The most trusted casinos on BTalk

[decodx]

That’s exactly why I’m asking community about trusted casinos. I don’t want to promote shady casinos because the reputation of my website will be more important and I care about my visitors.

Yes, it is good to seek the opinion of the community. If you are building a casino review website or affiliate marketing site it's best to seek the opinion of the customers. The feedback from real gamblers will be more valuable than any random and anonymous feedback from people who've never played online casinos. If you want to maintain your ranking as a trusted casino review website, you have to have real feedback from real gamblers.

I agree that you need to stay away from shady casinos with bad reputation, shady affiliates and swindling tactics. Many casinos offer rich referral programs with an opportunity for people to earn an affiliate income on their review website. That's why some scam casinos end up on many casino review websites. I hate when I see that. It means that the casino review websites are not objective and at the end of the day they only care about making money. This is not the honest and ethical way to do reviews and affiliate marketing. That's why I recommend you to check out the Scam Accusations board to filter out the suspicious casinos.

[bitzizzix]

Since there is no universal ranking of dibitcointalk casinos, so it all depends on many criteria that you can check for yourself, you can determine the casino that best suits your needs by following a few simple steps.
and most people will judge when they follow a live casino with signature casino and consider it the trusted and best casino because they are involved and feel the truth.

and so far the casinos that I think are reliable and suit my needs are: Rollbit, Fotune Jack, Cryptogames, Stake and Blackjackfun.

[Chato1977]

I have played in Many gambling site but my most reliable and playing now? it is Winz.IO . try visiting the site and see it for yourself .

There are many active players daily and you will not regret to play for this gambling site.

[Bitinity]

Thank you everyone who shared valuable information in this topic
Soon I will launch my website which will be in casinos review niche and I promise to bring exciting new features and hopefully we will build a nice community.

Basically it is simple if you want to start a casino review site, you can learn from the older and trusted casino reviews such as BTCGOSU and Gamblingbro. Having a list of trusted casino is a must but you should also provide great information that is easy to read and understand. Most people do not like read a wall of text when it comes to casino review. Be sure that you have your own style when reviewing the casinos, do not try to be similar to other reviewers.

[VanityWallets2015]

I also think you should not be biased in reviewing the gambling sites and you should include their websites weaknesses or negatives so you would be giving a real review and not only what promotions and good things does every gambling site has just too get someone signed on that gambling site.

[AicecreaME]

Hello there. Basically title says it all. The question is targetting veterans on this forum with more experience than me.
If you could take a few minutes and write a list of the most trusted casinos, I would appreciate a lot.
I'm pretty new here and from what i've seen so far, 1xbit, bitstarz and a few more are not really accepted in the gambling community because they have bad reputation. This is for my website that will come out in a few weeks

Thank you!

Aside from asking here, which I guess already gave you an idea whom to trust and not to, you should take some time and do an in-depth research and background checking of those casinos listed to be trusted here in forum. Because of course, despite having trusted and veterans here regarding gambling that can give you some insights and suggestions, you are still responsible in terms of making your own analysis and decision. Do not just rely on what other people have said. Acknowledge it, but assess it as well.

Search the net regarding the unbiased reviews of those who experienced their service first-hand and check their website too, together with their requirements, processes, license, and operations. Hope your website will come out the way you planned it to.

[perla]

It would be much better if you test the gambling site by yourself since you will be going to experience the gambling site and give your personal review rather than gathering information online and other users experience, right?

[stepwilli]

It was nice that you're being too observant despite of being a newbie. You're not the typical newbie that we know that jumps instantly on any casino that they see and as a result they will got scammed easily. 1xbit is popularly known for being a scam but despite that fact, it was still being promoted heavily on this forum. I don't know why the admins didn't ban this gambling company for good.

I see that you're building a casino review site? But it's nice that you allow outside reviews. That only shows that you are not biased not unlike to most gambling review sites out there that only care for themselves. Let us know when your site is ready as we are like to support you.

[decodx]

It would be much better if you test the gambling site by yourself since you will be going to experience the gambling site and give your personal review rather than gathering information online and other users experience, right?

Wrong. There is no point to having a choice between those two, because one doesn't exclude the other. He can do both.

If he decides to test the casino site on his own, then he can focus on his personal impression and give his analysis and feedback.
However, if he wants to collect the opinions and reviews of other users, then he will have collective knowledge of the community and can base his reviews on facts rather than assumptions, which is more legitimate and more objective.

[Desmong]

I still don't get it cause there are many casinos here and looking for a trusted Casino is based on individual experience on the platform. Selecting a good casino should not be based on what others thinks only. Personal experience is also important so to prevent having a different experience from what other people's view are. Having personal experience will be more convincing than others opinion.

[roslinpl]

Stake was my preference.Because it was used by huge people and promote by huge people on the forum.The payment of the campaign also paid without delays.I had some game on this gambling website ,like trusted.Actually I had not faced any difficulties on playing the game.The withdraw process of the game also not very long time.It was released in a short period of time.

[ajochems]

Actually by asking others,you should had your own opinion in this.Becausesome people will support for the promotion of the campaign,they are working.Some may follow the old statement of the forum member and reply the same to you.But the fact is,your money and you should be responsible to it.Don’t believe others on the money concept.Make your own statement and strategy for the money trading.

