🚀 [ANN] Stabila Public Chain (STB) | Decentralize the financial system. 🚀

[stabilastb]

Do you have any plan to do bounty? I would love to join . Waiting for the reply.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5379099

[stabilastb]

Reserve for future updates.

How can we buy token?Is there any guideline?

A bit of patience. We list in February 2022 when users will be able to trade STB.
If you want to buy now the only place is buying from other Stabila holders or from Stabila web wallet at https://stabilascan.org/

[stabilastb]

Any limit for at one time send STB to other wallet? STB was based on TRON (TRX) link? What is the Stabila Power (SP)

No limits on sending Stabila. STB is not based on TRX link)

[stabilastb]

Reserve for future updates.

How can we buy token? Is there any guideline?

Interesting project. How can I start mining? Do you have any video or any article?

What is the gRPC forr stabila chain It's the security to access The idea of Stabila Public CHain is necessary and the prospects are great.

Just go to your wallet and press Buy Stb button. You will be guided by the process. Can buy for BTC, ETH, USDT. Please make sure you fill in the address you will pay from. After payment and confirmation, your account will be credited with the respective amount of Stabila. It's easy. Ethereum and BTC confirmations make take longer, just have patience, otherwise, the process is automatic. You will get notified by email. In case of issues, there is a ticket system in place.



To start with mining you need to become an executive. Download our wallet-cli and apply for an executive. Now is rather expensive to apply for an executive. It is 1000 STB. In the nearest future this setting may be lower by governors, so it will be rather accessible to the larger public.


gRPC is a modern, open-source, high-performance remote procedure call (RPC) framework that can run anywhere. gRPC enables client and server applications to communicate transparently and simplifies the building of connected systems.

[stabilastb]

Reserve for future updates.

How can we buy token? Is there any guideline?

Interesting project. How can I start mining? Do you have any video or any article?

What is the gRPC forr stabila chain It's the security to access The idea of Stabila Public CHain is necessary and the prospects are great.

Just go to your wallet and press Buy Stb button. You will be guided by the process. Can buy for BTC, ETH, USDT. Please make sure you fill in the address you will pay from. After payment and confirmation, your account will be credited with the respective amount of Stabila. It's easy. Ethereum and BTC confirmations make take longer, just have patience, otherwise, the process is automatic. You will get notified by email. In case of issues, there is a ticket system in place.

Stabila trade with USDT/ ETH I don't understand MONETA HOLDING, please explain. Any unique role of Moneta

The exchange will roll out initially with the following pairs: STB, ETH, BTC, USDT
Moneta Holdings is the company managing the support for Stabila Public Chain. As Stabila is a decentralized blockchain, the governing bodies decided to outsource the DEV support to Moneta Holdings.



To start with mining you need to become an executive. Download our wallet-cli and apply for an executive. Now is rather expensive to apply for an executive. It is 1000 STB. In the nearest future this setting may be lowered by governors, so it will be rather accessible to the larger public.


gRPC is a modern, open-source, high-performance remote procedure call (RPC) framework that can run anywhere. gRPC enables client and server applications to communicate transparently and simplifies the building of connected systems.

[Bitstar_coin]

Comparing stabila network with ethereum network won't give a proper record until stabila has been able to prove it can provide all these services and handle them smoothly as mentioned in the whitepaper, stabila has no projects in its ecosystem yet so it is possible it can process such high transaction per second compare to eth that has thousands of projects using the smart contract,
So the big question is what will make new projects to use stabila instead of the rest alternatives, sol, polygon, polkadot, avalanch, tron already provide cheap transaction fees and good service, what is different with stabila network.

[stabilastb]

Comparing stabila network with ethereum network won't give a proper record until stabila has been able to prove it can provide all these services and handle them smoothly as mentioned in the whitepaper, stabila has no projects in its ecosystem yet so it is possible it can process such high transaction per second compare to eth that has thousands of projects using the smart contract,
So the big question is what will make new projects to use stabila instead of the rest alternatives, sol, polygon, polkadot, avalanch, tron already provide cheap transaction fees and good service, what is different with stabila network.

Thank you. I can say your question is essential in the sense of signaling genuine, meaningful, and necessarily-ongoing inquiries. These are grapple-worthy, substantive questions that not only require wrestling with but are worth wrestling with, that could lead users to some critical insight.

"So the big question is what will make new projects to use stabila instead of the rest alternatives, sol, polygon, polkadot, avalanch, tron already provide cheap transaction fees and good service, what is different with stabila network."

First of all, it is people's choice. Why have to choose from many yogurts if there is greek yogurt. Why have to choose from many brands when there is one initial brand?

Now talking about brands. Every brand distinguishes itself with certain elements like quality, style, price, etc...
  
