Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk IV (2024 Q2) [MODERATED] 🤨🔬

[Pandu Geddon]

I can't understand, so you're saying that feedback on the trust page about some accounts having alts should be written in a neutral style? If my memory serves me right, I've come across such reviews in a negative style. So it turns out that this is wrong and you still need to write a neutral feedback?

the comment you use for the negative tag you provide shows an account connection. whereas having multiple accounts is allowed as long as you don't use them to cheat in the same campaign which is against campaign manager rules. that's what you haven't presented in your catch proof.

That being said, if your capture only refers to account connections that weren't proven to be cheating in the campaign, then a neutral tag is sufficient.
but if you show evidence of cheating in your campaign, you can negatively tag it.

and for proof of the Twitter social media account that you mentioned cannot be evidence of an evasion ban account report. That's because the user @SaimExch is the last user of the Twitter account. and he has been banned. whereas previous users who used the Twitter social media account, @Waleedhaji and @Waleedzain323 have not been banned.

so as long as you can't show cheating by the three accounts, you can change your negative tag to Neutral with a connected account comment.

[FatFork]

I can't understand, so you're saying that feedback on the trust page about some accounts having alts should be written in a neutral style? If my memory serves me right, I've come across such reviews in a negative style. So it turns out that this is wrong and you still need to write a neutral feedback?

If accounts are found engaging in cheating or doing other shady stuff, it makes sense to give them a negative tag. However, if there are no such issues, a neutral tag would be more appropriate. Just so you know, having multiple alt accounts on the forum isn't against the rules.

[Shahinbd]

To
The Forum administration.
Subject: Application for the red tag remove.

Honourable sir,
With due respect to known Alts of anyone a user generated list MK IV ( 2023 Q2)

My BTT username  Shahinbd has been red tag.
Issa56 team has made a report against Shahibd.
I have announced.I don’t  bounty cheating and lier. I have cleared my BTT name Shahinbd but it is not my userID Xavier pz

Please  see the proof on complaints bounty work link :
Week 6
https://imgur.com/a/hT4s9QC

Week 7
https://imgur.com/a/aOrVcP1

I don’t used her wallets address. See the above screenshot pictures. Please Justice It's and remove my red tag.


I want justice for forum.
Please check it and taken your red tag
and give me a work opportunity.
Thanks

[Timelord2o67]

Two and a half years ago you were tagged for plagerism but only now want to bellyache because you've been slapped for having been identified as having an alt two weeks ago?

[DireWolfM14]

give me a work opportunity.

You've been a member of this forum for almost 4 years, you've made over 6k posts, and have yet to earn a single merit.  But you think it's the recently exposed red-tags that are keeping you from having work opportunities?  Wow.

[light_warrior]

2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Dorimon45
2. Btc.06

Proof:

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username:Dorimon45
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3518978
Telegram Username:@Sharif2730
Participated Campaigns:Twitter, telegram, Tiktok
BSC Wallet Address:0x6CD8b3c41e4f020C37dc9c8013bb01d1fCcC5a14

[ Archive ]

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username: Btc.06
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3536420
Telegram Username: @Sharif2730
Participated Campaigns: Facebook,Twitter,Discord,Telegram
BEP-20 Wallet Address: 0x6CD8b3c41e4f020C37dc9c8013bb01d1fCcC5a14

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses and Telegram Username:

Code:

@Sharif2730
0x6CD8b3c41e4f020C37dc9c8013bb01d1fCcC5a14

[Timelord2o67]

give me a work opportunity.

You've been a member of this forum for almost 4 years, you've made over 6k posts, and have yet to earn a single merit.  But you think it's the recently exposed red-tags that are keeping you from having work opportunities?  Wow.

Thank you for your post, it's thoughtful and concise.

I was wanting to respond to something you posted in the poker player thread concerning trust feedback where you mention slapping negative feedback on alts.

Unfortunately, Poker Player locked that thread before I could point out that investigators here in this thread have a policy of negative against alts ONLY where there is evidence the alts have scanned e.g. claiming from the same campaign.

I was also going to suggest in that thread you go back and review your legacy trust feedback posts in the same way I suggested The Sceptical Chymist needs to review their legacy posts - alas, my suggestion to them fell on deaf ears.  

