SandboxCasino.io サンドボックス It's Simple: Fun and Fair.

[Eternad]

4. The system has many factors for duplicates and we want to welcome to test it, as per our terms and conditions we want to welcome Sammy1 to submit full KYC and we shall push KYC forms as well on all other duplicates associated to his account (over 13 accounts) and get to the bottom of it. To make this go even easier and faster, we will provide an incentive to all of those users for their completed KYC.

This is bullshit ultimatum because providing 13 accounts to KYC even if they aren’t connected is very hard to do because we are all talking about casino KYC here and not government requirements. KYC is not the only solution to solve this case but rather prove that the user cheat on your software and not just by connecting him to other user that commit fraud. Even if he is the same user but he won the money in fair way, Is that still cheating? You are using that argument to denied his payment and you are dodging to provide an evidence showing the user cheat on your games. This is the only way to prove your action for not paying him.

You should pay him if the only reason that you are using against him is the connection to other account.

[Coin_trader]

Your response of “get to the bottom of it” by 13 other users submitting their KYC makes no sense.

Stop with all the theatrics and smoke/mirrors responses. I won this fair and square my risking a shitload of money by playing thousands of dollars in max bets.  Pay me!

This only means that they will not gonna pay you unless you manage to off the hook with connection that obviously sucks because it will not gonna happened. Judging by the way they handle this issue, I’m starting to believe that they don’t have any intention to settle this on your favor because they got you with your VPN connection. The only thing we can do for now is just to warning new member about this issue for future reference.

Those cashback offer on the bottom of the reply seems he is just joking around about your case and don’t expect something good will be come with that gesture. Sorry for your loss.

[stomachgrowls]

4. The system has many factors for duplicates and we want to welcome to test it, as per our terms and conditions we want to welcome Sammy1 to submit full KYC and we shall push KYC forms as well on all other duplicates associated to his account (over 13 accounts) and get to the bottom of it. To make this go even easier and faster, we will provide an incentive to all of those users for their completed KYC.

This is bullshit ultimatum because providing 13 accounts to KYC even if they aren’t connected is very hard to do because we are all talking about casino KYC here and not government requirements. KYC is not the only solution to solve this case but rather prove that the user cheat on your software and not just by connecting him to other user that commit fraud. Even if he is the same user but he won the money in fair way, Is that still cheating? You are using that argument to denied his payment and you are dodging to provide an evidence showing the user cheat on your games. This is the only way to prove your action for not paying him.

You should pay him if the only reason that you are using against him is the connection to other account.

Im not totally agreeing on OP but in general once a certain player had violated one of the site terms and conditions then they do have the rights on asking out for some verification or kyc.. If the user

caught out using up VPN and its against on site rules then there's nothing you can do but to abide on whats been asked before your locked funds would be released.It would really be just as

needing to comply or would just simply skip it because you dont like for those all of accounts to have KYC? Your choice actually!

[Eternad]

4. The system has many factors for duplicates and we want to welcome to test it, as per our terms and conditions we want to welcome Sammy1 to submit full KYC and we shall push KYC forms as well on all other duplicates associated to his account (over 13 accounts) and get to the bottom of it. To make this go even easier and faster, we will provide an incentive to all of those users for their completed KYC.

This is bullshit ultimatum because providing 13 accounts to KYC even if they aren’t connected is very hard to do because we are all talking about casino KYC here and not government requirements. KYC is not the only solution to solve this case but rather prove that the user cheat on your software and not just by connecting him to other user that commit fraud. Even if he is the same user but he won the money in fair way, Is that still cheating? You are using that argument to denied his payment and you are dodging to provide an evidence showing the user cheat on your games. This is the only way to prove your action for not paying him.

You should pay him if the only reason that you are using against him is the connection to other account.

Im not totally agreeing on OP but in general once a certain player had violated one of the site terms and conditions then they do have the rights on asking out for some verification or kyc.. If the user

caught out using up VPN and its against on site rules then there's nothing you can do but to abide on whats been asked before your locked funds would be released.It would really be just as

needing to comply or would just simply skip it because you dont like for those all of accounts to have KYC? Your choice actually!

Read a little deeper to know what’s really going on. Sandboxcasino allow VPN before and just remove it in the ToS after but @sammy read it and knew that it was allowed when he is playing in the casino. They are now using the VPN rules that newly added in there ToS to connect him to existing user that banned on the casino.

Sandbox should resolved this properly and provide proof that sammy cheated instead of not honoring his win just because he use same IP with other banned user.

[lmvegas]

Why not just to do what they're asking and get it over with? I see it as the same thing as Stake would do, seems like its common nowadays for crypto casinos to ask for it. Especially if you use trading platform as you have mentioned, then your ID is already compromised and out there.

[stomachgrowls]

^
Its been stated that it would really be just temporary.
Temporarily due to some internal infrastructure change

Have you able to get your winnings? If not then post up some scam accusations with strong
evidence and proofs that you do have against this casino.

[BitcoinHunt3r]

^
Its been stated that it would really be just temporary.
Temporarily due to some internal infrastructure change

Have you able to get your winnings? If not then post up some scam accusations with strong
evidence and proofs that you do have against this casino.