The Solana blockchain has suffered an outage for the third time in a matter of months. It is unclear whether the issue was a simple network failure because of high traffic or collapsed because of hackers' distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack. Reports indicate other developers are dissatisfied with the drop in confidence Solana's repeated glitches have caused, complaining of a lack of transparency at the decision-making and at protocol developers' group Solana Labs and expressing frustration that new problems keep appearing. Words like "reboot," "downtime," "transaction failure," and "hard restart" generate terrible press and are not the ones people want to see as they are prepared to inject millions of dollars into a relatively new, fast-growing blockchain financial system.

Ethereum has many problems, and apparently, they will be fixing those problems over six years. They will not recover as their system is old, heavy, and not fit to change. Vitalik Buterin considers the personnel working with Ethereum as a bigger problem than the actual software, as he stated in a recent interview. While the personnel working on the project may or may not be problematic, it is undoubtedly not the only shortcoming. The new rollout and software upgrades will not solve the long-term problems plaguing the network from reaching leadership again. They will slowly fade away, the same as Polaroid did some time ago.

The whole Plkadot ecosystem revolves around money. Those who have more money (DOT) control everything in this blockchain. Ultimately many support the theory - it will fail.

Avalanche has its issues like transactions may be delayed if validators do not agree on the status. There is no liveness guarantee where conflicting transactions are concerned.

Tron is printing TRX out of thin air, worse than Federal Reserve does lately. TRX is minted out of nowhere, and the chain is not decentralized; versa, it is under totalitarian control. It is a dangerous game for its supporters or users.

Finally, the fraud on these blockchains is epic. Moreover, no one seems to have an interest in stopping that. It just raises questions about the actual stuff going on behind the scenes.

Stabila niche choice is :
Fraud & Scam Free
Financial Instruments

And Yes, I do agree Stabila needs a proper record and should not compare to ethereum until stabila has been able to prove it can provide all these services and handle them smoothly. The comparison was based on Stabila tests. Nevertheless, let us wait for the Defi ecosystem to be deployed in the nearest future. We shall get the answers very soon.  

As we see many projects fall behind as they said in their roadmap. what about you, are you going according to your roadmap?

Up to now, we are on time with our roadmap. I feel there is a lot of development going on right now and things may get complicated. If we will fall off track we will readjust the roadmap. 

[mdzahed134]

As i know that Stabila (STB) didn’t listed on exchanges but in the stablia website price is up & down around 18$. Also showing 24 hours volume and total market cap. But i searched and i couldn’t found it CMC or Coingecko. That means STB token already trade on it’s own DEX?  

[Bitstar_coin]

Comparing stabila network with ethereum network won't give a proper record until stabila has been able to prove it can provide all these services and handle them smoothly as mentioned in the whitepaper, stabila has no projects in its ecosystem yet so it is possible it can process such high transaction per second compare to eth that has thousands of projects using the smart contract,
So the big question is what will make new projects to use stabila instead of the rest alternatives, sol, polygon, polkadot, avalanch, tron already provide cheap transaction fees and good service, what is different with stabila network.

Thank you. I can say your question is essential in the sense of signaling genuine, meaningful, and necessarily-ongoing inquiries. These are grapple-worthy, substantive questions that not only require wrestling with but are worth wrestling with, that could lead users to some critical insight.

"So the big question is what will make new projects to use stabila instead of the rest alternatives, sol, polygon, polkadot, avalanch, tron already provide cheap transaction fees and good service, what is different with stabila network."

First of all, it is people's choice. Why have to choose from many yogurts if there is greek yogurt. Why have to choose from many brands when there is one initial brand?

Now talking about brands. Every brand distinguishes itself with certain elements like quality, style, price, etc...
  
The Solana blockchain has suffered an outage for the third time in a matter of months. It is unclear whether the issue was a simple network failure because of high traffic or collapsed because of hackers' distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack. Reports indicate other developers are dissatisfied with the drop in confidence Solana's repeated glitches have caused, complaining of a lack of transparency at the decision-making and at protocol developers' group Solana Labs and expressing frustration that new problems keep appearing. Words like "reboot," "downtime," "transaction failure," and "hard restart" generate terrible press and are not the ones people want to see as they are prepared to inject millions of dollars into a relatively new, fast-growing blockchain financial system.

Ethereum has many problems, and apparently, they will be fixing those problems over six years. They will not recover as their system is old, heavy, and not fit to change. Vitalik Buterin considers the personnel working with Ethereum as a bigger problem than the actual software, as he stated in a recent interview. While the personnel working on the project may or may not be problematic, it is undoubtedly not the only shortcoming. The new rollout and software upgrades will not solve the long-term problems plaguing the network from reaching leadership again. They will slowly fade away, the same as Polaroid did some time ago.

