Documentary 'Finding Satoshi' will investigate the origins of Satoshi Nakamoto

[mynonce]

https://variety.com/2021/film/news/bitcoin-documentary-finding-satoshi-matthew-miele-1235125648/

'A new documentary is in the works exploring the mysterious founder of Bitcoin and the larger state of cryptocurrency.

Director Matthew Miele (“Always at the Carlyle,” “Quixotic Endeavors”) will helm the project, titled “Finding Satoshi.” The film will investigate the origins of Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin, whose identity and invention remains secret.'

https://thelatch.com.au/who-is-satoshi-nakamoto-bitcoin-documentary/

'Perhaps all will finally be revealed when Finding Satoshi finally lands on our screens.'



----------

(edited)
found another upcoming documentary


https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8843046/

The Search for Satoshi

From the Writer/Director of Banking on Bitcoin (2016), comes a new documentary diving deeper into the world of Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency.

[TheNineClub]

I doubt they would be able to keep this kind of news under wraps as the primary investigations are probably done by this point and the footage will more or less be a follow-up on those investigations. It will probably follow through with some possible suspects with some drama thrown in. Still a good watch IMHO.

[gmaxwell]

They didn't contact any of the people who actually worked with Satoshi... so it sounds like it'll be low quality.  Maybe even a paid piece to promote one of the impersonators.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

Why should we care about who satoshi is today?

The mere fact that Bitcoin has been doing well and it's adoption has been improving for over a decade without anyone having any clue who the Bitcoin creator was, is more than enough to show that the Bitcoin community just doing fine with the status quo.

What intrigues me is the malicious actors who have no interest in Bitcoin and created their under performing shitcoins are more concerned about trying to take credit for being the creators of bitcoin, yet they have their forgotten shitcoins to run  

I wouldn't be surprised if the Documentary is another one of Faketoshi's plots.

[kaya11]

Better to keep the founder anonymous if I am to be asked. I wouldn't invest in BTC anymore knowing he is still alive and got the most of the wealth all by himself. So it is better be like this and those coins should just be ignored and forgotten and move on. There would be just another one pretending to be Satoshi at the end of the documentary and that adds up to the list.

[carlfebz2]

Why should we care about who satoshi is today?

Always been like this on where they dont really stop on finding the creator or the ones who do make out this revolutionary and we have seen lots of faketoshi around and do we really believe that government isnt making out some research in quiet phase? For sure they had been doing this
in silent.

This would be a never ending hunt as long he doesnt exposed up his real identity then people or the community would  really be having those questions
in mind.

Our curiosity will really follow us up into certain extent on where we do believe that we cant able to be done.

[mynonce]

found another upcoming documentary


https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8843046/

The Search for Satoshi

From the Writer/Director of Banking on Bitcoin (2016), comes a new documentary diving deeper into the world of Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency.

[Hydrogen]

It all comes down to sources of funding for documentaries. Movie making is an expensive business, which can be prone to certain conflicts of interest.

It would be nice if everyone who made a documentary did so purely based on a motivation to publish the truth. The harsh reality of it is, there is often much more money thrown at people for publishing lies, than there is for those interested in putting the truth or facts out there. So the market can be flawed in ways. Although there definitely are some independent film makers out there who are more motivated by moral concerns than monetary ones.

[mynonce]

It all comes down to sources of funding for documentaries.

No funding will be big enough, if you can sign a message with the right private key.

[gmaxwell]

Although there definitely are some independent film makers out there who are more motivated by moral concerns than monetary ones.

Even then: Garbage in, Garbage out.  The film maker might be trying to do an honest job, but if they're too thoroughly surrounded by disinformation they just may never encounter the truth.

[Fundamentals Of]

Nothing will be revealed after Finding Satoshi is shown on our screens but more and more speculations. But I still think this is net positive for Bitcoin. The more movies, documentaries, series, etc making mention or giving focus on either Bitcoin, Satoshi, cryptocurrency, blockchain, etc the more Bitcoin is promoted and marketed. The more Bitcoin is heard or read the more people get curious about it. Curiosity will lead them to ask about Bitcoin. The moment they learn about the basics of Bitcoin could be the moment they are attracted to it.

[worle1bm]

It all comes down to sources of funding for documentaries. Movie making is an expensive business, which can be prone to certain conflicts of interest.

It would be nice if everyone who made a documentary did so purely based on a motivation to publish the truth. The harsh reality of it is, there is often much more money thrown at people for publishing lies, than there is for those interested in putting the truth or facts out there. So the market can be flawed in ways. Although there definitely are some independent film makers out there who are more motivated by moral concerns than monetary ones.

