💙Allstarsbet101.com 💙 - More than 2000 Titles | Crypto + Fiat

[Saleem-Allstars]

I havent created an account, but looking at how the slot contest participant post their entries in the thread, it seems that the username is taken from the personal information (real name). What I do not understand is when allstarsbet said that players can fill "address" with anything (I assume we can fill all the information randomly). I think it may make a problem in the future once further check is needed. Lets say I create an account and fill the data which is not the same with my real identity, upload my documents and it is approved automatically as OP said. One day I played and lucky enough to win big (over the KYC limit), I'm sure there will be further check for my account and they may see that my information as filled in the account is not the same as in the document. What will happen next? Will my big win be confiscated because I put random personal information which is not the same as what is in my ID card?

We can't say for sure but it will definitely be a bit problematic if that happens you can't defend yourself because it's your own fault
Usually on other sites KYC is applied when your withdrawal reaches a certain limit not at the beginning maybe Allstarsbet101 can consider it even though we know the decision is in their hands.

Somehow, that will create suspicion as you do not use your real identity and will end you by freezing your account. At that time, we will have difficulty proving ourselves since we are doing the wrong thing from the beginning.

If a small gambler needs to fill KYC, even if that is automatic, it is not easy for us who do not use too big money to gamble to send the document. But I will not have a problem if the KYC limitations are somehow increased to 3,000 USD/EURO, so they need to fill KYC. I agree with @Bitinity's suggestion to change the KYC from mandatory to optional so many gamblers can register on your site.

No, thats not true. You completely made up a whole scenario in your head. How do you know what we require as proof of ID for KYC? how do you what the policies for freezing an account are. My point is if you are not comfortable putting your own address, then just dont do it. We understand the need for privacy.

The KYC limits are for anything above 3,000 USD/EURO as i mentioned earlier. You will still need to get in touch with support so we can avoid duplicate account scams. It is a very fair and prudent approach in my opinion.

[udidrone]

The KYC limits are for anything above 3,000 USD/EURO as i mentioned earlier. You will still need to get in touch with support so we can avoid duplicate account scams. It is a very fair and prudent approach in my opinion.

Well at least this confirmation will answer the doubts of those who want to create an account here and this is a general rule in some casinos
Another concern is, can you enable usernames/UID for each user? so it doesn't have to display the real name most people don't like it. It would be better if there was a username/UID .

[Wiwo]

Let me briefly pen down my observation on the KYC requirement on casinos, many players will prefer to remain anonymous for as long as possible and with no limit to what there can withdraw from the site, and according to the admin statement KYC requirement is for a withdrawal above $3k which may sound good to some small players that will bet with a small amount but don't you want to see big whales playing on your site you is it that the big players don't care about KYC.
Just my thoughts anyways but in whichever ways I wish you guys good luck

[panjul07]

The KYC limits are for anything above 3,000 USD/EURO as i mentioned earlier. You will still need to get in touch with support so we can avoid duplicate account scams. It is a very fair and prudent approach in my opinion.

Well at least this confirmation will answer the doubts of those who want to create an account here and this is a general rule in some casinos
Another concern is, can you enable usernames/UID for each user? so it doesn't have to display the real name most people don't like it. It would be better if there was a username/UID .

I just do not get the idea of "get in touch with support" to avoid duplicate accounts.
Is this even possible to detect multiple accounts by contacting support?
Sorry for asking as it is the first time I heard such way to avoid multi accounts.
Coming up to the username/UID, yes it is inconvenience for most people to have their real name as their username.
There should be an option to create username as player wish.

[Saleem-Allstars]

The KYC limits are for anything above 3,000 USD/EURO as i mentioned earlier. You will still need to get in touch with support so we can avoid duplicate account scams. It is a very fair and prudent approach in my opinion.

Well at least this confirmation will answer the doubts of those who want to create an account here and this is a general rule in some casinos
Another concern is, can you enable usernames/UID for each user? so it doesn't have to display the real name most people don't like it. It would be better if there was a username/UID .

I just do not get the idea of "get in touch with support" to avoid duplicate accounts.
Is this even possible to detect multiple accounts by contacting support?
Sorry for asking as it is the first time I heard such way to avoid multi accounts.
Coming up to the username/UID, yes it is inconvenience for most people to have their real name as their username.
There should be an option to create username as player wish.

Yes it is possible. You would be surprised at how similar the same users email addresses tend to be. We have already stopped a few. Obviously there would be a few who bypass this manual check but hey, at least its more business for us

[Saleem-Allstars]

Let me briefly pen down my observation on the KYC requirement on casinos, many players will prefer to remain anonymous for as long as possible and with no limit to what there can withdraw from the site, and according to the admin statement KYC requirement is for a withdrawal above $3k which may sound good to some small players that will bet with a small amount but don't you want to see big whales playing on your site you is it that the big players don't care about KYC.
Just my thoughts anyways but in whichever ways I wish you guys good luck

Thank you for your kind words. I always preferred having the smaller players than any big whales come on the site. Higher volume with lower risk in my opinion is a better way to run a business. But KYC is definitley pushing more buttons than i thought it would

[Wiwo]

Thank you for your kind words. I always preferred having the smaller players than any big whales come on the site. Higher volume with lower risk in my opinion is a better way to run a business. But KYC is definitley pushing more buttons than i thought it would

Oh that nice to focus on the small players rather than the whales and using the kyc requirement to push that buttons may likely drive the small players away also since many players most especially from this forum kick against KYC because we value anonymous/privacy. Anyways once again I wish you all the best in this journey.

