Crypto Gambling Review Site

[ScamViruS]

Welcome to the forum.

Review site plays an important role for a gambler in choosing a gambling website. I visited your website and before looking at some other details I saw that you have listed 1xbit, 1xbit is not a legit casino. There are a lot of allegations against this casino and gamblers are being deceived. So I think it is your responsibility to delist this casino from your website to protect gamblers.

[iv4n]

<...>
Still, the only warning you give regards 1xbit is that they have a weak support service, while in fact, it should be said there are scam accusations against them, what goes much further than a simple poor support.

Apart from 1xbit casino, the list also includes 1xbet, 22bet, and MelBet which are all operated by the same scam company. Additionally, some of the casinos on the list are completely unknown, while many other legitimate and well-known casinos have been left out. But the strangest thing is that Bitcoin.com is also on the list, which is not even a casino site.

There can be good money in an affiliate site, from players who play through you, and maybe even more if you take money from the casino to advertise it! With these ratings for casinos that have a bad reputation on the forum, we see that the OP didn't do the research properly, or simply he is paid for marketing and high ratings on his site!
Rarely we come across an honest affiliate site that really cares about which casinos they list, pay attention to scam reports, write their own articles and not copy and take from others, or write as others have told them because of money from marketing! We have a couple of good affiliate sites here, so the OP has to work harder and be much more honest if he wants more attention here!

[khaled0111]

OP, you claim that you take what you do seriously, from your main page:

We take what we do so seriously and only recommend sportsbooks and casinos that we consider to be among the absolute best gambling sites around. When it comes to the upper echelon of Bitcoin gambling sites, as is the case generally, there’s often not one casino and betting operator that is objectively better than another.

Do you really do that?! If yes then how come you ended up giving 1xbit a 95/100 rating?
are you aware of the number of open scam accusation topics against them on the reputation board? did you check their ann thread and read the complaints of their customers?
Sorry OP, your didn't do your job properly and your reviews shouldn't be trusted.

[coin-investor]

OP, you claim that you take what you do seriously, from your main page:

We take what we do so seriously and only recommend sportsbooks and casinos that we consider to be among the absolute best gambling sites around. When it comes to the upper echelon of Bitcoin gambling sites, as is the case generally, there’s often not one casino and betting operator that is objectively better than another.

Do you really do that?! If yes then how come you ended up giving 1xbit a 95/100 rating?
are you aware of the number of open scam accusation topics against them on the reputation board? did you check their ann thread and read the complaints of their customers?

He is not responsible he created a thread for his review site and did not address our concerns he only has one post and his last login was 3 days ago I don't know if he has a plan to come back here, his gambling review is one example of bias and irresponsible rating he can defend that it's his own review site and he has control and responsibility what to post and what casinos should get a good or bad rating but he should consider that his reputation very much depends on his rating and review.
The way he reviews he has no reputation and he is like all the promoters of scam casinos here.

[harizen]

To OP, is it really a "controversial move" by Stake.com, and they risking their great reputation if they didn't have a sign-up bonus. Generally, if there's a sign-up bonus, it's a great move totally even for a brand new site?

Just want to point out that reputation shouldn't be damaged especially for a well-establish platform if they didn't have a sign-up bonus.

But I like the other reviews you made for Stake. It was 9/10 for me.

[Agbe]

Reviewing a site is a very good development. But before a site that has been given negative trust should be reviewed, it should be ban to avoid massive lost.

The OP might know that 1xbet has been given negative trust in the Bitcointalk forum. It's like they want to Know the reasons but I don't see anything to review the site. If they really want to review the site they should visit The owner or the management of the site to restructure the company and be genuinely carry out their activities to the public. Because reviewing the site is like a waste of time. After the review and post the articles for the public to read without doing the right thing, it is a waste of time.

And if after the review and the site is banned forever, the OP has done best, therefore, he most be recommended for a good job.

[Bitinity]

To OP, is it really a "controversial move" by Stake.com, and they risking their great reputation if they didn't have a sign-up bonus. Generally, if there's a sign-up bonus, it's a great move totally even for a brand new site?

Just want to point out that reputation shouldn't be damaged especially for a well-establish platform if they didn't have a sign-up bonus.

True, welcome bonus has nothing to do with reputation. No site will get good reputation site just because of the existence of welcome bonus and no site will get bad reputation just because there is no welcome bonus. I cant understand why this reviewer connecting welcome bonus to reputation. But wait, where is the OP? It seems that he is not willing to get in touch with members in this forum as he created this topic and went away after that.

[FrankBank]

Congrats on your website!

Looks good and very well made, easy to browse.

The real question arises it's either if this is your first time opening such portal or you have experience in the field? What are you guys doing to attract traffic? Do you have subscribers for mailers or this is a direct traffic only driven website?

Cheers!

[shasan]

Are you trying to a scam website and reviews has been made by you or from your side or you can allow anyone to make the reviews? Or you allow reviews for a specific gamblers who are the real gambler? I am saying this as you have added reviews of 1xbit which is a well known scam gambling site. But base on the reviews on your website 1xbit has 94 score out of 100. But base on their Announcement thread it should be something like 20score out of 100 even the score can be lower than this.

