With a minimum deposit amount of 0.03 and a maximum of 1.7 BTC, this can only be a scam... It is a 1 to 56 ratio!!!!
I just have started my own system, that comes with a guarantee fund (so when deposits will stop then people will get back their insurance amount), a 200% last deposit bonus, and a 1 to 3.5 ratio (and many more features, a lot more transparent, a lot more safe). If you want to check it, just click my signature!
Enjoy.
attention,
this guy is the scammer. it's him who have to prove us that he's for real.
he doesn't have transactions hash(proof of payments), nor dates and you have to register.
all this is weird and suspicious at least.
cointhinker, you say that BTC125 is a scammer, but i already been payed 14 times. and the proof of this is in a post in this topic. search for it and confirm for yourself.
i don't know what are you trying to pull but it's not working man
Well, I really left this topic, but you are forcing me to come back with what you have told...
So let's clear a few things:
- first of all, I am a TRUSTED member, and have a very good reputation on this forum; so calling me a scammer it's a little too much
- secondly: the reason why you need to login is NOT suspicious, it is actually making things VERY SAFE. So let me explain you why do I have a login system.
My system is built in a way that I can add ANY number of coins to it, in less than 5 minutes. What I have discovered already with the first coin I have added (LEAF), and which due to the lack of interest I disabled after two rounds, was that no matter how much you try, you can not get using raw transactions the sender's address 100% safe in every case. It happened in about 150 deposits that THREE times the system wrongly identified the sender address.
So this is why I introduced this login system, which is working exactly like Cryptsy (and this is why Cryptsy for example works the same way too, because they are situations when the sender address can not be resolved with a 100% accuracy). The login system is ONLY to make sure that EVERY PERSON has an INDIVIDUAL deposit address; also you can specify YOUR OWN wallet address, where you want to receive the payouts (as I told: JUST LIKE CRYPTSY). With this method, I think it is becoming absolutely obvious for everybody, that the problem with address identification is eliminated 100%.
- thirdly, if you have read what I just wrote above, then of course you immediately understand why there is no link to a blockchain, as every address is individual... however, I don't think that you have seen people compaining in none of my threads, that they haven't received their payouts, nor that the deposits are not showing up.
- fourthly, if you challenge me to really get into the 1 to 56 ratio problem (which I just wanted to point out, and that's all, but now you are really asking for), then here's the deal: I don't care what you are saying about how many times you were paid. It is not relevant, especially, that you might be the admin... Let me think that it is not a coincidence that the first 40 deposits are 0.03 BTC each (almost). Anyway, getting back to the point: right now you have to pay out 1.317 BTC, which you almost have... BUT then comes again a 1.10 payment, then a bit higher a 0.7, then a 1.7, and another 1.1 and so on. Now if I sum this then it will be about 4.6 BTC (only this 4 big ones) x 1.2 = 5.52 BTC to be paid out (I completely disregarded the small deposits).
Now, if people don't want to invest some ridicoulous amounts in your Ponzi (1.7 BTC), and they want to try it with the minimum, it would mean that you need at least 200 deposits just to get even with these four deposits! So, that is why this ratio is really bad... if one makes a big deposit then you need so many little ones to compensate that it will kill it.
- fifthly: if you want transparency you better start numbering your rows for example so noone can change it later... and do what I have done; I am displaying a meter which exactly shows users how much is collected from the next payout, so people have clear image about where they play with their coins. Also, I have the date of the last payout always displayed...
- sixthly: don't compare please this system, and don't tell that my system is a scam when you are defending this one. At this ponzi, if deposits stops everybody in the last 14 rows (the last 14 depositors) will loose their money completely. It's gone... my system at least offers some protection (there is always an insured amount, which I guarantee that you will get back when deposits stops). This insured amount depends on the guarantee fund, which is also very transparently displayed on the screen; the more deposits are, the higher the guarantee fund; the higher the guarantee fund, the higher is going to be the insured amount which in case of no more deposits people will get back (distributed proportionally with the amount of their deposit).
All information is displayed very very transparently on the screen.
So guys, before you start yelling scam to me, think twice... I am off now from this topic, but I damn sure will come back if you dare to tell me with bold that I am scammer...
EDIT: I accept logical arguments, but from now on let's avoid name - calling (I will avoid also).
