The most trusted casinos on BTalk

[noormcs5]

Of course you should research a site on your own and use that site.  Then you will have more fun using those sites and can gamble with confidence.  And if you choose a site after listening to others, it will not bring you confidence.  And if you don't gamble with confidence, you will lose big most of the time.  But yes it is good to get some advice from others it will help you to do better research. It can give you a better experience in gambling

Many trusted sites advertise on bitcointalk and stake.com can be considered as one of the best gambling sites. However, it is difficult to say that any one site is the most trusted and the rest are not. Every good gambling site is trustworthy and it is a personal preference where the gambler would like to bet. Some gamblers may prefer to play casino games and sports betting on the same site and therefore they will prefer the site offering the two.

Anyways, everyone can share their experiences on which gambling sites they gamble and let people decide for themselves, which sites they want to test and play. Another important thing among the trusted sites is that some may like one interface provided by the gambling site while others may like some other interface by another site. Same goes for features such as different odds offered by different sites.

[1714735770]

1714735770

[1714735770]

1714735770

[1714735770]

1714735770

[1714735770]

1714735770

[SamReomo]

It is always better to advice people to stay away from gambling? I don't think you know what you are doing, you are promoting a online casino and you want people to stay away from gambling? Why are you wearing a signature for a casino company then?

I don't think that it's a better advice to tell others to stay away from a thing that you're promoting yourself, but yeah someone should tell the new gamblers in detail that over-gambling can learn to gambling addiction and one should gamble in limit in order to enjoy the fun part of it. There are many new-comers who start gambling because they want to earn quick bucks by betting on the casinos games but they don't know that in the world of gambling we don't win all the times and sometimes we also face many losses. A gambler should consider gambling as a type of entertainment rather than considering as a way to earn a lot of money.

If you don't agree with something then you should not promote it but if you're promoting something then you should at least don't advice others to stay away from it. I agree with you that one should tech others about gambling responsibility because responsible gamblers will never get addicted to gambling and they can enjoy gambling as a fun activity, and might earn some revenue if they are lucky. The luck plays a very important role for the gamblers and one should teach them that if at certain days they're facing many losses then they should stop gambling activity for a few days or limit their hours to 1 or 2 everyday.

[Wiwo]

Stake   12/18/2023   ?   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5478418.0
Fortunejack   12/18/2023   ?   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5478417.0

These two were just added so the credibility is to be determined.

Both seem credible, but they aren't really scams commited by the sites themselves. The gambler on Stake lost his money to a hacker since he didn't enable 2FA which implies that fault lies on both sides here.

In the FJ case, it seems that a third party is responsible for the issue and FJ is already trying to resolve the issue.

The case which happened to the stake user is definitely the fault of the user and not stake, so I am going to disagree with you when you say it's the fault of both sides.

Stake have done their best in providing good security features for their users, Stake still can not be the one to turn on those security features for the user, a user is solely responsible for turning on any of the security features he or she feels he or she needs, and leave the ones he or she thinks is irrelevant to him or her, if a user having good amount of money on his or her stake account doesn't find it needful to turn on 2fa for the safety of their funds, then whatever happens that leads to the user losing those funds, that is clearly his or her fault and not the fault of the Casino.

On telegram, I belong to a high rollers group, and those guys play majorly on Stake, the group has over 800 members, and the majority of them has nothing less than $400,000 on their respective stake accounts which they use for gambling and sports betting, for around eight months I've been in that group, no one of them have ever complained of losing his or her money on stake, aside the money lost to gambling.

Some times,  some of the cases that are coming against some of the reputable casinos are pour lack of experience and knowledge from the gambler,  how can you be blaming a casino for your own mistakes,  because most times,  those who come up with all these accusations when checked properly are the main reasons why they had that problem in the first place,  for example,  how can anyone who failed to read the terms and conditions of a casino come out to blame that casinos simply because their demand for KYC along the line?

So if such a gamble should come out to accuse being locked out from the casino due to non-kyc non-availability or unable to meet the KYC requirements it becomes very obvious that he failed on his part to take note of details and that shouldn't be blamed on the casino on the long run, the reason why we still have some of those cases untreated is that the casinos have already taken their stand on that case and they won't go back to change things just to favour particular players.

[3kpk3]

The case which happened to the stake user is definitely the fault of the user and not stake, so I am going to disagree with you when you say it's the fault of both sides.