[light_warrior]

2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Alex Joe
2. Khalilan

Proof:

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username: Alex Joe
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3512333
Telegram Username: @Dinmen1
Participated Campaigns: Twitter, Telegram & Discord, Instagram
BSC wallet: 0x103f7722580314608Eae62f0DAef19742Cd1e051

[ Archive ]

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username:  Khalilan
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2972833
Telegram Username: @Dinmen1
Participated Campaigns: Twitter, Facebook, Instagram
BSC wallet: 0x103f7722580314608Eae62f0DAef19742Cd1e051

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses and Telegram Username:

Code:

@Dinmen1
0x103f7722580314608Eae62f0DAef19742Cd1e051

[DireWolfM14]

I was also going to suggest in that thread you go back and review your legacy trust feedback posts in the same way I suggested The Sceptical Chymist needs to review their legacy posts - alas, my suggestion to them fell on deaf ears.  

Sorry, I missed that post you wrote to The Sceptical Chymist, so I'm not sure to what you're referring.  As for tagging alts of known scammers, of course I'm in support of that, given the evidence linking the accounts is compelling enough that a reasonable person would be left without a doubt.  I left that post in Poker Player's thread rather brief on purpose, because there seems to be this attitude among some DT members than anyone with an undisclosed alt is up to something nefarious.  I find that assumption simply absurd.

[Issa56]

3 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Sifat01
Mix$$01
Mixpip01

Proof:
Sifat01

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username:Sifat01
Forum Profile Link:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3499015
Telegram Username:@Islam449
Participated Campaigns:Twitter, telegram, Tiktok
BSC Wallet Address:0xfc38fbcDA185EA1940354606740a696Fc2370208

[Achieve]

Mix$$01

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username:Mix$$01
Forum Profile Link:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3531525
Telegram Username:@
Participated Campaigns:Twitter, telegram, Tiktok
BSC Wallet Address:0xfc38fbcDA185EA1940354606740a696Fc2370208

[Achieve]

Mixpip01

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username:Sifat01
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3499015
Telegram Username:@sakib2526
Participated Campaigns:Twitter, telegram, Tiktok
BSC Wallet Address:0xfc38fbcDA185EA1940354606740a696Fc2370208

[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Code:

BSC wallet address:0xfc38fbcDA185EA1940354606740a696Fc2370208

Miscellaneous:
These three users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet multiple times, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these three accounts are operated by one person.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; The $DONS. Bounty manager; BountyDetective. Sifat01 is number 122 on Twitter spreadsheet, Mix$$01 is number 788 on Telegram spreadsheet and Mixpip01  is number 0 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; RADA - Making Changes in Football with Blockchain. Bounty manager; julerz12. Sifat01 is number 179 on Telegram spreadsheet, Mix$$01 is number 340 on Telegram spreadsheet and Mixpip01  is number 0 on Telegram spreadsheet.

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Gucci12
Siam20

Proof:
Gucci12

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username: Gucci12
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3473541
Telegram Username: Reta_2076
Participated Campaigns: Twitter. Telegram. tiktok, Facebook,
BSC Wallet Address: 0x75030d1bBDd8b9ca73f602e391b4Df6b15852f98

[Achieve]

Siam20

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username: Gucci12
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3473541
Telegram Username: Reta_2076
Participated Campaigns: Twitter. Telegram. tiktok, Facebook,
BSC Wallet Address: 0x75030d1bBDd8b9ca73f602e391b4Df6b15852f98

[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Code:

BSC wallet address:0x75030d1bBDd8b9ca73f602e391b4Df6b15852f98

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet multiple times, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; RydeSwap . Bounty manager; BountyDetective. Gucci12 is number 47 on Twitter spreadsheet and Siam20 is number 15 on Twitter spreadsheet.


