluate.

[naim027]

Instead of saying they participated in same bounty campaign, can you provide proof? I couldn’t exactly find our where they abuse campaign with multiple account. How did I miss lol? Share the proof with relevant link. That would be good to evaluate.

I already provided the Proof.

Telegram Username: @bright4mech
Twitter Url: https://twitter.com/bright4mech
wallet Address: 0x686a1Da514673eb8fF3bF9B281F5958C23DcA1eB

twitter username: @bright4mech
twitter url: https://twitter.com/imecharles96
ETH: 0x686a1Da514673eb8fF3bF9B281F5958C23DcA1eB

* They Participated in the Same Campaign. Click on the Quotes and it will redirect you to the campaign thread.
* Check their Telegram username And ETH Address. Both used @bright4mech and 0x686a1Da514673eb8fF3bF9B281F5958C23DcA1eB
* Look at their Forum name: it's a bright Gang. brightology, bright4mech, Crypto Bright.

[rozak]

buddy, why don't you combine your findings with an existing thread?
I mean  Topic: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2021 Q4)
there is a form that has been prepared systematically and is very easy to understand.
if collected in one container, wouldn't it look neater?

but I appreciate your findings. keep it up

[naim027]

The rule of the forum is not to allow more than one post in a row. But he posted five in a row. Proof.

  

I don't know if the rules are the same for the bounty thread. If yes, it's the moderator's job to merge the post. Since we do not have access to edit or delete his post.

buddy, why don't you combine your findings with an existing thread?
I mean  Topic: Known Alts of any-one - A User-Generated List Mk III (2021 Q4)
there is a form that has been prepared systematically and is very easy to understand.
if collected in one container, wouldn't it look neater?

but I appreciate your findings. keep it up

Thank you for your suggestions. Honestly, I am not regular on the Reputation thread. If you look at my recent post, you will understand it. My bad I didn't notice there is already a dedicated thread for finding bounty cheaters. I will contribute to his thread.

[lovesmayfamilis]

Instead of saying they participated in same bounty campaign, can you provide proof? I couldn’t exactly find our where they abuse campaign with multiple account. How did I miss lol? Share the proof with relevant link. That would be good to evaluate.

I already provided the Proof.
* Look at their Forum name: it's a bright Gang. brightology, bright4mech, Crypto Bright.

I think you should also learn how to use the site https://bpip.org/
If you looked at this site or LoyceV site https://loyce.club/bans/usernames.txt
you would notice that all of your found accounts were previously banned. But yes, according to your investigations, there is one live account, and I will also add that I found another one. And they all break rule 25. Ban evasion.
And yes, it is clear that you know how to use the search, so in the future, be careful, since the creation of a topic about killed accounts sometimes does not bring any benefit.

Ban evasion.



bright4mech Autoban user
Cryptocb Autoban user
Brightcrypto Autoban user
Bright4Real Autoban user
Crypto Bright
Chelsea2021

Twitter link: https://twitter.com/bright4mech

Twitter Link: https://twitter.com/bright4mech

[ archive ]

Twitter Profile URL: https://twitter.com/bright4mech

Twitter Link: https://twitter.com/bright4mech

brightchimezie054@gmail.com

Email registering on Coinsbit ( https://coinsbit.io ): brightchimezie054@gmail.com

[ archive ]

Email: brightchimezie054@gmail.com

[ archive ]

[rony01]

Two More Account Connected:

rony01 76)
alviemery96 1)

Proof:

Bitcointalk username: alviemery96
Video Review link: https://youtu.be/U1zt5v95CrI
BSC  address: 0xd0e2f99c4D168Ee6Df515a0eACFBf13aaD5d65Ef

Bitcointalk username: rony01
Video Review link: https://youtu.be/Q36R7pNPFeg
BSC  address: 0x5560A89e579C02158C78CB6Fe69539F204a627d6

Either He Used The Same Address by Mistake, Or They could be connected accounts.
 

[google translate ]

What address is the same, please explain in more detail because there is no similarity in the post?

which equals older posts means plagiarism.. it can result in permanent bans


example .. this user uses my username . does it include being connected or plagiarism?

Bitcointalk username: rony01
Video Review link: https://youtu.be/oopyNVbChr8
BSC  address: 0x32A94B84c1C7aE5D5Ad85aAd7314fB0C8Eb60a8c

Proff https://archive.li/4kRVF

[Rikafip]

What address is the same, please explain in more detail because there is no similarity in the post?

which equals older posts means plagiarism.. it can result in permanent bans

alviemery96 edited his post on September 17th, so that's why the same address is not visible at first. Luckily, all posts on forum are archived in their original and unedited version so this is how post looked like originally. Here is the original version of the post.

Bitcointalk username: alviemery96
Video Review link: https://youtu.be/U1zt5v95CrI
BSC  address: 0x5560A89e579C02158C78CB6Fe69539F204a627d6

In certain cases that wouldn't be much of a proof as anyone can use anyone else's address (for example you can use my address to try set me up), but in this case both accounts are posting exclusively in bounty section. Question is, why would he use your address? It's not like your post was right on top of his so he copy/pasted by mistake. Even if both of those accounts are yours, you are not breaking any rules as long as you keep those accounts in separate campaigns and as long you are not ban evading.

[noorman0]

-snip-
which equals older posts means plagiarism.. it can result in permanent bans

There are certain conditions that cause users to be banned.
Following the postal format to register for a bounty is not the same as plagiarism because the details of the identity and work of each participant are the highlight.

example .. this user uses my username . does it include being connected or plagiarism?

Maybe I'm wrong, I guess it's just a mistake. I have checked the spreadsheet and he submitted his own details.

[rony01]

Snip

thank you for your confirmation .. i'm not good at english so i use google translate.

I often encounter many users using other user report formats and editing the contents of their reports..

and how many use my address even though I warned them by quoting their posts who used my details wrong but sometimes they are too lazy to check past posts

-Snip_

thank you very much for your help for this problem

[naim027]

Edited Out

I apologize for the inconvenience. To be honest, These was my newbie days. Maybe that guy copied your authentication post and didn't edited the address (I did the same in my newbie days). That doesn't proof that the account is connected. I apologize again. I have edited the post and removed that allegations.

[rony01]

_snip

no problem. now everything is clear . 

[Themix Bounty00]

2 Account connected

Bounty name:[Pre-Launch] Trident Protocol

1.Rakib3333
2.Rony$33

Proof:

Bsc address: 0x7303e76F9AE4A6B71670baa9821a4e21f760E6C5

Bsc address: 0x7303e76F9AE4A6B71670baa9821a4e21f760E6C5

Related Addresses:

BEP-20 Wallet Address:0x7303e76F9AE4A6B71670baa9821a4e21f760E6C5

The account Rakib3333 has plagiarism. Accordingly, after the ban of one account, the second will also be banned.