overly complicated. simple is best.
Vote in person only.
This has been subdued by infiltration and system infiltration by intelligence services. The counting and transmission of votes is manipulated. You may believe that this is not happening, but then you "believe" in democrazy, just like "believing in god".
Here is now a different system presented where voting can be verified/analyzed by system software and users, so there is no more believe but mathematical proof and verification by users themselfes.
I Agree that the various systems have been compromised.
But most of that is due to the way the votes are counted.
I have noticed also that the MORE complicated a system is the MORE likely there will be corruption if there are People in the loop.
Back to keeping it simple. 1 person. 1 vote. Counted immediately not overnight not 3 days later. Polls open. Counts are taken live. Polls close, voting is done. Recorded live from the second the polls open to the polls close. The count the people coming in and leaving the total should be exactly the number of votes taken at that poll.
Use paper only. pencil only.
(debatable idea)
polls should also ALWAYS be handled by the opposing party in a dual party system So if the expected outcome is for one party the the opposing party handles the polls for that area. if its close then 50/50 (this idea is debatable)