2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Swieetboyhood66
Lezyboyhoodson88

Proof:
Swieetboyhood66

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username: Swieetboyhood66
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3485672
Telegram Username: @Rubelrana6678
Participated Campaigns:  Twitter,Telegram
BSC wallet address : 0xebA0A47d171C0cf1277cC97696A33f3117851aCb

[Achieve]

Lezyboyhoodson88

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username: Swieetboyhood66
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3485672
Telegram Username: @Rubelrana6678
Participated Campaigns:  Twitter,Facebook,Telegram
BSC wallet address : 0xebA0A47d171C0cf1277cC97696A33f3117851aCb

[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Code:

BSC wallet address:0xebA0A47d171C0cf1277cC97696A33f3117851aCb

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet multiple times, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; The $DONS. Bounty manager; BountyDetective. Swieetboyhood66 is number 873 on Twitter spreadsheet and Lezyboyhoodson88 is number 803 on Twitter spreadsheet.

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

edisonali
Uzzalroy

Proof:
edisonali

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username: edisonali
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1994251
Telegram Username: @anushreedas
Participated Campaigns: Reddit, Medium, Telegram, Twitter , Facebook , Instagram , Discord, Article, Videos, Linkedin
BSC Wallet Address: 0x4c189d00BeD6c861d5025e6d6B9C1Aef117Dd755

[Achieve]

Uzzalroy

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username: edisonali
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1994251
Telegram Username: @anushreedas
Participated Campaigns: Twitter , Facebook , Article, Videos
ETH  Wallet Address: 0x4c189d00BeD6c861d5025e6d6B9C1Aef117Dd755

[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Code:

BSC wallet address:0x4c189d00BeD6c861d5025e6d6B9C1Aef117Dd755

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet twice, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; RydeSwap. Bounty manager; BountyDetective. edisonali is number 467 on Twitter spreadsheet and Uzzalroy is number 477 on Twitter spreadsheet.

[Timelord2067]

.  I left that post in Poker Player's thread rather brief on purpose, because there seems to be this attitude among some DT members than anyone with an undisclosed alt is up to something nefarious.  I find that assumption simply absurd.

As do I.

As I said to The Sceptical Chymist they are critical of other user's trust feedbacks yet of their own 3,050+ trust feedbacks there are many of the type they are critical of. I have given examples of more than a dozen at a time The Sceptical Chymist has done, so they are not isolated incidents. I have suggested The Sceptical Chymist needs to trim their own trust feedbacks down to about 400 maximum using the ten questions I posed a couple of weeks ago.

This is the type of negative trust feedback others have started threads against me in the past then the DT echo chamber sings in a lipsinc chorus...

Incorrigible, entitled troll and spammer insisting on being given a loan despite the only collateral he claims to have to offer is an obsolete iPhone that's not worth the amount he wants to borrow, and stolen or hacked identification documents of others.

A similar post

Troll seeking attention, and obviously an account of someone who's trust is already ruined.

May I suggest again that you go back and review your own 344 trust feedbacks, please based on my post to The Sceptical Chymist, please?


With regards to negatives on alts I can only suggest you look back over the last few pages as the issue came up and each of us has chimed in to remind a newer contributor that having alts does not mean they are out to scam.

Any negative trust feedback on alts has been where there is a solid connection for claiming in a campaign etc.

Feel free to review ALL of my ~350 trust feedback and tell me where they are wrong.

[DireWolfM14]

May I suggest again that you go back and review your own 344 trust feedbacks, please

I should do that more frequently than I do, I would guess there are more than just two examples that need to be addressed.  We all evolve through out our journey on this forum.

However, out of the two that you referenced the first one is fresh in my memory and I think it's pretty darn accurate.  I don't see any need to revise it, other than maybe reference the thread where he wanted to sell use as collateral a $250 iPhone for a $500 loan.  The second one you referenced I agree it seems rather weak, so yeah I'll take a look at it.

With regards to negatives on alts I can only suggest you look back over the last few pages as the issue came up and each of us has chimed in to remind a newer contributor that having alts does not mean they are out to scam.

Any negative trust feedback on alts has been where there is a solid connection for claiming in a campaign etc.

Feel free to review ALL of my ~350 trust feedback and tell me where they are wrong.

I'll take a look as time permits, and let you know in PM if I think anything needs to be reviewed.  No need to pour salt on old wounds out in public.

