People claiming themself satoshi

[bitzizzix]

Anyone claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto is just taking advantage of bitcoin's growing popularity to make it popular as well, but they can't provide accurate evidence, so ignore it.
Although there has been much speculation over the years about who Satoshi Nakomoto is, there has never been any confirmation, and the answer is that no one knows who Satoshi Nakamoto really is other than him.
It also showcases the beauty of bitcoin because of the blockchain that makes its identity undiscoverable.

[naim027]

Well, people claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto because they want the advantage of the popularity of Satoshi Nakamoto. Take Craig for example, There are still a lot of people who believe that he is the real Satoshi Nakamoto. At this moment, Craig announces that he is going to create another crypto. For example, Bitcoin lite. There are a lot of people who are going to invest in that shitty project. That's how Bitcoin Cash and BSV have been created. The only thing is, they want to take advantage of the popularity of Satoshi Nakamoto. Most of their target/aim is to scam people. I am not sure if there is another thing behind claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto.

If somebody is Satoshi he can very easily prove that by moving bitcoins from the famous Satoshi Wallet. Nobody to date can do that. It's our responsibility that we must not give any attention to such Faketoshis who can't prove themselves as satoshis.
As you said BSV and bitcoin cash are created by people who are just scammers and it's us who fell victim to them just because of our negligence.

No one knows if Satoshi is still alive. But I assume he is alive and watching the drama that a lot of people claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto. Imagine you are alive and in front of you, Someone pretending to be you. I am sure you will laugh a lot 😂. Still, I don't think he will reveal his identity. If he does, his life will be under big threats because of his money and he has to maintain a lot of things for security purposes. I think he loves to be a normal average person like everyone else. I am wondering, maybe he is living a cool life in a small village or island 😍

[riskarcher]

Well, people claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto because they want the advantage of the popularity of Satoshi Nakamoto. Take Craig for example, There are still a lot of people who believe that he is the real Satoshi Nakamoto. At this moment, Craig announces that he is going to create another crypto. For example, Bitcoin lite. There are a lot of people who are going to invest in that shitty project. That's how Bitcoin Cash and BSV have been created. The only thing is, they want to take advantage of the popularity of Satoshi Nakamoto. Most of their target/aim is to scam people. I am not sure if there is another thing behind claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto.

If somebody is Satoshi he can very easily prove that by moving bitcoins from the famous Satoshi Wallet. Nobody to date can do that. It's our responsibility that we must not give any attention to such Faketoshis who can't prove themselves as satoshis.
As you said BSV and bitcoin cash are created by people who are just scammers and it's us who fell victim to them just because of our negligence.

No one knows if Satoshi is still alive. But I assume he is alive and watching the drama that a lot of people claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto. Imagine you are alive and in front of you, Someone pretending to be you. I am sure you will laugh a lot 😂. Still, I don't think he will reveal his identity. If he does, his life will be under big threats because of his money and he has to maintain a lot of things for security purposes. I think he loves to be a normal average person like everyone else. I am wondering, maybe he is living a cool life in a small village or island 😍

Well that's so funny, So many dramas in the name of Satoshi Nakamoto, I believe people who claim to be under this name have no shame. even though the creators of Bitcoin clearly want to keep their identity secret so that Bitcoin becomes anonymous and decentralized. it would be impossible for him to publish himself. A good indication why they claim satoshi nakomoto because they want popularity but stupidly they can't prove how Bitcoin was created

[FIFA worldcup]

I would like to learn about themselves, would you please like shared that articale or that articale here?

Although there's a lot came who's claim to be Satoshi but won't able to prove himself real one.

You won't blame them because from my part i seen it like people who wants to indirectly scandal the Bitcoin if they succeed being accepted as Satoshi, some people here does not meet Satoshi but they are claiming to be him so that they will have some agreement with government to tarnish the reputation of bitcoin, so that is how am seeing the reason why people is claiming that name, from what is going on, we don't know the real Satoshi and is not possible for it to reappear again since it left the forum

People who are losers, need fame without doing anything and they think that by claiming themselves Satoshi, they can easily gain some fame. But this is not actually the case.
People hate those people, who falsely claim themselves satoshi.

[Lorence.xD]

I don't know what people think, but I've never been curious enough to see how mysterious it is. We all consider it to be a group and it is absurd for anyone to stand up and claim to be at the top of everything, imo.
And as far as I know, it's all of us.

