Crypto Gambling Review Site

[delfastTions]

You are right, sometimes I questioned a lot what they took into account to make decisions to see what factors they based on to make the review and why they chose those casinos as good when they had a bad reputation within our forum and their answer is that They were based on other factors such as withdrawals, promotions, bonuses, but in the end, if this is not verified, then it is not possible to speak well or badly, I think that is the detail that is lacking.

That is why every site that makes reviews would be convenient if they could review the forum and the reputation of each site before making or submitting a review, it is more convenient, so they do not earn a bad reputation.

Here you can even understand how the casino review site objectively presents information, or does it write custom reviews for money.  If the data of such a site at least approximately corresponds to the feedback from BTT, then you can trust this site.  Because it is in BTT that I think the most objective posts are from direct casino users.
  And it is worth reading about 100-150 recent posts in the topic about the casino and you will get an objective picture of events.

[lule29]

I have seen some sites that are listed on many review sites who are fraudulent and are known scammers that's is the major reasons why I never trust the judgement of review sites as their judgements are biased and base on the money paid by the casino operators of simply because of the popularity of the casino resulting from widespread of promotional activities.

There is no need to get a review rating from an online platform when you can make some research about the casino and see players feedback then make your judgement from there.

How curious I have also come across sites that are specialists in reviewing casinos, and they consider good casinos to some that here in our forum have them on the blacklist, and that their illicit acts or scams have really been verified, I think that sometimes they give those review notes because the users who do it are relatively new to their job and from such a variety of casinos, for them it is quite a lot of work, but there is a good reason that they should know important things that is the reputation of each casino on our forum, I encourage new reviewers to do a search on our forum for reputable casinos before giving a review.

The biggest set back is that most of those casino reviews sites are not members of this forum and at that are unaware of what is going on in regards to the reputation but what I except from verified review is the fact that their carry out adequate research and investigation before making their review.

But then reversed is the result as most reviews are now done with the influence of corrupt administration and at the end send out wrong reviews.

You are right, sometimes I questioned a lot what they took into account to make decisions to see what factors they based on to make the review and why they chose those casinos as good when they had a bad reputation within our forum and their answer is that They were based on other factors such as withdrawals, promotions, bonuses, but in the end, if this is not verified, then it is not possible to speak well or badly, I think that is the detail that is lacking.

That is why every site that makes reviews would be convenient if they could review the forum and the reputation of each site before making or submitting a review, it is more convenient, so they do not earn a bad reputation.

* This message is not written with the aim of insulting Cryptogamblr but describes the actions of certain sites similar to this. *

Don't forget the main reason why this kind of websites exists. It is to make money by referring the players. Before taking the advice of any website as somebody mentioned go to BTT to see if the casino can be trusted. It ain't a problem for them to write good reviews if they are making a good cut from that.

[AicecreaME]

You are right, sometimes I questioned a lot what they took into account to make decisions to see what factors they based on to make the review and why they chose those casinos as good when they had a bad reputation within our forum and their answer is that They were based on other factors such as withdrawals, promotions, bonuses, but in the end, if this is not verified, then it is not possible to speak well or badly, I think that is the detail that is lacking.

That is why every site that makes reviews would be convenient if they could review the forum and the reputation of each site before making or submitting a review, it is more convenient, so they do not earn a bad reputation.

Here you can even understand how the casino review site objectively presents information, or does it write custom reviews for money.  If the data of such a site at least approximately corresponds to the feedback from BTT, then you can trust this site.  Because it is in BTT that I think the most objective posts are from direct casino users.
  And it is worth reading about 100-150 recent posts in the topic about the casino and you will get an objective picture of events.

There are casinos which have reliable reviews from those first-hand experience of satisfied players. Most of these kinds of review is legitimate since it's have tried the quality of service and is talking from experiencing it maybe for a short period of time or even a long duration already. Many casinos has still verified reviews which the newbies from gambling could take some advice from. However, there are also gambling websites that pay people just for the sake of leaving a good review on their site. It's either a sponsored review incline with the casino, or a paid review in partnership with them.

There are also people who advertise because they are paid. In fact, there are already many posts here regarding that matter. They specifically call it 'shilling' and it's also happening in gambling industry not only in coins. Hence, people should really make an in-depth research before getting into it. Just like what you have said, it's a good idea to read even hundreds of posts regarding site reviews just to make sure they are unbiased and completely objective.

