It would be great if we took a bold stance in investing in bitcoin.
Just like aggressively accumulating when prices are falling, This approach accelerates the growth of Bitcoin in our portfolio.
However, If we fail to take the bold stance of Aggressive Buying, it will take a long time to accumulate Bitcoin. As I wrote in this Thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5581686.msg66670723#msg66670723I wouldn't necessarily say that being aggressive is wrong, but if you are going beyond your discretionary income, that is wrong, because aggressive accumulation with the wrong funds or beyond your discretionary income will be problematic to your Bitcoin investment later in the future, but if you are doing it within the confinement of your discretionary income, then their is no problem about that.
As for dip buying, it's also not a problem if you are not waiting for it before buying, because it's unwise pausing your accumulation and hoping to buy at a dip that we are not sure when it may come, so it's an unwise thing to do, which we should not engage ourselves in.
There is no problem with aggressive buying if it is what you want and you have sufficient discretionary funds to fund it but if you don't have sufficient discretionary funds you should suspend it.
What you are saying makes no sense. If your discretionary income goes up then you are capable of buying more BTC with the discretionary funds because the amount of funds available is higher. Having a higher available amount does not cause you to be more aggressive based on having a higher amount available.
The description of aggressive versus whimpy relates to how much a guy chooses to invest within the range of choices that he has available from within the discretionary funds that he has available, so if he has $100 of discretionary funds available every week, then maybe he can choose to invest anywhere between $0 and $100, and of course, if he chooses a higher amount then he is more aggressive relative to if he were to choose a lower amount.
If a guy has $300 of discretionary funds available every week, then his amount is higher and his range of options is higher, yet the mere fact that he chooses to invest more than $100 per week does not cause him to be more aggressive merely because he is investing a higher amount than he was capable of investing earlier..
I think that we should first focus on buying Bitcoin with amount that we can comfortably afford from our discretionary funds, if there is surplus funds at our discretion then we can go for aggressive buying.
Nothing wrong with that idea.
I believe that it is due to the zeal of accumulating many Bitcoin so that it will generate enough profit that drives many people to want to buy aggressively.
Nothing wrong with choosing to buy aggressively. It is a choice within a tolerable range. A problem likely would come if a guy goes beyond his tolerable range, whether it was on purpose or due to mistakes... so sometimes it is better to invest less aggressively in order to lessen the odds of overdoing it by mistake.
It doesn't matter what you feel about having a large accumulation of Bitcoin if you cannot afford to buy aggressively it is better to avoid it and concentrate on what you can afford.
You seem to be referring to buying overaggressively, since buying aggressively is a choice within an acceptable range. There is nothing wrong with guys choosing to buy aggressively as long as they don't overdo it.
Always priotize your basic expenses before any discretionary expenses.
dah.. .Of course.
Investing is done within discretionary funds, so there is an assumption that discretionary funds have already accounted for all basic expenses. Sure, guys sometimes make mistakes in their calculations, so frequently it is better to not max out their levels, and also it is good to have some cash cushion in case guys make mistakes by overdoing it from time to time. Now if they overdo it on purpose, then that is a different story in which they should be trying to control themselves since we are trying to talk about investing in this thread, not gambling.
[edited out]
People who don't already have their backup funds before they start investing shouldn't be thinking about delaying their investment because they don't have their backup fund especially their emergency fund ready,
at the end of the day their investment should be of higher priority than their emergency fund, this is not to diminish the value of having an emergency fund but your investment should come first or you do them together.
I don't have any problem with the idea of building bitcoin faster or greater than emergency funds (back up funds), yet emergency funds/back up funds should not be completely dismissed as if they were not important, since there needs to be some level of back up funds, even if it is a small amount that might be only a few days of expenses, otherwise if the back up funds are zero, then there is no really way to have confidence that the beginner is not investing in bitcoin with non-discretionary funds...
It seems that if the back up funds are at or close to zero, then there may be some need to emphasize back up funds, yet perhaps once the amount put into bitcoin and back up funds might approach some meaningful amount of 1 or 2 weeks of expenses, then probably it could be reasonable to give emphasis towards growing the bitcoin faster than the back up funds..and of course, there is likely going to continue to be a certain amount of risk in having relatively low quantities of back up funds, yet they will help to alleviate the more likely fluctuations in income/expenses, and not really able to protect from the larger fluctuations in income/expenses, yet it is within the judgement of each person to figure out what he considers to be a sufficiently reasonable balance that is likely not to cause him later regrets.
The way people talk about emergency funds is as if they are spending so much on buying Bitcoin, as if there is no emergency, and if any challenge happens the money they are about to use to buy Bitcoin will solve their problems becauseno emergencyfund. As a beginner starting Bitcoin investment, an emergency is not a reason to avoid investing because to some people it seems that because there is no emergency fund, there is no need to invest in Bitcoin. An emergency fund can come later after a good amount of Bitcoin has been accumulated; it's something you need to plan for, and it doesn't just happen immediately when you want to start Bitcoin investment.
I see both sides. Personally, I don't think newbies should should delay Bitcoin investing forever because they hasn't built a full emergency fund yet.
If someone has discretionary income, he can start accumulating small amounts while slowly building his emergency fund alongside it. That way he doesn't miss out or delay on starting early, and by slowly building his emergency funds he also has some protection against unexpected expenses in the future.
In the very beginning, many of us (and perhaps especially poor people with low levels of discretionary funds) are going to be putting ourselves and our bitcoin holdings at risk by ONLY having small amounts of back up funds, and so we likely need to be careful to make sure that we are not getting greedy or sloppy.. and so the balance is likely not easy, and not everyone can have their problems resolved by increasing their discretionary funds, so they have to work with the funds that they have..