Tokenista (OP)
Member
 Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 14
Everyone join Blurt.blog & Steemit.com
|
 |
April 07, 2022, 09:56:33 AM |
|
 If we look at generally what BLURT is, how Graphene Works, and how Groups and Delegation Programs make it work better, we can start to put together our own Programs. So first, BLURT is a STEEM Clone with no SBD, SBD going up and down based on the amount of STEEM Rewarded in a Dollar, so low STEEM Rewards bring high SBD Values. BLURT does not have this, BLURT also doesn't have down Voting so we can't cancel out each other's Votes and have problems coming from that kind of what could be called Harassment, or Bullying, or just Deplatforming as it has been being defined. So Steemit Rewards people for holding more SP, BLURT rewards you for holding more BP. This can be put on Autopilot with Delegation Programs, so you can invest and let someone else Vote for you. This also then gets into Curation generally where you can Buy in, and Vote without having to Delegate to someone else, and the more you own the better. Now is a good time to Buy BLURT, because at 1 Penny it will likely go way up in Value, it has 0 chance of staying below $0.02-$0.03 and will likely soon go up to match Steemit as more people join. If you Buy 100,000 BLURT at 1 Penny you may not be giving great Rewards, but when it's $0.10 you will be much happier. If you Buy 1,000,000 or 5,000,000 at a Penny, then it goes up, you are that much better off, and now you can basically have your own Corner of a Social Media website. If you look at @double-u you can see an example of this, then looking at @r2cornell shows you how Delegation works, but his program does not have Rewards. @tomoyan will pay you for your Delegation so it is like Autopilot, and you can request a Vote from him. @r2cornell will Vote on your posts if you make good posts. If we look at Steemit and HIVE groups that helps everyone find each other, instead of just scrolling through the "New Posts" page. And we can see that STEEM-Engine Tokens, HIVE-Engine Tokens, and Bitcointalk or other Announcement and Community Threads bring the most value to Communities, apart from Delegation Programs. The Programs on Steemit are much more Advanced than BLURT, and HIVE more advanced than Steemit. We can see that Steemit is leaving a lot on the Table by not merging TRC20 into groups like @aggroed has. Basically, and we will be doing this under the Van Kush Banner, if I make a group called "TRC20 Announcements" on Steemit, or even on STEEM and HIVE, then I create a Script that Rewards all users of #TRC20 and have everyone in my Group start using the Hashtag and Connecting their Wallets to a Bot like this: VKRW Airdrop https://blurt.blog/blurtutorial/@punicwax/vkrw-airdropThen now I can have that Bot Rewarding everyone in our group. If we have more people copy us and join our Group and Hashtags, we all get TRC20 Airdrops. If we build a place for this, then we are like STEEM-Engine, if we build a DEX to autohost all of the Tokens, we are more like STEEM-Engine. We can also do this on BLURT, we can create something that works on all 3 Platforms this way, by using other Blockchains on these Blockchains, utilizing what they have to offer. We then make Facebook groups and other groups, so then we can bring people in to the Rewards Programs. Witnesses should have Tokens, Businesses, Influencers, etc, etc. They should all be hosting Tokens, Rewarding people with them, Buying BLURT and STEEM for more Rewards. So then basically we reach out into all of Social Media, taking over MetaVerse, Rewarding people everywhere for using our Hashtags, or Retweeting, etc. BLURT Outreach https://blurt.blog/blurtutorial/@punicwax/blurt-outreachVote for our Witness https://blurt.blog/introduceyourself/@tracy55/vankush-familyI have written about this and will put the quotes up here, but I want to get into kind of the "Problem" with rewards Tokens and the Solutions to those problems. So, If I create a Rewards Token that simply Rewards into Infinity, as our first one VKRW will, then there have to be Mechanisms to keep the value up. When creating a Currency today "Liquidity" is a Keyword because all the investors want to be able to Cash out. But if your Rewards Token goes into Infinity there is a problem of