🌀 [banned mixer] - CoinJoin Mixer | Your Anonymity Is Our Priority!

[GazetaBitcoin]

I am reserving Romanian translation for UniJoin ANN thread. I will come back to this post once the translation is done.

Aaaand it's done: [banned mixer] - CoinJoin Crypto Mixer | Anonimitatea Ta Este Prioritatea Noastră. I would be more than happy to see OP updated with this first translation

I tried to connect to clearnet using a regular browser (I see the same thing in the tor). 

I am encountering same issue here, but only on clearnet. I am also receiving same error (525). However, Tor version works for me. Perhaps UniJoin can take a look?

[1714252426]

1714252426

[1714252426]

1714252426

[sokani]

I'm having the same error message, hope it gets fixed soon.

I would like to reserve a spot for the translation of UniJoin ANN in pidgin language.

[JeromeTash]

I tried to connect to clearnet using a regular browser (I see the same thing in the tor). 

I am encountering same issue here, but only on clearnet. I am also receiving same error (525). However, Tor version works for me. Perhaps UniJoin can take a look?

Same here

I have sent a message to their customer support regarding the issue. When Mixing, I think members should be encouraged to learn more to the Tor Mirror to achieve a maximum level of privacy

[UniJoin]

Hi guys! I am checking it now with the technical department. Thanks!

[klarki]

I am encountering same issue here, but only on clearnet. I am also receiving same error (525).

Everything is already working as it was before.

When Mixing, I think members should be encouraged to learn more to the Tor Mirror to achieve a maximum level of privacy

Tor is not a universal solution for anonymity. At a minimum, I would recommend using a VPN when interacting with onion sites (Tor+VPN).



UniJoin, when will the UniJoin service work for LTC, USDT, ETH? Is there at least an approximate launch date?

[Peanutswar]

Im one of the Bitcointalk translator for the Pilipinas local board and Im done translating the thread into our local.  [TRNSL][ANN][banned mixer] - CoinJoin Crypto Mixer | Iyong Anonymity Ang Aming Uunahin!

[Poker Player]

The other day I read the first article, which I quite enjoyed, and I had pending to read the second one, which I just did. Apart from being very well written and touching on several points, I enjoyed the account that the libertarian ideology that was at the birth of bitcoin and even in its prehistory. Today there is not so much libertarian ideology, something that can be seen in this forum, and probably has to do with what is mentioned in the article that the early adopters did it for ideological reasons while today the main motivation to get bitcoin is usually pecuniary.

In the near future we are going to publish the 3rd article (a continuation of the first two). But I would like to know the opinion of users about how often this should be done. For a second it seemed to us that the publication of 1 article per week is quite common. We will be grateful for any reasonable answer.

I see that the second one was published about two weeks after the first one, and now it is almost two weeks since the publication of the second one, I would still publish with that time interval. Twice a month. They are quite elaborate and dense articles and I think it justifies a lower frequency of publication than the usual of once a week.

[LoyceV]

I would recommend using a VPN when interacting with onion sites (Tor+VPN).

I'm not going to take your word for it. Tor Project generally doesn't recommend it. Read the link and TorPlusVPN Wiki for the details.

[JeromeTash]

Tor is not a universal solution for anonymity. At a minimum, I would recommend using a VPN when interacting with onion sites (Tor+VPN).

But at least they will still be using the website's tor mirrors, right?

My suggestion is for people to completely avoid using the clearnet version as it's more vulnerable and less secure in terms of privacy/anonymity. Now where they will use VPNs on top of onion sites or not is their choice.

[sokani]

I would like to reserve a spot for the translation of UniJoin ANN in pidgin language.

Pidgin language translation of UniJoin's ANN is done. [ANN] [banned mixer] - CoinJoin Crypto Mixer: Your anonymity na our priority

[UniJoin]

We have published a new exciting article! This is the third part and the continuation of one big thought!

https://unijoin.medium.com/bitcoin-monopoly-world-2d425170b3c7



Fun fact: We first used AI to generate an image 

[UniJoin]

We would also be grateful if someone could suggest a way to reduce images when publishing without losing quality!

[GazetaBitcoin]

Hey UniJoin!

Thank you for publishing another article! I am sure that readers will appreciate this one as well.

Regarding your question, in order to change image resolution on the forum you can "play" with the following BBCode commands: height and width. For example, you can use a sequence like this:

Code:

[img height=350]https://i.ibb.co/Sd1qjcL/b6af176c-8048-4729-b91e-4db06822b3f5.jpg[/img]

This way you'll adjust the height of your uploaded image to 350 pixels (the width will adjust automatically). I use this height for most of my uploaded images. However, in some occasions, I also set it to even a lower value, such as 250 or 200.