The whole Plkadot ecosystem revolves around money. Those who have more money (DOT) control everything in this blockchain. Ultimately many support the theory - it will fail.

Avalanche has its issues like transactions may be delayed if validators do not agree on the status. There is no liveness guarantee where conflicting transactions are concerned.

Tron is printing TRX out of thin air, worse than Federal Reserve does lately. TRX is minted out of nowhere, and the chain is not decentralized; versa, it is under totalitarian control. It is a dangerous game for its supporters or users.

Finally, the fraud on these blockchains is epic. Moreover, no one seems to have an interest in stopping that. It just raises questions about the actual stuff going on behind the scenes.

Stabila niche choice is :
Fraud & Scam Free
Financial Instruments

And Yes, I do agree Stabila needs a proper record and should not compare to ethereum until stabila has been able to prove it can provide all these services and handle them smoothly. The comparison was based on Stabila tests. Nevertheless, let us wait for the Defi ecosystem to be deployed in the nearest future. We shall get the answers very soon.  

Well thanks for the detailed explanation and am glad you brought up the issue solana blockchain recently encountered, although it is not very clear what was the cause of the outage but i want to believe it was as a result of a network failure not anything related to hack otherwise that would have been made public for everyone to know, and since even the strongest networks have all experience one breakdown or another, what is stabila doing to prevent this from happening when the ecosystem start growing and more projects start using this network!

And do you really think you can build a scam free network? how exactly do you intend to achieve that because in this space ones there is a hype be it on a project or niche people wants to take advantage and that includes scammers,
will stabila verify every projects that wants to use the network, if so how you intend to achieve that?

[stabilastb]

Comparing stabila network with ethereum network won't give a proper record until stabila has been able to prove it can provide all these services and handle them smoothly as mentioned in the whitepaper, stabila has no projects in its ecosystem yet so it is possible it can process such high transaction per second compare to eth that has thousands of projects using the smart contract,
So the big question is what will make new projects to use stabila instead of the rest alternatives, sol, polygon, polkadot, avalanch, tron already provide cheap transaction fees and good service, what is different with stabila network.

Thank you. I can say your question is essential in the sense of signaling genuine, meaningful, and necessarily-ongoing inquiries. These are grapple-worthy, substantive questions that not only require wrestling with but are worth wrestling with, that could lead users to some critical insight.

"So the big question is what will make new projects to use stabila instead of the rest alternatives, sol, polygon, polkadot, avalanch, tron already provide cheap transaction fees and good service, what is different with stabila network."

First of all, it is people's choice. Why have to choose from many yogurts if there is greek yogurt. Why have to choose from many brands when there is one initial brand?

Now talking about brands. Every brand distinguishes itself with certain elements like quality, style, price, etc...
  
The Solana blockchain has suffered an outage for the third time in a matter of months. It is unclear whether the issue was a simple network failure because of high traffic or collapsed because of hackers' distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack. Reports indicate other developers are dissatisfied with the drop in confidence Solana's repeated glitches have caused, complaining of a lack of transparency at the decision-making and at protocol developers' group Solana Labs and expressing frustration that new problems keep appearing. Words like "reboot," "downtime," "transaction failure," and "hard restart" generate terrible press and are not the ones people want to see as they are prepared to inject millions of dollars into a relatively new, fast-growing blockchain financial system.

Ethereum has many problems, and apparently, they will be fixing those problems over six years. They will not recover as their system is old, heavy, and not fit to change. Vitalik Buterin considers the personnel working with Ethereum as a bigger problem than the actual software, as he stated in a recent interview. While the personnel working on the project may or may not be problematic, it is undoubtedly not the only shortcoming. The new rollout and software upgrades will not solve the long-term problems plaguing the network from reaching leadership again. They will slowly fade away, the same as Polaroid did some time ago.

The whole Plkadot ecosystem revolves around money. Those who have more money (DOT) control everything in this blockchain. Ultimately many support the theory - it will fail.

Avalanche has its issues like transactions may be delayed if validators do not agree on the status. There is no liveness guarantee where conflicting transactions are concerned.

Tron is printing TRX out of thin air, worse than Federal Reserve does lately. TRX is minted out of nowhere, and the chain is not decentralized; versa, it is under totalitarian control. It is a dangerous game for its supporters or users.

Finally, the fraud on these blockchains is epic. Moreover, no one seems to have an interest in stopping that. It just raises questions about the actual stuff going on behind the scenes.