[light_warrior]

2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Balmarka$22
2. Madu$11

Proof:

PROOF OF REGISTRATION#
Forum Username: Madu$11
Forum Profile Link. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3462377
Telegram Username: devilmadu
Participated Campaign: Article Twitter telegram TikTok Facebook
BSC Wallet Address: 0x31cD13A31E9bbb21cC9F1244bBD532D91Edd24d7

[ Archive ]

PROOF OF REGISTRATION#
Forum Username: Madu$11
Forum Profile Link. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3462377
Telegram Username: devilmadu
Participated Campaign: Article TikTok
BSC Wallet Address: 0x31cD13A31E9bbb21cC9F1244bBD532D91Edd24d7

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses and Telegram Username:

Code:

devilmadu
0x31cD13A31E9bbb21cC9F1244bBD532D91Edd24d7

Miscellaneous:

Since the post written by Balmarka$22 has not been edited, I think the user just mixed up his alts.

[Timelord2067]

edisonali
Uzzalroy

Sir, I think your mistake, for one mistake of yours, I will be rejected from all bounty campaigns. If I can't apply in Bounty Detective's campaign within 5 minutes, the chances of getting approved are very low, so everyone applies together very quickly.

In that case, many people can make many kinds of mistakes. I hope you understand me. Please remove the negative trust. I will be forever grateful to you.

From a very cursory glance I've counted at least two other user profiles that use

Code:

anushreedas

for twitter and facebook profile details (and at least one UID with that term in their profile name).

I'm not convinced.

Fix up your quote by removing the non relevant portions of Isss56's investigation or I will delete it along with any other posts you make.

[Sifat01]

3 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Sifat01
Mix$$01
Mixpip01

Proof:
Sifat01

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username:Sifat01
Forum Profile Link:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3499015
Telegram Username:@Islam449
Participated Campaigns:Twitter, telegram, Tiktok
BSC Wallet Address:0xfc38fbcDA185EA1940354606740a696Fc2370208

[Achieve]

Mix$$01

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username:Mix$$01
Forum Profile Link:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3531525
Telegram Username:@
Participated Campaigns:Twitter, telegram, Tiktok
BSC Wallet Address:0xfc38fbcDA185EA1940354606740a696Fc2370208

[Achieve]

Mixpip01

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username:Sifat01
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3499015
Telegram Username:@sakib2526
Participated Campaigns:Twitter, telegram, Tiktok
BSC Wallet Address:0xfc38fbcDA185EA1940354606740a696Fc2370208

[Achieve]

what's wrong with me.🙄 @Mix$$01 and @Mixpip01 they copied my proof.  Where is my fault here? Why should I be considered a cheater for someone else? I am ready to do whatever it takes to prove my innocence.  I will always say I am innocent.
You notice well.  None of them joined the bounty.  Just posted on the forum.  So I think they probably copied my evidence by mistake.  Or they are trying to trick me.  Please investigate thoroughly.  Here I am innocent sir.

[Xal0lex]

3 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

If the author of the topic does not mind, I would like to comment on this post.

First, you are misquoting the posts. Quotes should contain a link to the post you are quoting, so that anyone who wants to can go and see the post.

For example (quote from your post):

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username:Mix$$01
Forum Profile Link:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3531525
Telegram Username:@
Participated Campaigns:Twitter, telegram, Tiktok
BSC Wallet Address:0xe94a3a7f6603b2D72c352581bb7bBbBCFe4399B8

As you can see, the post you quoted is different from the one currently on the forum. Thus, you are misleading forum users.

Second, ninjastic links are not suitable as an archive. The link to the actual post, not the ninjastic post, should be as an archive. You can archive a post (topic) using well-known archivers such as archive.is or web.archive.org

Well, thirdly, I once wrote that:

In bounty, some users use previous posts as a sample, they copy that post and then edit it to suit themselves. Ninjastic remembers the post in its original form, which is why such mishaps occur.

Maybe this is just such a case

[Timelord2067]

3 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

If the author of the topic does not mind, I would like to comment on this post.

Not at all - I've been on the road for the last week and haven't been able to give this thread my full attention.

First, you are misquoting the posts. Quotes should contain a link to the post you are quoting, so that anyone who wants to can go and see the post.

