People claiming themself satoshi

[molsewid]

It doesn't matter how many people claim to be the creators of Bitcoin, because a "creator" who doesn't want to be identified will always be hard to find. Satoshi wouldn't reveal himself like Craig did. Satoshi does not work alone, Bitcoin proponents at the start of the project may ask for various rations of money on the grounds that they are entitled to it. If Craig doesn't comply, then he's not a satoshi, and neither is anyone else claiming he's Satoshi.

Let them fight to claim a satoshi, the important thing is that we should always warn people if he claims to be "contacted by Satoshi", he 100% isn't Satoshi, So believe me, that those who claim Satoshi, are 100% not satosi, but scammers. unless accompanied by an email that has been used by Satoshi in the past.

Exactly well said mate, Satoshi if he is still alive today will for sure choose to have a private life like what he did and will enjoy his life, his money, his bitcoin anonimously. With bunch of people claiming to be Satoshi so far none of them have provided proof that will make bitcoin community believe on their self-claim. And if I were also Satoshi I will going to choose a private life also and will enjoy life behind the code name to avoid life conflicts because for sure his life will be in total publicity if he would going to introduce himself to public.

[Wawa2013]

It doesn't matter how many people claim to be the creators of Bitcoin, because a "creator" who doesn't want to be identified will always be hard to find. Satoshi wouldn't reveal himself like Craig did. Satoshi does not work alone, Bitcoin proponents at the start of the project may ask for various rations of money on the grounds that they are entitled to it. If Craig doesn't comply, then he's not a satoshi, and neither is anyone else claiming he's Satoshi.

Let them fight to claim a satoshi, the important thing is that we should always warn people if he claims to be "contacted by Satoshi", he 100% isn't Satoshi, So believe me, that those who claim Satoshi, are 100% not satosi, but scammers. unless accompanied by an email that has been used by Satoshi in the past.

Exactly well said mate, Satoshi if he is still alive today will for sure choose to have a private life like what he did and will enjoy his life, his money, his bitcoin anonimously. With bunch of people claiming to be Satoshi so far none of them have provided proof that will make bitcoin community believe on their self-claim. And if I were also Satoshi I will going to choose a private life also and will enjoy life behind the code name to avoid life conflicts because for sure his life will be in total publicity if he would going to introduce himself to public.

There was no need for Satoshi to reveal his identity to the public, because Satoshi knew that revealing his identity to the public would only
cause trouble. I also agree with you, Satoshi was most likely now enjoying his life somewhere. So there was no way Satoshi could reveal
his identity, if someone claims to be Satoshi and without solid evidence, that person is definitely lying. There were indeed some people who
confidently professed themselves to be Satoshi Nakamoto, but none of these people were able to show valid evidence. The conclusion is
that Satoshi Nakamoto's identity is not yet known, so we have to be careful if someone claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto, don't believe him right away.

[kryptqnick]

Multiple sources to look for the lists of impostors were suggested by others, and yet I don't think they will cover absolutely everyone. I remember about a year ago someone claimed that they were Satoshi, and they would provide evidence of it very soon. It wasn't a person with a particular name, but rather someone under a pseudonym. Right now I can't even remember anything else about it, but my point is that many non-popular people and groups of people probably claimed to be Satoshi or at least to reveal Satoshi's true identity, but, as the op said, it doesn't mean anything, and it's merely an attention grabber. If Satoshi ever decides to reveal identity, it's not hard to do it by proving to have access to what's assumed to be Satoshi's bitcoins. But I don't think this will ever happen.

[D-law]

Cracked my ribs seeing this alone
Satoshi might end up been a 22 year old.
Keep dreaming/ anticipating as we wait patiently to see him.
 

[The Cryptovator]

I think OP got the desired answer who claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto. If you need more information then you may read this article, there is a short description about their claim. Till now no one succeed to sign a message from Satoshi's Bitcoin address. I don't think Satoshi lost private keys who is the creator really and know very well lost private key means lost ownership of Bitcoin. But if it's true that Satoshi lost all of his private keys then most likely we never gonna introduce to the Bitcoin creator. And to be honest it's not really a need to discover the creator of a decentralized cryptocurrency.

[South Park]

There are some people who have claimed themselves as satoshi nakamoto. Craig is one of them. I'm sure all of them are fraud. Just trying to get into the focus, they are nothing but attention seeker. Anyway, can someone give me a complete list of people who have claimed them as satoshi nakamoto?

