Do You Think New Casino Should Partnered With Bounty Managers To Gain Trust?

[Despairo]

but maybe we need to see how much royse777 improves its reputation. because royse777 is a trusted bounty manager (in the past) and the better the bounty manager, the more he has to deal with, like his own reputation

So you're trying to say Royse777 right now isn't trusted bounty manager anymore? If he's not trusted, why he need to pay the campaign and the customers will his own pocket money? He can easily ran away if he don't mind with his repuation anymore. Some people doesn't feel safe when they reveal his identity and his mistake was so trust with Bitlucy without thinking the consequences.

[GigaBit]

For a short-term effect, cooperation with managers who have a good reputation and a long history of work is certainly positive. But if the project hires an unknown manager (or some team member works instead of him) and at the same time all obligations are met on time, then for subsequent participants there is no difference who the manager is, since the work is established and carried out according to plan.

Those who work on bounty managing program on Bitcoin Talk can do well, if the casino owner think they will do better for his or her casino site that is wll. We know that it is a popular forum which is renowned all over the world. But first you have to see that your casino site is legit or not or in developing progress.
 
After a deep observation bounty manager decide they should work or not. Over all i think it would be a great plane. I think this is a strategy.
In a competitive business you must work with creative ideas otherwise it will be difficult to get success.

[robelneo]

but maybe we need to see how much royse777 improves its reputation. because royse777 is a trusted bounty manager (in the past) and the better the bounty manager, the more he has to deal with, like his own reputation

So you're trying to say Royse777 right now isn't trusted bounty manager anymore? If he's not trusted, why he need to pay the campaign and the customers will his own pocket money? He can easily ran away if he don't mind with his repuation anymore. Some people doesn't feel safe when they reveal his identity and his mistake was so trust with Bitlucy without thinking the consequences.

I am neutral on Royse777's flag but I believe that he is still reputable, anyone running a business here in Bitcointalk and doing good will not do something that will harm his business or reputation there were things that should have been done, and out of Royse777 control, there's also risk being a bounty manager and this is just one of them, all the other bounty managers can learn from what Royse has gone through.

[Pandu Geddon]

but maybe we need to see how much royse777 improves its reputation. because royse777 is a trusted bounty manager (in the past) and the better the bounty manager, the more he has to deal with, like his own reputation

So you're trying to say Royse777 right now isn't trusted bounty manager anymore? If he's not trusted, why he need to pay the campaign and the customers will his own pocket money? He can easily ran away if he don't mind with his repuation anymore. Some people doesn't feel safe when they reveal his identity and his mistake was so trust with Bitlucy without thinking the consequences.

I am neutral on Royse777's flag but I believe that he is still reputable, anyone running a business here in Bitcointalk and doing good will not do something that will harm his business or reputation there were things that should have been done, and out of Royse777 control, there's also risk being a bounty manager and this is just one of them, all the other bounty managers can learn from what Royse has gone through.

I'm sure Royse777 hasn't lost its reputation. many members know how Royse777 has worked for years in managing campaigns.
Royse777 is only bothered by the current case. even one of the clients being handled also had to cut off cooperation with Royse777 regarding the campaign being carried out. Royse777 certainly understands this problem. and the solution is being worked out. he tried to return the funds withheld from his pocket money. it's a form of responsibility that I believe we should appreciate.
but I have not read the continuation of the case, whether the return has been executed or not.

[Boristhecat]

I am neutral on Royse777's flag but I believe that he is still reputable, anyone running a business here in Bitcointalk and doing good will not do something that will harm his business or reputation there were things that should have been done, and out of Royse777 control, there's also risk being a bounty manager and this is just one of them, all the other bounty managers can learn from what Royse has gone through.

As I understand it, this activity always carries a certain risk and in some cases the bountymanager can cover the losses from his own pocket, but if these losses are huge, then what should be done in this case? After all, we can say that the manager is just as affected as the other participants in the bounty campaign. Another thing is that Royse777 associated himself with the project itself (if I'm not mistaken, he wrote about close cooperation with the project team) and was not just a hired manager.

