ㅤ

[FatFork]

It's not about the post got paid or not, but you create those thread intended only to earn merits for applying a campaign.

So why do I locked it and move it directly to the archive? I hope that the administrators have access to log time of moving topics, but the number of views proves that no one has seen them, so how will I get merits?

If you hadn't moved the topic to Archival, you would have violated the forum rules by duplicate posting and self-plagiarism.
Honestly, I don't buy your explanation. Whether it was for merit hunting or not, this isn't an appropriate use of the forum. If all you wanted to do was test your bot, you could do it with just one topic, not a dozen.

Anyway, I will continue to do this using a bot account @Husires_bot ...

I strongly advise you not to do this.

[1715569258]

1715569258

[1715569258]

1715569258

[1715569258]

1715569258

[1715569258]

1715569258

[1715569258]

1715569258

[Husires_bot]

Whether it was for merit hunting or not, this isn't an appropriate use of the forum. If all you wanted to do was test your bot, you could do it with just one topic, not a dozen.

Again:

 1. I was moving topics immediately after creating them, checking the number of views for each topic.
 2. I rarely participate in signature campaigns, check it out, and most of these topics are not paid (I think my all paid posts are less than 5 months since 2018.)
 3. Let's say it's an offense with 49 merits (8% of my total merits) currently i have about 255 sendable merit and I can abuse it to get more merits than the above.
 4. One topic or dozen, this is up to me, the point here is the abuse of merits, which I can discuss in detail.
 5. Above I made two replies in a row, @mod will delete one of them and edited my reply, and I can say @mprep read this topic, specifically this part “Anyway, I will continue to do this using a bot account @Husires_bot (I will create it within 24 hours) if there is any rule that prevents re-posting articles I have written, please let me know.”, and did not take any action, which means it is not against the forum rules.
 6. I will continue to do it using this account.

[examplens]

If I'm doing this for merits, why am I locking the thread and archiving it directly? Look at the number of views in my topics in the archive and you will find that it is less than 20, is this the behavior of someone looking for merits?

ok, maybe you're not doing it for merit, but if your threads didn't get single merit, this means that no one recognized them as useful. this is just one more reason not to repost topics that are not accepted as useful.
it could be concluded that you are doing unnecessary spam on the forum.

As for the reason why I do this, this is because i edit this bot AutoReply v1.0, and long topics are suitable for that im trying to do, is there a rule that prevents re-writing my topics?  

this explanation is complete nonsense. If you want to test and improve this bot, you can use some off-topic or Archival boards and probably need to clearly indicate that this is for testing purposes and that there is a possibility of deleting that topic.
So the other members will not waste time and participate in the discussion for which you have no real interest.

Step2:  Bot summarizing news and articles. I've been doing this manually in the threads that were mentioned above.

I was thinking of making a bot that would do a news feed, where it would be automatically created in press/Economics board and summarizing some good articles from Binance academy/Reddit/Quora.
The source of the news will not be RSS updates, topic will be summarized in txt file, pass to Step1 and created automatically.

your posts ^{mentioned in OP} so far don't look like a bot deals with a news feed.

I don't know what kind of exclusion you're talking about, but i expect some user/merit source already add this user to ignore list.

Probably all campaign managers can exclude them from their campaign.
user himself says that he is not particularly interested in campaign signatures

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Does this prove you wrong?
Can anyone prove anything wrong I'm doing?

* Merit Source - Plagiarist (#2627711 “Ratimov”)

Two wrong do not make it right. Besides, something seems wrong to others don't need to be wrong for you. If you are doing this for the purpose of the bot then just continue. Don't bother of the discussion here.

Husires did not do anything wrong in terms of breaking the forum rules. The same applied to Ratimov with his Plagiarist themes. What makes me laugh that a merit whore is protecting his territory so that others do not become his competition LOL I would find this topic very normal if this would discovered by some other members than a guy who has devoted his entire life to fish merit on the forum.