Stabila niche choice is :
Fraud & Scam Free
Financial Instruments

And Yes, I do agree Stabila needs a proper record and should not compare to ethereum until stabila has been able to prove it can provide all these services and handle them smoothly. The comparison was based on Stabila tests. Nevertheless, let us wait for the Defi ecosystem to be deployed in the nearest future. We shall get the answers very soon.  

Well thanks for the detailed explanation and am glad you brought up the issue solana blockchain recently encountered, although it is not very clear what was the cause of the outage but i want to believe it was as a result of a network failure not anything related to hack otherwise that would have been made public for everyone to know, and since even the strongest networks have all experience one breakdown or another, what is stabila doing to prevent this from happening when the ecosystem start growing and more projects start using this network!

And do you really think you can build a scam free network? how exactly do you intend to achieve that because in this space ones there is a hype be it on a project or niche people wants to take advantage and that includes scammers,
will stabila verify every projects that wants to use the network, if so how you intend to achieve that?

Solana just fixed a bug that could allow hackers to steal millions an hour. Rug pull and network exploits have dominated public opinion in the crypto industry. Defi applications have now lost more than $ 2 billion to such hacks.

At Stabila, we test first, review, test again, and only deploy if a safe consensus has been achieved.

Stabila will verify every project that wants to use the network.
Secondly, Stabila will stop fraudulent concept contracts, and mainly the issuance of useless tokens made to defraud people of their funds is a priority. The network governance has set up a smart contract deployment fee of 1000 STB to start with; this way, many scams are not even attempting to deploy. Licensing is a process of reviewing the concept of the contract, its economic bases, and utility, followed by KYC, AML, documents review, pretty much like a bank or financial organization does. Licensing filters 99% of scams and fraud.  

Many Defi projects are created with the idea of pulling assets together so the teams behind those projects will run away with those funds later.

Today 99% of tokens are useless. This asset class has no value unless it is a security token or is real-asset-backed. Asset backing comes in the form of crypto/fiat/securities/commodities. In most cases, asset backing is an official process. The token owner must register the issue with the securities commission or any other authority responsible for the instrument used. Stabila does not have all of this infrastructure yet, but the idea is to build it.

We all see BSC being the frontrunner of this fraud epidemic. People seem to enjoy pumping dollars into thin air. It is their right. However, when the disease starts to cure, people will start asking where their funds are gone and how they could fall for this. This wake-up process will probably lead to the search for genuine projects that actually do something to minimize fraud and scams.

As i know that Stabila (STB) didn’t listed on exchanges but in the stablia website price is up & down around 18$. Also showing 24 hours volume and total market cap. But i searched and i couldn’t found it CMC or Coingecko. That means STB token already trade on it’s own DEX?  

Coin Market Cap and Coin Geko are purely scamming websites only. They directly and knowingly manipulate the information of multiple listings. They falsify information, write, publish and promote blatant lies about coins/tokens to further that manipulation. There are no companies, and there are no teams behind these websites. Very comfortable if an investigation comes your way in the future. These websites are popular as people "Do not look up" to question what is the truth behind these websites.

Stabila price is based on the internal algorithm and its internal pool. It regulates according to demand and sales flow. Stabila will migrate to market pricing in Feb when trading on the exchange starts.

[Bitstar_coin]

Comparing stabila network with ethereum network won't give a proper record until stabila has been able to prove it can provide all these services and handle them smoothly as mentioned in the whitepaper, stabila has no projects in its ecosystem yet so it is possible it can process such high transaction per second compare to eth that has thousands of projects using the smart contract,
So the big question is what will make new projects to use stabila instead of the rest alternatives, sol, polygon, polkadot, avalanch, tron already provide cheap transaction fees and good service, what is different with stabila network.

Thank you. I can say your question is essential in the sense of signaling genuine, meaningful, and necessarily-ongoing inquiries. These are grapple-worthy, substantive questions that not only require wrestling with but are worth wrestling with, that could lead users to some critical insight.

"So the big question is what will make new projects to use stabila instead of the rest alternatives, sol, polygon, polkadot, avalanch, tron already provide cheap transaction fees and good service, what is different with stabila network."

First of all, it is people's choice. Why have to choose from many yogurts if there is greek yogurt. Why have to choose from many brands when there is one initial brand?

Now talking about brands. Every brand distinguishes itself with certain elements like quality, style, price, etc...
  
The Solana blockchain has suffered an outage for the third time in a matter of months. It is unclear whether the issue was a simple network failure because of high traffic or collapsed because of hackers' distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack. Reports indicate other developers are dissatisfied with the drop in confidence Solana's repeated glitches have caused, complaining of a lack of transparency at the decision-making and at protocol developers' group Solana Labs and expressing frustration that new problems keep appearing. Words like "reboot," "downtime," "transaction failure," and "hard restart" generate terrible press and are not the ones people want to see as they are prepared to inject millions of dollars into a relatively new, fast-growing blockchain financial system.

