Drake became partners of the Stake Casino

[KTChampions]

I think that in order to get a serious partnership or sponsorship you have to work very hard and stubbornly, so I would not separate the money "earned" and received in that way. Theoretically, he should declare any income and the tax office will know how much he earned from this partnership, but I do not know whether this data is public in the country where he pays taxes or not.

Speaking of taxes then we do know on how government do seriously take about it which it is understandable that there would really be a tax into it and the data or any information would be just personal.
Dont see for it to be exposed or just letting off or know the public on how much he do paid up. Does it really matter? It isnt really that right on boggling up our minds on how he do earn
or on how he do spend up his funds or money on various things.

If I remember correctly, in Norway (or Finland) any citizen can go to the website of the tax office and study the tax return of any other citizen (but not anonymously - you will find out who looked at your declaration). Such information is evaluated differently everywhere - somewhere as private, and somewhere as socially significant, that is, it is made public.
The very details of the cooperation between the casino and Drake do not really matter, but human curiosity is pushing to find out.

[1715235814]

1715235814

[1715235814]

1715235814

[1715235814]

1715235814

[1715235814]

1715235814

[Mahanton]

I think that in order to get a serious partnership or sponsorship you have to work very hard and stubbornly, so I would not separate the money "earned" and received in that way. Theoretically, he should declare any income and the tax office will know how much he earned from this partnership, but I do not know whether this data is public in the country where he pays taxes or not.

Speaking of taxes then we do know on how government do seriously take about it which it is understandable that there would really be a tax into it and the data or any information would be just personal.
Dont see for it to be exposed or just letting off or know the public on how much he do paid up. Does it really matter? It isnt really that right on boggling up our minds on how he do earn
or on how he do spend up his funds or money on various things.

If I remember correctly, in Norway (or Finland) any citizen can go to the website of the tax office and study the tax return of any other citizen (but not anonymously - you will find out who looked at your declaration). Such information is evaluated differently everywhere - somewhere as private, and somewhere as socially significant, that is, it is made public.
The very details of the cooperation between the casino and Drake do not really matter, but human curiosity is pushing to find out.

When someone around is curios then they would really be finding up ways on how for it to be known or justified their doubt that they do have in mind.I dont know that it could be possibly be happening on where someone could checked out someones declaration in private? If its neither on Norway or Finland then it might be only available into those places but you cant really see this in most countries.So its still hard to find the information that you are tending to seek or find on.

[goinmerry]

If I remember correctly, in Norway (or Finland) any citizen can go to the website of the tax office and study the tax return of any other citizen (but not anonymously - you will find out who looked at your declaration). Such information is evaluated differently everywhere - somewhere as private, and somewhere as socially significant, that is, it is made public.
The very details of the cooperation between the casino and Drake do not really matter, but human curiosity is pushing to find out.

Seriously? That is something already private and I think it's already violating our privacy. Even an employee of tax agencies can't easily access any information without permission. I'm not aware that it's possible in Norway or Finland etc.

Regardless, I don't understand what's the big deal on that part related to Drake's partnership with Stake.

I know it doesn't really matter to know what's behind the cooperation between Drake and Stake but I don't see why should be curious about that.

[stadus]

If I remember correctly, in Norway (or Finland) any citizen can go to the website of the tax office and study the tax return of any other citizen (but not anonymously - you will find out who looked at your declaration). Such information is evaluated differently everywhere - somewhere as private, and somewhere as socially significant, that is, it is made public.
The very details of the cooperation between the casino and Drake do not really matter, but human curiosity is pushing to find out.

Seriously? That is something already private and I think it's already violating our privacy. Even an employee of tax agencies can't easily access any information without permission. I'm not aware that it's possible in Norway or Finland etc.

Regardless, I don't understand what's the big deal on that part related to Drake's partnership with Stake.

I know it doesn't really matter to know what's behind the cooperation between Drake and Stake but I don't see why should be curious about that.

Sadly there can be those times like that especially when people got so curious about your personal information or even your tax declaration, actually I'm seeing that they are just envy that's why they would take such steps to answer their curiosity when infact they already knew that it is illegal to invade someone's privacy especially for sensitive informations like that.