[Shamm]

Let me briefly pen down my observation on the KYC requirement on casinos, many players will prefer to remain anonymous for as long as possible and with no limit to what there can withdraw from the site, and according to the admin statement KYC requirement is for a withdrawal above $3k which may sound good to some small players that will bet with a small amount but don't you want to see big whales playing on your site you is it that the big players don't care about KYC.
Just my thoughts anyways but in whichever ways I wish you guys good luck

Thank you for your kind words. I always preferred having the smaller players than any big whales come on the site. Higher volume with lower risk in my opinion is a better way to run a business. But KYC is definitley pushing more buttons than i thought it would

That's a great choice op that for now you should prefer the smaller players in your casino/ sites than choosing bog whales in your sites. And about the KYC some big players or gamblers choose always anonymous and did not give some private information about them and we can not force then to do that cause the privacy of the user is better to hide.

[Wiwo]

That's a great choice op that for now you should prefer the smaller players in your casino/ sites than choosing bog whales in your sites. And about the KYC some big players or gamblers choose always anonymous and did not give some private information about them and we can not force them to do that cause the privacy of the user is better to hide.

Yeah most especially now that the casino is just building up with new community members small players will give more feedback easily than the whales since the whale's players only come for the winning, most small players just play for fun that way they can easily point out any shortfall in the system that need to be fixed by the team.

[MonsterV]

That's a great choice op that for now you should prefer the smaller players in your casino/ sites than choosing bog whales in your sites. And about the KYC some big players or gamblers choose always anonymous and did not give some private information about them and we can not force them to do that cause the privacy of the user is better to hide.

Yeah most especially now that the casino is just building up with new community members small players will give more feedback easily than the whales since the whale's players only come for the winning, most small players just play for fun that way they can easily point out any shortfall in the system that need to be fixed by the team.

Whales that come naturally play on the site. It is first more important to establish a good foundation and to gain a solid reputation on the forum. That can take a while, but it can also happen very quickly. Players will monitor all topics to make sure there are no issues with the site. If payouts are processed quickly without any problems and accounts are not closed, you can build a solid foundation with a good reputation fairly quickly. And also important to continue to communicate with customers about certain comments or comments, that is always appreciated on the forum.

[udidrone]

Thank you for your kind words. I always preferred having the smaller players than any big whales come on the site. Higher volume with lower risk in my opinion is a better way to run a business. But KYC is definitley pushing more buttons than i thought it would

Oh that nice to focus on the small players rather than the whales and using the kyc requirement to push that buttons may likely drive the small players away also since many players most especially from this forum kick against KYC because we value anonymous/privacy. Anyways once again I wish you all the best in this journey.

If have to choose almost all casinos will remove the KYC system but they can't do anything because it's a rule in some countries then to overcome this limit is applied
I've also seen some casinos take the risk of not doing KYC but I think they have prepared all the possibilities and Allstars Bet101 don't want to take the same action

[Wiwo]

Thank you for your kind words. I always preferred having the smaller players than any big whales come on the site. Higher volume with lower risk in my opinion is a better way to run a business. But KYC is definitley pushing more buttons than i thought it would

Oh that nice to focus on the small players rather than the whales and using the kyc requirement to push that buttons may likely drive the small players away also since many players most especially from this forum kick against KYC because we value anonymous/privacy. Anyways once again I wish you all the best in this journey.

I have to choose almost all casinos will remove the KYC system but they can't do anything because it's a rule in some countries than to overcome this limit is applied
I've also seen some casinos take the risk of not doing KYC but I think they have prepared all the possibilities and Allstars Bet101 don't want to take the same action

You are right KYC is mandatory for regulatory compliance casinos and before the are issued license they have to abide by the KYC rule, which is very understandable, just like it is in using centralized exchange a user must pass through the KYC process to get the account verified I know this is an anti-money laundering law and is fine.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Thank you for your kind words. I always preferred having the smaller players than any big whales come on the site. Higher volume with lower risk in my opinion is a better way to run a business. But KYC is definitley pushing more buttons than i thought it would

Oh that nice to focus on the small players rather than the whales and using the kyc requirement to push that buttons may likely drive the small players away also since many players most especially from this forum kick against KYC because we value anonymous/privacy. Anyways once again I wish you all the best in this journey.

