No..Craig Wright Was NOT Named Bitcoin's Creator

[TheBeardedBaby]

Just gonna drop this one here:



Source: Twitter

In less than 50 days is the Hodlonaut court case. "Satoshi" will be in even more debts...

Here's something just for fun https://twitter.com/21minimal/status/1467918023042469891

[1715023053]

1715023053

[1715023053]

1715023053

[1715023053]

1715023053

[DaveF]

he has been ordered to pay $100 million dollars which will bankrupt him many times over

I guess there is a silver lining after all.

I'm not familiar with the legal system, specially the western type but it seems to me that essentially he has been playing the legal system to progress his scams. The media seems to love him too since by creating "attractive" titles they get a ton of traffic which may be considered a win for him lol.

Nah, he will just create another scamcoin to sell to his followers and it will all be good or have someone rewrite parts of the BSV code to give him 2 million coins, sell them on the market for $100 each and poof he has the money.

And since he could "move" those coins that means he must be the creator.

-Dave

[bitzizzix]

Craig Steven Wright comes across as grumpy and whiny and a liar, and Satoshi comes across as a technologist who communicates as expected and is concise and balanced.
Basically, Craig should focus more on how Satoshi communicates and try to imitate him, because the more Craig talks and acts, the more people will judge him as unlike Satoshi and will ignore him.
and regarding this news, everyone who has been in the industry for a long time will never believe Craig, and those who are new and most likely will believe it before doing any actual investigation. and he will continue to poison every new bitcoin user into believing that Satoshi Nakamoto is him.

[ultrloa]

Craig Steven Wright comes across as grumpy and whiny and a liar, and Satoshi comes across as a technologist who communicates as expected and is concise and balanced.
Basically, Craig should focus more on how Satoshi communicates and try to imitate him, because the more Craig talks and acts, the more people will judge him as unlike Satoshi and will ignore him.
and regarding this news, everyone who has been in the industry for a long time will never believe Craig, and those who are new and most likely will believe it before doing any actual investigation. and he will continue to poison every new bitcoin user into believing that Satoshi Nakamoto is him.

He just grab the opportunity to tell that because he knows Satoshi so that he will get instant fame for the coin he didn't created he has a hard face telling that he is the real one while he didn't have any proof about that claims. Maybe they can fool new people especially those who didn't get informed about the certain drama happening here. That's why its good to have these kind of discussion since this could influence newbie to not believe on what those clown says or claims.

[ChiBitCTy]

Thank you for writing this up! Just sent this over to my buddies as I woke up the other day to texts from a couple buddies who were discussing the lawsuit / craig wright having won and tried explaining how this absolutely does not say that Craig is Satoshi. If pretty easy to see this is the case after all.

[Leviathan.007]

This man never stops and it's not the first time for this big lier, he is trying so hard to claim he is the satoshi and creator on the bitcoin project while he got nothing and no shreds of evidence, I saw many news about him and many articles where they wrote Craig won and he could prove that he is the real satoshi, while all these are pointing the wrong direction and we saw the market didn't really show any reaction to this news and this shows people already know him and know he is lying like before and that's nothing new about this crazy lier who suffers from some mental illness.

[arabspaceship123]

Why's he desperate to prove himself as Satoshi? Craig Wright hasn't signed any wallets used by Satoshi so there isn't any proof. There's a list of wallets Craig Wright claimed are owned by him and they're being claimed by Dave Kleiman's estate but some are signed with messages saying Craig Wright is a fraud.

How's he still spreading lies about him being Satoshi? Who'd believe his claims when he's not signed any wallets Satoshi used?

People still read this news articles?

It's interesting to see how much desperate CW is to prove himself as satoshi. I read those article to get informed what he is doing exactly. Well, whatever they do, whatever they have, they can't prove CW as satoshi unless CW can sign a message from one of known address of satoshi.

[Lizzylove1]

I knew it was a misleading information when I saw the flash news on my news feeder. I thought all these was since all over 2years ago. The media has a way of twisting information and misinforming the public.

[franky1]

he has been ordered to pay $100 million dollars which will bankrupt him many times over

I guess there is a silver lining after all.

Nah, he will just create another scamcoin to sell to his followers and it will all be good or have someone rewrite parts of the BSV code to give him 2 million coins, sell them on the market for $100 each and poof he has the money.

And since he could "move" those coins that means he must be the creator.

