What do you think about owning and selling your content on social media?

[ultiex]

When it comes to buying and selling content, I don't think it's appropriate for this word because there are cases where they are paid specifically to introduce a project.
other than that there may be some people who introduce it voluntarily but this is only for their personal benefit and hope that there will be feedback from those who own the project

If you are the writer of a good story, you own it. People will buy if the story makes them feel. Similar to NFTs, but I want to talk about a broader issue, which is content (images, text, etc.)

[bering]

I'm not contents creator so i have no experience for this field but present day most of people can making money from creating the particular contents and promote it through their social media such as instagram, twitter or youtube channels but first of all you should became an social media influencer with plenty of followers so your contents will attract people to buy it

[Dr.Osh]

as far as I understand, we do not sell content on social media, but we attract potential users to enjoy the content that we have so that we can earn money from it. what I mean is, the content remains completely yours. It's different when you sell content, then the content you have is no longer yours.
well, in general, this is a common thing, but for me it is an interesting thing. That's because when we can make money from the content that we have, it means we can understand consumer desires. This is closely related to SEO techniques or sales techniques. the more you attract people's attention in a good way, the more chances to make money there. whether it's to advertise or sell a product.

[Alanaz]

When it comes to buying and selling content, I don't think it's appropriate for this word because there are cases where they are paid specifically to introduce a project.
other than that there may be some people who introduce it voluntarily but this is only for their personal benefit and hope that there will be feedback from those who own the project

If you are the writer of a good story, you own it. People will buy if the story makes them feel. Similar to NFTs, but I want to talk about a broader issue, which is content (images, text, etc.)

I think it's almost the same.
For example, if there is a coin that is about to be listed or an NFT, then it might do something like that because there are indeed content creators who peddle the task of introducing things like that, although not many.
Another example is when someone is live streaming about a certain game, such as NFT, etc., this can also be done.

[yazher]

This will be made possible if there will be exclusivity of the product you are sellinging but most of those are not, once they are on the internet, everything can be copy and paste. Imagine, even the games that are worth millions to create are not safe to be crack, what makes a content to be unique? If only we can implement like an NFT where every item is unique and exclusive, and has some feature whenever someone owns it, no one can use it at all.

[aioc]

Thank you. I am developing project in this direction. To help the community sell their content. If you have any ideas or suggestions please help me. About Difficulty, issues related to selling content. In your opinion, when the product is sold, should the author be entitled to any future transactions? Opensea is allowing it

You mean royalty, why not it still depends on the agreement, record companies are doing that even though they sold their content they still get a slice of the royalty you should have an option for royalty so the original author can still promote his works even though he did not own his works anymore, like composers or singers of songs, looking forward to get an update of your project that will benefit the community.

[ultiex]

This will be made possible if there will be exclusivity of the product you are sellinging but most of those are not, once they are on the internet, everything can be copy and paste. Imagine, even the games that are worth millions to create are not safe to be crack, what makes a content to be unique? If only we can implement like an NFT where every item is unique and exclusive, and has some feature whenever someone owns it, no one can use it at all.

I will give specific examples. You create a saying ''OMG'' If you post it on the platform of the Cryptizen project. It will be yours, because you are the first. What I mean here is that everything becomes valuable if it is analyzed for value. Does this appeal to you? When your simple sentence is used by many people.

Thank you. I am developing project in this direction. To help the community sell their content. If you have any ideas or suggestions please help me. About Difficulty, issues related to selling content. In your opinion, when the product is sold, should the author be entitled to any future transactions? Opensea is allowing it

You mean royalty, why not it still depends on the agreement, record companies are doing that even though they sold their content they still get a slice of the royalty you should have an option for royalty so the original author can still promote his works even though he did not own his works anymore, like composers or singers of songs, looking forward to get an update of your project that will benefit the community.

Thank you! we will apply this.

[doomloop]

I'm not contents creator so i have no experience for this field but present day most of people can making money from creating the particular contents and promote it through their social media such as instagram, twitter or youtube channels but first of all you should became an social media influencer with plenty of followers so your contents will attract people to buy it

They have always been avenues for content creators to earn money through their content that they create, whether you are a writer or you create content that has to do with videos, there’s always ways to earn with it.

