Elizabeth Warren hatred for crypto is like no other

[fullhdpixel]

There is no way to avoid all this, if Elizabeth isn't doing it another person will the bitter truth is there will always be someone who will go against crypto tech and to be fair it's normal, such have to happen for crypto to prosper that's my own belief.

That is true, if she is not doing it, there will always be someone else who is out there sharing negative thoughts about Bitcoin. It is a normal thing that is always bound to happen. Starting from the first time that I got to know what Bitcoin is all about, there has always been people who never say anything good about Bitcoin, they always try to discourage others with every slightest opportunity they get.

So, it is nothing new to me, and moreover not everyone would be part of the Bitcoin market, it’s just meant for the people who truly understands it and value what they have.

[Ketesnuko]

People like Elizabeth Warren will only have to use bad crypto projects as their excuses that crypto is bad generally, yea I know there is no way to get rid of bad projects or scam projects in crypto space but she needs to understand what BTC can do for people, instead of going after crypto in general she should use that energy on bad projects.

[fvb]

I always ignored the statements of such people who, in my opinion, are far away and who do not understand everything very well. But all the same, they shout at every convenient speech about the dangers of something in which they do not understand. So I'm not interested in that opinion.

[Abiky]

That media has been used for this purpose for as long as i can remember, the goal is basically just to highlight crypto (most especially Bitcoin) as being negative/bad, it has worked to an extent, but not to the level they want it to cause only ignorant people who don't do their research just believe absolutely everything they see on the internet. I personally would ignore Elizabeth Warren and her statements, it really isn't important and doesn't mean anything in the grand scheme of things, so let's not place too much importance on that.

Elizabeth Warren is just one "hater" who doesn't understand what crypto is truly about. Same thing goes for Warren Buffet and Donald Trump. They are the old generation which quickly rejects innovation because they're comfortable with the old banking system. It doesn't matter what the minority says against crypto, as long as there's a loyal community supporting it every step of the way. Decentralization and censorship-resistance will ensure crypto will last for generations.

One thing for sure is that Bitcoin's been the best-performing crypto asset since its inception, with gains never before seen in history. There's been a lot of criticism against Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, yet they're still standing strong to this date. With many countries opening their arms to crypto/Blockchain tech, it should only be a matter of time before we experience a cashless society. Just my thoughts

[robelneo]

Don't tell me you have nothing to say about Elizabeth Warren, she is yet again throwing stones at crypto claiming that Russia can use crypto to evade sanctions, FUD? But it's said that Ukraine got up to 20million in crypto donations, why can't see just support this instead of FUD?

It's been like this ever since some people will shill other people will create FUD Cryptocurrency because we have to admit that Cryptocurrency has its own advantage and disadvantages and this is where shillers and FUDSTER get their opinion if they are against Cryptocurrency they will always find fault because they failed or just ignore the beauty of decentralization.

Even if the whole world accepted Cryptocurrency and this will not end there are still people loyal to centralization, this war only shows the advantage of using Cryptocurrency it's a safe haven for citizens whose country is involved in war.

[crzy]

Don't tell me you have nothing to say about Elizabeth Warren, she is yet again throwing stones at crypto claiming that Russia can use crypto to evade sanctions, FUD? But it's said that Ukraine got up to 20million in crypto donations, why can't see just support this instead of FUD?

This is why USA will soon regulate cryptocurrency so they can still impose sanctions to Russia, this is not a FUD more likely a scenario that many countries will soon regulate. Russia will of course use Cryptocurrency as an alternative and they are already on process for this, once they make this legal we can expect a good pump but hoping that regulations wont hurt crypto users.

[adzino]

Don't tell me you have nothing to say about Elizabeth Warren, she is yet again throwing stones at crypto claiming that Russia can use crypto to evade sanctions, FUD? But it's said that Ukraine got up to 20million in crypto donations, why can't see just support this instead of FUD?

It is because people pay more attention to FUDs and negative news. But how is this FUD when Russia can use crypto currencies to evade sanctions? I mean doesn't it prove that Crypto currencies are more superior than fiat currency and no government or anyone can stop anyone from using their own money? Doesn't sound like an FUD but more like people should be FOMOing because Russians will be ditching their fiat currency and start using bitcoin.

[Fatunad]

Don't tell me you have nothing to say about Elizabeth Warren, she is yet again throwing stones at crypto claiming that Russia can use crypto to evade sanctions, FUD? But it's said that Ukraine got up to 20million in crypto donations, why can't see just support this instead of FUD?

Cant really control what others would say regarding crypto. First and foremost, bitcoin is decentralized and if Russia using dex which has no jusirdiction by thr government cant really intervene on their thing if they wanted to use btc or crypto for that matter. Its just a simple gesture which should be ignore actually.

You are right! When it comes to words to be spoken then all of us does have the freedom of speech even if they would be saying up thing which is against on the main principle of bitcoins existence
then let them be because the people or community around isnt really that easy to believe and would be reacting into these times. Those words wouldnt really be that too influential.
Bitcoins purpose could really go into some extent because it is just a digital currency which everyone could make use off without any interventions.