By applying this command to your image posted above we obtain this:



If you feel the image is stretched somehow you may use other values for height and width. I hope this helps.

[light_warrior]

Hello UniJoin! I translated your article Bitcoin: The Way of the Free Man into Russian. Would you mind?

[Latviand]

If you need an article translator in Medium, I am a newbie Filipino translator although I can send you some of my works via PM or email.

[tabas]

We would also be grateful if someone could suggest a way to reduce images when publishing without losing quality!

Usually with the images on the threads I made, I'm testing around the height from 300-500. You can check the threads that I've made and see if the size is what you think fits, like this one. And I've just fixed all of the images from my previous threads.

We have published a new exciting article! This is the third part and the continuation of one big thought!

https://unijoin.medium.com/bitcoin-monopoly-world-2d425170b3c7

Thank you for this article. I'm liking these articles as it's becoming a series and continuation. Great job!  

[Cricktor]

Again a nice read of your third article in the current series about US state's hypocrisy dealing with private minted money. As usual it's about keeping control and the upper hand. Loosing that is what politicians and government fear the most.

You might want to fix a typo that distracted me: in first sentence of fourth paragraph there's "abonimation" which should rather be "abomination".

Anyway, again a good and interesting read, thanks for that!

...


Fun fact: We first used AI to generate an image 

I can see that and for me personally it ruins the picture, especially the coin face is (badly) distorted in important details, no readable letters on the perimeter and some more. I like the original coin face logo and its design and it's message in the details. I guess it's hip nowadays to let some bloody AI do things for cheap. If it then looks cheap: mission not accomplished! (Yeah, I'm old-school, I know.)

[boltz]

Again a nice read of your third article in the current series about US state's hypocrisy dealing with private minted money. As usual it's about keeping control and the upper hand. Loosing that is what politicians and government fear the most.

You might want to fix a typo that distracted me: in first sentence of fourth paragraph there's "abonimation" which should rather be "abomination".

Anyway, again a good and interesting read, thanks for that!

...


Fun fact: We first used AI to generate an image 

I can see that and for me personally it ruins the picture, especially the coin face is (badly) distorted in important details, no readable letters on the perimeter and some more. I like the original coin face logo and its design and it's message in the details. I guess it's hip nowadays to let some bloody AI do things for cheap. If it then looks cheap: mission not accomplished! (Yeah, I'm old-school, I know.)

Well ...is true that AI can do miracles when it comes to photos but they kinda feel soulless right ? I mean , I've played with MidJourney AI for quite a while now and even if I like what he draws , all the photos are just a combination of multiple styles from different artists. 

Heading now to read the article as the current market of cryptos seems to be on a crossroad with price of Bitcoin trying to stabilize around 30k$ and that would be amazing as long as he can keep this position during the summer cycle. The title is also like a glove on the current market situation as the greed indicator is becoming bigger and bigger when there is not real motive for people to be greedy as Bitcoin doesn't seem to drop under 25k again or ever. ( my opinion ).

I've stole that picture hehe and I'm gonna place it as my desktop background. 

[Yamane_Keto]

I recently joined your signature campaign and  I wanted to try the service I am trying to advertise, the home page is simple but it contains a lot of unnecessary data, for example



If the mixing service for these altcoins is not ready, do not indicate it on the home page.

Why does the user need to wait to two confirmations? All services require one confirmation, and there is no difference between one or two confirmations. It would have been more convincing if 6 confirmations were requested.

Cloudflare DDoS makes the site very slow, and since you care about customer data and don't want Chainanalysis to collect data, doesn't using coinjoin with Cloudflare provide traceable privacy?
It's my initial impression other than that the service is good and I hope you guys will be successful, I will be testing the mixing service soon.

[DooMAD]

I recently joined your signature campaign and  I wanted to try the service I am trying to advertise, the home page is simple but it contains a lot of unnecessary data, for example

(...)

If the mixing service for these altcoins is not ready, do not indicate it on the home page.

I wouldn't say three icons is "a lot".  And I don't see how else UniJoin could highlight what services will be available in future.  I'd say it depends on the timeframe.  If support for those other currencies is more than a few months away, then perhaps it is unnecessary to show.  But if it's only a few weeks until users can utilise that service, then they should be informed of what's in the pipeline.

Ever watched a movie trailer before?  The movie likely isn't ready yet, but it gets peoples' attention.  There are many examples of media to show off what people can look forward to when something isn't yet finished. I don't see why this should be any different.