The thing is that you will have to build your audience, because your audience is the money that you are going to make from your content. Take for example, one can decide to be a Blogger, and when you have audience that regularly visit your website to read your contents, that would mean income for you. The same thing with video creators, when you have audience that watches your video, it also translates to money.

[barbara44]

I think a little more explanation on this would have been helpful for people to understand what you're trying to talk about here. When you say owning your content online, are you trying to say that people will own a particular content that they write online, and when readers wants to read it they would have to pay them for it?

I have seen quite a few platforms that are similar to what you are talking about here. Take for example, steemit.com is one of the platforms where users write content, and when readers appreciate their contents they drop a like on it, and the more likes that the writers are able to get, the more that they are going to be paid for the content that they create on the platform.

So, I am guessing that you mean something like that, or maybe you’re trying to say that readers may have to buy the content from the writers?

[ultiex]

I think a little more explanation on this would have been helpful for people to understand what you're trying to talk about here. When you say owning your content online, are you trying to say that people will own a particular content that they write online, and when readers wants to read it they would have to pay them for it?

I have seen quite a few platforms that are similar to what you are talking about here. Take for example, steemit.com is one of the platforms where users write content, and when readers appreciate their contents they drop a like on it, and the more likes that the writers are able to get, the more that they are going to be paid for the content that they create on the platform.

So, I am guessing that you mean something like that, or maybe you’re trying to say that readers may have to buy the content from the writers?

Readers do not need to pay. What I mean is that they will only pay when they want to be the owner of a valuable phrase, story, or content. Then that person can sell it. Ownership means that the post will be on your social profile.

[goldkingcoiner]

Does this appeal to you?
Please share your thoughts

that really depends on what you mean and which social media's you are talking about. If you are talking about social medias like Facebook or similiar, you may find that a lot of content is being stolen and its basically nearly impossible to track down and do anything against the culprits. So owning is a big problem. And selling something anyone can steal anyway.... Well... Thats a problem too.

[ultiex]

Does this appeal to you?
Please share your thoughts

that really depends on what you mean and which social media's you are talking about. If you are talking about social medias like Facebook or similiar, you may find that a lot of content is being stolen and its basically nearly impossible to track down and do anything against the culprits. So owning is a big problem. And selling something anyone can steal anyway.... Well... Thats a problem too.

Imagine Cryptizen as Facebook. If you post a story, we will generate a hash. This helps you verify this hash you are the first creator on the Cryptizen social network. So it will get you native. If someone else uses it (100% same as your content) then it is considered reused.

[michellee]

I think a little more explanation on this would have been helpful for people to understand what you're trying to talk about here. When you say owning your content online, are you trying to say that people will own a particular content that they write online, and when readers wants to read it they would have to pay them for it?

I have seen quite a few platforms that are similar to what you are talking about here. Take for example, steemit.com is one of the platforms where users write content, and when readers appreciate their contents they drop a like on it, and the more likes that the writers are able to get, the more that they are going to be paid for the content that they create on the platform.

So, I am guessing that you mean something like that, or maybe you’re trying to say that readers may have to buy the content from the writers?

Readers do not need to pay. What I mean is that they will only pay when they want to be the owner of a valuable phrase, story, or content. Then that person can sell it. Ownership means that the post will be on your social profile.

If so, that will be good for your readers but I hope that the readers do not have to pay a subscription fee that they should pay because I see that some websites apply this to get something from their readers. I guess it is like Facebook that users can upload their content to their social page but this time, they own that content and no one can use that content unless they buy from the real owner. But how to prevent the other users from downloading the content without buying from the owner? When it comes to the internet, if you want to buy something from the site, you should become a member and pay some amount to download the content. It will interest if you explain more details.

[ultiex]

I think a little more explanation on this would have been helpful for people to understand what you're trying to talk about here. When you say owning your content online, are you trying to say that people will own a particular content that they write online, and when readers wants to read it they would have to pay them for it?

