I have been perusing the thread and understand the OP. Maybe he opened the thread a little early but I understand him being pissed off.
Surely, if Stake.com is hiding behind their clauses, nothing can be done from a legal standpoint, but to me it seems morally reprehensible.
If the bets are voided, those who lost the bet are not going to protest, of course, it benefits them, but it is normal for the winner to be pissed off.
I think that in this case they should have assumed the mistake and pay edgycorner what is his, which in the total budget of Stake.com should be nothing.
Your support is much appreciated. Bitcointalk gets very political, I don't expect much support from here.
Clearly Stunna gets the problem, but for some reason it's not getting reflected. I hope it's just an issue of miscommunication, as Stunna states.
Where's that coming can you give us an example where the allegation is valid but the community opted to go the other way, the community calls a spade a spade when it comes to allegations as long as the allegation has proof to show, and besides it's too early to post your allegation since the support has not answered yet, you have not given them enough time to address or correct the issue.