He has made every effort but still has not been paid and the admin account has gained negative trust on unresolved accusations
Shutdown temporararily is a casino reason to erase traces in some cases when the site enters the shutdown mode sometimes they never come back
But let's think positively here let's just say they are really back next month.

[abel1337]

WARNING: SandBoxCasino.io has Ceased operations after scamming me!

Crazy to see that all it took was me winning $127,000 to force this scam casino to disappear. I still blame OwlGames because prior to my win, they proudly listed their parent company (Cyber Galaxy B.V.) as owning both casinos. Both casinos also listed the same owner on their license pages. Conveniently all references to Cyber Galaxy B.V. disappeared when I complained about being scammed out of $127,000!

I've seen your thread before and it's sad to see that they still haven't paid you yet. Your allegations make sense to me and I think your situation drive SandBoxCasino.io into "temporary closure". They converted your winnings into BTC before they cleared out your balance and it is from 2 months ago which prices are relatively high compared to our current price. If they did a comeback, There's a chance that they will pay your winnings but I think it will be on BTC which value is less than the value of your actual winnings. Smart way of taking advantage on customers.

[stomachgrowls]

^
Its been stated that it would really be just temporary.
Temporarily due to some internal infrastructure change

Have you able to get your winnings? If not then post up some scam accusations with strong
evidence and proofs that you do have against this casino.

He has made every effort but still has not been paid and the admin account has gained negative trust on unresolved accusations
Shutdown temporararily is a casino reason to erase traces in some cases when the site enters the shutdown mode sometimes they never come back
But let's think positively here let's just say they are really back next month.

If thats the case on which this casino or platform does have pending accusations and been negatively tagged then we cant really avoid or safe to presume that they are
already having that exit scam behavior? Unless if they did really stick into their words and coming back but now that you had mentioned about their current reputation
then i do already have doubts that they would be coming back but lets see. 

Haven't been paid on the amount of $127,000 is not something that you can just take it easily.

[Taskford]

^
Its been stated that it would really be just temporary.
Temporarily due to some internal infrastructure change

Have you able to get your winnings? If not then post up some scam accusations with strong
evidence and proofs that you do have against this casino.

He has made every effort but still has not been paid and the admin account has gained negative trust on unresolved accusations
Shutdown temporararily is a casino reason to erase traces in some cases when the site enters the shutdown mode sometimes they never come back
But let's think positively here let's just say they are really back next month.

If thats the case on which this casino or platform does have pending accusations and been negatively tagged then we cant really avoid or safe to presume that they are
already having that exit scam behavior? Unless if they did really stick into their words and coming back but now that you had mentioned about their current reputation
then i do already have doubts that they would be coming back but lets see. 

Haven't been paid on the amount of $127,000 is not something that you can just take it easily.

$127,000 is huge amount and that can't be take easily by anyone and its huge risk for the whales because they xan possibly do this to them and take there huge deposited amount. If they not solve this issue then its good to avoid since there's nothing good we can get for that case. Now since this issue has been raised for sure people are aware and curious to know the development if this case.

[stomachgrowls]

^
Its been stated that it would really be just temporary.
Temporarily due to some internal infrastructure change

Have you able to get your winnings? If not then post up some scam accusations with strong
evidence and proofs that you do have against this casino.

He has made every effort but still has not been paid and the admin account has gained negative trust on unresolved accusations
Shutdown temporararily is a casino reason to erase traces in some cases when the site enters the shutdown mode sometimes they never come back
But let's think positively here let's just say they are really back next month.

If thats the case on which this casino or platform does have pending accusations and been negatively tagged then we cant really avoid or safe to presume that they are
already having that exit scam behavior? Unless if they did really stick into their words and coming back but now that you had mentioned about their current reputation
then i do already have doubts that they would be coming back but lets see. 

Haven't been paid on the amount of $127,000 is not something that you can just take it easily.

$127,000 is huge amount and that can't be take easily by anyone and its huge risk for the whales because they xan possibly do this to them and take there huge deposited amount. If they not solve this issue then its good to avoid since there's nothing good we can get for that case. Now since this issue has been raised for sure people are aware and curious to know the development if this case.

Really hard to believe on if there's no solid proofs about the accusation yet owner/admin did really make out some response.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5384549.msg60721769#msg60721769

It is attached or pertains to multi accounting and using up VPN which it would really be normal that a platform will really be making out those actions
when it regards to violations.So its really hard on whom to believe on which everything cant really be seen clearly.

[Little Mouse]

It is completely understandable and it makes good business sense. The brand is worthless right now and a liability to owl.games and cyber bv. I doubt they see much action these days anyways.Therefore, it's more profitable for them to cut Sandbox.io off and focus on scamming people through owl.games via their shit token.

Owl games has already shared their standing on this issue. Though I'm not sure what is true or false, there's no point of bringing owl games without having any concrete proof on the hand. Don't think I'm vouching for them because I'm wearing their signature. I would still say the same if I were in any other campaign.