[delfastTions]

You are right, sometimes I questioned a lot what they took into account to make decisions to see what factors they based on to make the review and why they chose those casinos as good when they had a bad reputation within our forum and their answer is that They were based on other factors such as withdrawals, promotions, bonuses, but in the end, if this is not verified, then it is not possible to speak well or badly, I think that is the detail that is lacking.

That is why every site that makes reviews would be convenient if they could review the forum and the reputation of each site before making or submitting a review, it is more convenient, so they do not earn a bad reputation.

Here you can even understand how the casino review site objectively presents information, or does it write custom reviews for money.  If the data of such a site at least approximately corresponds to the feedback from BTT, then you can trust this site.  Because it is in BTT that I think the most objective posts are from direct casino users.
  And it is worth reading about 100-150 recent posts in the topic about the casino and you will get an objective picture of events.

There are casinos which have reliable reviews from those first-hand experience of satisfied players. Most of these kinds of review is legitimate since it's have tried the quality of service and is talking from experiencing it maybe for a short period of time or even a long duration already. Many casinos has still verified reviews which the newbies from gambling could take some advice from. However, there are also gambling websites that pay people just for the sake of leaving a good review on their site. It's either a sponsored review incline with the casino, or a paid review in partnership with them.

There are also people who advertise because they are paid. In fact, there are already many posts here regarding that matter. They specifically call it 'shilling' and it's also happening in gambling industry not only in coins. Hence, people should really make an in-depth research before getting into it. Just like what you have said, it's a good idea to read even hundreds of posts regarding site reviews just to make sure they are unbiased and completely objective.

I think that the information about the casino in the topics in BTT is quite objective also because those players who write posts in the topics have the appropriate ranks and merits and it is unlikely that such users of our forum will write something biased.  Maybe, of course, one of these users will do it, but the vast majority will not.
And when reading a topic, posts from beginners and low ranks can be skipped, not read, especially if it seems to you that this is a custom text and this user himself is paid.  Then you can't trust him.  
But, after reading what they write in the last 100-150 posts of a particular topic, you can definitely draw conclusions about this casino.

[rodskee]

Exactly and this is why I don't believe in online review scores as their are easily bought, I have visited some review platforms and have gone through their records and sometimes one can easily see the corruption that have out played reality as some bad casinos are rate as the best on some of those review sites.

It is not a wise decision too to believe or depends on only the review site as they can promote scam site too to earn a small amount of money both from referral commission and/or they may earn money for listing the scam site. So, before depositing we should analyses the site to be safe from the scammer.

Actually we in this forum had already done with those review site as we already proven that only few if None of them are fair in their reviews ,
majority are BS in which taking payments to their site that will be feature .

Maybe we need to take a look deeply in the site that we will  be depositing , that is the reason why we are responsible to our own payments.

[mdzahed134]

Exactly and this is why I don't believe in online review scores as their are easily bought, I have visited some review platforms and have gone through their records and sometimes one can easily see the corruption that have out played reality as some bad casinos are rate as the best on some of those review sites.

Yeah, also i think mostly review sites didn’t provided accurate rating about casino sites, because of they're paid of SCAM or shit gamble sites owners as like 1xbit, otherwise how it can be top 5 position i see in the some review sites, definitely those are manipulated. Personally i following this forum in gambling section to get real information about a casino site.

[delfastTions]

If some casinos offer even small surcharges or just bonuses to some author of a gambling review site, such an author will still agree to post positive information about this casino. But there is also the opposite - some kind of casino can also order anti-advertising of competitors. And also for money. As a result, all information will be so distorted that it will not correspond to the objective picture of events in the casino world at all. So none of the gambling review sites can be trusted.

[AicecreaME]

If some casinos offer even small surcharges or just bonuses to some author of a gambling review site, such an author will still agree to post positive information about this casino. But there is also the opposite - some kind of casino can also order anti-advertising of competitors. And also for money. As a result, all information will be so distorted that it will not correspond to the objective picture of events in the casino world at all. So none of the gambling review sites can be trusted.