[wxa7115]

How is Stake ranked below Fortunejack? Why is 1xBit in the Top 5?

Fortunejack isn’t bad either. Stake is great. I myself is playing there but Fortunejack has built some good reputation as well. Maybe there criteria fits best for Fortunejack LOL but hell, how come 1xbit?
This proves that he is biased and that's because they are trying to monetize the site. Otherwise, they wouldn’t be. That's where GamblingBro is much different.

Some reviewer just set up their review site just to make money from their affiliate links and don't care about giving the right review they will rank high those casinos that can and will give them a good affiliate earning we should not support or even read their reviews because it's thrash BTCGOSU and Gamblingbro are still the best casino reviewers and these newbie reviewers will have a hard time establishing their reputation here if they only think of money.

That is basically the way it is, as long as they get their commission they could care less about how reliable and trusted the casino really is, honestly I doubt that a great deal of those review sites actually gambled in the casino in question and they just made up the whole review.

With this in mind then it is important to avoid those kind of review sites and instead rely on websites in which you can find the opinions of people which use the services in which you happen to be interested, and this forum is a perfect example of a site that fulfills those conditions.

[Hamphser]

Are you trying to a scam website and reviews has been made by you or from your side or you can allow anyone to make the reviews? Or you allow reviews for a specific gamblers who are the real gambler? I am saying this as you have added reviews of 1xbit which is a well known scam gambling site. But base on the reviews on your website 1xbit has 94 score out of 100. But base on their Announcement thread it should be something like 20score out of 100 even the score can be lower than this.

5/100 or even lower should be put up on 1xbit yet it has been known that this site does really have lots of issues and complaints into this forum and people around on this forum alone does know on what reputation

it does have which it is just not right on including it  for some review which it isnt really worth unless if there would be some sort of warning or caution but instead it had been given 94 which does proves out
that this site doesnt really have made out some in depth review or simply not being aware on latest updates or some sort.

[Maus0728]

If you have any questions, requests, or advice, please let us know!

Maybe the way to get more audience here in forum is that you make your reviews more realistic and also based on this community since most of the review sites were either paid or just a small group of reviewers. Try to make it a community-based reviews with summarized points and ideas from the community that is also based on the threads, reputation, and accusation made in the forum. And with that, you will be the first forum-driven review platform for gambling (as for my knowledge). We all do want to point out why you would say that 1XBIT "isn't a scam" despite the allegations written by the players affected on this forum and still haven't resolved. Kindly edit those or be a wasted platform.

[BitcoinAccepted]

If you have any questions, requests, or advice, please let us know!

Maybe the way to get more audience here in forum is that you make your reviews more realistic and also based on this community since most of the review sites were either paid or just a small group of reviewers. Try to make it a community-based reviews with summarized points and ideas from the community that is also based on the threads, reputation, and accusation made in the forum. And with that, you will be the first forum-driven review platform for gambling (as for my knowledge). We all do want to point out why you would say that 1XBIT "isn't a scam" despite the allegations written by the players affected on this forum and still haven't resolved. Kindly edit those or be a wasted platform.

It just depends on how the term scam is interpreted, right? 1xbit has resolved many issues and returned many players their deposit, even when it turned out that there were cheaters on the site. Apparently there's something about the API of the 1xbit software that allows players to cheat tom at table tennis, because then there are cameras on it and the point played was already known. Other bookmakers have solved this (as far as I can find) by drastically reducing the limits on table tennis Live. That's annoying for the real gamblers, but cheaters will always keep trying.

[qwertyup23]

How is Stake ranked below Fortunejack? Why is 1xBit in the Top 5?

Fortunejack isn’t bad either. Stake is great. I myself is playing there but Fortunejack has built some good reputation as well. Maybe there criteria fits best for Fortunejack LOL but hell, how come 1xbit?
This proves that he is biased and that's because they are trying to monetize the site. Otherwise, they wouldn’t be. That's where GamblingBro is much different.

Some reviewer just set up their review site just to make money from their affiliate links and don't care about giving the right review they will rank high those casinos that can and will give them a good affiliate earning we should not support or even read their reviews because it's thrash BTCGOSU and Gamblingbro are still the best casino reviewers and these newbie reviewers will have a hard time establishing their reputation here if they only think of money.

That is basically the way it is, as long as they get their commission they could care less about how reliable and trusted the casino really is, honestly I doubt that a great deal of those review sites actually gambled in the casino in question and they just made up the whole review.

With this in mind then it is important to avoid those kind of review sites and instead rely on websites in which you can find the opinions of people which use the services in which you happen to be interested, and this forum is a perfect example of a site that fulfills those conditions.

Unfortunately, you are definitely right.

Lots of video reviewers are somehow micromanaged and controlled by the gambling website itself, that is why the review sometimes comes and sounds bias on their perspective. Video reviewers also say what the gambling website managers wants them to say further making the video unrealistic and bias.