Stake have done their best in providing good security features for their users, Stake still can not be the one to turn on those security features for the user, a user is solely responsible for turning on any of the security features he or she feels he or she needs, and leave the ones he or she thinks is irrelevant to him or her, if a user having good amount of money on his or her stake account doesn't find it needful to turn on 2fa for the safety of their funds, then whatever happens that leads to the user losing those funds, that is clearly his or her fault and not the fault of the Casino.

It's true that the gambler messed up by not enabling 2FA which would saved him from this mess, but it's also true that he wouldn't have to go through this ordeal if Stake's security stopped the hacker in the first place.

The fact is that a Stake account got hacked despite the site being one of the top gambling sites these days which is embarassing to say the least.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

The case which happened to the stake user is definitely the fault of the user and not stake, so I am going to disagree with you when you say it's the fault of both sides.

Stake have done their best in providing good security features for their users, Stake still can not be the one to turn on those security features for the user, a user is solely responsible for turning on any of the security features he or she feels he or she needs, and leave the ones he or she thinks is irrelevant to him or her, if a user having good amount of money on his or her stake account doesn't find it needful to turn on 2fa for the safety of their funds, then whatever happens that leads to the user losing those funds, that is clearly his or her fault and not the fault of the Casino.

It's true that the gambler messed up by not enabling 2FA which would saved him from this mess, but it's also true that he wouldn't have to go through this ordeal if Stake's security stopped the hacker in the first place.

The fact is that a Stake account got hacked despite the site being one of the top gambling sites these days which is embarassing to say the least.

Man, what exactly are you saying?

Now, I am going to say this before I proceed, I am not defending Stake, I don't want anybody to come around a start accusing me of defending stake possibly because I am wearing their signature ad, no, I will never support a casino doing wrong even if I am in their pay roll.

Now, with the above being out of the way, I would like to ask you, how would you have expected stake security to stop the hacker? Is it the security the user enabled or turned on, or the one he did not turn on? Oh, you expected stake to turn on automatically turn on the security for him right?  .

And speaking of the fact that an account on stake got hacked despite them being the top online gambling casino, and you think this is a shame on them, bud, thousands of binance users have been hacked in previous times, as well as other exchanges.
When it comes to security, you are your own security, all the platform owe you as a user is to provide you with all the security features they thing is useful for your account safety, it's up to you to use it, or ignore it.

[gunhell16]

In my opinion, there is an actual way to measure the degree of trustworthiness a casino has managed to earn from gamblers around the world or gamblers within an specific community  and that could be achieved by estimating the volume the casino has per gambler who actively gambles on there.
Obviously, the more a casino is trusted, the more people (specially high rollers) feel save enough to deposit the bulk of their money intended to gamble and bet.

That being said, I do not personally have the numbers on the volume of the main Bitcoin casinos which are prefered by our community, though ,I am pretty sure Stake is definitely in the top 3 of the most trusted casinos of this forum. Sometimes, I take a look at the history section of Stake to see how much others users  wager and I can see thousands of dollars behind put per a single dice roll or slot spin. That is a sign people who uses Stake do not fear their money would be seized for no reason and also a sign of the legitimacy of the service. Though, Stake is not the only one, there are other which I am sure can also show off such big volume, I am just not sure in what position they would be in.

Actually, there are many trusted crypto gambling sites that we can recommend to newbies in this forum who also want to gamble. Stakescom, Duelbits, Rollbit, Trustdice, BcGames, LiveCasino, Fortunejack, and others that have existed for a long time on this forum platform will not disappear here.

Now, I won't mention the others; it's up to OP to do research; after all, there are many people who gave him here that he can play with, and it's up to OP to decide which one he wants to gamble with.

[Haunebu]

Now, with the above being out of the way, I would like to ask you, how would you have expected stake security to stop the hacker? Is it the security the user enabled or turned on, or the one he did not turn on? Oh, you expected stake to turn on automatically turn on the security for him right?  .

And speaking of the fact that an account on stake got hacked despite them being the top online gambling casino, and you think this is a shame on them, bud, thousands of binance users have been hacked in previous times, as well as other exchanges.
When it comes to security, you are your own security, all the platform owe you as a user is to provide you with all the security features they thing is useful for your account safety, it's up to you to use it, or ignore it.

What the heck are you on about? It's pretty evident that you don't understand much about security protocols. If Stake's security infrastructure was robust, the hacker that we are talking about wouldn't have been able to hack the gamblers account.