Ethereum has many problems, and apparently, they will be fixing those problems over six years. They will not recover as their system is old, heavy, and not fit to change. Vitalik Buterin considers the personnel working with Ethereum as a bigger problem than the actual software, as he stated in a recent interview. While the personnel working on the project may or may not be problematic, it is undoubtedly not the only shortcoming. The new rollout and software upgrades will not solve the long-term problems plaguing the network from reaching leadership again. They will slowly fade away, the same as Polaroid did some time ago.

The whole Plkadot ecosystem revolves around money. Those who have more money (DOT) control everything in this blockchain. Ultimately many support the theory - it will fail.

Avalanche has its issues like transactions may be delayed if validators do not agree on the status. There is no liveness guarantee where conflicting transactions are concerned.

Tron is printing TRX out of thin air, worse than Federal Reserve does lately. TRX is minted out of nowhere, and the chain is not decentralized; versa, it is under totalitarian control. It is a dangerous game for its supporters or users.

Finally, the fraud on these blockchains is epic. Moreover, no one seems to have an interest in stopping that. It just raises questions about the actual stuff going on behind the scenes.

Stabila niche choice is :
Fraud & Scam Free
Financial Instruments

And Yes, I do agree Stabila needs a proper record and should not compare to ethereum until stabila has been able to prove it can provide all these services and handle them smoothly. The comparison was based on Stabila tests. Nevertheless, let us wait for the Defi ecosystem to be deployed in the nearest future. We shall get the answers very soon.  

Well thanks for the detailed explanation and am glad you brought up the issue solana blockchain recently encountered, although it is not very clear what was the cause of the outage but i want to believe it was as a result of a network failure not anything related to hack otherwise that would have been made public for everyone to know, and since even the strongest networks have all experience one breakdown or another, what is stabila doing to prevent this from happening when the ecosystem start growing and more projects start using this network!

And do you really think you can build a scam free network? how exactly do you intend to achieve that because in this space ones there is a hype be it on a project or niche people wants to take advantage and that includes scammers,
will stabila verify every projects that wants to use the network, if so how you intend to achieve that?

Solana just fixed a bug that could allow hackers to steal millions an hour. Rug pull and network exploits have dominated public opinion in the crypto industry. Defi applications have now lost more than $ 2 billion to such hacks.

At Stabila, we test first, review, test again, and only deploy if a safe consensus has been achieved.

Stabila will verify every project that wants to use the network.
Secondly, Stabila will stop fraudulent concept contracts, and mainly the issuance of useless tokens made to defraud people of their funds is a priority. The network governance has set up a smart contract deployment fee of 1000 STB to start with; this way, many scams are not even attempting to deploy. Licensing is a process of reviewing the concept of the contract, its economic bases, and utility, followed by KYC, AML, documents review, pretty much like a bank or financial organization does. Licensing filters 99% of scams and fraud.  

Many Defi projects are created with the idea of pulling assets together so the teams behind those projects will run away with those funds later.

Today 99% of tokens are useless. This asset class has no value unless it is a security token or is real-asset-backed. Asset backing comes in the form of crypto/fiat/securities/commodities. In most cases, asset backing is an official process. The token owner must register the issue with the securities commission or any other authority responsible for the instrument used. Stabila does not have all of this infrastructure yet, but the idea is to build it.

We all see BSC being the frontrunner of this fraud epidemic. People seem to enjoy pumping dollars into thin air. It is their right. However, when the disease starts to cure, people will start asking where their funds are gone and how they could fall for this. This wake-up process will probably lead to the search for genuine projects that actually do something to minimize fraud and scams.

As i know that Stabila (STB) didn’t listed on exchanges but in the stablia website price is up & down around 18$. Also showing 24 hours volume and total market cap. But i searched and i couldn’t found it CMC or Coingecko. That means STB token already trade on it’s own DEX?  

Coin Market Cap and Coin Geko are purely scamming websites only. They directly and knowingly manipulate the information of multiple listings. They falsify information, write, publish and promote blatant lies about coins/tokens to further that manipulation. There are no companies, and there are no teams behind these websites. Very comfortable if an investigation comes your way in the future. These websites are popular as people "Do not look up" to question what is the truth behind these websites.

Stabila price is based on the internal algorithm and its internal pool. It regulates according to demand and sales flow. Stabila will migrate to market pricing in Feb when trading on the exchange starts.