[ChrisPop]

I think it is a good marketing idea to associate one's business with reputable authorities in certain niches.

Personally, I feel more safe to use a casino if it has a successful collaboration with one of the bigger thought leaders on this forum. I'm not referring necessarily to bounty managers, but a good quality and well managed campaign can certainly make a difference. The casino quality needs to match the "ambassadors" though. You can't hide the crocodile behind the bush. Also a reputable bounty manager won't usually take on work unless it meets certain standards.

[gunhell16]

If the bounty Managers has a good track record here in the forum, surely there is a big advantage in if ever there is a new casino wants or looking for a BM here. But of course, if ever the casinos didn't give the payment for the Bm to distribute to their participants the blame is not at bounty managers. That is why it is still good to participate in the casinos if there is an escrow, there is a high chances that the payment will  be distribute at the right time.

[Cookdata]

I was confused at first with the headline but it should have been signature manager, bounty manager doesn't necessarily need to be a signature manager as one is paid in Altcoins while the second is paid in bitcoin only which can be found on service board.
This depends on what the Casino is trying to achieve but remember that reputation is the out most priority here, if you don't have it, no campaign manager will want to work with you because there is no point in promoting your casino that doesn't pay users. If your casino is well known for good payout, partnership with a manager should be a bonus marketing for the company.

[len01]

but maybe we need to see how much royse777 improves its reputation. because royse777 is a trusted bounty manager (in the past) and the better the bounty manager, the more he has to deal with, like his own reputation

So you're trying to say Royse777 right now isn't trusted bounty manager anymore? If he's not trusted, why he need to pay the campaign and the customers will his own pocket money? He can easily ran away if he don't mind with his repuation anymore. Some people doesn't feel safe when they reveal his identity and his mistake was so trust with Bitlucy without thinking the consequences.

no, i didn't say it like that.
i said "in the past" not that i'm saying royse777 doesn't believe it now, but i mean that in the past royse777 has never had a problem being a bounty manager in any company and many member of this forum admit that royse777 is a good manager, but after he joined the bitlucy project, there are several forum member who think that royse777 made a mistake promoting a project that doesn't know its authentic identity. so currently being discussed about the reputation of royse777.
i know until now royse777 is a very good bounty manager and i really believe he can make his reputation good again after some problem he faced when he joined the bitlucy project
as
@Pandu Geddon said

Royse777 is only bothered by the current case

[Peanutswar]

I think it is a good marketing idea to associate one's business with reputable authorities in certain niches.

Personally, I feel more safe to use a casino if it has a successful collaboration with one of the bigger thought leaders on this forum. I'm not referring necessarily to bounty managers, but a good quality and well managed campaign can certainly make a difference. The casino quality needs to match the "ambassadors" though. You can't hide the crocodile behind the bush. Also a reputable bounty manager won't usually take on work unless it meets certain standards.

It is ideal only to the manager who already built a good reputation in the community at the same time for sure they filtered those offer to make sure that the community itself is safe from the scams and not getting paid that's why how the escrow works if they make a campaign and manage by the managers.

[ethereumhunter]

If the bounty Managers has a good track record here in the forum, surely there is a big advantage in if ever there is a new casino wants or looking for a BM here. But of course, if ever the casinos didn't give the payment for the Bm to distribute to their participants the blame is not at bounty managers. That is why it is still good to participate in the casinos if there is an escrow, there is a high chances that the payment will  be distribute at the right time.

We are lucky to be on this forum because we have several reputable and trustworthy BMs to handle campaigns as well as escrow agents. They have been used to handling campaigns for a long time and that is why many new casinos are contacting them to deal with promotion issues on this forum. By using trusted BM services, casinos can run good promotions and casinos only need to focus on providing the best service for members. The support from the campaign will lift the casino reputations and will become one of the trusted casino.

