I hope everyone reading the proof and statistic provided know that it doesn't justify Peter Schiff to be the reason Satoshi
Did you read it yourself? It wasn't even about Peter Schiff. It was about a different Peter, Peter Wuille. Of course, he's not Satoshi, either.
It seems Peter is indeed Satoshi. Not only do proof, reasoning, and statistical analysis point at him, he also admitted it himself. Just hours ago. Here: LOL!
Wait, don't tell me you believe Peter Schiff was indeed the reason Satoshi. I will advise you to read his tweet by heart and you'll see that he's pulling our legs after he's aware that some people claim he was Satoshi.
I hope you understand that we're in the "April fool" month.
Please read between the lines, my friend. There's such a thing as a tongue-in-cheek remark or post. That's sarcasm, in other words. I was hoping the LOL! would serve its purpose. It seems it didn't, at least on your part.
You don't read tweets by heart; you read them by your eyes. LOL!