Could Trump be the right choice for the ownership of Chelsea.

[paxmao]

That would be quite interesting to see. I dislike Trump in most ways, he tends to draw the focus of attention, does name-calling to opponents all the time and before he was banned, twitted with arrogance and aggressiveness.  But all that that is to be despised in politics is exactly what can make a football team more famous and fun.

Another matter is if Trump is really rich. Rumours say that he owns a lot, but also owes a lot.

[1715244313]

1715244313

[1715244313]

1715244313

[1715244313]

1715244313

[1715244313]

1715244313

[jrrsparkles]

He was a good business man but it is enough to run a football club? I don't think so and it maybe just a buzz created from the spark because we can't take everything seriously even Trump itself talks about it. He could be successful with entertainment industry or real estate so if he is smart enough he will go for that.

[delfastTions]

That would be quite interesting to see. I dislike Trump in most ways, he tends to draw the focus of attention, does name-calling to opponents all the time and before he was banned, twitted with arrogance and aggressiveness.  But all that that is to be despised in politics is exactly what can make a football team more famous and fun.

Another matter is if Trump is really rich. Rumours say that he owns a lot, but also owes a lot.

Here the question arises - is it worth the team to become "fun"?
In what sense is it fun to score stupid goals, or entertain fans with jokes on the football field?   
 All the same, this team is very serious and their behavior is suppressed, it is not worthy of them.  And it is right.  Serious football is mostly without unnecessary jokes. 
If Trump appears, which I doubt, then anything can be expected, but I think just not the best game of the season.

[michellee]

He was a good business man but it is enough to run a football club? I don't think so and it maybe just a buzz created from the spark because we can't take everything seriously even Trump itself talks about it. He could be successful with entertainment industry or real estate so if he is smart enough he will go for that.

As a businessman, maybe he wants to spread his business in sports and who knows, the club can grow more. But hopefully, those who buy the club are people who really have a passion for sports and want to advance the club. But if Trump really wants to buy Chelsea, hopefully, it has nothing to do with politics and indeed because he wants to help Chelsea move forward and develop even more in the future. We can only support whoever buys Chelsea.

[mm2543363580]

I watched a documentary on Trump and got to know that he owned an airline too which went to into loss and ultimately it was closed. One of his colleagues admired him so much that even during those days - trump sided him. There is some charisma in his personality - Trump is liked by the American that is why he was supported by many Americans, most of the american appreciated and admired his policies. So, I think there is no harm if Trump own it.

I hate Trump probably more than I hate any other dictator in the world and Trump wasn't even a dictator, he lost, he tried to overturn but failed and he just left, so it was a democratic situation even though it pushed the boundaries a lot. However, even as a person who hates him, I have to give it to him that there is something about him that rallied the republicans more than anyone else in the world, there was something about him that rallied even democrats more than any other president.

Biden became the president with the most votes ever in history, and Trump got the second most votes in the history as well, which tells you something when he got the second most votes and still lost. All in all, he would rile up the protesters, and he would rile up the supporters. Not a bad choice. However, he is broke and has no money so he can't buy Chelsea, probably can't even buy just their training ground.

One of the good things Biden did. Was getting their forces out from Afghanistan after 2 decades. Which might have saved a huge revenue for States. But some of the bad decisions of Trump does not make him a bad man. He has support from his colleagues and his team. Although he is not a sportsman and his personality shows that he is not much interested in sports or exercise so I am not sure he  would be able to deal with this stress.

[jrrsparkles]

He was a good business man but it is enough to run a football club? I don't think so and it maybe just a buzz created from the spark because we can't take everything seriously even Trump itself talks about it. He could be successful with entertainment industry or real estate so if he is smart enough he will go for that.

As a businessman, maybe he wants to spread his business in sports and who knows, the club can grow more. But hopefully, those who buy the club are people who really have a passion for sports and want to advance the club. But if Trump really wants to buy Chelsea, hopefully, it has nothing to do with politics and indeed because he wants to help Chelsea move forward and develop even more in the future. We can only support whoever buys Chelsea.