[_act_]

I don't see any wrong if the Casino decide to partner with the bounty manager, in fact, there would have an advantage if that happens and can attract more investors and more community here in the crypto space will support more in the casino for sure in the end. But partnering with the team I guess there is also a disadvantage too, once the campaign did something which is not good in the community and the impact possible things that would be blame is that BM and destroy its reputation as BM for sure in the end.

It is not bad at all, but I am thinking that as the campaign ends, the manager also will not continue to work with the casino again, but if the campaign continues, the campaign manager will continue to work together with the casino company. One of the reasons a casino will still work together with a campaign manager is if the campaign manager has given the casino sites owners how to promote their casino and it successfully work, they might later even employ the campaign manager as one of their main workers.

[FatFork]

If the bounty Managers has a good track record here in the forum, surely there is a big advantage in if ever there is a new casino wants or looking for a BM here. But of course, if ever the casinos didn't give the payment for the Bm to distribute to their participants the blame is not at bounty managers. That is why it is still good to participate in the casinos if there is an escrow, there is a high chances that the payment will  be distribute at the right time.

We are lucky to be on this forum because we have several reputable and trustworthy BMs to handle campaigns as well as escrow agents. They have been used to handling campaigns for a long time and that is why many new casinos are contacting them to deal with promotion issues on this forum. By using trusted BM services, casinos can run good promotions and casinos only need to focus on providing the best service for members. The support from the campaign will lift the casino reputations and will become one of the trusted casino.

A good promotion can be a great way to lure people to a casino they haven't visited before and to try it for the first time. Having a good campaign manager will make their promotions look great in front of potential users and will get forum members interested, making them more likely to participate in the promotion. On the other hand, inexperienced campaign manager could end up making the promotion look bad, or go through the whole process completely wrong, that will give the casino a bad name. One of the best ways to avoid having a bad campaign is to have a good campaign manager.

However, a great promotion isn't always enough to increase the casino's reputation. Just because they have a good promotion, that doesn't mean that the player experience is as good as they could be. Since the most important part of a good casino is the player experience, it's important for the casino to have a good support from their staff and a management that can provide a pleasant experience for all users of the casino. When the user experience is good, the casino will become better known and will have a stronger reputation.

[RealMalatesta]

For a short-term effect, cooperation with managers who have a good reputation and a long history of work is certainly positive. But if the project hires an unknown manager (or some team member works instead of him) and at the same time all obligations are met on time, then for subsequent participants there is no difference who the manager is, since the work is established and carried out according to plan.

Those who work on bounty managing program on Bitcoin Talk can do well, if the casino owner think they will do better for his or her casino site that is wll. We know that it is a popular forum which is renowned all over the world. But first you have to see that your casino site is legit or not or in developing progress.
 
After a deep observation bounty manager decide they should work or not. Over all i think it would be a great plane. I think this is a strategy.
In a competitive business you must work with creative ideas otherwise it will be difficult to get success.

Interestingly, bitcointalk used to be a place that we talked about bitcoin and maybe a few other altcoins but it is not like that at all anymore.

This is now a place where gamblers are here, and we talk about crypto casino a lot, and there are also a lot of places that start their own crypto project as well, new tokens and such which gets promoted here. That is all this forum is all about anymore, it's the casino owners and gamblers, it's the project creators and investors, these four group in total are the biggest piece of the forum nowadays. This is why it makes sense for new casinos to deal with bounty managers, a signature campaign would improve the chance of success a lot.

[masulum]

This is now a place where gamblers are here, and we talk about crypto casino a lot, and there are also a lot of places that start their own crypto project as well, new tokens and such which gets promoted here. That is all this forum is all about anymore, it's the casino owners and gamblers, it's the project creators and investors, these four group in total are the biggest piece of the forum nowadays. This is why it makes sense for new casinos to deal with bounty managers, a signature campaign would improve the chance of success a lot.

I agree with you, Logically, if this forum doesn't have any impact for casino, then there aren't signature campaigns from casinos or other online gambling. Now, most signatures are filled by betting sites, its mean in this forum, gamblers are very active and casinos have the potential to be known by all members here. So, surely one day there will be a new casino that uses BM's services to promote their services here.