[Silberman]

Agree. It's definitely a win-win situation for both Stake and Drake. And you got a point as well regarding Stake having the greater benefit in this partnership because like what you said, Drake is promoting them based on their contract. Certainly, Drake having many followers because he has a wide reach will garner many potential gamblers to play on Stake.com. At the same time, Drake is known to be a 'passionate' gambler, while he is promoting Stake, he will definitely play in it using his own money. After all, that's what he's known for - betting and risking big amounts.

So it's really a win on the side of Stake. Although I'm sure Drake would also enjoy some perks of being collaborated with them.

Since both parties are winning with this arrangement I think it is best to not look at things in that way, after all it is almost impossible to arrange things in such a way that both parties will benefit in the same exact proportion than the other, there will always be a party that wins more, and even if we were to agree with the assumption that stake is benefiting more than drake with this arrangement then we should applaud stake by being able to get such a good deal for themselves while benefiting drake in the process as well.

[KTChampions]

If I remember correctly, in Norway (or Finland) any citizen can go to the website of the tax office and study the tax return of any other citizen (but not anonymously - you will find out who looked at your declaration). Such information is evaluated differently everywhere - somewhere as private, and somewhere as socially significant, that is, it is made public.
The very details of the cooperation between the casino and Drake do not really matter, but human curiosity is pushing to find out.

Seriously? That is something already private and I think it's already violating our privacy. Even an employee of tax agencies can't easily access any information without permission. I'm not aware that it's possible in Norway or Finland etc.

Regardless, I don't understand what's the big deal on that part related to Drake's partnership with Stake.

I know it doesn't really matter to know what's behind the cooperation between Drake and Stake but I don't see why should be curious about that.

I found this information, as I understand it is common in the Scandinavian countries:

Privacy, what privacy? Many Nordic tax records are a phone call away

When top earners’ tax returns are published in Finland, they call it “national envy day”. In Sweden, one phone call will get you your lawmaker’s tax bill. Norwegians’ fascination with each others’ taxes has been labeled “financial porn”.

While the Panama Papers have forced British politicians to reveal tax details that are traditionally kept private, and U.S. presidential candidates are under pressure to do likewise, most Nordic citizens’ tax returns are freely available.

Every November, Finnish media publish the names of about 10,000 of the country’s biggest earners, plus hundreds of celebrities and sports stars, making headlines with top 10 lists of the biggest tax payers.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-panama-tax-nordics-idUSKCN0X91QE

Yes, I also think that this is too personal information, but as I mentioned in some countries this information is considered to be of public importance, so it becomes available to everyone.
Regarding Drake, this is interesting because he is a tier 1 celebrity and everyone (or many people) would be interested in how much he is paid for any promotion.

[stadus]

I found this information, as I understand it is common in the Scandinavian countries:

Privacy, what privacy? Many Nordic tax records are a phone call away

When top earners’ tax returns are published in Finland, they call it “national envy day”. In Sweden, one phone call will get you your lawmaker’s tax bill. Norwegians’ fascination with each others’ taxes has been labeled “financial porn”.

While the Panama Papers have forced British politicians to reveal tax details that are traditionally kept private, and U.S. presidential candidates are under pressure to do likewise, most Nordic citizens’ tax returns are freely available.

Every November, Finnish media publish the names of about 10,000 of the country’s biggest earners, plus hundreds of celebrities and sports stars, making headlines with top 10 lists of the biggest tax payers.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-panama-tax-nordics-idUSKCN0X91QE

Yes, I also think that this is too personal information, but as I mentioned in some countries this information is considered to be of public importance, so it becomes available to everyone.
Regarding Drake, this is interesting because he is a tier 1 celebrity and everyone (or many people) would be interested in how much he is paid for any promotion.

Well I believe getting too much information is bad for one's privacy, I mean would they also want that their private information will be revealed publicly? I don't wonder why they even have a national envy day or even call it that way. That's just too absurd! Breaching one's privacy is already considered illegal and I'm curious what's the root or cause why they started to make that laws.

I doubt that the US Senators would agree on that law, it would never be passed because US citizens really cares their own privacy.

[KTChampions]

Well I believe getting too much information is bad for one's privacy, I mean would they also want that their private information will be revealed publicly? I don't wonder why they even have a national envy day or even call it that way. That's just too absurd! Breaching one's privacy is already considered illegal and I'm curious what's the root or cause why they started to make that laws.

I doubt that the US Senators would agree on that law, it would never be passed because US citizens really cares their own privacy.

