Well, Things started from
this thread created by
Poker Player. Last night. I was writing on his thread and suddenly he locked the topic. So I PM'd him and told him if it is possible to open the thread again. So that I can leave my post there since it was written already. He responded and I posted.
After that,
dkbit98 created
a thread and accused me that I am the alt of "
Poker Player" without any proof or evidence. And he said he can prove the connection in a minute but failed to prove that.
I can show the connection in few minutes, but I am not in the mood for alt witch hunts now and that was never the point of this topic.
Sending merits to your own alt accounts and talking to yourself is also not cool.
Also, The Pharmacist left question for him and he is silent.
I can show the connection in few minutes, but I am not in the mood for alt witch hunts now and that was never the point of this topic.
OK, well you did bring it up as well as lightlord's alleged health issues, which I have my doubts about (but to respect you and this thread, that's the last mention I'll make of the latter). If you do, in fact, have evidence of Poker Player and naim027 being alts that you could present within minutes--as you said--why don't you just do that? It's not a witch hunt, and it would explain what everyone here is spending time speculating about.
Saying something like "Oh, I could instantly prove so-and-so are alt accounts but I just don't have time for that" is just a backhanded slap in the face to whoever it is that's being accused. It would be better to either
not make a statement like that or show the evidence if you've got it. Just saying.
However, I never knew
Poker Player before yesterday. I don't know where is he from. But, Everyone can see from my recent Local board thread that I am from Bangladesh.
Even, he left neutral feedback on my profile saying I am an alt of "
Poker Player" without any proof and evidence.
Do you think his behavior is acceptable? Did he abuse the trust system?