[doomloop]

Don't tell me you have nothing to say about Elizabeth Warren, she is yet again throwing stones at crypto claiming that Russia can use crypto to evade sanctions, FUD? But it's said that Ukraine got up to 20million in crypto donations, why can't see just support this instead of FUD?

Everyone is free to have their own opinion about Bitcoin, you can’t really change that. There will always be people who are out there to say bad about Bitcoin, they are always blinded by hatred and would never see the good things that the cryptocurrency community is doing, they are only going to be seeing the bad ones instead.

Although I am not saying that it’s wrong for someone to point out something they feel is not right, because if they never point out the wrong things then there would be no way for us to know all those things and try to fix them up. So whatever she wants to say, she’s free to say it, she is not the only one that has made such comments, there have also been other people who has been saying that Russia would use Bitcoin as a way to evade sanctions. But, one thing I know for sure is that whatever they’re all saying, it won’t affect Bitcoin.

[jostorres]

I really don't want to get to know Elizabeth Warren and really don't want to know what impact it will have on crypto. No matter how many times he talks about the negative side of the crypto market. Remember cryptocurrency is freedom especially Bitcoin and no one can dictate to anyone for this. Except for the policy of the country where the witch Elizabeth Warren lives. Anyway, the fact is we still make over $30K. He asks who can spread FUD so easily, after all he will never say anything.

Not necessary but up to you if you want to know her personality on what makes you think why he hate crypto. I think he doesn't hate crypto and he doesn't spread fud but you guys only misunderstood what he said.

I think what he mean is Russia can still escape some sanctions given to them and he don't want this to happen because he wants Russia to see suffer a lot but it seems Russia is too brave to answer this, this is why they are now planning to shutdown their internet. It was like they are saying that they don't care about cryptos. The crypto donation in Ukraine can serve as a counter for any negativities including fud, there's no need to worry.

[Abiky]

Everyone is free to have their own opinion about Bitcoin, you can’t really change that. There will always be people who are out there to say bad about Bitcoin, they are always blinded by hatred and would never see the good things that the cryptocurrency community is doing, they are only going to be seeing the bad ones instead.

Although I am not saying that it’s wrong for someone to point out something they feel is not right, because if they never point out the wrong things then there would be no way for us to know all those things and try to fix them up. So whatever she wants to say, she’s free to say it, she is not the only one that has made such comments, there have also been other people who has been saying that Russia would use Bitcoin as a way to evade sanctions. But, one thing I know for sure is that whatever they’re all saying, it won’t affect Bitcoin.

Of course. Not everyone will find Bitcoin attractive. Some will hate it, while others will embrace it for their own benefit. Opinions won't affect Bitcoin thanks to its decentralized and censorship-resistant nature. There are many people supporting the Blockchain, so it should be able to last for a long time (probably forever).

As expected, Elizabeth Warren is a government official so it's normal to see her opposing Bitcoin. Her opinion doesn't matter as long as the majority is with Bitcoin. People should focus on what matters most which is maintaining Bitcoin's decentralization. As long as this is prioritized, there should be nothing to worry about. Just my opinion

[isaac_clarke22]

~

Turns out that the decentralized idea of Bitcoin goes way more than what it means. Imagine if Bitcoin was not decentralized, then the so-called "Cancel Culture" will just start to say crap to it especially in Twitter.
Bitcoin is one of those "you won't lose anything" if you embrace it.

[wxa7115]

This is not fear. Her life her decision why you are taking her deeply. Just leave her. She is free to decide.

I do not really care what she thinks but it's not about her opinion about crypto or decision to speak against it. It's more about her hypocrisy as pointed out in the post. Crypto donations to Ukraine is all over the news and it's impossible for her not to have heard or read about it.

That is what the politicians like to do, they try to cherry pick on every single issue to try to get an advantage at a later time, but this is not going to work against bitcoin, bitcoin is just a tool and like any tool it can be used for good or evil and whichever decision people take it is not the tool that somehow is at fault for what happens afterwards.

So I have no doubts that if Russia uses bitcoin to reduce the burden on the sanctions used against it then the US will use this to try to create even harsher regulations against bitcoin.

[Yaunfitda]

I really don't want to get to know Elizabeth Warren and really don't want to know what impact it will have on crypto. No matter how many times he talks about the negative side of the crypto market. Remember cryptocurrency is freedom especially Bitcoin and no one can dictate to anyone for this. Except for the policy of the country where the witch Elizabeth Warren lives. Anyway, the fact is we still make over $30K. He asks who can spread FUD so easily, after all he will never say anything.

Not necessary but up to you if you want to know her personality on what makes you think why he hate crypto. I think he doesn't hate crypto and he doesn't spread fud but you guys only misunderstood what he said.

I think what he mean is Russia can still escape some sanctions given to them and he don't want this to happen because he wants Russia to see suffer a lot but it seems Russia is too brave to answer this, this is why they are now planning to shutdown their internet. It was like they are saying that they don't care about cryptos. The crypto donation in Ukraine can serve as a counter for any negativities including fud, there's no need to worry.