I have to choose almost all casinos will remove the KYC system but they can't do anything because it's a rule in some countries than to overcome this limit is applied
I've also seen some casinos take the risk of not doing KYC but I think they have prepared all the possibilities and Allstars Bet101 don't want to take the same action

You are right KYC is mandatory for regulatory compliance casinos and before the are issued license they have to abide by the KYC rule, which is very understandable, just like it is in using centralized exchange a user must pass through the KYC process to get the account verified I know this is an anti-money laundering law and is fine.

Many things about the casino seem good to me here, and that is that they take into account the importance of players who do not consider themselves whales, and this is something great, because in a conglomerate of games there are more small players than whales, this will always be true, Based on this, I don't quite understand the requirements that talk about No KYC and KYC compliance, I understand that there is KYC and that you can request additional data if the casino decides at a certain time that they consider it necessary, but When you talk about elimination, do you mean that you are considering eliminating KYC completely?

[Saleem-Allstars]

Guys I've been MIA trying to get the KYC out of the way for all crypto players.

FINALLY, its done. No KYC requirements for all and any crypto players on the site.

In the progress of updating the T&Cs on the site so bear with me until i get that done.

Appreciate your support in making Allstars Bet (finally) a crypto friendly platform

Thanks 

[Mahdirakib]

~snip~

Your website still have the requirement of level 1 KYC verification in the second step of registration page. How you have removed the KYC verification for crypto players? If you really want to describe it as ‘No KYC' for crypto players then you have to remove the mandatory level 1 verification system from the sign-up option. I'm wondering how you will run your casino without the KYC verification requirement while you are licensed from Curacao gambling operator!

[Solosanz]

Your website still have the requirement of level 1 KYC verification in the second step of registration page. How you have removed the KYC verification for crypto players? If you really want to describe it as ‘No KYC' for crypto players then you have to remove the mandatory level 1 verification system from the sign-up option. I'm wondering how you will run your casino without the KYC verification requirement while you are licensed from Curacao gambling operator!

I thought they really remove the KYC requirement, but well since they still ask KYC on the second step, they're lying about their words. I think this casino should be marked because they're not genuine and professional, perhaps they announce this to attract gamblers to visit their site. I never see a casino offer no KYC under curacao license, I'm sure KYC is mandatory and they reserve the right to ask when they feel suspicious, that's not NO KYC.

[Nrcewker]

Guys I've been MIA trying to get the KYC out of the way for all crypto players.

FINALLY, its done. No KYC requirements for all and any crypto players on the site.

In the progress of updating the T&Cs on the site so bear with me until i get that done.

Appreciate your support in making Allstars Bet (finally) a crypto friendly platform

Thanks 

Glad to hear that you have listened the members here and made the changes accordingly.
There are still some doubts regarding withdrawals.
The withdraws aren’t instant right? I mean you guys check for multi accounts and then process the withdraw manually?
Also I have seen few days back you guys have mentioned some partnership with another payment getaway company for withdrawals. So how does this work? You guys give green signal after manually checking withdraw amount and then send green signal to the other company to process the withdraw?
This might be long hectic thing as a Gambler I feel, can’t you guys manage it all by yourself?

[Strongkored]

Guys I've been MIA trying to get the KYC out of the way for all crypto players.

FINALLY, its done. No KYC requirements for all and any crypto players on the site.

But this shouldn't be necessary at the time of registration if your Casino has completely removed the KYC terms


maybe there is no problem with having to fill in the date of birth, but when registrant should fill the home address and telephone number it has entered the KYC section, even though players can use fake data but still players must be careful if one day get accuse because of suspicious activity it will be put players account in trouble.

[stomachgrowls]

Your website still have the requirement of level 1 KYC verification in the second step of registration page. How you have removed the KYC verification for crypto players? If you really want to describe it as ‘No KYC' for crypto players then you have to remove the mandatory level 1 verification system from the sign-up option. I'm wondering how you will run your casino without the KYC verification requirement while you are licensed from Curacao gambling operator!

I thought they really remove the KYC requirement, but well since they still ask KYC on the second step, they're lying about their words. I think this casino should be marked because they're not genuine and professional, perhaps they announce this to attract gamblers to visit their site. I never see a casino offer no KYC under curacao license, I'm sure KYC is mandatory and they reserve the right to ask when they feel suspicious, that's not NO KYC.

As a gambler then you could always opt on putting false information if you do really need to play on a certain site or you are eager on doing it but its not recommendable yet we know on what would be the

hassle when it comes to those times which you do really need to have some verification thats would be the time you would be fucking up yourself.We do have lots of casinos that doesnt ask out KYC

and most of the time where platforms do really ask about this is into those platforms which are fiat casinos that had adopted or accepted crypto recently.

[khaled0111]

Guys I've been MIA trying to get the KYC out of the way for all crypto players.

FINALLY, its done. No KYC requirements for all and any crypto players on the site.

Welcome back Saleem-Allstars. We understand that you have been busy working on developing your casino and fixing staff but your latest post was like three months ago which, in my opinion, is not good if you want to keep this thread alive and active. If your account remain inactive for a long time, users will start asking questions about how serious you are and this is something you don't want to happen.
Regarding kyc, are you going to remove the level-1 verification requirement too?