It is very obvious that all of those that make that claim are lying, if they were the real satoshi then they will have no problem demonstrating who they are by just moving some coins that are believed to belong to satoshi, if they did that then there will be no need to make all of the claims they make, besides why would satoshi want to reveal himself after so many years? After all it cannot be because of the money as he is one of the richest persons alive, could it be for the fame? But he rejected all of that when he did everything he could to remain anonymous, so as you can see it does not really make a lot of sense to come out and reveal his identity on his own after so much time has passed.

[chanler]

right, they just need attention. it's a mess and I think it's bothered a lot of people. they show their own evidence and their own reasons, after all I don't really care about that and I'm more focused on my own target in making a profit here. why people claim to be Satoshi of course because there is a reason in it and if many people are deceived then it can harm many people. so stay careful and don't trust people like that. I only avoid things that can be detrimental.

[kaya11]

Nick Szabo
Craig Steven Wright
Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto

These three are more into discussion for the innovation. Among them Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto have denied that he is not Satoshi. One who keeps on claiming himself as Satoshi is Craig Steven Wright.

Craig Steven Wright doesn't have any strong evidence to put forth and prove himself as Satoshi. He is called as fraud for his activities by most popular cryptocurrency enthusiasts/developers like Vitalik Buterin.

Nick Szabo haven't claimed himself as Satoshi. During the days of 2008 he was much into smart contracts development. He also brought in Bit Gold and worked for digicash to bring crypto on digital payments. Based on his historical note he's also among the list who are doubted as Satoshi.

I am convinced that Dorian is a possibility, he once said that he was part of it and later on claims he did not. Maybe he is Nakamoto and he is just trying to protect his family and everything. But in the end there was no solid evidence and if there are the US government hide it. There are lots of studies about who he really is and the moment you dig in, it keeps get harder to make a conclusion.

[Quidat]

snip

I am convinced that Dorian is a possibility, he once said that he was part of it and later on claims he did not. Maybe he is Nakamoto and he is just trying to protect his family and everything. But in the end there was no solid evidence and if there are the US government hide it. There are lots of studies about who he really is and the moment you dig in, it keeps get harder to make a conclusion.

None of them i would believed to be Satoshi yet we dont know if this is an individual or a group of people which we cant really point on our fingers and do we really believe that he could easily claim himself or reveal if he knows that he's on danger on creating such decentralized thing?

I dont really believe about those inputs but rather believe into the opposite ones.Let the lists becomes longer and as long no one could

prove out like moving those coins one of those satoshi wallets then they would just be always faketoshi.

[GeorgeJohn]

There are some people who have claimed themselves as satoshi nakamoto. Craig is one of them. I'm sure all of them are fraud. Just trying to get into the focus, they are nothing but attention seeker. Anyway, can someone give me a complete list of people who have claimed them as satoshi nakamoto?

I can equally said that those set of people are fraudster who is looking for people they want to deserve and make away with their money, claiming to be Satoshi is not a new thing because I have come across of this particular or this kind of thread before, but I don't really know if I have render my own opinion here before, but nevertheless let us have it in mind that we can't see Satoshi because he left the community long time ago, except it's a fresher people can have the opportunity to deserve that they are real Satoshi.

[Oceat]

There are some people who have claimed themselves as satoshi nakamoto. Craig is one of them. I'm sure all of them are fraud. Just trying to get into the focus, they are nothing but attention seeker. Anyway, can someone give me a complete list of people who have claimed them as satoshi nakamoto?

I can equally said that those set of people are fraudster who is looking for people they want to deserve and make away with their money, claiming to be Satoshi is not a new thing because I have come across of this particular or this kind of thread before, but I don't really know if I have render my own opinion here before, but nevertheless let us have it in mind that we can't see Satoshi because he left the community long time ago, except it's a fresher people can have the opportunity to deserve that they are real Satoshi.

I've seen quite a few in the past that claiming they were Satoshi but none of them could prove it technically. They would just shove their paperwork as if it's enough to be called as Satoshi and one of them is Craig who still pushing the title to be his. But look at it now, what are the results of his claims?

I don't know if there are still people who still believe in their claims that would be a stupid idea if they don't just do their own research. Well, afaik Satoshi is long gone and he/she/they has no plans on getting back since the government are already eyeing on his return so there would be a manhunt if he would ever showed up in this forum.