You are very optimistic. Remember how literally 20-30 years ago there was such a thing as a "secret bank deposit" when your relationship with the bank was kept secret and did not concern anyone. What is with this concept now? It just doesn't exist. The same will happen with other areas of life that are now private - officials will only say that this is done for your benefit and against terrorists and will take away your privacy.

[jossiel]

Since both parties are winning with this arrangement I think it is best to not look at things in that way, after all it is almost impossible to arrange things in such a way that both parties will benefit in the same exact proportion than the other, there will always be a party that wins more, and even if we were to agree with the assumption that stake is benefiting more than drake with this arrangement then we should applaud stake by being able to get such a good deal for themselves while benefiting drake in the process as well.

Yeah.

If they're making more than Drake and benefiting from this partnership, they did a good job on their end and they're able to maximize their investment through him.

They're not new to this so they know what's the drill and how to make it known in the market to get more gamblers inside their platform.

[seleme]

Since both parties are winning with this arrangement I think it is best to not look at things in that way, after all it is almost impossible to arrange things in such a way that both parties will benefit in the same exact proportion than the other, there will always be a party that wins more, and even if we were to agree with the assumption that stake is benefiting more than drake with this arrangement then we should applaud stake by being able to get such a good deal for themselves while benefiting drake in the process as well.

Yeah.

If they're making more than Drake and benefiting from this partnership, they did a good job on their end and they're able to maximize their investment through him.

They're not new to this so they know what's the drill and how to make it known in the market to get more gamblers inside their platform.

I still can't believe how bad website performance that sponsors Drake, UfC. This partnership will be win-with for both parties and new user flow is main goal of Stake marketing team. Let's see what will happen after first stream since Drake stream has been delayed for 5 weeks. He keep placing million dollars worth roulette bets on live roulette tables and keep promoting website on Instagram stories. The upcoming streams will cause more traffic on platform but I doubt Stake will be to handle that much server loading since today was big fiasco during weekly raffle.

[Yamifoud]

Since both parties are winning with this arrangement I think it is best to not look at things in that way, after all it is almost impossible to arrange things in such a way that both parties will benefit in the same exact proportion than the other, there will always be a party that wins more, and even if we were to agree with the assumption that stake is benefiting more than drake with this arrangement then we should applaud stake by being able to get such a good deal for themselves while benefiting drake in the process as well.

Yeah.

If they're making more than Drake and benefiting from this partnership, they did a good job on their end and they're able to maximize their investment through him.

They're not new to this so they know what's the drill and how to make it known in the market to get more gamblers inside their platform.

I still can't believe how bad website performance that sponsors Drake, UfC. This partnership will be win-with for both parties and new user flow is main goal of Stake marketing team. Let's see what will happen after first stream since Drake stream has been delayed for 5 weeks. He keep placing million dollars worth roulette bets on live roulette tables and keep promoting website on Instagram stories. The upcoming streams will cause more traffic on platform but I doubt Stake will be to handle that much server loading since today was big fiasco during weekly raffle.

They had chosen and accepts Drake as one of their partner for they know that this could help them in the long run. I'm not going to question their market sharing as in the first place, they already agreed on it before the partnership starts. I don't like to draw a conclusion that fast as there is certainly a time for both parties to develop. But as of now, it was very clear that both of them are benefiting from this and believe that their partnership really works.

[YinShuiSiYuan]

Agree. It's definitely a win-win situation for both Stake and Drake. And you got a point as well regarding Stake having the greater benefit in this partnership because like what you said, Drake is promoting them based on their contract. Certainly, Drake having many followers because he has a wide reach will garner many potential gamblers to play on Stake.com. At the same time, Drake is known to be a 'passionate' gambler, while he is promoting Stake, he will definitely play in it using his own money. After all, that's what he's known for - betting and risking big amounts.

So it's really a win on the side of Stake. Although I'm sure Drake would also enjoy some perks of being collaborated with them.

Since both parties are winning with this arrangement I think it is best to not look at things in that way, after all it is almost impossible to arrange things in such a way that both parties will benefit in the same exact proportion than the other, there will always be a party that wins more, and even if we were to agree with the assumption that stake is benefiting more than drake with this arrangement then we should applaud stake by being able to get such a good deal for themselves while benefiting drake in the process as well.