-Dave

he does not need to do anything.
craig the human has to pay$100m into a company W&K owned by... craig.
so its just a paper statement saying he paid himself. essentially just a W&K letter head saying to the judge that W&K accepted payment of $100m and is final and settled and wont be disputed (letter wrote by craig)

what i can see actually happening is..
craig the human.. will play that he as a human is now bankrupt. and so file bankruptcy to dissolve all his debts he has personally accumulated and make his creditors at a loss. and then pretend (on paper) that W&K is now valued at +$100m to pretend W&K has collateral

[arabspaceship123]

He's getting humiliated because he won't be able to pay the $100M in cash or bitcoin. Why's he put himself in public shame? He didn't profit in anything by getting to court against Kleiman's estate.

he does not need to do anything.
craig the human has to pay$100m into a company W&K owned by... craig.
so its just a paper statement saying he paid himself. essentially just a W&K letter head saying to the judge that W&K accepted payment of $100m and is final and settled and wont be disputed (letter wrote by craig)

what i can see actually happening is..
craig the human.. will play that he as a human is now bankrupt. and so file bankruptcy to dissolve all his debts he has personally accumulated and make his creditors at a loss. and then pretend (on paper) that W&K is now valued at +$100m to pretend W&K has collateral

[franky1]

He's getting humiliated because he won't be able to pay the $100M in cash or bitcoin. Why's he put himself in public shame? He didn't profit in anything by getting to court against Kleiman's estate.

he doesnt need to pay the $100m in the physical world. its just a paper-shuffle
(just needs a W&K letterhead saying 'we been paid)

craig didnt even pay any court costs. he had butt-kissing 'investor' friends front him by paying the court costs under a promise that if he wins he can then do book deals and movie rights deals for documentaries about his life/story and stuff and they will get paid back their "investment" via those profits.

its also about him valuing his patents at upto trillions of dollars in value pretending his patents are ownership of bitcoin which his "investors" will get a cut of.

heck. to true craig style. i can even see him using this court order along with the W&K letter head suggesting payment received undisputed. as future "proof" of W&K holdings of $100m in fiat(on paper). without revealing any bank account balance sheet as real proof, to the try to scam some investor into buying W&K under his usual false pretenses.

little do they realise he has no real value/collateral to make good on his promises..
and thats what the community is laughing at. valueless scammy craig being unable to make good on promises and lying so much that sooner or later, his scammery will come to a short sharp end.

[Beparanf]

I knew it was a misleading information when I saw the flash news on my news feeder. I thought all these was since all over 2years ago. The media has a way of twisting information and misinforming the public.

Yeah. This clowns are arguing about the Bitcoin mined by Satoshi while Craig Wright can't even prove that he is really holding the private key to the Bitcoin wallet of Satoshi. They are fighting over an imaginary money just to make some noise again in crypto. A typical move from Bitcoin SV founder claiming its the real Bitcoin.

Satoshi made a master piece by creating Bitcoin and leave his identity anonymous for a long time. Why the hell he will appear again out of no where just to introduce himself and create a mess on his life. He can simply mix the Bitcoin he is holding and cashout hassle free.

[Fundamentals Of]

But will these news matter when the people themselves are all aware how Craig Wright is nothing but a delusional clown? I don't think a lot of people will be convinced that Craig Wright is the real Satoshi, not when he cannot even prove the ownership of the addresses he claimed he owns. Have we forgotten that even those addresses he claimed he owns have even called him a fraud by way of a signed message?

And how about his BSV? It's already going down the drain. That's the real Bitcoin as he claims. The fate of BSV reflects the level of trust people and institutions have in CSW.

[franky1]

Satoshi made a master piece by creating Bitcoin and leave his identity anonymous for a long time. Why the hell he will appear again out of no where just to introduce himself and create a mess on his life. He can simply mix the Bitcoin he is holding and cashout hassle free.

though [real satoshi] made bitcoin and envisioned its future. i beleive in some of the early updates he didnt really care much for backing up private keys and could have lost them in some bug or forgetful incident. so dont expect to see any movements of them. back then bitcoin had no $ value so saving them was not that important. especially in a deflationary system where having less coins in circulation helps the value of the other coins that do circulate. so keeping them had no advantage if you never intend to spend them.

as for craig(faker). all he has ever had was a lying mindset and a publicly available list of public addresses which anyone can have(meaningless. no value ever) in 2011-2013 when craig first came across bitcoin. and alot of butt-kissing investors handing him money hoping to get rich off him.

[yhiaali3]

This misinformation will always continue to spread, the reason is clear, simply because exciting news gets more people's attention and that's exactly what the press wants, they want to attract more readers to their newspapers and news and make a lot of noise, so they choose exciting misleading headlines with care, The American newspapers  is particularly good at this.
In fact, they don't care if the CW is lying or true, they just want the news to spread among the largest number of people to get fame and more advertising revenue.