2FA is an additional layer of security offered by sites on top of their inbuilt security. Do your research!

[Dunamisx]

We all have individuals different tastes from the way we use a gambling platform, what entice you may be what i frown on at, so there are many crypto gambling platform we can choose from a range right from the numbers of those having their signature campaign ongoing and they also have an active announcement thread for their service discussions, likewise we are more proficient than each other in gambling.

[Wiwo]

We all have individuals different tastes from the way we use a gambling platform, what entice you may be what i frown on at, so there are many crypto gambling platform we can choose from a range right from the numbers of those having their signature campaign ongoing and they also have an active announcement thread for their service discussions, likewise we are more proficient than each other in gambling.

That is it because what may be appealing to you may be displeasure for me,  but then also we have to know that at some point we have what we can generally agree with and at the end come out with a generally accepted stand on it and when it comes to the issues with best casinos and reputation we all have one objective for them and at such individual differences will be put at rest at that point since what we talking is what concerns all gamblers.

Take a scam casino for example,  no individual will ever want to get scammed so no matter what the individual difference is at that point we will have to come to one term about the issues which is a scam and nothing to add,  and both and everyone will have to accept that unless the other is part of the scam if not we all will have the same stand on the same casino.

[LUCKMCFLY]

The list will likely be endless if we were to start mentioning all the trusted casinos here, every one definitely have one or two they love for one or two reasons, but then, casinos I've not read any bad reviews about are listed as -

1. owl.games
2. stake.io
3. Freebitco.in
4. Blackjack.fun
5. Rollbit
6. Duelbits
7. Forturnjack

There are several others, like tens and tens of them, but the mentioned above, are the ones I could  call to mind when writing this comment.

Bro, I am with you on this and I must say you revealed my mind when it comes to all the listed casinos, you are just on point. Anyone looking for the best casinos with many extras can simply get it from there. Only that, though new, I would love to add Shuffle.com to it. This is also a very good casino in which anyone who is playing there has nothing to worry about. They continue to maintain a good community here, and to date, there has never been a single complaint about them.

Besides, I think you made a mistake with the stake.io, you might want to correct it as stake.com is the only one I know.

Judging from the date that fivestar made the comment which is April, 2022, that's over a year ago, my guess is that, he was still possibly new to either gambling or stake at that time, that is, he was yet to get familiar with stake, that is why he made this mistake, because I too cant imagine making a mistake on the url of a site I am promoting, and good thing he's been quoted here, hopefully, he will come around and correct it.

And again, also worth mentioning is the fact that from when he made that list to now, alot of have changed with owl.games, I myself have seen some comments from fivestar in recent times criticizing owl.games for their recent behaviors, and the fact that they are no longer on this forum makes me feel like they do not deserve to be on that list though.

I dont know if its just me but i do remember that i have seen that site name Stake.io (not Stake.com) into this forum or it was just me. Im not that sure of on which i did make out some search and i cant find something on which it would really be related to this on which means that he might really be that have mistakenly be able to put up .io instead of .com. Seeing on that typing that Fortunejack word is already jumbling
but well it isnt really that a huge matter which we do know that there's only 1 stake that do exist.Speaking about the most trusted casinos of Bitcointalk then i do agree with the list except owl.games since i dont have
experience on playing into that platform but i was aware into their existence.

People been telling was true that when it comes to reputation and popularity then it wouldnt be precise nor concise knowing that market is really been that divided and doesnt really stay up on one place
on which means that exact numbers couldnt be that possible or simply it is really just that dynamic considering that demand will really be changing from time to time due to several factors.
So there's no one would be able to give out those numbers on which it is normal.

The funniest part is that I never gave the date of posting a thought, early 2022? That's much, a lot could have happened though. In fact, I was never a member of this forum by then, so I can't know so much that happened in that regard. But it would be fine if you gist more about this since you witnessed it. I mean the Stake part, not the others like Fortunejack. Was it Stake itself that owned the domain before or some sort of scam or those who were trying to make money through a similar domain name? Why I got curious that time that I pointed the attention of the OP to it is that I only know Stake.com and I have known it even before I joined the forum. Immediately I saw stake.io, I thought it was an error, but still not to limit it to my only understanding, I decided to check the website out, and I saw a different thing entirely. A site that was trying to sell a domain for $180,000 which I don't think can ever be from stake. Even if Stake is not using a domain like that anymore, they will at least still try to hold it down since it carries a similar name as theirs.

