What can you say about this? is 63 months to lenient for this kind of case or his sentencing should be longer as he has assisted a known terrorist country?
A court decision has been made for Griffith, as far as I know, from a five year lawsuit, the court gave Griffith a lesser sentence than demanded, only 63 months in prison.
If you look at Griffith's journey in helping North Korea only to train North Koreans in the immunity of the global banking system and to avoid sanctions in using crypto, but in the case of Griffith, there are pros and cons to the punishment that has been assigned to him, the US believes that Griffith's behavior could threaten global peace from a nuclear point of view, I think this punishment for Griffith is due to the selfishness of North Korea against the rejection of international sanctions.
I've read history about other countries doing the same thing as Griffith did in helping and evading sanctions in the same way clandestinely, strangely very few Americans are involved and do it in cases like this, I also wonder why Griffith dares to help North Korea which is clearly against international law.
I think this sentence is very light, most likely the US courts have other reasons behind the lightness of Griffith's sentence.........!