I agree that there are paid post to either advertise or make an accusation that could destroy the casino's reputation. Hence, it would be best if you would do an in-depth research about the casino you are planning on playing with aside from reading the reviews only on a gambling review site. There are shilling posts and posts written intended to defame a gambling website so that they would have lesser competitor. Anyone can fall victim from these which is why it is still our responsibility to countercheck whether the feedbacks are true or just made up because someone is paid.

It would be hard to verify each reviews since most of the reviews only provide the pen name of the author and not the real name to secure the identity. A person can check it through articles and other reviews on other platforms such as youtube and other gambling site which are known to be reputable of giving true first-hand experience of the players only.

[LodisMcguire]

With many members here who already discussed the topic,it's clear that without transparency of the review,people will not trust it readily.
We just have to wait for testimony of the people who already tried each site personally,so we can judge if it's worth it or not.

[FatFork]

If some casinos offer even small surcharges or just bonuses to some author of a gambling review site, such an author will still agree to post positive information about this casino. But there is also the opposite - some kind of casino can also order anti-advertising of competitors. And also for money. As a result, all information will be so distorted that it will not correspond to the objective picture of events in the casino world at all. So none of the gambling review sites can be trusted.

Nowadays, there is no more solid trust for gambling review sites, either. After reading some of them, it became apparent that most reviews were biased and unreliable. Because, for example, some reviews are not even written by the real gamblers, but by salespeople of gambling websites or other people who are hired to write them. Other review sites were just copied from one another. So it's hard to rely on any of the reviews written by these review websites. So, apart from using reliable gambling review sites, one should also try to check out more sites which try to be more objective, in order to determine what actually is a reliable source of information.

[stomachgrowls]

I agree with the top 4 casino reviews but disagree with the last one. Maybe you will come across a lot of accusations that will make you retract the 95/100 review. Apart from that, your review site is pretty good and not too crowded with lots of unimportant features. My only 1 point suggestion is that you put the reputation of the casino first before leaving a valid review.

I hope you will add Betfury to the list of casinos you will review.

Thank you, and leave us with objective feedback regarding the casinos listed on this forum.

Thats why i cant really trust up every casino reviewers out there or any sites in related with reviews/feedbacks or something in related on which there are even sites which arent known into this market and

the worst they are including out those casinos/platforms which does have some lots of issues and complaints just like on what you had screenedshot above about 1xbit which shouldnt really be on the list.
Some members had already mentioned on sites which can really be trusted thats why we should really be careful on choosing or reading one.

[delfastTions]

With many members here who already discussed the topic,it's clear that without transparency of the review,people will not trust it readily.
We just have to wait for testimony of the people who already tried each site personally,so we can judge if it's worth it or not.

Correctly!  Only real players, and those who have played enough on a particular site, can write their impressions of the game more objectively.  And often even bring some nuances when using this casino.  Such information cannot be written by a simple site reviewer, since he simply does not have enough time for a detailed study of the resource.  He has a series of site reviews and, accordingly, the quality of the reviews is low.

  By the way, in the BTT topics on specific casinos, here in the "Gambling" section, you can find very valuable information that you will not learn from the articles in the reviews.  And it will be objective.

[doomloop]

With many members here who already discussed the topic,it's clear that without transparency of the review,people will not trust it readily.
We just have to wait for testimony of the people who already tried each site personally,so we can judge if it's worth it or not.

Why wait for other people? What if you are the ones that will try it immediately? That saves you time and the advantage of it is that you are more sure because it was yourself that tried it than to the others that we are not sure if they are lying or not. You don't really need to have a big fund to do it but a small amount will do.

There are also sites which offers free spins and faucets where you can use so that you won't need to deposit anymore. I don't know if what transparency you mean there because this was a review site and all reviews that they have made should be available for public viewing but that made sense. They wont be a review site anymore if they keep wont be transparent.

[dercosoakh]

Why is there no cloudbet.com in the ranking of your site?

[FatFork]

Why is there no cloudbet.com in the ranking of your site?

It's been two months since the OP posted this topic, and he has yet to reply to questions and comments from the community. Therefore, I can only assume that your question will remain unanswered as well, along with other unanswered and much more important questions, such as listing shady casinos such as 1xbit / 1xbet, 22bet, melbet ... and other potentially suspicious sites.