In the win-win statement, it is not that someone will win more and someone else will win less, but that no one is losing out on it. At least not Stake.com or Drake.
However, I think that with such a large marketing expense, Stake.com may try to raise its house edge to cover the costs. So if someone loses out on it, it's probably players.

[Wiwo]

If I remember correctly, in Norway (or Finland) any citizen can go to the website of the tax office and study the tax return of any other citizen (but not anonymously - you will find out who looked at your declaration). Such information is evaluated differently everywhere - somewhere as private, and somewhere as socially significant, that is, it is made public.
The very details of the cooperation between the casino and Drake do not really matter, but human curiosity is pushing to find out.

Seriously? That is something already private and I think it's already violating our privacy. Even an employee of tax agencies can't easily access any information without permission. I'm not aware that it's possible in Norway or Finland etc.

Regardless, I don't understand what's the big deal on that part related to Drake's partnership with Stake.

I know it doesn't really matter to know what's behind the cooperation between Drake and Stake but I don't see why should be curious about that.

Sadly there can be those times like that especially when people got so curious about your personal information or even your tax declaration, actually I'm seeing that they are just envy that's why they would take such steps to answer their curiosity when infact they already knew that it is illegal to invade someone's privacy especially for sensitive information like that.

Your personal information/data are mostly visited when you become a public figure or you contesting an election your opponents may try to look for data to use against you as a political attack and if you are found wanting in your tax returns that information can be used to disqualify you from an election that is what is happening in my region so the government makes it compulsory for public office holders and political leaders to declare their asset. and make their task information public and published on the revenue office website, but this does not apply to all the citizens but only to government officeholders.

[blockman]

In the win-win statement, it is not that someone will win more and someone else will win less, but that no one is losing out on it. At least not Stake.com or Drake.
However, I think that with such a large marketing expense, Stake.com may try to raise its house edge to cover the costs. So if someone loses out on it, it's probably players.

Well as said by the others, two of them are winning on this. The expense for things like this is well budgeted by them. They have it cover and if there's a change to their house, we'll know about it.
In marketing or having a deal with a celebrity, there's always the cost ready and they've got a huge budget on this so if you're thinking about it. They don't even discuss it in the public.

[agustina2]

Your personal information/data are mostly visited when you become a public figure or you contesting an election your opponents may try to look for data to use against you as a political attack and if you are found wanting in your tax returns that information can be used to disqualify you from an election that is what is happening in my region so the government makes it compulsory for public office holders and political leaders to declare their asset. and make their task information public and published on the revenue office website, but this does not apply to all the citizens but only to government officeholders.

I understand that but not to the extent that people have to know Drake's tax or whatever just because of this partnership with Stake. And besides, he is not an election candidate that's why I can't apply that statement of yours here.

Anyways, let's stick with the Drake X Stake program.

Who else here submit some info here:

Code:

"To enter this chance to win, Email your phone number and username to winwiththeboy@stake.com"

Any feedback about if there's someone here who actually got lucky to win here?

[bitgov]

Who else here submit some info here:

Code:

"To enter this chance to win, Email your phone number and username to winwiththeboy@stake.com"

Any feedback about if there's someone here who actually got lucky to win here?

It seems that cryptocurrency casinos are already entering a completely different level. Not only are they no longer anonymous, but they are also starting to play with data harvesting. I realize the prize is very high, but in my opinion the chances of winning it are too small to give them phone number. In my opinion, this is already too much.

[TheGreatPython]

If I remember correctly, in Norway (or Finland) any citizen can go to the website of the tax office and study the tax return of any other citizen (but not anonymously - you will find out who looked at your declaration). Such information is evaluated differently everywhere - somewhere as private, and somewhere as socially significant, that is, it is made public.
The very details of the cooperation between the casino and Drake do not really matter, but human curiosity is pushing to find out.

Seriously? That is something already private and I think it's already violating our privacy. Even an employee of tax agencies can't easily access any information without permission. I'm not aware that it's possible in Norway or Finland etc.

Regardless, I don't understand what's the big deal on that part related to Drake's partnership with Stake.

I know it doesn't really matter to know what's behind the cooperation between Drake and Stake but I don't see why should be curious about that.

Yes it is private on most countries but not on those countries he listed. I think people there doesn't really care about their privacy or we can say that it was not a strict country because they allow such things. The partnership between stake and drake is not really a big deal to us but there are still people that is not contented on what they see but they need to dig for more information.