If you truly want to have an honest feedback and opinion from the users, then rely on forums such as this one for your information. People here would give their unbiased opinion and they would also recommend more options/information about the website as a whole.

[carlfebz2]

How is Stake ranked below Fortunejack? Why is 1xBit in the Top 5?

Fortunejack isn’t bad either. Stake is great. I myself is playing there but Fortunejack has built some good reputation as well. Maybe there criteria fits best for Fortunejack LOL but hell, how come 1xbit?
This proves that he is biased and that's because they are trying to monetize the site. Otherwise, they wouldn’t be. That's where GamblingBro is much different.

Some reviewer just set up their review site just to make money from their affiliate links and don't care about giving the right review they will rank high those casinos that can and will give them a good affiliate earning we should not support or even read their reviews because it's thrash BTCGOSU and Gamblingbro are still the best casino reviewers and these newbie reviewers will have a hard time establishing their reputation here if they only think of money.

That is basically the way it is, as long as they get their commission they could care less about how reliable and trusted the casino really is, honestly I doubt that a great deal of those review sites actually gambled in the casino in question and they just made up the whole review.

With this in mind then it is important to avoid those kind of review sites and instead rely on websites in which you can find the opinions of people which use the services in which you happen to be interested, and this forum is a perfect example of a site that fulfills those conditions.

Unfortunately, you are definitely right.

Lots of video reviewers are somehow micromanaged and controlled by the gambling website itself, that is why the review sometimes comes and sounds bias on their perspective. Video reviewers also say what the gambling website managers wants them to say further making the video unrealistic and bias.

If you truly want to have an honest feedback and opinion from the users, then rely on forums such as this one for your information. People here would give their unbiased opinion and they would also recommend more options/information about the website as a whole.

I do always recommend or do much prefer when searching up for some information on this forum which is more reliable and non-biased as we all know since there would be actual people who do have that kind of

experience which they could definitely tell on their real-time engagement which they would be share up but of course you should know to differentiate on which one is a legit feedback or opinion
and wont be falling into some fake feedbacks.

You do have your own common sense on how you would spot them out.

[delfastTions]

I do always recommend or do much prefer when searching up for some information on this forum which is more reliable and non-biased as we all know since there would be actual people who do have that kind of

experience which they could definitely tell on their real-time engagement which they would be share up but of course you should know to differentiate on which one is a legit feedback or opinion
and wont be falling into some fake feedbacks.

You do have your own common sense on how you would spot them out.

I would like to praise our forum even more for objective information about the operation of gambling sites.  Since you always read the opinions of completely different people on the work of a particular casino, you get accurate information.  And it's fresh and authentic. 
This is much more reliable than any author's reviews, which are often just hidden advertisements with elements of inaccuracy and praising the site.

[kotajikikox]

welcome to the forum ,,

Looks like after 1 week of this post you did not even return to answer some questions here? are you seriously advertising here?

and also you want to conduct reviews but has no time to update this thread?

___________________________________________

Also hw legit and trustworthy the site? aren't you accepting payments to shill for other site? because this is a common way of review site to earn by receiving money from the company that they will boost the name.

[FatFork]

Looks like after 1 week of this post you did not even return to answer some questions here? are you seriously advertising here?

and also you want to conduct reviews but has no time to update this thread?

Yes, it's been one week since he started this thread and I don't think he'll come back to discuss it anymore. He obviously only wanted to promote his fake review website with his post, without considering or discussing the suggestions and comments of the forum members. He hasn't even bothered to log on to the forum ever since.

[d3nz]

Looks like after 1 week of this post you did not even return to answer some questions here? are you seriously advertising here?

and also you want to conduct reviews but has no time to update this thread?

Yes, it's been one week since he started this thread and I don't think he'll come back to discuss it anymore. He obviously only wanted to promote his fake review website with his post, without considering or discussing the suggestions and comments of the forum members. He hasn't even bothered to log on to the forum ever since.

I think he created the account just to promote the website and nothing else I tried on checking the website and looks like some of the reviews are not accurate or created personally. The good thing about the website is showing you all of the gambling sites if you are not familiar with them and information (I don't know if it's correct) for every site.

Much better if the TS will make an update and provide more information for the reviewer rather than a vector picture which we cannot know if it's really a legit review.

[nakamura12]

I think he created the account just to promote the website and nothing else I tried on checking the website and looks like some of the reviews are not accurate or created personally. The good thing about the website is showing you all of the gambling sites if you are not familiar with them and information (I don't know if it's correct) for every site.

Much better if the TS will make an update and provide more information for the reviewer rather than a vector picture which we cannot know if it's really a legit review.

That's the worst part of a gambling review site that are not made seriously. Unlike other gambling review sites that are created with the intention of giving an honest would provide an honest reviews instead of biased review like the ones that are paid to boost a certain casino that did pay. If op only created an account in Bitcointalk Forum without updating the thread or even bother visiting this thread and also didn't update what's on the gambling review site then op only wanted to earn through referral link on op's gambling review site and nothing else.