Scamsite adkinsbet.com = bitlucy.com ?

[bislom]

After reading how they interacting with customers, I have only seen doing one sportsbook before interacting like this, and that was the scam project adkinsbet.com
Bitlucy is finding arguments not to pay withdrawals, and is operated by de corrupt DT member Royse777, which only got his DT rank because of his friends on the forum.
I am pretty sure that adkinsbet and bitlucy belongs to the same owner, the patterns are exactly the same - with the final purpose of not paying out customers.

Be warned, do not deposit money to bitlucy!

[Poker Player]

Hi,

First, this should be in scam accusations, but I've already reported it to be moved.

Second, if you want to be taken seriously you should provide some kind of evidence and not just your word.

Third, what you say regarding Royse777's reputation is pure garbage. There are as of today 59 people who trust her judgement, and they are from all over the world, it is laughable that you say they are her friends.

[cabron]

You can't just assume bitlucy owner is the same owner of adkinsbet until you have proof. Having patterns is just one but one solid proof would be more evident. Adkinsbet was somewhat connected to 1xbet in the past, maybe there is the need to look at it first.

Isn't Royse77 only managing their campaign? He doesn't look like he own it as he clearly posted it on the thread but he is closely working with the team which I guess he trusted them too.

[avikz]

After reading how they interacting with customers, I have only seen doing one sportsbook before interacting like this, and that was the scam project adkinsbet.com
Bitlucy is finding arguments not to pay withdrawals, and is operated by de corrupt DT member Royse777, which only got his DT rank because of his friends on the forum.
I am pretty sure that adkinsbet and bitlucy belongs to the same owner, the patterns are exactly the same - with the final purpose of not paying out customers.

Be warned, do not deposit money to bitlucy!

Can you please share evidence? An acquisition without evidence just doesn't make sense to be honest. One operator can run multiple websites and we already have such examples, but that doesn't mean they are scam. Once you gathered the evidence, open a thread in the below mentioned sub-forum,

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0

It is the right place to talk about such things.

[Eternad]

After reading how they interacting with customers, I have only seen doing one sportsbook before interacting like this, and that was the scam project adkinsbet.com
Bitlucy is finding arguments not to pay withdrawals, and is operated by de corrupt DT member Royse777, which only got his DT rank because of his friends on the forum.
I am pretty sure that adkinsbet and bitlucy belongs to the same owner, the patterns are exactly the same - with the final purpose of not paying out customers.

Be warned, do not deposit money to bitlucy!

You are judging base on your feelings and not by facts. You are attacking personally Royse777 and connecting the dots a scam casino to a new one that he manage without basis. I saw how Royse777 still properly replying on your negative comment spam in Bitlucy thread. You should focus on your own business and let other user protect there own money by DYOR on the casino. This is not helping the community at all.

[bislom]

After reading how they interacting with customers, I have only seen doing one sportsbook before interacting like this, and that was the scam project adkinsbet.com
Bitlucy is finding arguments not to pay withdrawals, and is operated by de corrupt DT member Royse777, which only got his DT rank because of his friends on the forum.
I am pretty sure that adkinsbet and bitlucy belongs to the same owner, the patterns are exactly the same - with the final purpose of not paying out customers.

Be warned, do not deposit money to bitlucy!

You are judging base on your feelings and not by facts. You are attacking personally Royse777 and connecting the dots a scam casino to a new one that he manage without basis. I saw how Royse777 still properly replying on your negative comment spam in Bitlucy thread. You should focus on your own business and let other user protect there own money by DYOR on the casino. This is not helping the community at all.

I am helping the comunity, by warning people about this scam site. They refused to pay out 4 people already. I dont care about these shills and DT friends trying to protect royse.
He is the owner of the site, but he just tells everybody he has a little share so that they can not blame him if the casino does not pay out.
Believe me, its a one man operation.
Why should I provide evidence? The way they are handling withdrawal says enough.
And Royse is tagging people without evidence, this guy does not deserve DT status and this casino is a big joke.

[acroman08]

would you mind sharing evidence that shows bitlucy is adkinsbet? I've seen several accounts pop up once in a while when a new casino is launched accusing it to be the previously well-known scam site adkinsbet. none of them really provided evidence suggesting the casino they are accusing is actually adkinsbet.

as for your withdrawal, it's quite clear that you broke their rules.

[rhomelmabini]

After reading how they interacting with customers, I have only seen doing one sportsbook before interacting like this, and that was the scam project adkinsbet.com
Bitlucy is finding arguments not to pay withdrawals, and is operated by de corrupt DT member Royse777, which only got his DT rank because of his friends on the forum.
I am pretty sure that adkinsbet and bitlucy belongs to the same owner, the patterns are exactly the same - with the final purpose of not paying out customers.