Obviously no one really want to invest on something big to spoil their future atleast Trump won't do that in my opinion. But the competition for the club is big so I don't know even if he really interested to buy the club still he has to bid more to buy it due to more competition and who knows he got enough on his bank account or not.

[TopT3ns]

Doesnt matter if the owner is knowledgeable or not or having a passion or not because they would simply hire someone to do the job and its not compulsory honestly but it would be good if he had really the idea
on what he's been dealing with.Speaking if its the right choice then who are we for him to stop if he tends to choose or be the owner of Chelsea?
As long you do have the money then you could  do almost everything.

Yeah its true about not matter about new owner for Chelsea have passion and knowledge about football but just waiting how loyal and want to waste much money for club contributing as active on window transfer, maybe looks the same with first time when Abramovich arrive 19 years ago on Chelsea, he not have experience about how to manage one club but his decision as loyal owner really brave with much money out for getting star player. Right now all football owner not have passion with football but they take care with business on sport competition just take profit with good manage club.

[KTChampions]

Sure. Trump is a good manager and the fact that he is not a football fan is good - he will choose competent management and they will work for the good of the club. By the way, I remember how Abramovich bought Shevchenko and always wanted to see him in the squad, even though it was contrary to Mourinho's vision. Therefore, it remains to be seen whether it is good or bad when the owner is too passionate about football.

Doesnt matter if the owner is knowledgeable or not or having a passion or not because they would simply hire someone to do the job and its not compulsory honestly but it would be good if he had really the idea
on what he's been dealing with.Speaking if its the right choice then who are we for him to stop if he tends to choose or be the owner of Chelsea?
As long you do have the money then you could  do almost everything.

Actually, as I have already written, in some cases it is important - Abramovich interfered in the transfer policy of Chelsea (when Mourinho was the head coach) and perhaps this was one of the factors that led to the fact that gradually the tension grew and the results worsened. And in the end, Mourinho left the club.

[Theones]

Sure. Trump is a good manager and the fact that he is not a football fan is good - he will choose competent management and they will work for the good of the club. By the way, I remember how Abramovich bought Shevchenko and always wanted to see him in the squad, even though it was contrary to Mourinho's vision. Therefore, it remains to be seen whether it is good or bad when the owner is too passionate about football.

Doesnt matter if the owner is knowledgeable or not or having a passion or not because they would simply hire someone to do the job and its not compulsory honestly but it would be good if he had really the idea
on what he's been dealing with.Speaking if its the right choice then who are we for him to stop if he tends to choose or be the owner of Chelsea?
As long you do have the money then you could  do almost everything.

Actually, as I have already written, in some cases it is important - Abramovich interfered in the transfer policy of Chelsea (when Mourinho was the head coach) and perhaps this was one of the factors that led to the fact that gradually the tension grew and the results worsened. And in the end, Mourinho left the club.

Yes - that's correct. Most of the businessmen have the managers to take care of their business. But Trump knows how to keep things running. May of the Americans supported his decision and he was admired and liked by many Americans. So I would say if he gets the team, maybe it the team will be happy on getting the new owner. Sometimes the change is good.

[Theones]

Obviously no one really want to invest on something big to spoil their future atleast Trump won't do that in my opinion. But the competition for the club is big so I don't know even if he really interested to buy the club still he has to bid more to buy it due to more competition and who knows he got enough on his bank account or not.

When you visit states you will see so many Trump Towers. This means Trump did really well in real estate. Trump owned an airline too - He then became a president and was liked and admired by many Americans because he was a spokesperson of many Americans. If he became owner of Chelsea - there are good chances that the team will get a good owner.

[titular]

I am a huge Chelsea fan, I am not sure how I would feel about this.

The problem is that he is such a controversial figure. You will have some fans that will boycott games if something like this were to happen.

I have nothing horrible to say about Mr. Trump, but I just know wherever he goes, a storm brews.

[Theones]

I am a huge Chelsea fan, I am not sure how I would feel about this.

The problem is that he is such a controversial figure. You will have some fans that will boycott games if something like this were to happen.

I have nothing horrible to say about Mr. Trump, but I just know wherever he goes, a storm brews.