[bitzizzix]

This is now a place where gamblers are here, and we talk about crypto casino a lot, and there are also a lot of places that start their own crypto project as well, new tokens and such which gets promoted here. That is all this forum is all about anymore, it's the casino owners and gamblers, it's the project creators and investors, these four group in total are the biggest piece of the forum nowadays. This is why it makes sense for new casinos to deal with bounty managers, a signature campaign would improve the chance of success a lot.

I agree with you, Logically, if this forum doesn't have any impact for casino, then there aren't signature campaigns from casinos or other online gambling. Now, most signatures are filled by betting sites, its mean in this forum, gamblers are very active and casinos have the potential to be known by all members here. So, surely one day there will be a new casino that uses BM's services to promote their services here.

Of course, this forum is very influential or has a good impact on gambling sites that are promoted or holding a signature campaign is a very effective step to develop the gambling site.
First, the gambling site will be known in this forum and try to get involved, especially those who follow the signature campaign, almost everyone will definitely follow it.
Second, the longer the signature campaign runs, the more people will trust it and the more customers it will come because it is guaranteed to be reputable and fair.
so this forum is very useful for gambling sites that I think will continue to appear.

[Gianluca95]

We've seen a lot of new casinos having issues with how to start promoting their project, they just come here to post their thread and that's it,  we have seen members recommending casino admin or representative get a copper account and hire a designer to design their thread this happens so many times.

Do You Think New Casino Should Partnered With Bounty Managers To Gain the Trust of the community and start on the right foot
take the case of Bitlucy where bounty manager Royse777 is the one opening and managing the thread, the thread is just perfect and everything on the casino home page is well placed.

Do you think it's a big advantage for the new casino that they have a bounty manager to be part of the team, we have a good lineup of reputable managers here.

It could be a good point for the casino to open his new brand with a Bounty/Campaign manager, but we have to say few thing:

- The most important thing of a casino will be always payments and support, if you don't have it, you can't substitute this two important point with a bounty manager.

- I work as campaign manager, but If I have to do this, in the main thread I'll always write that I'm not involved with activity in general, and I'll always reserve right to close it instantly if there is a scam accusation in way to

protect other user of forum.

[FatFork]

It could be a good point for the casino to open his new brand with a Bounty/Campaign manager, but we have to say few thing:

- The most important thing of a casino will be always payments and support, if you don't have it, you can can't substitute this two important point with a bounty manager.

I believe you made a typo. I've fixed it for you. 

- I work as campaign manager, but If I have to do this, in the main thread I'll always write that I'm not involved with activity in general, and I'll always reserve right to close it instant if there is a scam accusation in way to protect other user of forum.

Kudos to you! This should always be the guiding principle. Putting the welfare of the community before your own financial interests should be the hallmark of every good bounty manager.

[Vaskiy]

Some form of promotion done by a casino/sports betting platform gives more visibility and trust. This trust can be seen even high when the promotion is done through a trusted manager of the community. When the participants were paid in their own gambling site account, these users will initially give a try and further spread the word if they feel satisfied with the performance.

[LUCKMCFLY]

I think it is a good marketing idea to associate one's business with reputable authorities in certain niches.

Personally, I feel more safe to use a casino if it has a successful collaboration with one of the bigger thought leaders on this forum. I'm not referring necessarily to bounty managers, but a good quality and well managed campaign can certainly make a difference. The casino quality needs to match the "ambassadors" though. You can't hide the crocodile behind the bush. Also a reputable bounty manager won't usually take on work unless it meets certain standards.

I think this is one of the best answers I have found in this thread, because I don't think it can be better described, honestly I am usually a person who when I see a casino that is managed by a recognized campaign manager I don't worry about the site, I know that the manager would not let anything strange happen and I am sure that in case something bad or not good would stop the campaign just to see unusual behavior, here we are all human they can also make mistakes and if they do I think it is understandable and we cannot hit it with a hammer, in every place, in every casino, in every bet there will always be risks, and we are the ones who decide whether to take them or not.