Crypto Gambling Review Site

[Hamphser]

Not sure if you got my point - the traffic generated from Bitcointalk simply is not a whole lot, this is not the holy grail.

They might be generalizing considering that this place had the most crypto traffic and believing that majority of players from site do came from into this place.I do agree somewhat into that point or words about

overrated or overestimation which is partly true but we couldnt really precisely point out that having advertisements on this forum itself wont really be giving out some impact.

We wont be seeing quite number of companies that ran off their campaigns for very long if they arent some significant benefits.

[shasan]

Exactly and this is why I don't believe in online review scores as their are easily bought, I have visited some review platforms and have gone through their records and sometimes one can easily see the corruption that have out played reality as some bad casinos are rate as the best on some of those review sites.

It is not a wise decision too to believe or depends on only the review site as they can promote scam site too to earn a small amount of money both from referral commission and/or they may earn money for listing the scam site. So, before depositing we should analyses the site to be safe from the scammer.

[delfastTions]

Exactly and this is why I don't believe in online review scores as their are easily bought, I have visited some review platforms and have gone through their records and sometimes one can easily see the corruption that have out played reality as some bad casinos are rate as the best on some of those review sites.

It is not a wise decision too to believe or depends on only the review site as they can promote scam site too to earn a small amount of money both from referral commission and/or they may earn money for listing the scam site. So, before depositing we should analyses the site to be safe from the scammer.

For those who have long been versed in the question of how you can be deceived by advertising fraudulent sites, this is not a problem.  Such users are always critical of a particular publication. 
The danger lies in wait for those people who are just starting to study the world of gambling and can lose a lot of money by accidentally believing fake advertising.  But the reviews and our BTT posts are invaluable in warning such novice players.  Here you can understand what's what by reading the topics of different casinos.  And even a beginner can handle it. 

The main question here is how to most effectively send newcomers to this forum of ours.

[Tellek Garing]

I have seen some sites that are listed on many review sites who are fraudulent and are known scammers that's is the major reasons why I never trust the judgement of review sites as their judgements are biased and base on the money paid by the casino operators of simply because of the popularity of the casino resulting from widespread of promotional activities.

There is no need to get a review rating from an online platform when you can make some research about the casino and see players feedback then make your judgement from there.

[$crypto$]

I have seen some sites that are listed on many review sites who are fraudulent and are known scammers that's is the major reasons why I never trust the judgement of review sites as their judgements are biased and base on the money paid by the casino operators of simply because of the popularity of the casino resulting from widespread of promotional activities.

There is no need to get a review rating from an online platform when you can make some research about the casino and see players feedback then make your judgement from there.

Indeed, there are those who say that casino reviews can be manipulated as desired so that they are given a high rating but we as gambling players don't really trust the review site too much because it doesn't necessarily match how we feel when playing, it's better that way ourselves we will know more about the real casino not from that review.
But I always based on feedback on this forum, usually, it's more concrete with their opinion and it's almost the same with us.

[shasan]

There is no need to get a review rating from an online platform when you can make some research about the casino and see players feedback then make your judgement from there.

You are right. As the review site manipulate feedback of scam site by taking payment from the scammer (so called gambling site), there is no benefit of checking the review from the review sites. Hence we should research first but if anyone check about a gambling site on the forum or ask about the gambling site on the forum then the person (user) will not get any bad experience.

[Tellek Garing]

Exactly in that way members of the forum will not get misleading information about a casino if a member have adequate information about the casino on a first hand note it will become hard for review site to have influenced over you view since your information is not based on their on review rating as there are manipulated and structured in a way that will favor the casino since their is a fee attached to each review.

There is no need to get a review rating from an online platform when you can make some research about the casino and see players feedback then make your judgement from there.

You are right. As the review site manipulate feedback of scam site by taking payment from the scammer (so called gambling site), there is no benefit of checking the review from the review sites. Hence we should research first but if anyone check about a gambling site on the forum or ask about the gambling site on the forum then the person (user) will not get any bad experience.

On a second note not all review sites are corrupted there are some that still offers accurate review.

[Furious 7]

Exactly and this is why I don't believe in online review scores as their are easily bought, I have visited some review platforms and have gone through their records and sometimes one can easily see the corruption that have out played reality as some bad casinos are rate as the best on some of those review sites.

It is not a wise decision too to believe or depends on only the review site as they can promote scam site too to earn a small amount of money both from referral commission and/or they may earn money for listing the scam site. So, before depositing we should analyses the site to be safe from the scammer.