Be warned, do not deposit money to bitlucy!

You are judging base on your feelings and not by facts. You are attacking personally Royse777 and connecting the dots a scam casino to a new one that he manage without basis. I saw how Royse777 still properly replying on your negative comment spam in Bitlucy thread. You should focus on your own business and let other user protect there own money by DYOR on the casino. This is not helping the community at all.

I am helping the comunity, by warning people about this scam site. They refused to pay out 4 people already. I dont care about these shills and DT friends trying to protect royse.
He is the owner of the site, but he just tells everybody he has a little share so that they can not blame him if the casino does not pay out.
Believe me, its a one man operation.
Why should I provide evidence? The way they are handling withdrawal says enough.
And Royse is tagging people without evidence, this guy does not deserve DT status and this casino is a big joke.

Well, thanks for the help bislom but will you help us as well to follow your accusation, we somehow can't follow it. You can link the topics here regarding 4 users who were refused by bitlucy or post some screenshots regarding that. If your intention is to accuse bitlucy and Royse777 then move this on accusation board  or lock this and make another topic there attaching what you claim. You need evidence if you're accusing someone.

[judeafante]

After reading how they interacting with customers, I have only seen doing one sportsbook before interacting like this, and that was the scam project adkinsbet.com
Bitlucy is finding arguments not to pay withdrawals, and is operated by de corrupt DT member Royse777, which only got his DT rank because of his friends on the forum.
I am pretty sure that adkinsbet and bitlucy belongs to the same owner, the patterns are exactly the same - with the final purpose of not paying out customers.

Be warned, do not deposit money to bitlucy!

You are judging base on your feelings and not by facts. You are attacking personally Royse777 and connecting the dots a scam casino to a new one that he manage without basis. I saw how Royse777 still properly replying on your negative comment spam in Bitlucy thread. You should focus on your own business and let other user protect there own money by DYOR on the casino. This is not helping the community at all.

Based on his spam on Bitlucy he thinks and tries to justify that Bitlucy owes him $125 but of course, Bitlucy will not give in if he breaks the rules, there's a possibility that action will trigger the same action from the same users or other participants this action should not be tolerated, casinos should be firm on their judgment on implementation of the rules, the community will support casino who make a good judgement and uphold their rules.

[Eternad]

After reading how they interacting with customers, I have only seen doing one sportsbook before interacting like this, and that was the scam project adkinsbet.com
Bitlucy is finding arguments not to pay withdrawals, and is operated by de corrupt DT member Royse777, which only got his DT rank because of his friends on the forum.
I am pretty sure that adkinsbet and bitlucy belongs to the same owner, the patterns are exactly the same - with the final purpose of not paying out customers.

Be warned, do not deposit money to bitlucy!

You are judging base on your feelings and not by facts. You are attacking personally Royse777 and connecting the dots a scam casino to a new one that he manage without basis. I saw how Royse777 still properly replying on your negative comment spam in Bitlucy thread. You should focus on your own business and let other user protect there own money by DYOR on the casino. This is not helping the community at all.

I am helping the comunity, by warning people about this scam site. They refused to pay out 4 people already. I dont care about these shills and DT friends trying to protect royse.
He is the owner of the site, but he just tells everybody he has a little share so that they can not blame him if the casino does not pay out.
Believe me, its a one man operation.
Why should I provide evidence? The way they are handling withdrawal says enough.
And Royse is tagging people without evidence, this guy does not deserve DT status and this casino is a big joke.

Can you provide example on your claims that Royse is tagging without any evidence? The 4 people that claiming that didn’t withdraw the bonus amount is subjected to violation of the rules. Bitlucy has the right to halt withdrawal in case there’s some requirements that didn’t meet, I read one issue and the user play different slot games instead of pragmatic gaming which he agree on the written conversation with the support.

It’s rare to see someone complete the wagering requirements of the slot and win 125$ out of 7$ though. Again just provide solid proof and you will gain our trust about your scam accusation.

[Jawhead999]

They refused to pay out 4 people already.

Compile those users who doesn't got paid in this thread.

He is the owner of the site, but he just tells everybody he has a little share so that they can not blame him if the casino does not pay out.
Believe me, its a one man operation.

There's no proof, so it's only your assumptions to determine Royse777 is the owner of the casino and also one man operation.

Why should I provide evidence? The way they are handling withdrawal says enough.

Well, this make your accusation goes wrong since you failed to give the evidence. Anyway why we should trust someone without any evidence?

And Royse is tagging people without evidence, this guy does not deserve DT status and this casino is a big joke.

I don't see your account got painted by Royse777, you're wrong here. Are you have an another account got painted by him? so that's why you're mad here.

