He had the signature on for over 2 weeks. It was until i tagged him, that is when he came lamenting in my inbox how he was not aware that 1xbit were scammers. He applied for their campaigns twice, both campaign threads had warnings from different members about 1xbit being a scam. Sincerely, is OP trying to tell us he never saw the warnings?
Nice to read your post here, friend
It would have been extremely difficult or virtually impossible for the OP to not have noticed the red tags under the 1xbit promoters avatar when he applied to join the signature campaigns.
I agree with you, all excuses about ignorance look very implausible.
You are right, something does not add up.
But even more surprising is that he is concerned about neutral trust.
Maybe, but there could be more to this than meets the eye.
This just goes to show that the OP doesn't understand any difference in the trust system, and up to a point, he wasn't bothered by any feedback at all. But one day, his proud nature was hooked by a JollyGood tag. (irony)
The OP is not the first one who open threads about me after getting tagged but he is the first and so far only one to open a thread with a neutral tag.
The OP just has no idea how happy those who got negative tags from JollyGood before would be, and the tags would change to neutral.
I know JollyGood as someone who rarely changes his mind. There was a time when a moderator who vouched for a person requested a neutral review for an account.
It has happened a few times and on occasion I have felt uncomfortable giving in to requests from some DT colleagues who too often give the benefit of the doubt or ignore vital pieces of evidence and request the feedback be removed or revised.
In the history of the OP, a review was changed just like that, but the recipient's dissatisfaction breaks records.
As true as that is, the way you put that made me laugh
Either the OP is totally oblivious to what he did when signed up to promote the 1xbit scammers and all this is just a genuine mistake and error of judgement on his part therefore his dissatisfaction with my neutral tag can be partially explained
or
the fact he used a login of another account to contact logfiles shows the OP in an even more bad light. With the OP aiming to have the negative feedback from logfiles removed, it shows he wants to hold on to the account without any negative trust. Rather than go through all this drama it might have been better for him to register another account and start all over again to build it up.... unless his signature campaigns are the primary factor here.
The problem for the OP now is that he has given the impression he has an alt account too.
And all this in one thread just because of a neutral tag?