True, because indeed the score of reviews like this is indeed weak enough to be trusted. What I mean is that we don't even know whether the reviewer has really played or just wants something like a task that must be completed to get a reward.
It's too risky indeed if you refer to it, it would be better if you look at real reviews and one of them in this forum we can know which ones are good and which ones are not

[shasan]

What I mean is that we don't even know whether the reviewer has really played or just wants something like a task that must be completed to get a reward.

We cant know either they really played or not and also there is another important fact if they not played then nothing to say but if they really played but still I am confused either the site is legit or not because they may played with a little fund which might not be scammed but while we deposit with large fund and win then the site may turned into scam.

[LUCKMCFLY]

I have seen some sites that are listed on many review sites who are fraudulent and are known scammers that's is the major reasons why I never trust the judgement of review sites as their judgements are biased and base on the money paid by the casino operators of simply because of the popularity of the casino resulting from widespread of promotional activities.

There is no need to get a review rating from an online platform when you can make some research about the casino and see players feedback then make your judgement from there.

How curious I have also come across sites that are specialists in reviewing casinos, and they consider good casinos to some that here in our forum have them on the blacklist, and that their illicit acts or scams have really been verified, I think that sometimes they give those review notes because the users who do it are relatively new to their job and from such a variety of casinos, for them it is quite a lot of work, but there is a good reason that they should know important things that is the reputation of each casino on our forum, I encourage new reviewers to do a search on our forum for reputable casinos before giving a review.

[Tellek Garing]

I have seen some sites that are listed on many review sites who are fraudulent and are known scammers that's is the major reasons why I never trust the judgement of review sites as their judgements are biased and base on the money paid by the casino operators of simply because of the popularity of the casino resulting from widespread of promotional activities.

There is no need to get a review rating from an online platform when you can make some research about the casino and see players feedback then make your judgement from there.

How curious I have also come across sites that are specialists in reviewing casinos, and they consider good casinos to some that here in our forum have them on the blacklist, and that their illicit acts or scams have really been verified, I think that sometimes they give those review notes because the users who do it are relatively new to their job and from such a variety of casinos, for them it is quite a lot of work, but there is a good reason that they should know important things that is the reputation of each casino on our forum, I encourage new reviewers to do a search on our forum for reputable casinos before giving a review.

The biggest set back is that most of those casino reviews sites are not members of this forum and at that are unaware of what is going on in regards to the reputation but what I except from verified review is the fact that their carry out adequate research and investigation before making their review.

But then reversed is the result as most reviews are now done with the influence of corrupt administration and at the end send out wrong reviews.

[delfastTions]

The biggest set back is that most of those casino reviews sites are not members of this forum and at that are unaware of what is going on in regards to the reputation but what I except from verified review is the fact that their carry out adequate research and investigation before making their review.

But then reversed is the result as most reviews are now done with the influence of corrupt administration and at the end send out wrong reviews.

All this actual falsification of data certainly takes place in the publications. But it is really very difficult to do an objective study and it takes a significant amount of time. Few people can afford such research. Therefore, we will almost never get an objective result if we compare many sites. It remains to be content only with what is published, but it is critical of this information.
And about BTT, I think everyone knows very well, but they cannot seriously influence the opinion of individual, completely independent BTT users.

[Shamm]

What I mean is that we don't even know whether the reviewer has really played or just wants something like a task that must be completed to get a reward.

We cant know either they really played or not and also there is another important fact if they not played then nothing to say but if they really played but still I am confused either the site is legit or not because they may played with a little fund which might not be scammed but while we deposit with large fund and win then the site may turned into scam.

That's right some scammed casino really doing great if you win a small amount or deposit small amount too but when you deposit a big amount and win then there's a problem of the withdrawal and sometimes it leads to lost your money..
Some review of other casinos we can not sure if that is true if that review are came from a gambler that deposit a big amount and no problem with the withdrawal.

[Tellek Garing]

All this actual falsification of data certainly takes place in the publications. But it is really very difficult to do an objective study and it takes a significant amount of time. Few people can afford such research. Therefore, we will almost never get an objective result if we compare many sites. It remains to be content only with what is published, but it is critical of this information.
And about BTT, I think everyone knows very well, but they cannot seriously influence the opinion of individual, completely independent BTT users.

You are right most of the reviews sites are either to lazy to make out time to fine out the true nature of a casino by trying it out to have first hand information and also making contact with the right users to have their own experiences about the casino, that is why the responsibility is placed on the individual player to look for information about the casino their want to play on.