Inflation, but the USD Inflates, there is no Cap, so this is basically like a Fiat Currency. Ours will also inflate with Membership, as more people earn there is no Daily Cap, so the Rewards do not go down for each person as more join, it just continues to inflate and inflate. So what we can look to is Steemit, Steem-Engine, and several other systems. If we first look to GEMS it was a Telegram Clone Currency, years ahead of it's time, and GEMS is a good example of what we need moving forward. But STEEM based DPoS Models should be used with Voting and other Mechanisms, which gets into the things I have been talking about, will quote here, and write more about in this thread. Something that needs to be mentioned that may be being missed,
When Ethereum started there was the issue of Token Oraclization, and Forking the Chain, this then became a period of ICOs and World Wide ETH Seminars about Cloning Chains and using Testnets. What we are seeing how in DeFi is DEXs and Swaps, the DEX primarily existed in Ethereum EVM space, then Steem-Engine/Hive-Engine, ICOs on ETH were $10,000-$200,000 and with each chain that hosts Tokens it becomes an Advantage to come in early, so you hold this Utility Coin on a Blockchain that hosts Tokens. The Price barrier was dropped with EIP-1167, but there really has yet to be an extremely useful Token Mint outside of Hive-Engine and the other Aggroed Technologies, which should be seen everywhere, but are still rare. We should see options for Tokens and Contracts for Sale like Aggroed has, all over the Blockchain Universe. Like Discord Admin Bots, and Business Rules Engines, we should be seeing a lot more Tokenization and Rewards brought as Deployable on a DEX, with Staking, Distribution, etc, etc.
At one time there was a Coin called YouStocks, and I posted in their Thread, it would have been years ahead of it's time now that it doesn't exist, and the Developer completely disappeared. What these were would have been Stocks tradable for 1 ETH Clone Chain Token with its own Miners, so everyone was Mining it, and getting ready to have a Token Mint that was as integral to the Blockchain as Ether Mist, or MetaMask. Like Hive-Engine. This should be seen all over, and there should be a heavy emphases on adding Scripts to the Blockchain, there should be integration into existing Technology like Telegram, Discord and the coming MetaVerse.
And dApps should have less Focus on Gambling, and ROI Scheming, and instead be focused on things like building Tools for people to use. If we saw more dApps that had regular things that people already use everyday, but built on Blockchain, then they could use it. For example emails could be Tokenized, Subscriptions, etc. And we could start seeing things like Highly Developed Airdrop Tools that build lists from its History, provide settings, provide storage for organized lists with names, and create a Space on the Blockchain for people to use to create a Career in their Token or other people's Tokens. There could be all kinds of Mining Pool Development, Graphene Clones of Telegram, Twitter, YouTube, etc. Everything can be put onto Blockchain.
If we look at DevCoin they were basically the first ones to create a Rewards Pool, where it was either a basic SHA or Scrypt Coin, like Bitcoin or Litecoin Cloned, but the Specs or Tokenomics included an unlimited Supply with like 180,000,000,000 made per month, distributed to Miners, and then the Mining Pool had a Script (DevCoin and DevTome are on GitHub), that would give 10% of the Rewards to Writers on a Wiki. Rewards were not Voted on like Steemit, but 1 Share was awarded for every 1,000 Words, and if 5 people wrote 1,000 words each it split 5 ways, if 100,000 people wrote 1,000 words each it split 100,000 ways, making it more Rare at that point.
They did not understand that and it didn't work, the Aura Dev ran off so that didn't work either, and Steemit and HIVE are stumbling trying to find their Balance, with Aggroed kind of in the middle. So now I am building the needed Rewards Programs.
And this is DeFi, but it has always been part of Crypto.
The definition of burning crypto is the process of intentional burning to eliminate coins. Thus, crypto coins and the assets in them cannot be reused. To do so,token/ coin will be put into a non-retrievable wallet.