[Husires]

Two wrong do not make it right. Besides, something seems wrong to others don't need to be wrong for you. If you are doing this for the purpose of the bot then just continue. Don't bother of the discussion here.

All I'm looking for is an apology, if not for the whole topic, I hope Ratimov will be brave and apologize for this part, which has been proven wrong.

especially for those merit sources who sent merit to newly created duplicates of old topics (I was one of such sources).

..
.
 misleads other users who send him merit,

Husires did not do anything wrong in terms of breaking the forum rules. The same applied to Ratimov with his Plagiarist themes.

[khaled0111]

To be honnest, I don't think Husires' intention was to fish for merits. He started doing this a year ago and it's obvious that the duplicate threads didn't receive any signifant amount of merits, so why did he keep doing it if it's not working!
I'll give him the benifit of the doubt and believe his story.

However, he should stop doing this at least till he fixes his bot as this is not how a discussion forum is meant to be used.
@Husires, you should test your bot only on the archival or off-topic or even better: install SMF on your machine and make your tests there.
just my 2 sats

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Just because you weren't sent merits by the same person twice doesn't mean that re-posting and then getting merits is normal practice.

Your merit fishing tactics were normal? Especially those plagiarized themes. Collecting information from different Russian websites, translate them in English then take credit by saying, "in this theme I will lecture you how to become a merit whore" blab blab. It's funny how a merit whore argue and wants to make a valid point.

Can you explain to forum members when you sent merits to any of my "duplicate themes" twice?

Source: https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?to=Husires&from=Ratimov

Husires, are you saying Ratimov did not send merit to the duplicated topic? If that's true then the whore lied when said this:

especially for those merit sources who sent merit to newly created duplicates of old topics (I was one of such sources). Personally

And now note this:

Just because you weren't sent merits by the same person twice

The merit whore also said this:

I was not too lazy and checked absolutely all your topics

It's now confusing me what part of his claim is actually true.
1. Did he checked all your topics?
2. Did he lied intentionally to make things bad for you and make his claims more solid?

If you say that Ratimov did not send any merit to the duplicated topic but he came up with these nice claims against you with also saying he was the one who sent merits to duplicate topics then I would say he exaggerated when he said I was one of such sources, and I would also say all these are nothing but another merit finishing from an elite merit whore.


Edit: Reposted as the post above^{[https://ninjastic.space/post/59574934]} it was deleted and posted again^{[https://ninjastic.space/post/59575488]}


Edit edit:

Husires, those accusations were made at the end of 2020 and they were based on the fact that I copy someone else's text and use it in my topics, but when I use someone else's text, I do not quote it or highlight it as a quote. Yes, I copied other people's texts, but I always left links, just like you, at the end of the text.

In this article I would like to touch upon such a theme

Before: https://ninjastic.space/post/55742220
After: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5296174.0
Merit whore 😉

[Husires]

Husires, I hope you have the courage to admit that you are a "plagiarist" and topic duplicates abuser. The curtain.

You make yourself ridiculous, if you search a little you will find that I am writing:

information provided below is a summary of that article and may be slightly different from the author's point of view. Please refer to the source.

Disclaimer: The information's contained in this explanation is the result of my understanding of Bitcoin Support and Resistance and may contain some errors. Search and confirm about it.

This is exactly what the bot will do.

Step2:  Bot summarizing news and articles. I've been doing this manually in the threads that were mentioned above.

I was thinking of making a bot that would do a news feed, where it would be automatically created in press/Economics board and summarizing some good articles from Binance academy/Reddit/Quora.
The source of the news will not be RSS updates, topic will be summarized in txt file, pass to Step1 and created automatically.

Do you want to apologize for this part?

especially for those merit sources who sent merit to newly created duplicates of old topics (I was one of such sources)
>
>

 misleads other users who send him merit, write posts in his topics, and he just does these the topics are inactive,

@Husires, you should test your bot only on the archival or off-topic or even better: install SMF on your machine and make your tests there.