On the other hand some of this are so chucked up with corruption that their are paid to give out false scores in their reviews just to lure players.

[bitterguy28]

On the other hand some of this are so chucked up with corruption that their are paid to give out false scores in their reviews just to lure players.

This is what truly happens most of the time , Because  those BS reviews are being paid upfront for their misleading reviews towards casino sites and this is the same reason why I never trust any of them instead I will seek for what is the site is all about.
you should know that review sites are not that competent to be trusted and they are not even worth following .

[shasan]

Some review of other casinos we can not sure if that is true if that review are came from a gambler that deposit a big amount and no problem with the withdrawal.

It is difficult (impossible to know) either a review has been done for large deposit/wins or not. And also the review has been paid or not (if the review done by user) but if the review done by the team of the review site then we should know that the review has been added for the payment they received.Though They will add review for the reputed gambling site without receiving any payment.

[d3nz]

Some review of other casinos we can not sure if that is true if that review are came from a gambler that deposit a big amount and no problem with the withdrawal.

It is difficult (impossible to know) either a review has been done for large deposit/wins or not. And also the review has been paid or not (if the review done by user) but if the review done by the team of the review site then we should know that the review has been added for the payment they received.Though They will add review for the reputed gambling site without receiving any payment.

It's too good to be true and I think that they reviewed each website themselves. The only intriguing about his kind of review site is most of them are paid provide a good reviews or they hire someone else to review and get paid and I think this will link to a misleading review which we know that unknown gambling site are mostly scams and pretending to have a lot of user are playing on their site.

[livingfree]

On the other hand some of this are so chucked up with corruption that their are paid to give out false scores in their reviews just to lure players.

It will be a surprise if a scam casino and new one has already been given with a good rating.

That concludes that they've been really offering a service to make those names good through reviews. But I'm not closing my understanding that there are reviews that are legitimate.

Sometimes we're just curious because we're not expecting one to be reviewed great but then they do.

[wiss19]

It is difficult (impossible to know) either a review has been done for large deposit/wins or not. And also the review has been paid or not (if the review done by user) but if the review done by the team of the review site then we should know that the review has been added for the payment they received.Though They will add review for the reputed gambling site without receiving any payment.

It's too good to be true and I think that they reviewed each website themselves. The only intriguing about his kind of review site is most of them are paid provide a good reviews or they hire someone else to review and get paid and I think this will link to a misleading review which we know that unknown gambling site are mostly scams and pretending to have a lot of user are playing on their site.

Gamblingbro (a gambling review site) have conducted that before, where they pay users to post their feedback on each casinos found on their website. I like this idea because we can read different reviews from different users and we can compare it to the review made by gamblingbro.

By there we can easily detect if who is telling the truth and who is not, unlike to the common review sites where the review are only made by themselves and they also don't allow comments on their website. I think they are afraid to be judged by others. Not all unknown sites are scams but there are sites that aren't advertised in this forum and already have a good number of customers.

[LUCKMCFLY]

I have seen some sites that are listed on many review sites who are fraudulent and are known scammers that's is the major reasons why I never trust the judgement of review sites as their judgements are biased and base on the money paid by the casino operators of simply because of the popularity of the casino resulting from widespread of promotional activities.

There is no need to get a review rating from an online platform when you can make some research about the casino and see players feedback then make your judgement from there.

How curious I have also come across sites that are specialists in reviewing casinos, and they consider good casinos to some that here in our forum have them on the blacklist, and that their illicit acts or scams have really been verified, I think that sometimes they give those review notes because the users who do it are relatively new to their job and from such a variety of casinos, for them it is quite a lot of work, but there is a good reason that they should know important things that is the reputation of each casino on our forum, I encourage new reviewers to do a search on our forum for reputable casinos before giving a review.

The biggest set back is that most of those casino reviews sites are not members of this forum and at that are unaware of what is going on in regards to the reputation but what I except from verified review is the fact that their carry out adequate research and investigation before making their review.

But then reversed is the result as most reviews are now done with the influence of corrupt administration and at the end send out wrong reviews.

You are right, sometimes I questioned a lot what they took into account to make decisions to see what factors they based on to make the review and why they chose those casinos as good when they had a bad reputation within our forum and their answer is that They were based on other factors such as withdrawals, promotions, bonuses, but in the end, if this is not verified, then it is not possible to speak well or badly, I think that is the detail that is lacking.

That is why every site that makes reviews would be convenient if they could review the forum and the reputation of each site before making or submitting a review, it is more convenient, so they do not earn a bad reputation.