[bhooscream]

So far, there are some people (mostly popular) that claim themselves to be Satoshi. But no one can really prove that he is Satoshi exactly.
And this will be still ongoing to the future, there will be other new people or even similar people again that claim themselves to be the real Satoshi.
Actually, I believe that what Satoshi will reveal himself to the public if Satoshi itself has disappeared so far? I am sure that Satoshi has certain reasons why Satoshi disappeared so far and decide not to reveal his or their identity at that time. And this seems nonsense if Satoshi wants everybody to know who or what Satoshi is right now.

[Olayinka2225]

Nobody is Satoshi, somebody is Satoshi.
Nobody should even come out and say he's Satoshi because nobody ever know who Satoshi is. People coming out to claim they're Satoshi are just looking for cheap attention and fame which they won't get.

[worle1bm]

On the other hand, According to https://news.bitcoin.com, There are 10 People Who Might Be Satoshi Nakamoto.

• Vili Lehdonvirta
• Paul Le Roux
• Gavin Andresen
• Hal Finney
• Nick Szabo
• Bram Cohen
• Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto
• Craig Wright
• Dave Kleiman

Source: https://news.bitcoin.com/10-people-who-might-be-satoshi-nakamoto/

Surprisingly, they Listed 9 People Who might be Satoshi Nakamoto and the last one is missing. That might be Original One.
Whenever I think of Satoshi Nakamoto, I saw Dorian Nakamoto as the real One. IDK Why?

See we don't know who the real one is but who claim themselves to be the original one are not Satoshi and only want to claim the ownership of funds like CSW or other just want fame but they all are fake and can't give any single proof for the same.

Dorian just resembles the last name only and media hyped him at that time and some still believes he is the original one and have his profile photo on some twitter accounts as well but he himself has denied the claims as he said he misunderstood it but we don't know who is the original creator of bitcoin and in reality it doesn't matter at all.

[Chaim Herzog41]

They are simple people who want fame by calling themselves Satoshi

[dothebeats]

Well, if they got the name of Satoshi, they will attract a lot of attention, and they can use their new-found fame for profit by creating projects and businesses to attract a lot of people. We all know that there are only a handful of ways to prove that one is Satoshi, and those impostors so far haven't achieved any of those.

No matter how many of them attempt to take the name for themselves, they would not succeed and would certainly fail to prove their identity.

[Mpamaegbu]

I'm sure all of them are fraud.

But of course, they're. The situation best explains the scenario of those who don't have anything acting like they've all while those who have are pretending they don't have. The real Satoshi Nakamoto continues to burrow himself in hiding as the world continues to struggle to unravel him, those who seek attention pretend to be him. It's like a butterfly calling itself a bird; that still doesn't make it a bird. I'm sure the whole struggle to be Satoshi is because of the tremendous success Bitcoin has recorded. If Bitcoin had been a failure, definitely no one who've claimed to be him. It goes to show that failure is a bastard. For me, I don't even care who Satoshi is. I'm more focused on what he has given us than placing a face to that name.

[kucritt]

no one knows, who is satoshi nakamoto, he is very anonymously, entire world find him but no one knows who is he, is he still alive or not, nobody knows. some people said that satoshi nakamoto are the 5 big companies in japan. but it just a rumor nobody dont know for sure

[naim027]

See we don't know who the real one is but who claim themselves to be the original one are not Satoshi and only want to claim the ownership of funds like CSW or other just want fame but they all are fake and can't give any single proof for the same.

Dorian just resembles the last name only and media hyped him at that time and some still believes he is the original one and have his profile photo on some twitter accounts as well but he himself has denied the claims as he said he misunderstood it but we don't know who is the original creator of bitcoin and in reality it doesn't matter at all.

Right. Craig is one of them. Dorian is also the same. The media hyped a lot and they made them popular. I assume, Satoshi is not going to reveal ever himself. Bitcoin had its golden time for the last 3 years (especially in 2021). He is inactive from all of his know identity from 2020. No one knows him. If anyone wants to claim that he is Satoshi Nakamoto. He has to prove that with strong evidence. He should have to access his wallet which was used at the earlier beginning of bitcoin mining. He should have access to satoshi's official email account which was satoshin@gmx.com. Also, He should have access to his Bitcointalk forum account. If anyone claims that he is Satoshi Nakamoto, Media should ask them to prove it instead of making them popular. If they failed to access at least one of them, They are 100% frauds.

[deadmousehat]

I'm not surprised, there are always people who proudly lie to get the public's attention. I believe all those claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto are scammers and attention seekers and trying to make a profit. the real ones wouldn't suddenly appear and admit it for no reason like them.