WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT CIFI COINS

[glendall]

CIFI drama continues, will the remaining 70% of the bounty be paid? where the price of CIFI has now gone down, the devs should open themselves up to hunters paying for their rights, saying whether CIFI coins are good or not, judging by the belief system that exists in their team, from the start they were not committed, moreover later they could become investors who will become victims their greed

Oh my, just heard about the case today. If my memory is not wrong the one who manages the cifi bounty is irfan, right? Even though the manager has a high reputation it still could be turned out like this, I guess hunters have to consider picking bounties with escrowed funds in the future in order to avoid falling into the same scenario.

yes right irfan, but we also can't blame irfan 100% in this case, it all goes back to the dev organizer

[AnonBitCoiner]

Cifi project is looking good and performed well in previous bullish season. Cifi coin pump to 380$ but was only Whales game. Their game is also looking very good and pre-alpha already released.
But they scamed to Bounty Hunters are not good. If they cannot pay this value how they will give profit to game player?

[traderethereum]

there are some things about citizen finance, a lot of people give good views to citizens because they managed to get a price above $300 and they have invested in citizens so far.
but on the other hand there is a bad side from the cifi team. the team does not pay the 70% reward to the bounty participants and the cifi team always gets banned for every member who asks about cifi.


Can these two problems affect token citizens in the future? give your opinion here about citizen finance coin.
Is citizen finance suitable as an investment altcoin asset?

They should pay the bounty hunters because their project can grow because of the help from bounty hunters.
But I think that will not stop the project from running and becoming popular but it will be better if they can solve the payment for their bounty hunters so there is no problem between them.
Maybe Cifi teams will announce something on their telegram channel, especially the bounty hunters.
But we will see what will happen in the future for the Cifi project after this case but to be another crypto investment, I will think twice because I have other coins or tokens that can be my next investment.

[StarKay]

the team does not pay the 70% reward to the bounty participants and the cifi team always gets banned for every member who asks about cifi.


Can these two problems affect token citizens in the future? give your opinion here about citizen finance coin.
Is citizen finance suitable as an investment altcoin asset?

If I am to get you clearly, CIFI team already paid 30% of the total amount allocated to bounty campaign, and now bounty hunters are requesting for the remaining 70% but the team won't reply rather they will ban the person asking the question from their telegram group.
If that is the case, although it is not good but you need to tell us the T&C you agreed to before joining the campaign.
Are bounty related questions prohibited in their telegram group?
Do the team have a right to adjust bounty allocations?
If the answer to the two questions is yes, then you don't have a case. Otherwise you can keep up your campaign against the CIFI team.

About CIFI suitability, it is up to the investors to determine that. We use to say where I come from that "One man's food is another man's poison."

[asyakashi]

It's a risk as a bounter. But we can fight what they do to campaigners, I often see there are unfair projects. Gather people who get unfair rewards, you can drop their social media. Or spreading bad news wherever it is appropriate.

[QueenVera]

If they fear that hunters will dump the tokens then atleast they can release the payments in part like some of the projects does to avoid massive dump by hunters instead of holding their rewards and banning them.

This no longer an excuse, if your project is high quality people would not just dump your project and instead of been worried about hunters dumping why not concentrate on pre-sale and seed sale investors that get very high discount and get lots of tokens at their disposal that they can't dump whenever they want. Project like getting free promotion, they use the service of hunters and just do not want to pay them.

We have vesting schedule that a project can use to send reward of hunters in batches if they are that scared of dumpers but they always use the hunters as victim. Avoid project that do not escrow their reward, they can easily scam you this way.

[susuberuang]

It's a risk as a bounter. But we can fight what they do to campaigners, I often see there are unfair projects. Gather people who get unfair rewards, you can drop their social media. Or spreading bad news wherever it is appropriate.

Yes, and that's the only thing that can be done by every bounty participant who feels that he or she has been treated unfairly by the project team, but it can also have a deterrent effect for them, even if it's only a little, but it's still worth doing.

[1kodumtek7]

Frankly, I'm not related to the bounty of this project in any way. But I wouldn't invest into a project whose team don't pay the bounty participants. Because the team would be accustomed to not keeping their word and I wouldn't have left more than a shitcoin in my hand in the future.

[AhmadM]

Oh my, just heard about the case today. If my memory is not wrong the one who manages the cifi bounty is irfan, right? Even though the manager has a high reputation it still could be turned out like this, I guess hunters have to consider picking bounties with escrowed funds in the future in order to avoid falling into the same scenario.

yes right irfan, but we also can't blame irfan 100% in this case, it all goes back to the dev organizer

That's absolutely true, I believe he also has given his own disclaimer/warning of each bounty he managed before hunters try to participate in. Don't get me wrong, it doesn't mean he is supposed to take full responsibility for it. Meanwhile it would be a great helps for people who are involved in it if he could give his hands to meddle the issue in some ways.

