Could Trump be the right choice for the ownership of Chelsea.

[Marykeller]

I wouldn't like Trump to end up buying Chelsea. He won't be able to manage it fine. He'll be castigating the coach, the players openly if they fail to deliver.

There are indications that Turkish billionaire, Muhsin Bayrak, finds interest in buying Chelsea. He's most likely to buy Chelsea from its owner Roman Abramovich. He is 90% close to buying Chelsea

He might be the one to take over Chelsea the deadline is on March 15 even Abramovich thinks he is the next owner of the team because 90% to close a deal is almost a done deal unless some extra ordinary circumstances happen, but back to the question, Trump is capable he has proven that will long experience managing a business empire and of course, managing the most powerful country in the world although he is hounded by so many controversies.

Football is not the same as having long experience managing a business. The question is, is Trump passionate about football and successes in it like Abramovich? Football is not just about making money alone.
However, am going to miss Abramovich. Whoever owns Chelsea finally, let him not destroy the foundation Abramovich has built already for unnecessary business

[1715228386]

1715228386

[1715228386]

1715228386

[judeafante]

 Whoever owns Chelsea finally, let him not destroy the foundation Abramovich has built already for unnecessary business

I'm sure he will take care and continue the legacy, in the first, he'll not be going to buy it if he is not interested in continuing the legacy Chelsea has a good reputation and its owner is very passionate he must prove that he is more passionate and can continue the legacy and even achieved more, there's a lot of weight that the new owner will carry, if ever Trump gets it, he can continue the legacy.

[TopT3ns]

I recently came across a sport headline breaking: Donald Trump reveals interest in buying Chelsea football club. And many thoughts ran through my mind, can Trump among many other bidders be the right man for the club. Cause it's only businessmen with the kind of passion as Roman Ibrahimovic had for the club that can still sustain and keep keeping the flag flying from where Ibrahimovic stopped.

What your take on this, with the likes of Trump in the race for the ownership of Chelsea?

I haven't found accurate news that states Donald Trump interest in buying Chelsea, but for now it's only speculation about someone close to Trump who reportedly has a desire to buy Chelsea, namely Woody Johnson, if indeed if Chelsea were bought by Trump, I think Chelsea will turn into a club that is oriented to make money or business profits rather than achievements.

Looks like Arsenal owner most priority about how to earn much money than with achievement result getting by club, I think is looks very bad if Chelsea have deal with Donald Trump and I think better sell club for owner have decision keep priority with trophies achievement every year than talking about how much money or profit getting from football business, I think still have loyal football owner like Manchester City where the want waste much money for star player transfer and this needed by Chelsea new owner right now how to keep Chelsea as top four of primer league team.

[delfastTions]

I wouldn't like Trump to end up buying Chelsea. He won't be able to manage it fine. He'll be castigating the coach, the players openly if they fail to deliver.

There are indications that Turkish billionaire, Muhsin Bayrak, finds interest in buying Chelsea. He's most likely to buy Chelsea from its owner Roman Abramovich. He is 90% close to buying Chelsea

He might be the one to take over Chelsea the deadline is on March 15 even Abramovich thinks he is the next owner of the team because 90% to close a deal is almost a done deal unless some extra ordinary circumstances happen, but back to the question, Trump is capable he has proven that will long experience managing a business empire and of course, managing the most powerful country in the world although he is hounded by so many controversies.

Football is not the same as having long experience managing a business. The question is, is Trump passionate about football and successes in it like Abramovich? Football is not just about making money alone.
However, am going to miss Abramovich. Whoever owns Chelsea finally, let him not destroy the foundation Abramovich has built already for unnecessary business

It also seems to me that during the time that Roman Abramovich owned the team, everything was fine with the team.  He seems to have been a good sports sponsor and manager. 
Now I hear and read that some big Turkish businessman is close to buying Chelsea?  I think this will not be a very good choice for all the British, since the team is clearly part of the national heritage and identity.  In this sense, Trump seems to be a better fit. 
And it would be even better if someone from the richest Englishmen would have bought the team.  It would be right.

[ethereumhunter]

Football is not the same as having long experience managing a business. The question is, is Trump passionate about football and successes in it like Abramovich? Football is not just about making money alone.
However, am going to miss Abramovich. Whoever owns Chelsea finally, let him not destroy the foundation Abramovich has built already for unnecessary business

Yes, it is completely different from managing a business. It requires skill in managing the players and strategy. They may have similarities in managing risk and strategies but have differences in reality on the ground.

Hopefully, if Trump can buy Chelsea, he will keep it better and develop it even bigger and achieve something never before. And hopefully, Trump can be calmer in managing it.

[Theones]

I recently came across a sport headline breaking: Donald Trump reveals interest in buying Chelsea football club. And many thoughts ran through my mind, can Trump among many other bidders be the right man for the club. Cause it's only businessmen with the kind of passion as Roman Ibrahimovic had for the club that can still sustain and keep keeping the flag flying from where Ibrahimovic stopped.

What your take on this, with the likes of Trump in the race for the ownership of Chelsea?