These casinos are the most reliable without a doubt, I think that for me the most favorite of these is stake.com and it should be in first place , in fact it has more Community and is much more reliable in my opinion, also in the selection here It's not one of the best like bicasino.io, which is also very good, I disagree with what I've seen in the selection because I don't have a problem with the others but I would really take out OWL , I don't know , I don't think it's in yet of the high level of casinos, but that is just my personal perception , I have always Respected each person's way of thinking and what each person can do in a casino and what they can develop without a doubt , that is why I will always rprefer what I know has the most seniority and trust , that's why I like this selection of casinos that I evaluate in a different way, but even so it is good, of course according to the experience of everyone who I believe is the opinion that is made and They form some thoughts.

Since I'm in the forum, I can attest to the fact that freebitco.in used to like it much more because it didn't require KYC , now things are different, because Basically everything just happens in the world is an obligation that I have to comply with it , something that seems quite ugly to me and that is not pleasant, for me the css are done better as I say and that is my way of thinking, and since I have had experience in these casinos it can be seen that one always leans towards the Safest , because money is what you risk and that is what you should also take care of, because without money there is no game, unless you want to play with fictitious money which for many is not pleasant , not even for Educational purposes, for me it is But the emotion of betting with real money will always be a wonderful type of experience, which is why this should be taken with great caution , the benefits of doing things well translate into possible profits.

[EarnOnVictor]

The case which happened to the stake user is definitely the fault of the user and not stake, so I am going to disagree with you when you say it's the fault of both sides.

Stake have done their best in providing good security features for their users, Stake still can not be the one to turn on those security features for the user, a user is solely responsible for turning on any of the security features he or she feels he or she needs, and leave the ones he or she thinks is irrelevant to him or her, if a user having good amount of money on his or her stake account doesn't find it needful to turn on 2fa for the safety of their funds, then whatever happens that leads to the user losing those funds, that is clearly his or her fault and not the fault of the Casino.

It's true that the gambler messed up by not enabling 2FA which would saved him from this mess, but it's also true that he wouldn't have to go through this ordeal if Stake's security stopped the hacker in the first place.

The fact is that a Stake account got hacked despite the site being one of the top gambling sites these days which is embarassing to say the least.

You have made the right judgement from the start, but not the concluding part as no security can be breached because not even the US military is immune to hacking. This is why they are extra careful and spend billions on securities every year. Besides, I can partly join you in blaming the guy because it is a good layer of security to do the 2FA, but on the other hand, 2FA means nothing to some hackers, that's just the fact. Once they get the hold of your phone, they will do virtually everything and bypass every security, which including the fingerprint. That's what I read from one of the crackers of hackers, so we should all know that the internet on its own is not safe but we should try to increase security as we can and also not be careless about the way we operate and handle our gadgets and online accounts.

Having said that, you can naturally know that even Stake is not immune from hacking, but they will always try their best to keep their platform safe. However, nothing is guaranteed here and it also depends on how much the company is willing to pay for the security.

[benalexis12]

The case which happened to the stake user is definitely the fault of the user and not stake, so I am going to disagree with you when you say it's the fault of both sides.

Stake have done their best in providing good security features for their users, Stake still can not be the one to turn on those security features for the user, a user is solely responsible for turning on any of the security features he or she feels he or she needs, and leave the ones he or she thinks is irrelevant to him or her, if a user having good amount of money on his or her stake account doesn't find it needful to turn on 2fa for the safety of their funds, then whatever happens that leads to the user losing those funds, that is clearly his or her fault and not the fault of the Casino.

It's true that the gambler messed up by not enabling 2FA which would saved him from this mess, but it's also true that he wouldn't have to go through this ordeal if Stake's security stopped the hacker in the first place.

The fact is that a Stake account got hacked despite the site being one of the top gambling sites these days which is embarassing to say the least.

I play gambling here in the crypto industry, but I have never activated 2FA on casino platforms. Also, I don't have an account so far in Stakes, though as far as I know, it has 2FA, and besides that, Livecasino also has 2FA.

Maybe I will only do 2FA when I am required to activate 2FA to secure the account I have on the casino platform. That's the purpose of 2FA in a casino, so that you can't be hacked by exploitative people.