I have seen quite a few platforms that are similar to what you are talking about here. Take for example, steemit.com is one of the platforms where users write content, and when readers appreciate their contents they drop a like on it, and the more likes that the writers are able to get, the more that they are going to be paid for the content that they create on the platform.

So, I am guessing that you mean something like that, or maybe you’re trying to say that readers may have to buy the content from the writers?

Readers do not need to pay. What I mean is that they will only pay when they want to be the owner of a valuable phrase, story, or content. Then that person can sell it. Ownership means that the post will be on your social profile.

If so, that will be good for your readers but I hope that the readers do not have to pay a subscription fee that they should pay because I see that some websites apply this to get something from their readers. I guess it is like Facebook that users can upload their content to their social page but this time, they own that content and no one can use that content unless they buy from the real owner. But how to prevent the other users from downloading the content without buying from the owner? When it comes to the internet, if you want to buy something from the site, you should become a member and pay some amount to download the content. It will interest if you explain more details.

The user owns the content and it's public. Anyone can reuse the content because it's public, but it helps the content prove valuable. Because the blockchain is public and transparent, the author will sell valuable, interesting content. We still have the ability to pay to read content if the author wants it, and that content is not public. Do you know about IPFS? We apply it, the author needs to understand and build reasonable content and choose the right way to make money.

[Kocret02]

Readers do not need to pay. What I mean is that they will only pay when they want to be the owner of a valuable phrase, story, or content. Then that person can sell it. Ownership means that the post will be on your social profile.

Yes, that's true, because before the buyer doesn't want to own it, then he can only see things like collections of goods in the marketplace or like E-Commerce.
So it's also almost the same as the others although the way it starts is a little different from people selling other items

[sirminesalot]

Readers do not need to pay. What I mean is that they will only pay when they want to be the owner of a valuable phrase, story, or content. Then that person can sell it. Ownership means that the post will be on your social profile.

Yes, that's true, because before the buyer doesn't want to own it, then he can only see things like collections of goods in the marketplace or like E-Commerce.
So it's also almost the same as the others although the way it starts is a little different from people selling other items

From my view content is not something that sellable, if it already published it becomes the public ownership. It could be make money if you are hiring someone to make you a content, or the content itself is promoting a product that will be sold on also on the public, the money is coming from there.
But if you are on several platform like youtube, you could register your license to your content so it will be not able to steal.

[Dread Pirate Roberts]

Does this appeal to you?
Please share your thoughts

what kind of content do you mean? if an article or art. still okay. and many do it as part of a promotion of some sort. but if selling personal photos. family or things that are private I do not want. depending on what content .

[el kaka22]

From my view content is not something that sellable, if it already published it becomes the public ownership. It could be make money if you are hiring someone to make you a content, or the content itself is promoting a product that will be sold on also on the public, the money is coming from there.
But if you are on several platform like youtube, you could register your license to your content so it will be not able to steal.

There are thousands of books that are published and yet not public domain at all. Writers deal with publishing houses and they end up taking care of all the printing and media and all of that which results with authors making money. Same logic applies here, just because it is online and not on your hands doesn't change it, you could also be an author and your book could be ebook sold online and yet it is still illegal to distribute it.

I am not saying that it is not available, I downloaded games and movies on torrent before, but it just doesn't make the creators stop. Just because we downloaded games and movies online doesn't mean that the industry stopped or crashed, in fact they are making even more money these days in billions. So we should not really be that much shocked about the current situation and we should be focusing on how we can improve it.

[Jaered]

Still interesting an prospect to think and behold of, but where the problem lies and its still sticky and hairy, is the execution of the project. Some blockchain based projects like Steemit and non-blockchain based like Medium have tried it and ended up bottling the job. I still think there's  a future in that prospect though

[DeathAngel]

If you can make money & even an income on social media & it’s in a legal way then sure, go for it. I respect anybody with entrepreneurial capabilities. Even better if you can do it from the comfort of your own home.