Zlatan Abramovich and Roman Ibrahimovic - good mix )
Speaking on the topic, I do not see any problem in the fact that Chelsea will be bought by Trump. Even if someone does not like Trump as a politician, this does not mean that he should not be loved as a businessman. And it seems to me that it is better for Trump to be the owner of Chelsea than some regular sheikh (I don’t feel any negative towards them, but sometimes for them it’s not only a business, but also a purchase of status or money laundering).

I watched a documentary on Trump and got to know that he owned an airline too which went to into loss and ultimately it was closed. One of his colleagues admired him so much that even during those days - trump sided him. There is some charisma in his personality - Trump is liked by the American that is why he was supported by many Americans, most of the american appreciated and admired his policies. So, I think there is no harm if Trump own it.

[molsewid]

Yes, it is completely different from managing a business. It requires skill in managing the players and strategy. They may have similarities in managing risk and strategies but have differences in reality on the ground.

Hopefully, if Trump can buy Chelsea, he will keep it better and develop it even bigger and achieve something never before. And hopefully, Trump can be calmer in managing it.

Well I guess if ever Trump possibly the one who could buy Chelsea Club he will going to hire people with skills especially those who are sporty at heart to run this business. I still looking Trump as a successful businessman and I also think that if he alone will going to manage this sports business it would be a total kind of challenging for him to run it. So I guess whether one of the five candidates who wanted to buy Chelsea hopefully could make it more better and develop it even bigger football business club.

[Zackgeno96]

Well I guess if ever Trump possibly the one who could buy Chelsea Club he will going to hire people with skills especially those who are sporty at heart to run this business. I still looking Trump as a successful businessman and I also think that if he alone will going to manage this sports business it would be a total kind of challenging for him to run it. So I guess whether one of the five candidates who wanted to buy Chelsea hopefully could make it more better and develop it even bigger football business club.

I totally agree with you. I think that the right choice for the new ownership of Chelsea would be someone who understands its industry, has the rights capabilities to manage it or is willing to have all the necessary skill sets to be knowledgeable and qualified to run it. So, if Trump is willing to be on his best to be a qualified owner and manager of Chelsea, then maybe he deserves to own it, and the same goes for the other bidders.

[madnessteat]

Football is not the same as having long experience managing a business. The question is, is Trump passionate about football and successes in it like Abramovich? Football is not just about making money alone.
However, am going to miss Abramovich. Whoever owns Chelsea finally, let him not destroy the foundation Abramovich has built already for unnecessary business

Yes, it is completely different from managing a business. It requires skill in managing the players and strategy. They may have similarities in managing risk and strategies but have differences in reality on the ground.

Hopefully, if Trump can buy Chelsea, he will keep it better and develop it even bigger and achieve something never before. And hopefully, Trump can be calmer in managing it.

As I said in this thread, if Trump can run the U.S., then running a soccer club, even a club like Chelsea, is no problem for him. Personally, I have no doubt about that.

Besides, buying a soccer club does not mean becoming the coach of the team. For that there are specially trained people with a lot of experience under their belt.

[Gozie51]

On another side amidst all the bidders for the Chelsea club, I don't know how they can successfully do payment for whoever will get the bid because I held Abramovich has been restricted to do business with UK and maybe this sanction of more than 20 Russian high profile personalities extends to EU and US. So do we think payment is going to be made?

Or is bitcoin going to be a preferred choice ?

[ufaiz50]

I am not really familiar with this restriction being mentioned but, as businessmen, I think that the parties involve with this project and transactions will surely go out of the usual setting and find ways to let it proceed, even if it means embracing newer methods and technologies. As per the rightful choice for the ownership of Chelsea, only those who are part of the company would know based on the price of the bidders, but on top of that this is still a business agenda so we can’t really know how they would chose the new owner then.

[Zlantann]

Roman Abramovich has set a standard in Chelsea that would be very difficult for a new buyer to break. His passion and love for Chelsea is incomparable. He is a man that has no respect for race or nationality, in fact he is not a racist. Some of African best footballers came from his football club.
Donald Trump is an opposite of Roman Abramovich. Trump is money conscious and profit oriented and I doubt his passion for the game of football. I am not also sure Trump would treat every player equally regardless of their skin colour or nationality. Hence, Trump is a very wrong choice.

[Mauser]

What your take on this, with the likes of Trump in the race for the ownership of Chelsea?

Chelsea FC is major team in Europe that won a lot of championship since Abramovich bought the club. There is international interest in the team, the new owner could be a foreigner again. Trump definitely has the capabilities of pulling such a deal of. He loves public attention and can get the financing done. Only minor problem could be that he doesn't seem as the typical football fan. Not being an expert in the sport is no issue, he will have to listen to the manager and coaches. Also the fans should have no problem I would imagine. Trump seems very similar to the British prime minister Boris Johnson.
Yesterday I read that Nick Candy is biding  2.5bn GBP for the team. This is going to be an interesting takeover battle. I just wonder if Abramovich is really going to donate all the money he makes of the deal. With such prices it will be a big payoff for him.