And I don't think that Russia will shift to crypto or bitcoin to escape the sanctions. They already have a wise idea, sell their oil at a cheap price to countries not ally or ally with them. So who wouldn't want that? Except maybe the repercussions is that the West might sanctions those who are going to buy oil, so another politicking. Anyhow, as I have said, Russia has many ways still up their sleeves that's why I don't see crypto as their best options to evade the embargo on them.

[Jackl87]

Don't tell me you have nothing to say about Elizabeth Warren, she is yet again throwing stones at crypto claiming that Russia can use crypto to evade sanctions, FUD? But it's said that Ukraine got up to 20million in crypto donations, why can't see just support this instead of FUD?

I am not from the United States and therefore also not really familiar with all their politicians but if i remember correctly then this is also the same person that proudly declared herself as a native american? If that is the case then it should already be clear that this person is saying stupid stuff from time to time or maybe even all the time because she is as white as it can get. Her statement this time is kinda true though, cryptocurrencies can be used to transfer funds from one person to another even if one of those persons or institutes is a target of a sanction like we see it now in the ukraine war. So yes it is kinda true that you can not really sanction cryptocurrencies and that is a big plus of cryptos in my opinion.

[Anonylz]

Don't tell me you have nothing to say about Elizabeth Warren, she is yet again throwing stones at crypto claiming that Russia can use crypto to evade sanctions, FUD? But it's said that Ukraine got up to 20million in crypto donations, why can't see just support this instead of FUD?

Everyone has the right to their opinion, you can't force her to understand or see reason why she should support btc if she doesn't want to.
It is difficult to convince people like this until they come to experience it first hand, only then will they have a change of opinion.
The whole world already witness how btc  and other crypto becomes the only currency use for donations, even if she pretend not to notice, try to ignore it, history has already been made and there is no denying it. Soon she will come around, most of the btc haters are now btc lovers.

[wxa7115]

I really don't want to get to know Elizabeth Warren and really don't want to know what impact it will have on crypto. No matter how many times he talks about the negative side of the crypto market. Remember cryptocurrency is freedom especially Bitcoin and no one can dictate to anyone for this. Except for the policy of the country where the witch Elizabeth Warren lives. Anyway, the fact is we still make over $30K. He asks who can spread FUD so easily, after all he will never say anything.

Not necessary but up to you if you want to know her personality on what makes you think why he hate crypto. I think he doesn't hate crypto and he doesn't spread fud but you guys only misunderstood what he said.

I think what he mean is Russia can still escape some sanctions given to them and he don't want this to happen because he wants Russia to see suffer a lot but it seems Russia is too brave to answer this, this is why they are now planning to shutdown their internet. It was like they are saying that they don't care about cryptos. The crypto donation in Ukraine can serve as a counter for any negativities including fud, there's no need to worry.

And I don't think that Russia will shift to crypto or bitcoin to escape the sanctions. They already have a wise idea, sell their oil at a cheap price to countries not ally or ally with them. So who wouldn't want that? Except maybe the repercussions is that the West might sanctions those who are going to buy oil, so another politicking. Anyhow, as I have said, Russia has many ways still up their sleeves that's why I don't see crypto as their best options to evade the embargo on them.

Obviously they cannot escape all the sanctions they has been imposed to them with bitcoin, but as long as they can use it to diminish the impact of the sanctions, even if a little bit, that is going to be more than enough.

But their tactic of selling oil for a cheaper price is without a doubt a good one, after all countries not involved in the war will be happy to buy it, and even if the US does not like this there is nothing they can do, because if they threatened other countries with sanctions then they will be the ones that will seem to be tyrannical in their approach, as if you do not think and do what they want then sanctions will be imposed on you.

[Abiky]

Everyone has the right to their opinion, you can't force her to understand or see reason why she should support btc if she doesn't want to.
It is difficult to convince people like this until they come to experience it first hand, only then will they have a change of opinion.
The whole world already witness how btc  and other crypto becomes the only currency use for donations, even if she pretend not to notice, try to ignore it, history has already been made and there is no denying it. Soon she will come around, most of the btc haters are now btc lovers.

Of course. Everyone has their own opinion about Bitcoin. Some people say Bitcoin is the future of money, while others say it's a scam. It really doesn't matter what a few people say as long as the majority is with Bitcoin. Despite heavy criticism against Bitcoin, the Blockchain's still standing strong after all these years. That's thanks to the decentralized and censorship-resistant design of Bitcoin. If it was centralized, a negative comment from a politician like Elizabeth Warren would've destroyed it already.

Most politicians hate Bitcoin simply because they support big banks and the current economic system powered by Fiat. Constant opposition is to be expected as Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies become extremely popular worldwide. As long as decentralization is preserved, nothing else matters. Just my opinion

[BitKongy]

Ignore people who have less idea about crypto its a waste of time, it's not their fault that they are spreading false claims about something they don't understand though, my advice is do not let their point of view affect your own, in future, they might have a change of heart.

[Lizzylove1]

She is not the first that started FUDing crypto, some persons are under influence by powerful forces to trash Crypto but crypto always move past them quickly. Secretly they may be holding cryptocurrencies. Russians have been sanctioned enough and that is enough to bring their economy down.