I don't think you understand, I am talking about Contracts that hold Tokens like a Liquidity Value, "$1,000,000,000 held on PancakeSwap" or whatever, But it doesn't come out, and that's the Contract. Instead it goes in and another Token comes out forever and that old one is gone. I just out out the Concept of the Burn Mine we will be implementing on KULA Swap, and it's basically just a Smart Contract you put Tokens in to Burn, and it Mines a more Rare Token, this could even be done with like 5 Tokens Burning 1 Token, or 1 Token Burning 5 Tokens. As in you could have 5 TRC20s rewarding a Burn of VKRW, or you could have 1 TRC20 that Burns VKRW, STEEM, BLURT, HIVE and TRX. We will create a whole series of these like a Swap Pool, and Feeding Swap Pools as they will all be Swapped on KULASwap also. This would be the basic Code, this quote also links to a thread I have been writing about TRC20 Tokens. This will be a thread about TRC20 Token creation pragma solidity ^0.4.23;
import "./ITRC20.sol";
import "../../utils/SafeMath.sol";
/**
* @title Standard TRC20 token (compatible with ERC20 token)
*
* @dev Implementation of the basic standard token.
* https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-20.md
* Originally based on code by FirstBlood: https://github.com/Firstbloodio/token/blob/master/smart_contract/FirstBloodToken.sol
*/
contract TRC20 is ITRC20 {
using SafeMath for uint256;
mapping (address => uint256) private _balances;
mapping (address => mapping (address => uint256)) private _allowed;
uint256 private _totalSupply;
/**
* @dev Total number of tokens in existence
*/
function totalSupply() public view returns (uint256) {
return _totalSupply;
}
/**
* @dev Gets the balance of the specified address.
* @param owner The address to query the balance of.
* @return An uint256 representing the amount owned by the passed address.
*/
function balanceOf(address owner) public view returns (uint256) {
return _balances[owner];
}
/**
* @dev Function to check the amount of tokens that an owner allowed to a spender.
* @param owner address The address which owns the funds.
* @param spender address The address which will spend the funds.
* @return A uint256 specifying the amount of tokens still available for the spender.
*/
function allowance(
address owner,
address spender
)
public
view
returns (uint256)
{
return _allowed[owner][spender];
}
/**
* @dev Transfer token for a specified address
* @param to The address to transfer to.
* @param value The amount to be transferred.
*/
function transfer(address to, uint256 value) public returns (bool) {
_transfer(msg.sender, to, value);
return true;
}
/**
* @dev Approve the passed address to spend the specified amount of tokens on behalf of msg.sender.
* Beware that changing an allowance with this method brings the risk that someone may use both the old
* and the new allowance by unfortunate transaction ordering. One possible solution to mitigate this
* race condition is to first reduce the spender's allowance to 0 and set the desired value afterwards:
* https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/20#issuecomment-263524729
* @param spender The address which will spend the funds.
* @param value The amount of tokens to be spent.
*/
function approve(address spender, uint256 value) public returns (bool) {
require(spender != address(0));
_allowed[msg.sender][spender] = value;
emit Approval(msg.sender, spender, value);
return true;
}
/**
* @dev Transfer tokens from one address to another
* @param from address The address which you want to send tokens from
* @param to address The address which you want to transfer to
* @param value uint256 the amount of tokens to be transferred
*/
function transferFrom(
address from,
address to,
uint256 value
)
public
returns (bool)
{
_allowed[from][msg.sender] = _allowed[from][msg.sender].sub(value);
_transfer(from, to, value);
return true;
}
/**
* @dev Increase the amount of tokens that an owner allowed to a spender.
* approve should be called when allowed_[_spender] == 0. To increment
* allowed value is better to use this function to avoid 2 calls (and wait until
* the first transaction is mined)
* From MonolithDAO Token.sol
* @param spender The address which will spend the funds.
* @param addedValue The amount of tokens to increase the allowance by.