[Pmalek]

Believe me, its a one man operation.

No, that's not how it works. You need to provide evidence to back up your claims. If the system worked the way you suggest it should, half of the world would be in prison or dead because of hunches, feelings, and opinions.

And Royse is tagging people without evidence, this guy does not deserve DT status and this casino is a big joke.

Show us examples of some of those tags. I checked his most recent feedback and it's mostly related to people scamming or using multiple accounts in bounty and signature campaigns.

[btc_angela]

How can you be so sure that it is being operated by one company, one entity?

Are you the same guy who says that he has been scammed with $150? (correct me if I'm wrong).

Anyhow, it's your word against the casino, and you should have at least evidences before accusing them both as scam.

[ultrloa]

After reading how they interacting with customers, I have only seen doing one sportsbook before interacting like this, and that was the scam project adkinsbet.com
Bitlucy is finding arguments not to pay withdrawals, and is operated by de corrupt DT member Royse777, which only got his DT rank because of his friends on the forum.
I am pretty sure that adkinsbet and bitlucy belongs to the same owner, the patterns are exactly the same - with the final purpose of not paying out customers.

Be warned, do not deposit money to bitlucy!

Claiming to be operated as one company is huge claim so I guess you need to put a detail explanation with solid proof to consolidate your claim. Also move this topic as suggested by other on scam accusation so that you will be placed on right board for proper discussion of your assumptions.

Also don't answer with believe me because writing without proof will not validate anything.

[Bitinity]

would you mind sharing evidence that shows bitlucy is adkinsbet? I've seen several accounts pop up once in a while when a new casino is launched accusing it to be the previously well-known scam site adkinsbet. none of them really provided evidence suggesting the casino they are accusing is actually adkinsbet.

He has no evidence to support the accusation. Although his main purpose is to warn people, but it wont work like this. No one will trust him because of there is no valid evidence. I have no idea why he thinks like this but maybe he had a bad experience with new bookie in the past and he is so worry when there is another new bookie popped up in this forum. All in all it is a baseless accusation and we cant take it seriously.

[Wexnident]

Why should I provide evidence? The way they are handling withdrawal says enough.

That makes things simple. Why should we believe you then? Might I ask you to stop looking at yourself with rose-tinted glasses? Not everything you say is the truth nor should it be considered as such, especially if you refuse to offer proof of your claims. Not to mention that most tags of Royse777 (if not all) have references linked to it (except the latest one, which seems like it was deleted or off limits for me) and not to mention that in his feedback he already tagged (Negative) people from adskinsbet (or shill accounts who defended the site) himself (which was an issue from last year it seems).

[robelneo]

After reading how they interacting with customers, I have only seen doing one sportsbook before interacting like this, and that was the scam project adkinsbet.com
Bitlucy is finding arguments not to pay withdrawals, and is operated by de corrupt DT member Royse777, which only got his DT rank because of his friends on the forum.
I am pretty sure that adkinsbet and bitlucy belongs to the same owner, the patterns are exactly the same - with the final purpose of not paying out customers.

Be warned, do not deposit money to bitlucy!

I don't see the logic in your post, the basic has been if you follow the rules your withdrawal will be approved Bitlucy is running a signature campaign, and they are spending more than what you're requesting, but they will not give in to your demand because if they give in they are tolerating abuse and cheating and this will harm their reputation one case of abuse that is tolerated will be too many coming in the future.

[Bttzed03]

~
They refused to pay out 4 people already.

Why don't you let these people speak for themselves?

Why should I provide evidence? The way they are handling withdrawal says enough.

Whether you like it or not, you still need to provide substantial evidence. Without it, the community won't believe your words. AFAIK, you're the only one going after Bitlucy and @Royse777 for the past few days. Some members also refuted your claims about withdrawals.

And Royse is tagging people without evidence, this guy does not deserve DT status and this casino is a big joke.

Keep it about Bitlucy. If you have issues about his feedback, I suggest you open a separate topic in Reputation board.

edit: It seems like there are other two users complaining but both are newly created accounts. It's possible that they also belong to OP.

[VanityWallets2015]

I like the idea that you are trying to warn us or be careful on new gambling sites but I think you should provide proof first that they have connection with the adkinsbet, I think Royse already answer why they didn't pay the user or why there is some kind of withdrawal issue but I think it was fixed now or not yet?

[FatFork]

Why should I provide evidence? The way they are handling withdrawal says enough.

You should provide evidence because without them this is nothing more than mere slander. If you can't provide solid evidence, at least express your concerns and try to clarify and present your side of the story. Without evidence or arguments on your side, this is nothing more than baseless accusation and there is nothing to discuss.