[i]just my 2 sats[/i]

I think the reason here is the paid signature. I do not take posting seriously and post from time to time (1200 posts from 2018) so I use my main account.
Today I created this bot account. @Husires_bot

[NotATether]

@Husires

I still don't understand. If it's not for merit (as you say), then what is the point of creating the topic again with the AutoReply bot?  

[Husires]

what is the point of creating the topic again with the AutoReply bot?  

Check the code here: https://github.com/Aero-Blue/BTalk-AutoReply, the autoreply bot works to re-pump topics after checking that it has been about 24 hours since the last "bump" and not to create new topics.

As for the reason why I do this, this is because i edit this bot AutoReply v1.0, and long topics are suitable for that im trying to do, is there a rule that prevents re-writing my topics?  

What I'm trying to do I explained above.


Update:

Until this moment, I have answered to all the questions, no one has proven that I violated Bitcointalk rules, and it has not been proven that I got more than one merit per topic. I will consider this topic locked, although I had hoped to find apology from Ratimov.

Sorry for the misunderstanding, I'm going to stop it using my main account and I'll do some testing with @Husires_bot though I'm thinking about setting up my SMF.

Thanks everyone, I'm going to bed now, it's a little late here.

[logfiles]

It still doesn't make sense. You claim you moved all your duplicate posts to the archival board, but this is not true. Just from some random topics, this is what I got. I added some notes about the status of the thread

- [GUIDE] Cryptocurrency Spoofing/Wash Selling - 1 merits - Created by August 31, 2021, 11:14:30 AM - Archive - OP deleted, Still In trading discussion, contains replies.
- [GUIDE] Cryptocurrency Spoofing/Wash Selling - 0 merits - Created by November 22, 2021, 07:29:25 PM - Archive - Moved to Archival, No replies
- [GUIDE] Wash Selling - 0 merits - Created by December 16, 2021, 06:45:50 PM - Archive - Moved to archival, No replies
- [GUIDE] Cryptocurrency Spoofing/Wash Selling - 0 merits - Created by March 06, 2022, 03:07:03 PM - Archive - Still in trading discussion, No replies
- Crypto Portfolio Diversification - 6 merits - Created by July 18, 2021, 05:22:06 PM - Archive - OP deleted, Still in Beginners and Help, contains replies
- Crypto Portfolio Diversification - 0 merits - Created by September 25, 2021, 02:14:20 PM - Archive - Moved to Archival, no replies
- Crypto Portfolio Diversification - 0 merits - Created by December 22, 2021, 04:52:05 PM - Archive - Still in Altcoin discussion, Thread locked, No replies.

I could go on and on, but this should be enough to highlight what I want to understand.

1. What's the point of all this?
2. Is it too hard to bump an old topic you want other members to view?
3. Is it a must to create the same topic every other month when you run out of content to post?
4. Assuming some 50 members did exactly what you have been doing, do you think discussions in the forum would be cool?

Until this moment, I have answered to all the questions, no one has proven that I violated Bitcointalk rules,

How about this?

12. No duplicate posting in multiple boards (except for re-posting topics in the local language boards if they're translated and re-posting marketplace topics in the altcoin boards if altcoins are accepted).

No?

[lovesmayfamilis]

Here another question is in the air, how long were you going to copy your takes? Why not honestly warn that you do not need merits? All your “tests” could be known to users if you honestly warned everyone that there were already similar topics, and you are just fond of experiments.
Of course, now you can come up with anything that is even funnier, demanding an apology.
Let everyone who creates themes from this day will begin to duplicate in your way.
And for those who will stumble upon the same topics, “déjà vu” will begin to appear, that it was somewhere and once.
Ratimov, you could tag him with a neutral tag to warn everyone that this user requires careful study of the topics he created.

[logfiles]

Whoever reads the topic thinks that I do these topics daily. I started doing this about 8 months ago, it is 18 "duplicate themes"  with an average of 4 topics per month, locked topics, mostly in Archival with less than 20 views. Is this the spam?