*/
function increaseAllowance(
address spender,
uint256 addedValue
)
public
returns (bool)
{
require(spender != address(0));
_allowed[msg.sender][spender] = (
_allowed[msg.sender][spender].add(addedValue));
emit Approval(msg.sender, spender, _allowed[msg.sender][spender]);
return true;
}
/**
* @dev Decrease the amount of tokens that an owner allowed to a spender.
* approve should be called when allowed_[_spender] == 0. To decrement
* allowed value is better to use this function to avoid 2 calls (and wait until
* the first transaction is mined)
* From MonolithDAO Token.sol
* @param spender The address which will spend the funds.
* @param subtractedValue The amount of tokens to decrease the allowance by.
*/
function decreaseAllowance(
address spender,
uint256 subtractedValue
)
public
returns (bool)
{
require(spender != address(0));
_allowed[msg.sender][spender] = (
_allowed[msg.sender][spender].sub(subtractedValue));
emit Approval(msg.sender, spender, _allowed[msg.sender][spender]);
return true;
}
/**
* @dev Transfer token for a specified addresses
* @param from The address to transfer from.
* @param to The address to transfer to.
* @param value The amount to be transferred.
*/
function _transfer(address from, address to, uint256 value) internal {
require(to != address(0));
_balances[from] = _balances[from].sub(value);
_balances[to] = _balances[to].add(value);
emit Transfer(from, to, value);
}
/**
* @dev Internal function that mints an amount of the token and assigns it to
* an account. This encapsulates the modification of balances such that the
* proper events are emitted.
* @param account The account that will receive the created tokens.
* @param value The amount that will be created.
*/
function _mint(address account, uint256 value) internal {
require(account != address(0));
_totalSupply = _totalSupply.add(value);
_balances[account] = _balances[account].add(value);
emit Transfer(address(0), account, value);
}
/**
* @dev Internal function that burns an amount of the token of a given
* account.
* @param account The account whose tokens will be burnt.
* @param value The amount that will be burnt.
*/
function _burn(address account, uint256 value) internal {
require(account != address(0));
_totalSupply = _totalSupply.sub(value);
_balances[account] = _balances[account].sub(value);
emit Transfer(account, address(0), value);
}
/**
* @dev Internal function that burns an amount of the token of a given
* account, deducting from the sender's allowance for said account. Uses the
* internal burn function.
* @param account The account whose tokens will be burnt.
* @param value The amount that will be burnt.
*/
function _burnFrom(address account, uint256 value) internal {
// Should https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/zeppelin-solidity/issues/707 be accepted,
// this function needs to emit an event with the updated approval.
_allowed[account][msg.sender] = _allowed[account][msg.sender].sub(
value);
_burn(account, value);
}
}
ERC20 guide to help since they are basically the same https://github.com/bitfwdcommunity/Issue-your-own-ERC20-tokenOk and?
What would be the purpose of this? And by burning, you mean it'll be sent to a wallet where you can access them, right?