Good to know someone is thinking along this line because the growing rate of useless and scam projects is very alarming, if we want sanity in the crypto space then it is important that strict process of verification are implemented for proper sanitization, now talking about this verification on the stabila network, will it be an automated process or will it be somewhat manual?
1000 stb just to deploy smart contract in current price is quite a lot (more than $16,000) definitely no scam project would want to pay such a huge amount of money, only a real project with dedication and commitment will follow this procedure,

Your opinion on cmc and coingecko seem rather strong, they are your opinion but you do realize that majority of crypto community access these sites for clue of their investment decisions and several other stuffs, for stb to gain exposure as it start trading on the open exchange will require listing on these platforms, have you thought about this?

And talking about asset backing, what is stabila backed on and will you follow the process you mentioned above?

[stabilastb]

Comparing stabila network with ethereum network won't give a proper record until stabila has been able to prove it can provide all these services and handle them smoothly as mentioned in the whitepaper, stabila has no projects in its ecosystem yet so it is possible it can process such high transaction per second compare to eth that has thousands of projects using the smart contract,
So the big question is what will make new projects to use stabila instead of the rest alternatives, sol, polygon, polkadot, avalanch, tron already provide cheap transaction fees and good service, what is different with stabila network.

Thank you. I can say your question is essential in the sense of signaling genuine, meaningful, and necessarily-ongoing inquiries. These are grapple-worthy, substantive questions that not only require wrestling with but are worth wrestling with, that could lead users to some critical insight.

"So the big question is what will make new projects to use stabila instead of the rest alternatives, sol, polygon, polkadot, avalanch, tron already provide cheap transaction fees and good service, what is different with stabila network."

First of all, it is people's choice. Why have to choose from many yogurts if there is greek yogurt. Why have to choose from many brands when there is one initial brand?

Now talking about brands. Every brand distinguishes itself with certain elements like quality, style, price, etc...
  
The Solana blockchain has suffered an outage for the third time in a matter of months. It is unclear whether the issue was a simple network failure because of high traffic or collapsed because of hackers' distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack. Reports indicate other developers are dissatisfied with the drop in confidence Solana's repeated glitches have caused, complaining of a lack of transparency at the decision-making and at protocol developers' group Solana Labs and expressing frustration that new problems keep appearing. Words like "reboot," "downtime," "transaction failure," and "hard restart" generate terrible press and are not the ones people want to see as they are prepared to inject millions of dollars into a relatively new, fast-growing blockchain financial system.

Ethereum has many problems, and apparently, they will be fixing those problems over six years. They will not recover as their system is old, heavy, and not fit to change. Vitalik Buterin considers the personnel working with Ethereum as a bigger problem than the actual software, as he stated in a recent interview. While the personnel working on the project may or may not be problematic, it is undoubtedly not the only shortcoming. The new rollout and software upgrades will not solve the long-term problems plaguing the network from reaching leadership again. They will slowly fade away, the same as Polaroid did some time ago.

The whole Plkadot ecosystem revolves around money. Those who have more money (DOT) control everything in this blockchain. Ultimately many support the theory - it will fail.

Avalanche has its issues like transactions may be delayed if validators do not agree on the status. There is no liveness guarantee where conflicting transactions are concerned.

Tron is printing TRX out of thin air, worse than Federal Reserve does lately. TRX is minted out of nowhere, and the chain is not decentralized; versa, it is under totalitarian control. It is a dangerous game for its supporters or users.

Finally, the fraud on these blockchains is epic. Moreover, no one seems to have an interest in stopping that. It just raises questions about the actual stuff going on behind the scenes.

Stabila niche choice is :
Fraud & Scam Free
Financial Instruments

And Yes, I do agree Stabila needs a proper record and should not compare to ethereum until stabila has been able to prove it can provide all these services and handle them smoothly. The comparison was based on Stabila tests. Nevertheless, let us wait for the Defi ecosystem to be deployed in the nearest future. We shall get the answers very soon.  

Well thanks for the detailed explanation and am glad you brought up the issue solana blockchain recently encountered, although it is not very clear what was the cause of the outage but i want to believe it was as a result of a network failure not anything related to hack otherwise that would have been made public for everyone to know, and since even the strongest networks have all experience one breakdown or another, what is stabila doing to prevent this from happening when the ecosystem start growing and more projects start using this network!

And do you really think you can build a scam free network? how exactly do you intend to achieve that because in this space ones there is a hype be it on a project or niche people wants to take advantage and that includes scammers,
will stabila verify every projects that wants to use the network, if so how you intend to achieve that?

Solana just fixed a bug that could allow hackers to steal millions an hour. Rug pull and network exploits have dominated public opinion in the crypto industry. Defi applications have now lost more than $ 2 billion to such hacks.

At Stabila, we test first, review, test again, and only deploy if a safe consensus has been achieved.