That's just lazy thinking for you by saying that Satoshi is all of us, can you make it more cliche? I think that whoever is behind this massive project that we call the future of finances, their identity is highly detrimental to the development of bitcoin that they/he/she to remain anonymous all throughout so my take in this discussion is that we never should find the identities/identity behind Satoshi because it might be anticlimactic to the growth of bitcoin, let sleeping dogs lie as they say.

[Ryu_Ar1]

Anyone claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto is just taking advantage of bitcoin's growing popularity to make it popular as well, but they can't provide accurate evidence, so ignore it.
Although there has been much speculation over the years about who Satoshi Nakomoto is, there has never been any confirmation, and the answer is that no one knows who Satoshi Nakamoto really is other than him.
It also showcases the beauty of bitcoin because of the blockchain that makes its identity undiscoverable.

Actually it's quite simple, He doesn't want recognition for himself and that's the reason why he doesn't want to be known until now because indeed if the only goal was not to be famous he would have easily gotten it from the very beginning of his creation of bitcoin.
For example, such as Vitalik Buterin who created and claimed that ETH was created from scratch, actually Satoshi could also claim it actually but because he didn't want it he didn't do it, so for now why is he thirsting for recognition? no it doesn't really make sense

[erep]

Claiming himself to be a Satoshi is an attempt to embarrass himself in public because to be a Satoshi doesn't require recognition but does an unbreakable act for anyone in cryptocurrency to do, if his abilities don't reach the Satoshi position then stop making embarrassing confessions, just be yourself because it's better.

[Bitcoin SV]

Well, people claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto because they want the advantage of the popularity of Satoshi Nakamoto. Take Craig for example, There are still a lot of people who believe that he is the real Satoshi Nakamoto. At this moment, If Craig announces that he is going to create another crypto. For example, Bitcoin lite. There are a lot of people who are going to invest in that shitty project. That's how Bitcoin Cash and BSV have been created. The only thing is, they want to take advantage of the popularity of Satoshi Nakamoto. Most of their target/aim is to scam people. I am not sure if there is another thing behind claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto.

Provide any proof that Craig Wright is not Satoshi

[stepwilli]

There are so many people who have claimed that they are Satoshi, and there are also some of them that never claimed to be Satoshi, but due to one thing or the other, the public has suspected them to be the creator of Bitcoin.

With that said, none of them has been able to prove that they are the creator and some of them who were believed by the public to be the ones have also denied ever knowing anything that has to do with creating Bitcoin. So nobody is, and we cannot believe anyone that claims to be the one because none of them are able to prove that they are. Before we can believe any of that, the said person would have to prove it in one way or the other.

[raidarksword]

A true satoshi nakamoto will never his or her real identity to the public and it is a great thing to do. To the people who were claiming that they are satoshi, then think again because it is clearly a fake or fraud claims. Claiming that identity only seeks fame and credit grabbers of the success of bitcoin.

[seoincorporation]

...
Provide any proof that Craig Wright is not Satoshi

Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=np7mIOaVIFU

Vitalik Buterin and Lex Fridman have this good explanation about why Craig is not Satoshi. Craig wasn't able to sign transactions with satoshis addy, that would be the right way to prove he was Satoshi, but he couldn't prove it.

[BitcoinMoses]

Hello guys, nobody has claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto, except Craig Wright.
Is Craig Wright a credible person to play the role as Satoshi Nakamoto  ? 
A movie needs Hero and Vilain. Is Craig Wright Hero or the Vilain  ?

Can Craig Wright recreate the Genesis Block Hash  ?

Extra ordinary Claim require an extra ordinary evidence and proof-of-work.
Cryptographic Proof-of-Work.

How about organizing a Satoshi Candidates Summit  ?

The Pannel can decide who is more credible than other to claim the Satoshi Throne.

I am Moses BitcoinMoses. I do not need to claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
Anyone can Claim to be the real Bill Gate.


 

[naim027]

Well, people claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto because they want the advantage of the popularity of Satoshi Nakamoto. Take Craig for example, There are still a lot of people who believe that he is the real Satoshi Nakamoto. At this moment, If Craig announces that he is going to create another crypto. For example, Bitcoin lite. There are a lot of people who are going to invest in that shitty project. That's how Bitcoin Cash and BSV have been created. The only thing is, they want to take advantage of the popularity of Satoshi Nakamoto. Most of their target/aim is to scam people. I am not sure if there is another thing behind claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto.

