I will prefer small Society because it will be easy to handle and control, you can easily set law. I will prefer Sharia law because it give comfort to everyone in the society and no one is Above the Law, Muslim Christian Jewish etc. Anyone who live in a society where there is Sharia law, and they will be safe from any harm. Women will be respected, children will be discipline, marketplace will be conducted well, transaction will move smoothly no corruption, no harassment etc.
Note: Sharia law cover all aspect of life from the beginning to the end.
A cool picture of this inner my head is all I can imagine.
Since violence is what people don't like hate and respect, I'd want to use the Taliban's as my securities.
If not the Taliban's almost agressive as they're.
taliban are just angry ex-homeowners with guns. angry because they lost everything by western invasion.
they have no tactical skills or training..
if you want security. anyone can hold a gun.. but try someone that knows kung-fu or kickboxing. and has tactical experience.
EG if a paparazzi was shot by a angry ex-homeowner with a vendetta. just because they were stalking you,.. well, because you hired him expect alot of legal pain in the form of lawsuits and criminal charges.
however hire a guy that can restrain and put a guy to the ground without a shot fired. alls fair, self defense.
that said.
small communities might seem good from the outside. but have you ever tried to live in these elite 'gated' communities.
they think they are the law. .. cant have lawn grass over 2 inches long. cant water sprinkler the lawn during the day. cant have music or parties after 8pm.
muslim gated communities demand women cover their skin and make other overly-obedient laws for control of woman
small communities end up knowing too much about their neighbours and find any small reason to snitch on a neighbour
having a wider community dilutes the cesspool of snitching and rule making and instead tries to limit how many laws exist because the community is more broader and not all rules can fit all the community. so there are less rules by default.
EG not everyone can afford a gardener. so in a wider community of poor and elite. there are no elitist rules
EG in a small elitist community. standards and rules are higher to fend off letting the poor in.
EG in a small poor community. rules are made to fend off elitist 'takeover' of hard earned property.
the issue with society is not that laws are too wide or too tight. its that laws need to actually be reasonable and actually have an effect on the purpose for the rules.
EG car speeding laws. instead of making it a law that a car driver will be fined $1000 for speeding over 100mph. make it a rule that no public road worthy car can actually reach 100mph, using using speed limiter devices. and another rule that the fine is more then $1000 for damaging, tampering, removing the limiter.
that way the rules actually do stop people insanely speeding to cause an accident where they are fined after the damage is already done. and actually prevents speeding to prevent damage being done in the first place
its about having laws that fit the purpose of the activity that should not be acceptable