In our place, so many people are like this, they don't focus on their selves if what is wrong with them but they focus too much on other people. They badly want to get updates if what's going on with other people's lives. Stake already confirmed that drake is with them, that should already end there.

[Russlenat]

If I remember correctly, in Norway (or Finland) any citizen can go to the website of the tax office and study the tax return of any other citizen (but not anonymously - you will find out who looked at your declaration). Such information is evaluated differently everywhere - somewhere as private, and somewhere as socially significant, that is, it is made public.
The very details of the cooperation between the casino and Drake do not really matter, but human curiosity is pushing to find out.

Seriously? That is something already private and I think it's already violating our privacy. Even an employee of tax agencies can't easily access any information without permission. I'm not aware that it's possible in Norway or Finland etc.

Regardless, I don't understand what's the big deal on that part related to Drake's partnership with Stake.

I know it doesn't really matter to know what's behind the cooperation between Drake and Stake but I don't see why should be curious about that.

Sadly there can be those times like that especially when people got so curious about your personal information or even your tax declaration, actually I'm seeing that they are just envy that's why they would take such steps to answer their curiosity when infact they already knew that it is illegal to invade someone's privacy especially for sensitive information like that.

Your personal information/data are mostly visited when you become a public figure or you contesting an election your opponents may try to look for data to use against you as a political attack and if you are found wanting in your tax returns that information can be used to disqualify you from an election that is what is happening in my region so the government makes it compulsory for public office holders and political leaders to declare their asset. and make their task information public and published on the revenue office website, but this does not apply to all the citizens but only to government officeholders.

Yes, but that is not what we are discussing here because it is already expected that those people who chose to run for public seat should declare every penny in their bank and their asset, others call it Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth (SALN) .. What we are discussing is that it is normal for other country to find your private information even if you are just a regular citizen and that it's just a one phone call away, by the way that's legal for them as well.

[stadus]

Well I believe getting too much information is bad for one's privacy, I mean would they also want that their private information will be revealed publicly? I don't wonder why they even have a national envy day or even call it that way. That's just too absurd! Breaching one's privacy is already considered illegal and I'm curious what's the root or cause why they started to make that laws.

I doubt that the US Senators would agree on that law, it would never be passed because US citizens really cares their own privacy.

You are very optimistic. Remember how literally 20-30 years ago there was such a thing as a "secret bank deposit" when your relationship with the bank was kept secret and did not concern anyone. What is with this concept now? It just doesn't exist. The same will happen with other areas of life that are now private - officials will only say that this is done for your benefit and against terrorists and will take away your privacy.

It was kept secret because that is a confidential information and actually there's a law where it states neither anyone should know any deposits by one's person on his/her bank accounts or investments and even the concerned agencies or departments are prohibited to take a peak such accounts. If someone is suspicious and having some illegal activities then someone should file a concern first before you can look into that person's accounts.

I think this law still passes throughout the next generation. Correct me if I'm wrong on this one.

[jossiel]

Since both parties are winning with this arrangement I think it is best to not look at things in that way, after all it is almost impossible to arrange things in such a way that both parties will benefit in the same exact proportion than the other, there will always be a party that wins more, and even if we were to agree with the assumption that stake is benefiting more than drake with this arrangement then we should applaud stake by being able to get such a good deal for themselves while benefiting drake in the process as well.

Yeah.

If they're making more than Drake and benefiting from this partnership, they did a good job on their end and they're able to maximize their investment through him.

They're not new to this so they know what's the drill and how to make it known in the market to get more gamblers inside their platform.

I still can't believe how bad website performance that sponsors Drake, UfC. This partnership will be win-with for both parties and new user flow is main goal of Stake marketing team. Let's see what will happen after first stream since Drake stream has been delayed for 5 weeks. He keep placing million dollars worth roulette bets on live roulette tables and keep promoting website on Instagram stories. The upcoming streams will cause more traffic on platform but I doubt Stake will be to handle that much server loading since today was big fiasco during weekly raffle.

Well, he's an icon and celebrity.

That's going to be an assurance that there will be a lot of his fans registering on stake after seeing those stories that he makes and after posting it on his socials.

Maybe, they're already preparing for the possible flood of those new users on their platform soon.