[im posible]

I wonder why the media can make news headlines that are clearly hoaxes. What journalists care about are ratings and money.

[yazher]

This misinformation will always continue to spread, the reason is clear, simply because exciting news gets more people's attention and that's exactly what the press wants, they want to attract more readers to their newspapers and news and make a lot of noise, so they choose exciting misleading headlines with care, The American newspapers  is particularly good at this.
In fact, they don't care if the CW is lying or true, they just want the news to spread among the largest number of people to get fame and more advertising revenue.

Their title is misleading and it's like a clickbait title on youtube where the reality it's nothing that you've expected. they've been doing this for a long time don't really care if they mislead the people or not. in fact, this is their job they've even gotten so many lines on some songs where they were pinpointed as giving wrong information. right now, they put Craig Wright on the headline because of his claim as the founder of Bitcoin without any solid proof they just don't care at all.

[franky1]

I wonder why the media can make news headlines that are clearly hoaxes. What journalists care about are ratings and money.

even the mainstream media such as BBC in recent decades transitioned from investigative journalism to just plain reporting. they just report what was reported to them, no scrutinisation. no real staking their reputation. and more so 'tell us a story and if it seems to be worthy of public interest we will report on it"

take the 2016 article where craid done the [using a publicly available 7yo signature] 'heres todays proof i am..'
the BBC didnt send the data off to a cryptographer for verification. didnt take any documents with them to later release with the article for people to scrutinise. but instead just say they were party to a 'signing event' and that they read other people on other forums where some people were not sure if the proof was proof, essentially.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-36168863

when the article first published there was instant backlash and all BBC done was change the title from:
"Bitcoin creator reveals his identity"  to "Australian Craig Wright claims to be Bitcoin creator".

the article was also changed to recognise there was still doubt about Craig Wright's claim. but no sign of the BBC themselves doing any professional investigation or double checking with any cryptographer independently

[arabspaceship123]

What's the point of the judge saying he'll have to pay $100M? Is it only a political stunt or there's more to what's going on? I haven't any clues who's paying his legal fees and court costs can you name his friends? Who'd want to associate their name with Craig's?

He's getting humiliated because he won't be able to pay the $100M in cash or bitcoin. Why's he put himself in public shame? He didn't profit in anything by getting to court against Kleiman's estate.

he doesnt need to pay the $100m in the physical world. its just a paper-shuffle
(just needs a W&K letterhead saying 'we been paid)

craig didnt even pay any court costs. he had butt-kissing 'investor' friends front him by paying the court costs under a promise that if he wins he can then do book deals and movie rights deals for documentaries about his life/story and stuff and they will get paid back their "investment" via those profits.

its also about him valuing his patents at upto trillions of dollars in value pretending his patents are ownership of bitcoin which his "investors" will get a cut of.

heck. to true craig style. i can even see him using this court order along with the W&K letter head suggesting payment received undisputed. as future "proof" of W&K holdings of $100m in fiat(on paper). without revealing any bank account balance sheet as real proof, to the try to scam some investor into buying W&K under his usual false pretenses.

little do they realise he has no real value/collateral to make good on his promises..
and thats what the community is laughing at. valueless scammy craig being unable to make good on promises and lying so much that sooner or later, his scammery will come to a short sharp end.

[franky1]

What's the point of the judge saying he'll have to pay $100M? Is it only a political stunt or there's more to what's going on? I haven't any clues who's paying his legal fees and court costs can you name his friends? Who'd want to associate their name with Craig's?

1. if you imagine the court case is just a mediation of 2 parties, arguing about whatever they want. where the judge decides the debate winner. it then becomes clear that it doesnt matter if the debate is meaningless, it doesnt matter that the 2 parties are actually friends or on the same side outside the mediation room. all the judges job is, is to decide who wins a debate the two parties are having.

once you understand it in that format. you realise the game being played in public.

its a mediation of business contracts/paperwork. nothing to do with nation laws or criminality
there are literally millions of court cases over many decades that are just contract mediation.
its called civil court, not criminal court

2. who? well calvin ayres for one. and his partners and all the ceo's associated with all the businesses that are part of the shammy scammy group associated with craig.
a couple of years ago i remember a few names. but craigs case bored me soo much i let that information leave my brain and be lost to the vapour of nothingness. its noted somewhere in the court documents a few of those names. edit: i dug deep into old greymatter. jimmy nguyen,  Lorien Gamaroff  are other names.

but basically if you google any big names with businesses associated with the BSV crapcoin. they are only highly promoting it because they are highly invested in craig and hoping to someday get returns