[KTChampions]

Well I guess if ever Trump possibly the one who could buy Chelsea Club he will going to hire people with skills especially those who are sporty at heart to run this business. I still looking Trump as a successful businessman and I also think that if he alone will going to manage this sports business it would be a total kind of challenging for him to run it. So I guess whether one of the five candidates who wanted to buy Chelsea hopefully could make it more better and develop it even bigger football business club.

Sure. Trump is a good manager and the fact that he is not a football fan is good - he will choose competent management and they will work for the good of the club. By the way, I remember how Abramovich bought Shevchenko and always wanted to see him in the squad, even though it was contrary to Mourinho's vision. Therefore, it remains to be seen whether it is good or bad when the owner is too passionate about football.

[ropyu1978]

Roman Abramovich has set a standard in Chelsea that would be very difficult for a new buyer to break. His passion and love for Chelsea is incomparable. He is a man that has no respect for race or nationality, in fact he is not a racist. Some of African best footballers came from his football club.
Donald Trump is an opposite of Roman Abramovich. Trump is money conscious and profit oriented and I doubt his passion for the game of football. I am not also sure Trump would treat every player equally regardless of their skin colour or nationality. Hence, Trump is a very wrong choice.

I also really agree with your review, Trump is not the right choice to replace Abramovich, because he is not at all interested in the world of football, even he does not understand about the world of football, even though he has a right hand who is good at managing football, but most likely a player will not want to join chelsea, because he differentiates too much ethnicity, race and religion, while in professional football there should be no differences in ethnicity, race and religion, all in one team, respect and take care of each other, as happened when liferpol lifted the carabau cup .

[mindrust]

I recently came across a sport headline breaking: Donald Trump reveals interest in buying Chelsea football club. And many thoughts ran through my mind, can Trump among many other bidders be the right man for the club. Cause it's only businessmen with the kind of passion as Roman Ibrahimovic had for the club that can still sustain and keep keeping the flag flying from where Ibrahimovic stopped.

What your take on this, with the likes of Trump in the race for the ownership of Chelsea?

Could be. But why would he want to own a property in the UK? The UK already showed that they could seize the properties of the billionaires without any valid reason. I know Russia is in war with Ukraine but why would Abramovitz be responsible for Russia's actions? He is not a government guy after all.

I would stay away from the UK they showed themselves untrustworthy.

[Zilon]

Trump is a good business mogul so if he buys Chelsea he might do well in managing the club. But if Chelsea changes ownership the club might suffer some down moments in the early period of ownership transfer but i know for sure Trump will make a good director but it might take a while for the club to adapt to new management 

[Fatunad]

Well I guess if ever Trump possibly the one who could buy Chelsea Club he will going to hire people with skills especially those who are sporty at heart to run this business. I still looking Trump as a successful businessman and I also think that if he alone will going to manage this sports business it would be a total kind of challenging for him to run it. So I guess whether one of the five candidates who wanted to buy Chelsea hopefully could make it more better and develop it even bigger football business club.

Sure. Trump is a good manager and the fact that he is not a football fan is good - he will choose competent management and they will work for the good of the club. By the way, I remember how Abramovich bought Shevchenko and always wanted to see him in the squad, even though it was contrary to Mourinho's vision. Therefore, it remains to be seen whether it is good or bad when the owner is too passionate about football.

Doesnt matter if the owner is knowledgeable or not or having a passion or not because they would simply hire someone to do the job and its not compulsory honestly but it would be good if he had really the idea
on what he's been dealing with.Speaking if its the right choice then who are we for him to stop if he tends to choose or be the owner of Chelsea?
As long you do have the money then you could  do almost everything.

[ajochems]

Trump is a good option for many corporate. In his rule to the United States, he made many changes in law related to the Capitalists. Not only he made influence on United States, he had made a influence on the developing countries and made many counter attack to many nation foreign policies.Chelsea shares rate will increase in a couple of years and Trump may be the root cause for it.

[Boristhecat]

Zlatan Abramovich and Roman Ibrahimovic - good mix )
Speaking on the topic, I do not see any problem in the fact that Chelsea will be bought by Trump. Even if someone does not like Trump as a politician, this does not mean that he should not be loved as a businessman. And it seems to me that it is better for Trump to be the owner of Chelsea than some regular sheikh (I don’t feel any negative towards them, but sometimes for them it’s not only a business, but also a purchase of status or money laundering).

I watched a documentary on Trump and got to know that he owned an airline too which went to into loss and ultimately it was closed. One of his colleagues admired him so much that even during those days - trump sided him. There is some charisma in his personality - Trump is liked by the American that is why he was supported by many Americans, most of the american appreciated and admired his policies. So, I think there is no harm if Trump own it.

I watched a similar film (or rather read an article) and this material seemed to me very subjective - ordinary propaganda. As far as I remember, there were listed businesses where Trump failed and there are many more than one airline. But for some reason, those businesses where Trump succeeded were not mentioned there, although there were also many of them. Trump is indifferent to me, but I see bias in such a presentation of information.
I don't think he's any better/worse than the other businessmen who are currently bidding to buy Chelsea.