For example (quote from your post):

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username:Mix$$01
Forum Profile Link:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3531525
Telegram Username:@
Participated Campaigns:Twitter, telegram, Tiktok
BSC Wallet Address:0xe94a3a7f6603b2D72c352581bb7bBbBCFe4399B8

As you can see, the post you quoted is different from the one currently on the forum. Thus, you are misleading forum users.

I had a similar thought, but was wondering perhaps they don't have the BPIP extension to enable them to copy to clipboard from locked threads.

Second, ninjastic links are not suitable as an archive. The link to the actual post, not the ninjastic post, should be as an archive. You can archive a post (topic) using well-known archivers such as archive.is or web.archive.org

The correct link for the first is archive.today which will take you to a mirror in differing regions e.g ".is" or ".md" etc., but there are others.

I prefer to archive via both of these services and cite both in my posts.

Well, thirdly, I once wrote that:

In bounty, some users use previous posts as a sample, they copy that post and then edit it to suit themselves. Ninjastic remembers the post in its original form, which is why such mishaps occur.

Maybe this is just such a case

Yes, I agree and this issue does come up from time to time.  I encourage anyone citing such connections to investigate a user's *entire* post history to ensure such a mistaken connection does not occur.

As I wrote yesterday:

I'm not convinced.

Thanks for stopping by and providing some insight so we can all improve our reports.

Regards,

[Xal0lex]

I had a similar thought, but was wondering perhaps they don't have the BPIP extension to enable them to copy to clipboard from locked threads.

That's the thing: all the quoted posts are in UNblocked topics. And that is why I do not understand the actions of Issa56. There's nothing stopping him from going in and copying the post quotes into his own post. And then maybe he would be able to notice that the posts are different from each other in terms of addresses. And one post has no address at all.

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5454366.msg62319905#msg62319905
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5164058.msg61822356#msg61822356
3. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456287.msg62404024#msg62404024

[Issa56]

I had a similar thought, but was wondering perhaps they don't have the BPIP extension to enable them to copy to clipboard from locked threads.

Yes you are right.

That's the thing: all the quoted posts are in UNblocked topics.

After submitting proof of authentication and making mistake, some them will end up editing the proof of authentication, and some might even delete it. If am copying the proof of authentication just as you recommended, then its their new wallet address that will be reflecting not the one they mistakenly submitted.

And that is why I do not understand the actions of Issa56. There's nothing stopping him from going in and copying the post quotes into his own post. And then maybe he would be able to notice that the posts are different from each other in terms of addresses. And one post has no address at all.

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5454366.msg62319905#msg62319905
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5164058.msg61822356#msg61822356
3. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456287.msg62404024#msg62404024

If you can scan this wallet [ 0xfc38fbcDA185EA1940354606740a696Fc2370208 ] You will see that the their are three accounts connected to this account, and each account have used the wallet for proof of authentication more than twice.
Sifat01 (169)
Mix$$01 (6)
Mixpip01 (3)

I dont know maybe i answered your question.

[Pandu Geddon]

Sifat01
Mix$$01
Mixpip01

what's wrong with me.🙄 @Mix$$01 and @Mixpip01 they copied my proof.  Where is my fault here? Why should I be considered a cheater for someone else? I am ready to do whatever it takes to prove my innocence.  I will always say I am innocent.
You notice well.  None of them joined the bounty.  Just posted on the forum.  So I think they probably copied my evidence by mistake.  Or they are trying to trick me.  Please investigate thoroughly.  Here I am innocent sir.

if they accidentally copied your POA, did you also accidentally send them bnb for them when they wanted to sell their tokens?
maybe you are too generous, or indeed this is another coincidence.

https://bscscan.com/tx/0x6d75454195734daf8f5d63c1b4240f1590f65ea0b648930f42ea700cb11339cf

0xfc38fbcda185ea1940354606740a696fc2370208 : Sifat01 / Mixpip01 / Mix$$01
0xe94a3a7f6603b2d72c352581bb7bbbbcfe4399b8 : Mix$$01

so do you still want to say that your accounts are not connected due to a coincidence mistake in using POA?
In cases like this, there is indeed a possibility that they (bounty hunters) entered their details incorrectly as they are simply copying and pasting to quickly register a bounty campaign. but proof of blockchain connection can strengthen the evidence.