Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 05:34:29 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) would Have Saved Users over $80 Million in Gas Fees  (Read 38 times)
Block Magnates (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 02, 2022, 01:22:50 PM
 #1


The “Otherside NFT” land sale by the popular Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) creators began on May 1, 2022.

During the highly anticipated land sale, each plot was available for purchase at 305 APE, an ERC-20 token whose price temporarily soared ahead of the auction.

Although the sale dumped the usual Dutch Auction, it had some caveats that questioned Yuga Labs’ preparedness considering retail NFT collectors’ sensitivity to Gas fees.
https://imgur.com/a/BV9jU5c

Ethereum Temporarily Knocked Off

The rush to acquire land and be part of Yuga Lab’s success was understandable. Over the past few years, BAYC NFTs have earned the creator millions of dollars in revenue—and the number keeps growing as collectors jostle for these rare and uniquely illustrated apes.

It has emerged that Yuga Labs failed to optimize its smart contracts for Gas fees causing NFT purchasers to spend over $80 million extra in fees. The congestion caused by the race to purchase land temporarily “switched off” the lights in Ethereum, even causing Etherscan to halt temporarily. This outage subsequently caused disruptions in other crypto markets.

“We’re sorry for turning off the lights on Ethereum for a while. It seems abundantly clear that ApeCoin will need to migrate to its chain to scale properly. We want to encourage the DAO to start thinking in this direction.”
How Yuga Labs would Have Saved Users over $80 Million in Gas Fees

Ethereum might be one of the most decentralized networks but has a scaling problem. On-chain demand often leads to congestion, leading to Gas spikes despite desperate attempts to incorporate fee-curbing techniques. The activation of EIP-1559, as evidenced by the congestion, was of little help on May 1 when fees soared to $196 to send a simple transaction.

The “Otherside NFT” land sale saw collectors spend over $200 million in Gas within the first hour of launch–but it could have been lower. Analysts have pointed out that this was because Yuga Labs didn’t optimize their contracts to reduce Gas fees.

https://imgur.com/a/F5dt0SS

According to experts, the minter could have, for example, removed the ERC721Enumerable extension, saving land buyers around 70 percent in Gas costs.

https://blockmagnates.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/ERC721Enumerable-extension-1024x351.jpeg

Moreover, Yuga Labs could have used the Use ERC721A, making the minting of different NFTs of the same wallet as cheap as minting one NFT.
TastyChillySauce00
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3024
Merit: 1028


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile
May 02, 2022, 02:25:02 PM
 #2

YUGA just care to sell everything for the money. They will not care about their users. This can be seen from so many minting case that happened with yuga. I dind't like this but it seems any product created by yuga was just over hyped like this land sale minting. I think that it would better if it moves it to the scalable blockchain. The price of land was decreasing so hard.
Some people can pay less for the land and ape token dumped so hard too. it seems that land sale was the main thing that triggering the pump

..Stake.com..   ▄████████████████████████████████████▄
   ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄            ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██  ▄████▄
   ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██  ██████
   ██ ██████████ ██      ██ ██████████ ██   ▀██▀
   ██ ██      ██ ██████  ██ ██      ██ ██    ██
   ██ ██████  ██ █████  ███ ██████  ██ ████▄ ██
   ██ █████  ███ ████  ████ █████  ███ ████████
   ██ ████  ████ ██████████ ████  ████ ████▀
   ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██
   ██            ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀            ██ 
   ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀
  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███  ██  ██  ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ██████████████████████████████████████████
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█  ▄▀▄             █▀▀█▀▄▄
█  █▀█             █  ▐  ▐▌
█       ▄██▄       █  ▌  █
█     ▄██████▄     █  ▌ ▐▌
█    ██████████    █ ▐  █
█   ▐██████████▌   █ ▐ ▐▌
█    ▀▀██████▀▀    █ ▌ █
█     ▄▄▄██▄▄▄     █ ▌▐▌
█                  █▐ █
█                  █▐▐▌
█                  █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄
▄█▀       ▐█▌       ▀█▄
██         ▐█▌         ██
████▄     ▄█████▄     ▄████
████████▄███████████▄████████
███▀    █████████████    ▀███
██       ███████████       ██
▀█▄       █████████       ▄█▀
▀█▄    ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄  ▄▄▄█▀
▀███████         ███████▀
▀█████▄       ▄█████▀
▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀
..PLAY NOW..
jackg
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071


https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory


View Profile
May 02, 2022, 03:00:31 PM
 #3

It seems odd they wouldn't notice they could've cut fees by 70%, surely that'd be something you'd notice if you were competent or just did a small amount of testing. I've seen a lot of smart contract fees greatly reduce recently and I think it's optimisations like these that were missed first time but have since been resolved (either that or I just found a very optimal time to do my last interaction).
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!