Stabila will verify every project that wants to use the network.
Secondly, Stabila will stop fraudulent concept contracts, and mainly the issuance of useless tokens made to defraud people of their funds is a priority. The network governance has set up a smart contract deployment fee of 1000 STB to start with; this way, many scams are not even attempting to deploy. Licensing is a process of reviewing the concept of the contract, its economic bases, and utility, followed by KYC, AML, documents review, pretty much like a bank or financial organization does. Licensing filters 99% of scams and fraud.  

Many Defi projects are created with the idea of pulling assets together so the teams behind those projects will run away with those funds later.

Today 99% of tokens are useless. This asset class has no value unless it is a security token or is real-asset-backed. Asset backing comes in the form of crypto/fiat/securities/commodities. In most cases, asset backing is an official process. The token owner must register the issue with the securities commission or any other authority responsible for the instrument used. Stabila does not have all of this infrastructure yet, but the idea is to build it.

We all see BSC being the frontrunner of this fraud epidemic. People seem to enjoy pumping dollars into thin air. It is their right. However, when the disease starts to cure, people will start asking where their funds are gone and how they could fall for this. This wake-up process will probably lead to the search for genuine projects that actually do something to minimize fraud and scams.

As i know that Stabila (STB) didn’t listed on exchanges but in the stablia website price is up & down around 18$. Also showing 24 hours volume and total market cap. But i searched and i couldn’t found it CMC or Coingecko. That means STB token already trade on it’s own DEX?  

Coin Market Cap and Coin Geko are purely scamming websites only. They directly and knowingly manipulate the information of multiple listings. They falsify information, write, publish and promote blatant lies about coins/tokens to further that manipulation. There are no companies, and there are no teams behind these websites. Very comfortable if an investigation comes your way in the future. These websites are popular as people "Do not look up" to question what is the truth behind these websites.

Stabila price is based on the internal algorithm and its internal pool. It regulates according to demand and sales flow. Stabila will migrate to market pricing in Feb when trading on the exchange starts.

Good to know someone is thinking along this line because the growing rate of useless and scam projects is very alarming, if we want sanity in the crypto space then it is important that strict process of verification are implemented for proper sanitization, now talking about this verification on the stabila network, will it be an automated process or will it be somewhat manual?
1000 stb just to deploy smart contract in current price is quite a lot (more than $16,000) definitely no scam project would want to pay such a huge amount of money, only a real project with dedication and commitment will follow this procedure,

Your opinion on cmc and coingecko seem rather strong, they are your opinion but you do realize that majority of crypto community access these sites for clue of their investment decisions and several other stuffs, for stb to gain exposure as it start trading on the open exchange will require listing on these platforms, have you thought about this?

And talking about asset backing, what is stabila backed on and will you follow the process you mentioned above?

Opinion on CMC and CG: It is not my opinion and it is not an opinion. It is a proven fact. You are free to read reviews and make your own investigations. Many people rely on these services because there is no other or they don't look at correct or legitimate sources. It's their choice only. If they base investment decisions on what CMC and CG tell them, no wonder fraud is thriving, it only makes them make wrong decisions. LOL  
  
For STB to gain exposure as it starts trading on the open exchange will require listing on these platforms, have you thought about this?
There are no authorities to require listing on any websites! There is no consensus on where to list. The industry is not regulated and has no serious or trustworthy teams to fix that. Most probably there is no interest doing that otherwise there will be threads and discussions about that)

And talking about asset backing, it relates to tokens only as all tokens claim to be something or carry some sort of value. Stabila is a coin and is backed by its own technology, like ETH or BTC.

[mdzahed134]

As i know that Stabila (STB) didn’t listed on exchanges but in the stablia website price is up & down around 18$. Also showing 24 hours volume and total market cap. But i searched and i couldn’t found it CMC or Coingecko. That means STB token already trade on it’s own DEX?  

Coin Market Cap and Coin Geko are purely scamming websites only. They directly and knowingly manipulate the information of multiple listings. They falsify information, write, publish and promote blatant lies about coins/tokens to further that manipulation. There are no companies, and there are no teams behind these websites. Very comfortable if an investigation comes your way in the future. These websites are popular as people "Do not look up" to question what is the truth behind these websites.

Stabila price is based on the internal algorithm and its internal pool. It regulates according to demand and sales flow. Stabila will migrate to market pricing in Feb when trading on the exchange starts.

I'm not agree with you. Because i know that those coin tracking website can't provide real data always that means those aren’t scam or something like that. All of crypto fans have to check their coins price movement and many things through these sites. So i think a project will not be fulfill without listed on those sites.