[fruktik]

I don't think that it's a better advice to tell others to stay away from a thing that you're promoting yourself, but yeah someone should tell the new gamblers in detail that over-gambling can learn to gambling addiction and one should gamble in limit in order to enjoy the fun part of it. There are many new-comers who start gambling because they want to earn quick bucks by betting on the casinos games but they don't know that in the world of gambling we don't win all the times and sometimes we also face many losses. A gambler should consider gambling as a type of entertainment rather than considering as a way to earn a lot of money.

And before the New Year and during the New Year holidays, people will lose the most money, and some of them will even become addicted. )) So many days off ahead. We need to pass the time somehow, don’t we? And what can help? That's right, a casino where time flies completely unnoticed.

People have always wanted to make money quickly and without problems. But it’s just the opposite that happens. They simply lose all their funds at a high speed and may still be left with debts that will then have to be repaid for many years.

[delfastTions]

The case which happened to the stake user is definitely the fault of the user and not stake, so I am going to disagree with you when you say it's the fault of both sides.

Stake have done their best in providing good security features for their users, Stake still can not be the one to turn on those security features for the user, a user is solely responsible for turning on any of the security features he or she feels he or she needs, and leave the ones he or she thinks is irrelevant to him or her, if a user having good amount of money on his or her stake account doesn't find it needful to turn on 2fa for the safety of their funds, then whatever happens that leads to the user losing those funds, that is clearly his or her fault and not the fault of the Casino.

It's true that the gambler messed up by not enabling 2FA which would saved him from this mess, but it's also true that he wouldn't have to go through this ordeal if Stake's security stopped the hacker in the first place.

The fact is that a Stake account got hacked despite the site being one of the top gambling sites these days which is embarassing to say the least.

I play gambling here in the crypto industry, but I have never activated 2FA on casino platforms. Also, I don't have an account so far in Stakes, though as far as I know, it has 2FA, and besides that, Livecasino also has 2FA.

Maybe I will only do 2FA when I am required to activate 2FA to secure the account I have on the casino platform. That's the purpose of 2FA in a casino, so that you can't be hacked by exploitative people.

In general, I believe that such players who gamble with relatively small bets and, accordingly, small deposits do not need all this unnecessary fuss with obtaining access to their account using 2FA.  In my opinion, 2FA itself was no longer invented to ensure the security of the user, but for the best methods of identifying him on the network in order to collect information about the user himself.  And 2FA also has such a psychological effect on the user in the form of his complacency in the fact that no one will definitely be able to steal access to his account. 
Well, maybe it’s only in this psychological complacency of a person that the benefit of 2FA lies. 
But there is also harm in the fact that the person’s access pattern is revealed and in the fact that he does this voluntarily, and all this also takes away our precious time.

[blckhawk]

We all have individuals different tastes from the way we use a gambling platform, what entice you may be what i frown on at, so there are many crypto gambling platform we can choose from a range right from the numbers of those having their signature campaign ongoing and they also have an active announcement thread for their service discussions, likewise we are more proficient than each other in gambling.

As much as this is true, that still doesn't mean that there's no casino out here in the Bitcoin Forum that's not trusted by a lot of people, like there's a top 1 in terms of merits or number of positive trust, there's definitely a number 1 for trusted in casino, which is actually interesting because this could easily be solved by a poll where everyone can chip in a vote and tell us which is their most trust casinos, the only problem with the votes is that we don't know who's lying or not. I don't think though that signature campaigns are a good measure to see which one's more trusted, sure it can be a factor together with how long they've been running that campaign, I still think that it's a bit biased because some people are paid to promote this and even if it's not prohibited to not nominate your casino that you're promoting, it still feels wrong to do so.

[delfastTions]

We all have individuals different tastes from the way we use a gambling platform, what entice you may be what i frown on at, so there are many crypto gambling platform we can choose from a range right from the numbers of those having their signature campaign ongoing and they also have an active announcement thread for their service discussions, likewise we are more proficient than each other in gambling.

As much as this is true, that still doesn't mean that there's no casino out here in the Bitcoin Forum that's not trusted by a lot of people, like there's a top 1 in terms of merits or number of positive trust, there's definitely a number 1 for trusted in casino, which is actually interesting because this could easily be solved by a poll where everyone can chip in a vote and tell us which is their most trust casinos, the only problem with the votes is that we don't know who's lying or not. I don't think though that signature campaigns are a good measure to see which one's more trusted, sure it can be a factor together with how long they've been running that campaign, I still think that it's a bit biased because some people are paid to promote this and even if it's not prohibited to not nominate your casino that you're promoting, it still feels wrong to do so.