[hyudien]

but on the other hand there is a bad side from the cifi team. the team does not pay the 70% reward to the bounty participants and the cifi team always gets banned for every member who asks about cifi.

Oh my, just heard about the case today. If my memory is not wrong the one who manages the cifi bounty is irfan, right? Even though the manager has a high reputation it still could be turned out like this, I guess hunters have to consider picking bounties with escrowed funds in the future in order to avoid falling into the same scenario.

That is the problem that is quite an obstacle, namely not doing Escrow making payments seem to be stuck in their pockets. In my opinion, if the payment was made using the Escrow service, the story might not be as bad as this. You are right that the payment scenario must be realized so that it will not be discussed too often in the future. Even if you peek at her group at all it's quite disappointing.

[smartaction]

I also think that Citizen Finance is a scan project. The price of each token of this coin was $300 plus but it has come down to 30 again. I have invested in this project which has faced with big losses. The team of this project is seems scammer

You must understand that if this is crypto. Once you get into the peak price and you may suffer a huge lose for your investment but that may still different if you're getting it below $1 and you will always be in a huge profit. How big your lose in cifi totally determined by how bottom your entry. The bottom price mean the higher chance to get profit. I guess that julerz has stated the right opinion about this one. This is a part of effort created by the hunters to get attention by the team and they can be paid but the only problem is has the team aware about this? It seems like that they have not even seen this  nor the accusation thread.

I bought each Cifi token for $150. But now it has come down to the under $40. A few days ago, the price was rose to  $300. Which is 10x more than the current price. This means that the team of Citizen Finance Token is not strong.

[Alert31]

You are already accused this coin on this thread [HERE] that the team are scammers, why ask if it is a good coin to invest in?
Looks like you're just in crusade to spread bad news about this coin rather than trying to get an authentic financial discussion.
I would suggest to just continue the discussion about this coin on the scam accusation thread  you previously openned and not create another one.

I also think that Citizen Finance is a scan project. The price of each token of this coin was $300 plus but it has come down to 30 again. I have invested in this project which has faced with big losses. The team of this project is seems scammer

So I think that's the reality behind cifi team, to scam the investors and bounty hunters (by not paying the remaining 70%). Some of the projects like cifi are not worth investing for a long term because if they are afraid of losing even a small amount of their funds to pay the hunters who promote their project as part of their marketing, it means they just want to earn from their investors.

[JeffBrad12]

there are some things about citizen finance, a lot of people give good views to citizens because they managed to get a price above $300 and they have invested in citizens so far.
but on the other hand there is a bad side from the cifi team.

Whole of crypto market gets dumped so hard but you must also compare it with the initial price when the ico has begun and it seems like that this token is not yet dumping to the below ico price. This is still around 6x from the ico price.

the team does not pay the 70% reward to the bounty participants and the cifi team always gets banned for every member who asks about cifi.

It seems like that's a sensitive question for the cifi team.

Can these two problems affect token citizens in the future?

These problems can't affect the tokens. The development can do that.

give your opinion here about citizen finance coin.
Is citizen finance suitable as an investment altcoin asset?

Yes it's for short term but not for long term as the game is pretty similar to cs and it seems like a copy paste game with some additional things to be integrated with play to earn.

[nimogsm]

I know that the project has not paid the tokens in full for the bounty company and this is terrible.I also know that they ban everyone who asks them this question.One thing I don't understand is why all those who participated in the promotion can't collectively come together and create a topic on the forum with all the evidence and send a message on social networks.

[asriloni]

Can these two problems affect token citizens in the future? give your opinion here about citizen finance coin.
Is citizen finance suitable as an investment altcoin asset?

Those problems can't affect the token price and don't you aware even when they have not paid the bounty and the performance of tokens were still good? Can't you see the graph was showing the growth of this token from $1 to the hundreds of dollars? that proves that the accusation didn't give impact to the price of this token. Talking about how suitable investment is and people who believe in this token will call this as suitable investment but as hunters that have not yet paid and you will be calling this is not a suitable investment. The funds holding by them pushing them will be wasting your time only.

One thing I don't understand is why all those who participated in the promotion can't collectively come together and create a topic on the forum with all the evidence and send a message on social networks.

AFAIK an accusation thread already made by them but it seems like cifi didn't even look at that. They can only wait and that's the answer.

