PFizer destroyed in this video. Watch only if you can calculate

[Skybuck]

Video:

https://rumble.com/vqx3kb-the-pfizer-inoculations-do-more-harm-than-good.html

Definitions from website:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK63647/

From table 18.1 link:

"
Relative risk (RR)
the rate (risk) of poor outcomes in the intervention group divided by the rate of poor outcomes in the control group. For example, if the rate of poor outcomes is 20 per cent in the intervention group and 30 per cent in the control group, the relative risk is 0.67 (20 per cent divided by 30 per cent). The relative risk is 1 when the intervention has no effect, below 1 when it does good and above 1 when it does harm (see Absolute risk reduction).
"

"
Relative risk reduction (RRR)
the extent to which the risk of a poor outcome is reduced by an intervention. In the example given in Relative risk (above), the relative risk r
"

"
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) or risk difference
the difference in the incidence of poor outcomes between the intervention group of a study and the control group. For example, if 20 per cent of people die in the intervention group and 30 per cent in the control group, the ARR is 10 per cent (30–20 per cent).
"

Performed calculation:

162 / 18325 = 0,00884038199181446111869031377899 * 100 = 0,88403819918144611186903137789905

8 / 18198 = 0,00043960874821408946038026156720519e-4 = 0,04396087482140894603802615672052

rr = 0,04396087482140894603802615672052 / 0,88403819918144611186903137789905 = 0,0497273475989085763053598346854
rrr = 1 - 0,0497273475989085763053598346854 = 0,9502726524010914236946401653146 * 100 = 95,02726524010914236946401653146% = RRR

absolute = % die in normal=control group   - % of intervention group

Let's suppose all covid cases 162 and 8 die because of futher lack of info then:
absolute risk reduction = 0.88 - 0.04 = 0,841

So the video checks out, only 1 procent risk reduction.

However it gets more interesting later on in the video because the vaccines have side effects and actually destroys health and kills people.

Long story short it seems to be the vaccine does more harm than good !

Watch video yourself ! I only watch first part up to this calculation point but I will watch the rest as well.

Now you know why USA grants this SCAM Company Immunity during Emergency Situation.

As soon as Emergency Situation is gone, vaccinations will/most stop or this Company goes bankrupt in law suits !

Thus incentive for control freaks to lengthen the Emergency Situation.

(Save your life, enjoy your bitcoins !)

[1714998824]

1714998824

[1714998824]

1714998824

[1714998824]

1714998824

[xminer]

There's just one thing I don't understand.

We live in 21st century. DNA analysis costs under $100, anyone can do it (those 23andme and other services). Maybe "enhanced" processing will cost significantly more - raising total cost to $150-200 but still that's affordable.

So WTF we still use this "statistics" thing instead of studying "what does affect the outcome", linking positive and "side" effects to our genes and getting realistic predictions individually?

Most of people who jump with parachute end up well - 2% is "typical/acceptable losses" figure during military training. But I don't think everyone will agree to jump even for free if he understands he can be in that 2% figure.

[Skybuck]

2% loss means enemy has 52% and "our/your" army has 48% if their parachutes don't fail.

At 54% vs 46% the war is already over haha. 2% away from defeat !

Concerning DNA it's very complex and still not very well understood... at least the structures that come from it and the interactions !

Bye,
  Skybuck =D

[o_e_l_e_o]

So the video checks out, only 1 procent risk reduction.

Incorrect.

Let's say I have two populations, each with 1 million people. Population A get some intervention, and no one dies (0%). Population B get no intervention, and 10,000 people die (1%). Therefore, the intervention has reduced the absolute risk of death by only 1%. The relative risk of death, however, has been reduced by 100%.

The numbers you have quoted show 8 deaths in the vaccine arm and 162 deaths in the non-vaccine arm. Sure, the absolute risk reduction might only be 0.84%, but the relative risk reduction is 95%.

The numbers you have quoted prove the vaccine is 95% effective, it's just that you don't understand statistics. Which is fine - not everyone needs to understand statistics. The problem comes when anti-vaxxer nutjobs like the people making the video try to hold court and "educate" other people about things they don't understand.