It's not just spam, it's a complete mess, and you know it.

I quoted a few posts so that you see the mess for yourself. Posts that have members discussing or asking are having OP deleted but still open. Some that are intact and have a few or no replies are abandoned or locked, some moved to archival (which is OK). If you want to test your so-called bot, then at least label the title as "Testing" and be smart enough to move all your tested topics to archival, just like most members have been doing.

So you agree with me that they are locked and with 0 reply, right?

Where have I agreed with you on that?
Looks like you are not getting my point

As for the reason, it is because I move them to Archival manually, and to prove it:

Check the date the topics were created.
Ask the admin for my log-out date.

You will find that most of the topics that I have not moved, I logged out after that and have not logged in again for a while,

I had no idea, it's so hard to move test topics to archival 

Did you read my previous responses? I did not look for increasing views of my topics, check the total number of views and you will find less than 20.
.....
Did you read the comments above again?
Besides why do I need to do this, I rarely participate in many signature campaigns, and I am not active in the forum?

Of course, I read before responding... genius 
Not participating in a signature campaign shouldn't be an excuse to spam or cause a mess in the forum

4. Assuming some 50 members did exactly what you have been doing, do you think discussions in the forum would be cool?

When we talk about discussion, we are talking about open topics, not locked one, mostly in Archival

You haven't answered my question.

I can see threads with deleted OP and replies plus questions but still Open, and then posts with intact OP but locked. Do you like such a mess?
How about we do it x50?

click on report bottom  

You asked us to point out the rule you were breaking, I showed you.

[shasan]

How come no has noticed that before? Why would even he try this?

It is because maximum posts has no reply forum members just noticed posts and gave merit. Almost no interact on the topic. And also, many a time no one research about the duplicate of the post. Also, the posts weren't on the same board while new posts created. While new post created the old post on archival (maximum case) and this has been happened for nothing but for merit.

[Lucius]

I didn't want to open a new topic, but this is really strange behavior - because if someone in the same topic makes an identical post only 2 hours apart, then he/she are really lost in space/time, or is it a consequence of handling many alt accounts?





https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5405523.0 (archived)

[decodx]

Well... his explanation was the biggest load of horseshit I've ever seen, and it's even funnier that he was asking the members who called him out for an apology. I will tag his account to at least remember this case if I ever run into this member again in a thread.

[lovesmayfamilis]

I reported his double post. I looked at his earlier posts and didn't find any more duplicates. Sometimes this happens with other users, but with this account already having shown itself in a bad way once, each error glows with red flags.

[decodx]

Well... his explanation was the biggest load of horseshit I've ever seen, and it's even funnier that he was asking the members who called him out for an apology. I will tag his account to at least remember this case if I ever run into this member again in a thread.

This is funny, but unfortunately trust does not appear in discussion boards.
and tagging because of posting is something against the trust system that you abuse.

I'm sorry, but you're mistaken again. This is exactly why neutral feedback is for.
Your inability or unwillingness to understand even the simplest rules on this forum explains why you make so many mistakes here. Maybe you will get a better understanding of the Trust system after you read LoyceV's Beginners guide.

[Lucius]

I don't know, but if i want to spam, I will post on different topics, or at least the same replay.
Read the post carefully and you will notice that it is a mistake as the difference between the two responses is one word.

You have proven that your posts are not part of a natural process, but that you use various suspicious methods that lead you to these situations. Personally, I don't think that you are the only problem with such behavior, the bigger problem is those managers who take you into their campaigns in order to fill all the spots.

[decodx]

I'm sorry, but you're mistaken again. This is exactly why neutral feedback is for.
Your inability or unwillingness to understand even the simplest rules on this forum explains why you make so many mistakes here. Maybe you will get a better understanding of the Trust system after you read LoyceV's Beginners guide.

can you teach me? I can't find what you are trying to say.

Not gonna happen! You're all on your own.

How you can remember my account and trust not appear on discussions board?

Don't give up. It will come to you.