As I said before, this is probably just a paid promotion for some casino sites, or maybe he's just promoting those sites with the best affiliate terms. Whatever the reason, this is not a review site that can be relied upon for accurate, unbiased information.

[Peanutswar]

If some casinos offer even small surcharges or just bonuses to some author of a gambling review site, such an author will still agree to post positive information about this casino. But there is also the opposite - some kind of casino can also order anti-advertising of competitors. And also for money. As a result, all information will be so distorted that it will not correspond to the objective picture of events in the casino world at all. So none of the gambling review sites can be trusted.

Nowadays, there is no more solid trust for gambling review sites, either. After reading some of them, it became apparent that most reviews were biased and unreliable. Because, for example, some reviews are not even written by the real gamblers, but by salespeople of gambling websites or other people who are hired to write them. Other review sites were just copied from one another. So it's hard to rely on any of the reviews written by these review websites. So, apart from using reliable gambling review sites, one should also try to check out more sites which try to be more objective, in order to determine what is a reliable source of information.

Even the trust from the gambling review now can be paid that's why we don't know now mostly where is the most ideal to check the reliable platform and I guess the most ideal source is from the user's experience or the secondary information which comes from the experience of the player who makes play already in that platform and what are the possible cons and pros and if it is suitable for them still it is good if you check and observe too if they are doing well and good at the users taste.

[khaled0111]

Correctly!  Only real players, and those who have played enough on a particular site, can write their impressions of the game more objectively.  And often even bring some nuances when using this casino.  Such information cannot be written by a simple site reviewer, since he simply does not have enough time for a detailed study of the resource.  He has a series of site reviews and, accordingly, the quality of the reviews is low.

You are right and this is exactly why you will find that most reputable and honest review websites are being operated by real gamblers who have long years of experience in this field and they certainly know how to properly evaluate a casino. Usually, just by reading the few first lines from a review, you would know if it was written by someone who knows what he is talking about and have tested the casino with real money or by a freelance article writer.
In any case, a good review website should allow visitors to comment on reviews so they can share their own experience and add more information that the reviewer might have forgotten to mention in his article.

[alisonwonder]

Even the trust from the gambling review now can be paid that's why we don't know now mostly where is the most ideal to check the reliable platform and I guess the most ideal source is from the user's experience or the secondary information which comes from the experience of the player who makes play already in that platform and what are the possible cons and pros and if it is suitable for them still it is good if you check and observe too if they are doing well and good at the users taste.

I actually really doubt a review of a particular site to improve the gambling reputation of one of the casino platforms, but it's not bad because just to find more important information, but one of the true reviews is the response from the real community and usually the more the real community will give impact of positive reviews.

[delfastTions]

Even the trust from the gambling review now can be paid that's why we don't know now mostly where is the most ideal to check the reliable platform and I guess the most ideal source is from the user's experience or the secondary information which comes from the experience of the player who makes play already in that platform and what are the possible cons and pros and if it is suitable for them still it is good if you check and observe too if they are doing well and good at the users taste.

I actually really doubt a review of a particular site to improve the gambling reputation of one of the casino platforms, but it's not bad because just to find more important information, but one of the true reviews is the response from the real community and usually the more the real community will give impact of positive reviews.

From such reviews, the reader usually receives general information about what game options are offered in this particular casino. But usually the whole thing lies in the nuances that are not written in the reviews. And they don’t write because almost always these nuances (for example, possible difficulties with the withdrawal of the won cryptocurrency) create additional difficulties for the player. And what can be written here, except that the support will solve all the problems? But with such a solution to problems, you still have to be seriously nervous and worried. Naturally, no author of the review will write a word about such a situation.

[alisonwonder]

From such reviews, the reader usually receives general information about what game options are offered in this particular casino. But usually the whole thing lies in the nuances that are not written in the reviews. And they don’t write because almost always these nuances (for example, possible difficulties with the withdrawal of the won cryptocurrency) create additional difficulties for the player. And what can be written here, except that the support will solve all the problems? But with such a solution to problems, you still have to be seriously nervous and worried. Naturally, no author of the review will write a word about such a situation.

I think if something happens such situation will be published in the official telegram group (if any) or discord, but if they are gamblers from the forum then it will be posted on the topic for discussion purpose, so all gamblers will be open to solving problems so I don't think there are bad nuances hidden.