We can hope for the best. Trump is not a bad person - he had a successful career and what not he became president. If he can do well being a president he will surly be a good owner of the football team, but that would be big change coming for Chelsea. But change can be good sometime.

[bitgov]

Yeah its true about not matter about new owner for Chelsea have passion and knowledge about football but just waiting how loyal and want to waste much money for club contributing as active on window transfer, maybe looks the same with first time when Abramovich arrive 19 years ago on Chelsea, he not have experience about how to manage one club but his decision as loyal owner really brave with much money out for getting star player. Right now all football owner not have passion with football but they take care with business on sport competition just take profit with good manage club.
[/quote]
Nothing in the world is permanent and we all agree with it. Abramovich gave his precious 19 year to the club, it will be surly very difficult for him to accept that he will not be owner of the club he gave his time to. But Trump is not a bad choice either. He pulled off his presidential tenure well. I am sure if he become the owner of Chelsea - the club will flourish!

[bitgov]

Doesnt matter if the owner is knowledgeable or not or having a passion or not because they would simply hire someone to do the job and its not compulsory honestly but it would be good if he had really the idea
on what he's been dealing with.Speaking if its the right choice then who are we for him to stop if he tends to choose or be the owner of Chelsea?
As long you do have the money then you could  do almost everything.

Yeah its true about not matter about new owner for Chelsea have passion and knowledge about football but just waiting how loyal and want to waste much money for club contributing as active on window transfer, maybe looks the same with first time when Abramovich arrive 19 years ago on Chelsea, he not have experience about how to manage one club but his decision as loyal owner really brave with much money out for getting star player. Right now all football owner not have passion with football but they take care with business on sport competition just take profit with good manage club.

Nothing in the world is permanent and we all agree with it. Abramovich gave his precious 19 year to the club, it will be surly very difficult for him to accept that he will not be owner of the club he gave his time to. But Trump is not a bad choice either. He pulled off his presidential tenure well. I am sure if he become the owner of Chelsea - the club will flourish!

[DeathAngel]

Football clubs are usually a black hole. They cost so much to run so I’d say Trump wouldn’t want to be anywhere near Chelsea FC, especially as the club is owned by Russian crook Abramovich. Chelsea are going to end up with a consortium who are nowhere near as rich as the Russian. Their fun is over, I predict a far less successful period for Chelsea incoming.

[Cryptock]

Someone has to take over – so why not Trump. Trump had a successful career history and he likes taking risks and he has an amazing personality. I support Trump being Chelsea owner. I think the club will flourish when Trump will over take. He has an amazing personality and American liked him. Let’s hope that coming days bring good fortune for Chelsea.

[Theones]

Someone has to take over – so why not Trump. Trump had a successful career history and he likes taking risks and he has an amazing personality. I support Trump being Chelsea owner. I think the club will flourish when Trump will over take. He has an amazing personality and American liked him. Let’s hope that coming days bring good fortune for Chelsea.

Latest update is - Trump's billionaire pal Woody Johnson has £2 billion bit to get the ownership of Chelsea - I am following the news daily for the latest development and who will be next owner of Chelsea. But on the same note - I will be very sad for Current owner Roman Abramovich who will be loosing his passion after 19 year. What a tough luck!

[Theones]

I am a huge Chelsea fan, I am not sure how I would feel about this.

The problem is that he is such a controversial figure. You will have some fans that will boycott games if something like this were to happen.

I have nothing horrible to say about Mr. Trump, but I just know wherever he goes, a storm brews.

This is a very interesting forum but I didn't see any life in the forum for quiet sometime. I think no one is much interested in Trump or people are not interested in knowing the fate of Chelsea. I would like to know what people think about the new owner of the one going away.

[coinmanhere]

Well that dumb moron is not good for anything.

[Theones]

Well that dumb moron is not good for anything.

Well. I disagree!
He completed his presidential tenure successfully - Many American supported him, He is a successful and a rich businessman, so why not. Trump has an amazing personality. He is a leader and if be the owner of the club, I am sure he knows how to keep the his team happy.