Provide any proof that Craig Wright is not Satoshi

I don't give a fuck to people like you. I don't have that much time to waste on it. The earth doesn't require to prove that this is the only planet where people live. If you don't think so, You have to prove it. So, I don't think I have to prove that Fucking Craig is not Satoshi. You have to prove that he is Satoshi. In order to prove it, He has to do the following things,

• Ask him to mail from his official email which is Satoshin@gmx.com
• Move a Single satoshi from his mining wallet
• Login to Bitcoinalk

If your lord Craig cannot do these steps. Don't show me your freaking face. I don't want to talk with the people like you. Scammer.

[Lanatsa]

true rich people don't claim to be rich, true good people will not claim to be good

so,,,, the real satoshi won't admit to satoshi.. anyone who claims to be a satoshi, is a swindler

No one in his right mind would proclaim himself as Satoshi knowing on the creation that he had made yet he would mainly be targeted out by government if he tends to go out and show himself publicly.

I do rather see negative things rather than on positive events to happen if someone could prove out that he's satoshi.We've seen several people who do make out those claims but none of them

do able to give out solid proofs thats why im not surprising that there would be still several people who do make out some claims later.

[henmark]

Claiming himself to be a Satoshi is an attempt to embarrass himself in public because to be a Satoshi doesn't require recognition but does an unbreakable act for anyone in cryptocurrency to do, if his abilities don't reach the Satoshi position then stop making embarrassing confessions, just be yourself because it's better.

The worst part of it all is that he keeps making fake documents to prove that he is the one and all the time he has been caught and everybody knows now that he is forging the documents . And funniest part of it all? He still doesn’t want to admit that he is lying about being the real Satoshi Nakamoto.

I guess he has realized how far he’s gone in embarrassing himself and is now finding it very difficult to admit to admit that he’s been lying, because he now knows how damaging that would be to him and his career. Although , whether he admits it or not, he has already ruined his career and will start gradually falling from here.

[livingfree]

There's nothing to claim, Satoshi can prove by signing a message, or moving his coins.

And that's what those claimers can't do.

A simple way to prove that they're satoshi.

But, they can't provide any signed message to prove that they're the owner of those bitcoins that satoshi has left, the real satoshi.

[worldtraveller321]

I do not think we will ever learn who Satoshi really is.  Too many people at this point have come out with scams claiming they are Satoshi.

To the point now if the "real" satoshi came about, then no one would believe it.


Maybe one day we will find out the true story. Maybe after the person or persons have passed on. As there is for sure a document somewhere with everyone on it.

Otherwise we have to assume there are people out there who do know who Satoshi is.

Many are not going to say who it is. As no one will believe them.

As well finding out who Satoshi is now, would have no benefit at all. It could really make a change in the market good or bad.

As well many safety concerns for those people as well who do decide to come out in public from so so many other people and organizations at this point.

So more less we won't find out anytime soon.

I am assuming it is a group collective of a bunch of people who put it all together . But one person did over see that specific group.

At this time, all the stories and conspiracy theories that are on the true identity of Satoshi have themselves a better $ value vs finding out the true answers.

[Rockstarguy]

There's nothing to claim, Satoshi can prove by signing a message, or moving his coins.

People will always make claims that they are satoshi just to benefits things from the public,  but their claims are just empty , nothing to show up or prove they are the real satoshi. I don't think if satoshi will make himself known to the public anytime soon . People need to get this understanding so they don't easily fall for scammers.

[Luzin]

People will always make claims that they are satoshi just to benefits things from the public,  but their claims are just empty , nothing to show up or prove they are the real satoshi. I don't think if satoshi will make himself known to the public anytime soon . People need to get this understanding so they don't easily fall for scammers.

Of course, only people who understand Crypto understand Satoshi Nakamoto. It's useless to name himself as him if there's no hard evidence. In fact I don't think Satoshi should have turned himself up, just the technology used. I don't know how bad the atmosphere would be if he really came. Maybe his safety will be compromised. I think old crypto people will understand very well and will not be easily tempted by scamers. 

[nullama]

I do not think we will ever learn who Satoshi really is.  Too many people at this point have come out with scams claiming they are Satoshi.

To the point now if the "real" satoshi came about, then no one would believe it.

~snip~

There's no need to believe or trust anyone. It doesn't matter if a million people say they are Satoshi. The real Satoshi has the private keys of known addresses that we all know belong to him. If Satoshi wanted to prove anything he would just sign a message with that key. Or move coins around. He has chosen not to do so. Anyone just saying anything when claiming to be Satoshi is meaningless.

And even signing a message with that private key won't be 100% certain, because someone could have stolen them for example. But at least it would give you a high confidence that the person is Satoshi, unless it's proven the keys are compromised.

Don't trust, verify.