Who is Satoshi? Hypothesis with proof, reasoning, and statistical analysis

[BlackHatCoiner]

Why are people so obsessed in unveiling and knowing the identity of Satoshi?

Here are few reasons off the top of my head.

• They'll make tons of money from the media.
• They're curious to know how they are.
• They want to know if they're still alive. (And has still access to their money)

Generally, for those who make this kind of researches it's probably the former. 

[kevinovecka]

Why are people so obsessed in unveiling and knowing the identity of Satoshi?

Here are few reasons off the top of my head.

• They'll make tons of money from the media.
• They're curious to know how they are.
• They want to know if they're still alive. (And has still access to their money)

Generally, for those who make this kind of researches it's probably the former. 

For me it is more like curiosity about who made such awesome thing

I don't need his identity, face or anything

I would like to know who that person is- what was his skills, how he did it, if he did it alone, what was his inspiration, ideas, how long it took to finish it etc
Some story

[suzanne5223]

I hope everyone reading the proof and statistic provided know that it doesn't justify Peter Schiff to be the reason Satoshi

It seems Peter is indeed Satoshi. Not only do proof, reasoning, and statistical analysis point at him, he also admitted it himself. Just hours ago. Here: LOL!

Wait, don't tell me you believe Peter Schiff was indeed the reason Satoshi. I will advise you to read his tweet by heart and you'll see that he's pulling our legs after he's aware that some people claim he was Satoshi.
I hope you understand that we're in the "April fool" month.

[laurenB7742]

Sorry I didn't edit this -- Id love to hear your feedback/arguments against this

https://dbooneproductions.home.blog/2022/03/24/who-is-satoshi-nakamoto/

Is it too much to know? Ok i am telling you,
It is not necessary to know who Satoshi is. He has given us a system of passive earning and has made people financially self-dependent. He showed the thumbs up to the traditional banking system and explained to the people how to stay free from the tyranny of the government.

Without wasting time finding Satoshi, one should research his creation.

[Darker45]

I hope everyone reading the proof and statistic provided know that it doesn't justify Peter Schiff to be the reason Satoshi

Did you read it yourself? It wasn't even about Peter Schiff. It was about a different Peter, Peter Wuille. Of course, he's not Satoshi, either.

It seems Peter is indeed Satoshi. Not only do proof, reasoning, and statistical analysis point at him, he also admitted it himself. Just hours ago. Here: LOL!

Wait, don't tell me you believe Peter Schiff was indeed the reason Satoshi. I will advise you to read his tweet by heart and you'll see that he's pulling our legs after he's aware that some people claim he was Satoshi.
I hope you understand that we're in the "April fool" month.

Please read between the lines, my friend. There's such a thing as a tongue-in-cheek remark or post. That's sarcasm, in other words. I was hoping the LOL! would serve its purpose. It seems it didn't, at least on your part.

You don't read tweets by heart; you read them by your eyes. LOL!

[Taskford]

Here we are again discussing about Satoshi's identity and  another person popping out claiming that he is the one who create bitcoin. Maybe this is one of there free advertising method to make their name known to the public so I guess its better for people stop buying those claims and only believe if there'sa valid proof for example the satoshi account here will post about his comeback also a sign message will be one of solid proof about this claims.

[wozzek23]

I tried visiting the page but it seems that the post has been deleted, because it keeps saying that the page I have visited can’t be found. Anyways, from the comments so far that I have read, I was able to get what the article was talking about, and all I have got to say is that it is time that people really take a break from all these unveiling of Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity.

This theory even seems to be the worst from what I have seen other readers comment, because so far I have seen other theories that are far much better than it and quite believable than whatever the author has written here. But at the end, none of them is still able to tell who he is. So it’s best take a break from all these unnecessary theories that they are making.

[jostorres]

Why are people so obsessed in unveiling and knowing the identity of Satoshi?

Here are few reasons off the top of my head.

• They'll make tons of money from the media.
• They're curious to know how they are.
• They want to know if they're still alive. (And has still access to their money)

Generally, for those who make this kind of researches it's probably the former. 

Yeah, sure it’s definitely the first option, they are looking for a way to make tons of money from the media. Imagine being the one who reveals the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto? You’re going to get really popular and also make money off it.

But, the attempts that they are all making is now starting to seem really stupid to me, because it doesn’t make any sense at all trying to uncover mysteries that has been hidden for over a decade now and no one has been able to do it. Satoshi has seen that it is best for him or them to stay hidden, and I believe that whoever they are, before they went about this, they must have planned very well to hide their identity from the world.

[suzanne5223]

I hope everyone reading the proof and statistic provided know that it doesn't justify Peter Schiff to be the reason Satoshi

Did you read it yourself? It wasn't even about Peter Schiff. It was about a different Peter, Peter Wuille. Of course, he's not Satoshi, either.

I didn't know its Peter Wuille cause when I tried to read to understand the storyline of the theory with proof, and statistical analysis in the link provided by the Op appears that story was taken down and when I read your post it was pointing to Peter Schiff so I thought he was the Peter predicted to be Satoshi.

I think the site owner understands the misinformation of the article writer that's why they take it down.