The fact is people are interested in something interesting and they are not familiar with seeing the reality as movie makers always put up fictional characters and this is what they will be doing in this documentary so this is not appropriate at all.If you want to know the reality we need to go back to the that time and show some facts that happened in reality but they will be showing all according to their preferences.

[hd49728]

Another topic about satoshi and did authors do research and read some of topics or articles about satoshi?

I gathered every Satoshi Nakamoto thread.
Satoshi Nakamoto Institute's literature and research

Finding satoshi is not important because Bitcoin is pioneer cryptocurrency for decentralization so a decision to leave community and stay anonymously of satoshi is very great. It matches with decentralization core idea of Bitcoin.

[slaman29]

Another topic about satoshi and did authors do research and read some of topics or articles about satoshi?

I gathered every Satoshi Nakamoto thread.
Satoshi Nakamoto Institute's literature and research

Finding satoshi is not important because Bitcoin is pioneer cryptocurrency for decentralization so a decision to leave community and stay anonymously of satoshi is very great. It matches with decentralization core idea of Bitcoin.

I think I also commented before on one of these satoshi threads that actually yes, his identity and locating him or at least shedding light on his whereabouts, this is actually important but only for a sociologist and anthropologist (or crypto anthropology anyway). We cannot deny the value of finding him in this context.

But as to Bitcoin itself, the development and future, of course, Satoshi is now irrelevant.

[dkbit98]

I would be very careful watching any new Satoshi documentary movies, especially when I see how they are mentioning Craig Faketoshi Wright.
It's possible that Craig could pay someone to make a movie that shows him in some positive light, after his last case he now has to pay $100 million to W&K.
BSV supporters are now claiming this is the proof he is Satoshi  
More info:
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/06/miami-jury-rules-in-favor-of-craig-wright-bitcoin-claimed-inventor.html

CSW statement:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gSW3vU5DJHQ

[Obito]

They didn't contact any of the people who actually worked with Satoshi... so it sounds like it'll be low quality.  Maybe even a paid piece to promote one of the impersonators.

Can't blame them, I mean there's producers behind these documentary and may they don't like the idea that they're going to go to the real ones. Definitely someone's got paid but hey if it hooks people then so be it right?

[Mpamaegbu]

They didn't contact any of the people who actually worked with Satoshi...

Yeah, like contacting Martti Malmi He's user sirius on this forum, for those who want to check his profile up.

so it sounds like it'll be low quality.  Maybe even a paid piece to promote one of the impersonators.

I'm even wondering what makes anyone think that a Satoshi Nakamoto who remained elusive when Bitcoin was virtually not worth much will want to grant an interview now that it's premium. I don't see that happening. Perhaps those who are organizing the documentary only want to seek popularity for themselves, and nothing more.

[enhu]

Wriht already won the case proving he is Satoshi. The search is over. Of course non of us here beleve it since he cant sign a message to any wallets pressumed to be satoshi's.

Several investivations done but none will ever prove really and whoever may comeout we will always doubt with out signing a message. All these investigation will only be useless.

[KingsDen]

Satoshi Nakamato's identity should be left that way.
No one can uncover it.
Satoshi was able to hide his identity in technology age when it is near impossible to do so.
But just know that Satoshi is here. Satoshi might be reading this my comment, just that we don't know him but he knows himself.
The man we can believe is the man that will start using his bitcointalk account and grant that we meet him physically.
I guess your guess now

[dimonstration]

Wriht already won the case proving he is Satoshi. The search is over. Of course non of us here beleve it since he cant sign a message to any wallets pressumed to be satoshi's.

Several investivations done but none will ever prove really and whoever may comeout we will always doubt with out signing a message. All these investigation will only be useless.

The jury didn't prove that Craig Wright is indeed Satoshi Nakamoto, He just won against Kleiman claims to have a part for Craig Wright Bitcoin. We don't know if this case is all about publicity or not but at the end, Craig Wright still didn't prove that he is Satoshi since he can't access the Bitcoin Wallet until while the person who's claiming wo work with him is already dead. We all know that Craig Wright is doing everything just to promote his SV coin.

Crypto people will never believe unless he provide sign message for that dormant wallet address of Satoshi. Its easy to do that to prove his identity rather than doing crazy things like he was doing right now. He is already a Billionaire and he can easily protect himself from the law using that money if he really possess that money.