[goinmerry]

b]the team does not pay the 70% reward to the bounty participants and the cifi team always gets banned for every member who asks about cifi.
[/b]

Is there a separate group for any bounty-related questions? If there is, those who are complaining should not post their complaint on the main discussion group.
Is there an official announcement regarding the bounty status and it's followed properly? If there is, everyone just needs to be patient. I know the feeling of having hard-headed bounty participants as a campaign manager before.

I don't know though what's the status of the bounty as there are times, the project itself is crap when handling bounty payments.

Can these two problems affect token citizens in the future? give your opinion here about citizen finance coin.

About the bounty, no it won't really affect the whole. I don't know the bounty allocation but it should not shake the market even majority will sell.

On the market side, as long as the continuous healthy volume will be established, developments are continuous, they are always true to the community, everything will go well.

Disclaimer: This is just my quick view. I don't see yet what the whole project is all about.

[lobo13hf]

i see that so many people are complaining on it. The problem is the cifi team didn't intend to pay at the date that already promised by them. that's why hunters are getting angry and they are starting to give negative feedback to the project and some people said that even they getting blocked when they wanna try to write negative feedback on twitter. The manager already tried to contact cifi team so many times and he got no response from the team. Even the manager can't do something as he understood that if the key was on the cifi team who is holding the fund. If the team didn't intend to release the token and how hard hunters to fight against the team will be totally useless. what they can do just wait and wait.

[julerz12]

-SNIP-
I'm just here to create a thread and provide experiences and ask for opinions from many people. Then why do you feel angry with me? Are you part of the cifi team?
isn't this forum free to discuss anything about altcoins? then where did I go wrong?

If you believe it's a scam (which I think you really do given the fact that you created a scam accusation against them) no point on asking financial advice around their coin, right? It's clear what you're doing is spreading as much information as you could to raise awareness about the bad actions taken by the team (hence the bold texts on 1st post) which is good, but don't hide your intentions by stating you're just here to discuss about an altcoin (that's BS, we're not idiots here) you already have bad and negative impression about them before you even started this thread.
BTW, I'm not mad or part of their team, just pointing things out.
I would suggest you take your concern with whoever manages the bounty campaign and reach out to the team itself 'cause I'm telling you now, you won't get anything done just by posting and stating more threads about them.

[aruldaroy]

the team does not pay the 70% reward to the bounty participants and the cifi team always gets banned for every member who asks about cifi.


Can these two problems affect token citizens in the future? give your opinion here about citizen finance coin.
Is citizen finance suitable as an investment altcoin asset?

If I am to get you clearly, CIFI team already paid 30% of the total amount allocated to bounty campaign, and now bounty hunters are requesting for the remaining 70% but the team won't reply rather they will ban the person asking the question from their telegram group.
If that is the case, although it is not good but you need to tell us the T&C you agreed to before joining the campaign.
Are bounty related questions prohibited in their telegram group?
Do the team have a right to adjust bounty allocations?
If the answer to the two questions is yes, then you don't have a case. Otherwise you can keep up your campaign against the CIFI team.

About CIFI suitability, it is up to the investors to determine that. We use to say where I come from that "One man's food is another man's poison."

Cifi project is looking good and performed well in previous bullish season. Cifi coin pump to 380$ but was only Whales game. Their game is also looking very good and pre-alpha already released.
But they scamed to Bounty Hunters are not good. If they cannot pay this value how they will give profit to game player?

It's a shame when they were tricked by other bounty hunters so they had to pay for everything.
If they can't pay those who join the game, of course they can't feel the benefits right.
But I still wonder why their team is said to be untrustworthy..?

[X-ray]

there are some things about citizen finance, a lot of people give good views to citizens because they managed to get a price above $300 and they have invested in citizens so far.
but on the other hand there is a bad side from the cifi team. the team does not pay the 70% reward to the bounty participants and the cifi team always gets banned for every member who asks about cifi.

The accusation has been running since last year. The team is paying the bounty in so many phases with no ETA. i expect you to get your reward next year maybe. Bounty question already considered as sensitive words in the main group.

Can these two problems affect token citizens in the future?

It's hard to tell you the fact but this accusation already exist since last year but the price of token is still not moving from two digits to the one digits. that proves that if the accusation didn't give any impact to the buyers of this token.

give your opinion here about citizen finance coin.
Is citizen finance suitable as an investment altcoin asset?

Dishonest team. In my opinion if this is only in the bounty distribution but when you're seeing the development progress by this time and that may give you different impression. This is just my 2 cents. Im sure that anyone has their own personal opinion about this but using this as investment was not good enough but it's not totally bad at all.