[coin-investor]

I still don't get it cause there are many casinos here and looking for a trusted Casino is based on individual experience on the platform. Selecting a good casino should not be based on what others thinks only. Personal experience is also important so to prevent having a different experience from what other people's view are. Having personal experience will be more convincing than others opinion.

You're right others may think that this casino is the best and most trusted because the community says so but you are also playing with other casinos that also offer better features and has good customer support but not getting the attention it needed because the majority that's playing there are not members of Bitcointalk.
It's ok to listen to the majority but your experience should be your judge in choosing the casino to play with, the word trust is subjective.

[Apocollapse]

Stake was my preference.Because it was used by huge people and promote by huge people on the forum.The payment of the campaign also paid without delays.I had some game on this gambling website ,like trusted.Actually I had not faced any difficulties on playing the game.The withdraw process of the game also not very long time.It was released in a short period of time.

It's really funny to see how the casino reputation is judged by the signature campaign in this forum, do you think if a scam casino run signature campaign and paid without delays, it's trusted too? lol. The reputation are determined by many factors, especially on their in-sites. If they can't handle a problem from their gamblers, or be fair about their TOS, obviously they can't be trusted.

[Nrcewker]

Stake was my preference.Because it was used by huge people and promote by huge people on the forum.The payment of the campaign also paid without delays.I had some game on this gambling website ,like trusted.Actually I had not faced any difficulties on playing the game.The withdraw process of the game also not very long time.It was released in a short period of time.

It's really funny to see how the casino reputation is judged by the signature campaign in this forum, do you think if a scam casino run signature campaign and paid without delays, it's trusted too? lol. The reputation are determined by many factors, especially on their in-sites. If they can't handle a problem from their gamblers, or be fair about their TOS, obviously they can't be trusted.

I can understand your feelings and depth of the words.
But I want to say you more what we can conclude from roslinpl's post.
If a site is able to run signature campaigns (which is expensive) and able to pay the users at the correct time, then this proves that the site has enough bankroll for the gamblers to play big.
Yes i am not supporting that all sites that runs signature campaigns are legit, but yes that proves they have enough funds  for the promotions.
Regarding stake.com , it's one of the oldest and trusted casinos and sportsbook, present in the market, and yes it's almost best for me.

[Desmong]

Stake was my preference.Because it was used by huge people and promote by huge people on the forum.The payment of the campaign also paid without delays.I had some game on this gambling website ,like trusted.Actually I had not faced any difficulties on playing the game.The withdraw process of the game also not very long time.It was released in a short period of time.

It's really funny to see how the casino reputation is judged by the signature campaign in this forum, do you think if a scam casino run signature campaign and paid without delays, it's trusted too? lol. The reputation are determined by many factors, especially on their in-sites. If they can't handle a problem from their gamblers, or be fair about their TOS, obviously they can't be trusted.

You are very right, knowing if a gambling platform is trusted is not about looking at signature campaigns and how fast they pay participants. We can always know the reputation of such gambling platform from review from people that had used the platform. Many factors should be considered here on how fast withdrawals take to reach customers wallet. Other factors should be considered.

[robelneo]

Stake was my preference.Because it was used by huge people and promote by huge people on the forum.The payment of the campaign also paid without delays.I had some game on this gambling website ,like trusted.Actually I had not faced any difficulties on playing the game.The withdraw process of the game also not very long time.It was released in a short period of time.

It's really funny to see how the casino reputation is judged by the signature campaign in this forum, do you think if a scam casino run signature campaign and paid without delays, it's trusted too? lol. The reputation are determined by many factors, especially on their in-sites. If they can't handle a problem from their gamblers, or be fair about their TOS, obviously they can't be trusted.

Reading the content of the post, promotion is just one of those and it's not only about the signature campaign when he posted

promoted by huge people

that includes those that are not wearing signature but promoting it as an affiliate and being mentioned on every discussion when it comes to trustworthiness like this topic.
No way a gambler should join a casino based on their promotion only it should be primary on the reputation of the casino.

[zidanw]

That is right you can consider them trusted with time since new gambling sites don't know if they can be trusted already some people here promote what's their in the signature even thogh that site is new and doesn't prove anything yet.

[bitterguy28]

That is right you can consider them trusted with time since new gambling sites don't know if they can be trusted already some people here promote what's their in the signature even thogh that site is new and doesn't prove anything yet.

It is better to advertise new casino than a scam casino , but OP is asking in which casino can we refer as a trusted one .

I an also representing a casino so it is obvious in which I will name right?

Stake was my preference.Because it was used by huge people and promote by huge people on the forum.The payment of the campaign also paid without delays.I had some game on this gambling website ,like trusted.Actually I had not faced any difficulties on playing the game.The withdraw process of the game also not very long time.It was released in a short period of time.

I will also vouch for Stake as I am a regular player and never had a problem for how many years now.

[decodx]

...some people here promote what's their in the signature even thogh that site is new and doesn't prove anything yet.

I think that was the dumbest comment I read today. What's wrong with promoting new casinos? There is nothing controversial about that. Even the most reputable ones were once new. How else would new ones be able to get established and built up their clientele?

But promoting a publicly known scam casino is a whole other story. And that should be absolutely discouraged in any community.