There is definitely a problem with the reliability of the information that you and I will receive on various issues.  Including the reliability of information about the quality of work and reliability of crypto casinos. 
Unfortunately, the entire body of information is a tangled tangle of truth and lies.  And it is absolutely impossible to unravel such a tangle if you are not an experienced specialist in this matter and have reliable, often insider information.  And of course there is a lot of advertising inform tion material ordered for an additional payment.  But such is our life in general.  We can simply only guess what the share of fake, false information is in all kinds of ratings, for example, ratings of crypto casinos.  And everyone determines for themselves what this proportion of falseness is.  And this just depends on the mental and analytical abilities of a person.  It seems to me that as civilization develops, this proportion of falsehood in all information is constantly increasing. 
As a result, we will soon find ourselves in a completely fake world of information technology. 
And this is no good at all.

[Oilacris]

We all have individuals different tastes from the way we use a gambling platform, what entice you may be what i frown on at, so there are many crypto gambling platform we can choose from a range right from the numbers of those having their signature campaign ongoing and they also have an active announcement thread for their service discussions, likewise we are more proficient than each other in gambling.

As much as this is true, that still doesn't mean that there's no casino out here in the Bitcoin Forum that's not trusted by a lot of people, like there's a top 1 in terms of merits or number of positive trust, there's definitely a number 1 for trusted in casino, which is actually interesting because this could easily be solved by a poll where everyone can chip in a vote and tell us which is their most trust casinos, the only problem with the votes is that we don't know who's lying or not. I don't think though that signature campaigns are a good measure to see which one's more trusted, sure it can be a factor together with how long they've been running that campaign, I still think that it's a bit biased because some people are paid to promote this and even if it's not prohibited to not nominate your casino that you're promoting, it still feels wrong to do so.

So if there is, then would you mind on trying out to tell at least those top rankings?  We do know that there's no way that we could be able to tell on whose at the top and whose at the bottom.

The important thing here is that a gambler should really know on what are the reputable and known sites that we do have on this forum on which they could at least assure that they are playing on the right place and not really just that hurriedly on trying out to play on platforms on which it isnt really that known into this forum itself. There's no way that we could be able to determine
on where it would really be heading up in terms of ranking or whatsoever. Thing here is that we do know that they are legit.

[2Pizza410000BTC]

Hello there. Basically title says it all. The question is targetting veterans on this forum with more experience than me.
If you could take a few minutes and write a list of the most trusted casinos, I would appreciate a lot.
I'm pretty new here and from what i've seen so far, 1xbit, bitstarz and a few more are not really accepted in the gambling community because they have bad reputation. This is for my website that will come out in a few weeks

Thank you!

Most trusted casino sites in bitcoin forum that people have been using regularly and have never been scammed from there I will mention all those casino sites here hope you correct me if I am wrong

Stake.com
Sportsbet.io
Duelbits
Rollbit
Forturnjack
Freebitco.in
Roobet Etc.

[erep]

Most trusted casino sites in bitcoin forum that people have been using regularly and have never been scammed from there I will mention all those casino sites here hope you correct me if I am wrong

Stake.com
Sportsbet.io
Duelbits
Rollbit
Forturnjack
Freebitco.in
Roobet Etc.

Some of the casino list posts have been answered in previous posts, but I recommend your answer because all the casino lists have earned the trust and reputation of forum community gamblers, so don't ever choose another crypto casino that doesn't necessarily have fair gambling and good service if you haven't gotten it. The reputation of active gamblers in forum communities because some new casinos eventually prove not to provide satisfactory service and they will remind us never to use new casinos.

[Rating Place]

Hello there. Basically title says it all. The question is targetting veterans on this forum with more experience than me.
If you could take a few minutes and write a list of the most trusted casinos, I would appreciate a lot.
I'm pretty new here and from what i've seen so far, 1xbit, bitstarz and a few more are not really accepted in the gambling community because they have bad reputation. This is for my website that will come out in a few weeks

Thank you!

You could say that the most trusted are the ones with no open scam accusations here. The rest have open scam accusations.

Betcoin
Nitrobetting
BetFury
Roobet
Owl