~ And to your Point, There could be Charity Burns, where the Burn Mine has like an Option to send Tokens to a Charity Address, like instead of Burning, and this could also itself become a Proof of Burn, like Proof of Dues, or Proof of Subscription. In the Burn Mine. Wouldn't it will miss the point of burning? As far as I know, the concept of burning is to eliminate the coin or token circulation within its blockchain to be unusable. By just moving the "burned" coins to let's say some charitable address will deem the coin still circulating. So, I think it will completely miss the point of burning. It would, but that's like saying "stop calling everything DeFi" when talking about Steemit, if we look at TRX they took the Witness System from BTS and STEEM to create SRs. So, What I'm talking about is a Burn Mine. Token Contracts that are Minted by other Tokens being burned as Fuel, some taking Several Tokens, this could even become so complex that Token Burn Tokens can be used to Mine other Tokens, and this could basically become a Mesh of Burn Mining. And if we look at this concept itself, many people are looking for Point and Click Mining, so what this offers is that, with Hashing Power on a Network forever, and the overall hash could be measured in dollars, with each Hasher having a Hash Rate. And then the Charity Burn would use all these same Mechanisms, but it wouldn't Burn it would go to a company, and this option would be surrounded by actual Burn contacts. Then you could have Subscription Based Networking on top of this, like Steemit with RSS feeds to other things instead of just Blogs, and the option to Tip the person in different Subscription packages. It could be private or just fundraising. So then if a person is popular, they can go in what at that point would be a Burn Mint, and Mint a Token for their Subscription, and they intake VKRW, TRX and BTC, and their Subscribers get content created by the person, and YouTubers, TikTokers, Bloggers, Vloggers, everyone could have Subscribers pay them in Tokens for creating things. So based on what exists now, here is what could happen
People get a Token and Wonder "What can I do with this?", And many reading here may think, "Invest", or whatever particular Mechanism, DEX, Bot, or whatever you use, but most people Wonder, "What is this for?", and don't want to learn all that. This is how UniSwap and PancakeSwap effected the Cryptocurrency World, and now it's kind of more straight forward for everyone.
What a Burn Mine adds is actual Utilities,
It starts with the Burn Mining Tokens, Subscriptions, etc, then all being Swapped. The Tokens we propose are Social Media Rewards, we are making a Telegram Rewards Bot like MEE6 from Discord, and we will also create one for Discord, these will be connected to TRC20 but we will eventually make them deployable from our Blockchain with the TRC20/BEP2 Peggy Option. We then will have a NutBox clone which is a STEEM Delegation Rewards Bot, and we will create Steemit Group and Hashtag Rewards Bots, deployable on our Blockchain, and we will do this across MetaVerse. You can compare this aspect to the Peace, Abundance, Liberty Network for Minnow Delegated Bot Voting from Discord, activated by commands in Discord like the BLURT Discord Bot. And you can compare the TRC20s we are making to Steem-Engine and Hive-Engine, though we also have Tokens on those Platforms and will offer Peggys to TRC20 very soon.
But if we then take a few steps back, like out of Blockchain, and look at Apps, and the Cloud, and SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc. We can look at 9-1-1 Call Centers and general Call Centers, and see that Telephones are part of this, and we can start by looking at 1-800 numbers and the craze there in like the 80s and now Psychics on Commercials selling Calls, etc. Therapy on the Phone, Psychiatrists, Doctors, etc, etc. Zoom Meetings, YouTube Videos, TikTok, and Live Streaming.
So,
When someone asks, "What can I use this for?", about a New Token, and we introduce the Concept of a Burn Mine, we can see that people can start accepting Currencies for Services, and provide Platforms for this. As I write this what comes to mind is the Mirror and Tonal, where the entire concept is to bring a Trainer to your Home, but in a way that is like the missing Exercise guy from the 70s or 80s who looks like the Painter guy kinda. And they bring the Trainer to everyone's home, and they can go through and select them probably, and you see the Peleton system has like places on GoPro or something, basically like using YouTube type coaching as an Organized Fitness System.
So if there are Subscriptions and Services, where different platforms Cover different things,
You could, for example, Buy Steemit Votes on our Platform through a Self Selected group of people offering their Votes for Sale, and anyone there can Buy ours, but it could be done by Proxy through the Burn Mine, or have Rewards through the Burn Mine, where as they Buy a Vote, they get a Hash Rate in the Mine.
Zynga could use this on Facebook, and it could very easily become like a Norm for Pay to Play services, like the Steam Gaming Platform, or like Sourceforge and like Pirate Bay kind of, but with Sales, for Tokens. And Live Broadcasting, all connecting to various Social Media Platforms. This is how we will merge the Burn Mines with what we are calling CandleBox. And SoapBox will be real Sales, like eBay or Etsy, where people can Rate your Service, but you can choose what Tokens and everything you accept. We will also be creating Registrar Systems.
|