[24Kt]

As i know that Stabila (STB) didn’t listed on exchanges but in the stablia website price is up & down around 18$. Also showing 24 hours volume and total market cap. But i searched and i couldn’t found it CMC or Coingecko. That means STB token already trade on it’s own DEX?  

Coin Market Cap and Coin Geko are purely scamming websites only. They directly and knowingly manipulate the information of multiple listings. They falsify information, write, publish and promote blatant lies about coins/tokens to further that manipulation. There are no companies, and there are no teams behind these websites. Very comfortable if an investigation comes your way in the future. These websites are popular as people "Do not look up" to question what is the truth behind these websites.

Stabila price is based on the internal algorithm and its internal pool. It regulates according to demand and sales flow. Stabila will migrate to market pricing in Feb when trading on the exchange starts.

I'm not agree with you. Because i know that those coin tracking website can't provide real data always that means those aren’t scam or something like that. All of crypto fans have to check their coins price movement and many things through these sites. So i think a project will not be fulfill without listed on those sites.

Same here. I don't agree that cmc or coingecko are scam sites because they are just tracking websites depending on the market's API provided. So if you want actual figures, you can always go to the trading platform itself. But to get an overview of the coin, these sites are actually helpful. And don't understand why he is labeling this as scam site. 
We will see in the coming month, how STB will perform in the market as expected it will be in the trading market. I hope no pump and dump will happen here.

[Bitstar_coin]

What is the current price on STB? When you are gonna list in exchange?

Here is a link to the official Website where you can find the current price https://stabilascan.org/  the price is $18 according to the site but not on any exchange yet, base on my previous discussion with the team, listing will be around February I don't know of any specific date, you should probably join their official Telegram for more information regarding that.

How can I buy token? Is it now tradable?

You can buy from the website if you already register an account, there is an option to with eth, btc or usdt although am not seeing any deposit option, the team can explain better.

[stabilastb]

Don't think to verify a transaction 60 seconds is too much when XRP, Steller and other take less than 4-5 sec? When we all need more transaction with less possible time then it's might a disadvantage.

An XRP transaction takes 3-7 seconds to process and over 2 minutes to get to a solidified state. Ripple is a centralized system, so it is a disgrace to process a transaction so long. For a centralized system, a transaction should be below 1 sec if considering high volumes and less than 80 millisec at the current state. They do not have a consensus, so basically, their servers only process transactions. I wonder what would happen if they switched to decentralized? They would process in 6-9 hours, worse than Ethereum. Moreover, if you compare their servers' power, you would question why their system is so slow.
 
A Stellar Lumens (XLM) transfer takes 3-5 seconds and 3-4 hours to get to the solidified state. Recently, blockchain-powered network Stellar stopped confirming transactions for more than one hour, effectively going offline. Stellar's major issue has now been highlighted publicly: The project is not decentralized, at least not to the extent expected at this point. Same story as Ripple.


An STB transaction takes 3 seconds to process and 56 seconds to get to solidified state. Decentralized environment.

[Gash]

1 sec transactions are common for blockchains that provide DAPP or DEX functionality meaning services that depend on confirmation times do not get stuck while processing on-chain things. XRP is just a corporate sissy pissy scam, they havent evolved since 2015. Their transactions contain nothing but bloat from bots they run to fake the network activity. I do not get why you compare yourself with Solana. Solana got network effect and a passel of investor money stacked in. They are incentivized to protect themselves against these failures like none other. Do not worry for them.

[Theones]

Quickly going through the website I came to conclusion that its just another p2p cash transfer platform (correct me if I am wrong). OP can you tell reason for launching such platform, as we already have many of such platforms in the market?

[og kush420]

In DPoS there are 21 governors. It means if anyone want to compromise the blockchain  then he can do that clearly by adding his 15 to 16 governers. DPoS is still in its early days or its a mature consensus algorithm like PoS or Pow?

You got it wrong my friend, its not that easy to launch 51% attack on DPoS algorithm. There will be 21 governors at the moment not that there are 21 total governors. There is a pool of nodes from which 21 are randomly selected as governor at the time. So its secure not sure how much secure. Thats wt my understanding is about DPoS.

[stabilastb]

1 sec transactions are common for blockchains that provide DAPP or DEX functionality meaning services that depend on confirmation times do not get stuck while processing on-chain things. XRP is just a corporate sissy pissy scam, they havent evolved since 2015. Their transactions contain nothing but bloat from bots they run to fake the network activity. I do not get why you compare yourself with Solana. Solana got network effect and a passel of investor money stacked in. They are incentivized to protect themselves against these failures like none other. Do not worry for them.

Yeah, right))))
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/02/320-million-stolen-from-wormhole-bridge-linking-solana-and-ethereum.html