Blockchain gaming is rising, big names like Ubisoft and EA Sports are joining...

[tThOMAS]

I am not surprised that names like EA, Ubisoft and the rest are in gamefi industry. I play some p2e games like Splinterlands, MOBOX and Axie Infinity but i don't see that can hold me on long terms, but hope in future be more interesting games. I heard that some good games are releasing this year for example ENGN this summer is gone publish new game that was done in Unreal Engine. So i think that in future p2e games are gone be more and more played.

[1715090570]

1715090570

[TimeTeller]

I am not surprised that names like EA, Ubisoft and the rest are in gamefi industry. I play some p2e games like Splinterlands, MOBOX and Axie Infinity but i don't see that can hold me on long terms, but hope in future be more interesting games. I heard that some good games are releasing this year for example ENGN this summer is gone publish new game that was done in Unreal Engine. So i think that in future p2e games are gone be more and more played.

The longevity of the P2E gaming platform depends on the team behind it.
So if the team is already satisfied to what they acquire, in terms of funds, they can easily abandon their project.
But for companies that are already established like Ubisoft, high likely that they are thinking of long-term goals.
They won't abandon the project for nothing. In this case, it is better to invest in a p2e platform backed by established company.

[Daodex]

Don't get your hope high peps because metaverse still have a long way to go and those big companies aren't ready to use something that's not completed yet but they are just following the trend hoping for something to work out, this is just my own point of view.

[masulum]

Don't get your hope high peps because metaverse still have a long way to go and those big companies aren't ready to use something that's not completed yet but they are just following the trend hoping for something to work out, this is just my own point of view.

Developers don't need perfect technology to get started. Metaverse is still new, just like a baby. But even with this condition, the technology in traditional games can be implemented for the metaverse, so the metaverse shouldn't have to wait too long to give better results than now. A simple example, in the traditional games, we buy skins, we buy diamonds, if we change skins to NFT, diamonds are converted into currency, meaning this game has entered the blockchain realm, just how to adapt it to P2E and further development for metaverse. So, P2E and Metaverse games should have a wide space and only need to change the system from traditional methods to Blockchain.

[amishmanish]

It is true that big companies are catching onto the crypto trends. From Nike to game studios, everyone is catching onto the NFT craze. The only problem is that NFTs are fast becoming centralized and corporatized. This goes against the very idea of artistic ownership and freedom which made NFTs a hit in the first place.

Despite this, there is too much money riding on these ideas and there aren't enough thought-leaders in the space who care about decentralization. Everybody is up for sale (maybe a few aren't) and the idea that NFTs or P2E games could somehow profit the gamers and the artists, will soon be proven wrong when these corporates start making the real push.

[Anonylz]

P2e will be more successful when notable gaming companies join the race. Metaverse is an upcoming ecosystem that is yet to be tapped, many of the p2e games developed in Metaverse are done by inexperienced devs, what this ecosystem need is experienced and standard gaming companies to create quality p2e games that will attract both gamers and non-gamers to want to play and earn as well.
It is better to have the real gaming companies come in to do what they know how to do best.

[bitgolden]

They are known companies that focus on making as much money as possible. EA got so much hate for the star wars game that we are talking about one of the all time most negative comments in all of reddit for example just for responding to feedback. This shows how much they care about only the money they make and do not care about the games they make.

Ubisoft is not a very much liked place neither for the same logic, they are called "ubishit" for a reason. So, if these places imagine that they could get people to pay them willingly just because they could convince them that NFT and meta is a better way to get their money, then they will do it.

[adzino]

It's no surprise that 'Play2Earn' games are doing well, the crypto space has become normalised and people are looking for ways to build their crypto portfolio for the future. These games reward players with valuable tokens for playing and competing, the best thing about it is the fact anyone can earn these tokens without investing their money. I recently discovered a game called 'NFTshootout', this is perfect for beginners in the P2E space as it doesn't require bags of skill and can make you a lot of crypto! The game is currently in the early beta but is preparing for the full release in the next few months, updates are dropping this month with the implementation of Unreal Engine 5 and the NFT marketplace. The team is constantly building and interacting with their great community that they built from the ground up, they are fully doxed and experienced people that want this game to succeed! Anyone can now join their scholarship program for free and get involved with the community 🔥

So what play to earn games are Ubisoft and EA developing? Because your post mentions nothing about them other than a game called "NFTshootout" which I doubt Ubisoft or EA developed because no one has heard of it.
Anyway, you won't be earning much from P2E games. No one gives out free money for playing games. Yes, you might get lucky and earn something big, but that's a rare case. In most of the cases you will be earning peanuts. And I am sure as more people starts to join, the less you will be earning. And only those you invests in those games will be earning the most (while taking some sort of risks). So you join early, you earn something if you are lucky. Or else you have to invest to earn something significant.

[7788bitcoin]

~
 A simple example, in the traditional games, we buy skins, we buy diamonds, if we change skins to NFT, diamonds are converted into currency, meaning this game has entered the blockchain realm, just how to adapt it to P2E and further development for metaverse. So, P2E and Metaverse games should have a wide space and only need to change the system from traditional methods to Blockchain.

That is true, all you need is the change the traditional methods and include them in a blockchain but you still need great games to be played and Ubisoft and EA sports have constantly put out great games one after another and since they are venturing into the hype P2E gaming market which means we can expect great games from proven teams which is always great for the fans.