Am curious about bounties

[raidarksword]

Yes, there are some few projects are worth to try to promote and of course it has a 50/50 chance the project will succeed or fail in the end. It all depends to project that already listed in the market through the bounty allocations on it and with limited participants it might be worth it to participate with especially if you have high rank forum account. Participating in the bounties that not yet listed, it is worth the time as well and all depends of the project type too.

[1714574404]

1714574404

[1714574404]

1714574404

[1714574404]

1714574404

[1714574404]

1714574404

[1714574404]

1714574404

[GatotKaca]

first, you must have a high rank to participate in the signature campaign, for payments that you can take instantly usually in the service section of this forum they only accept members with a minimum rank of full member. While your current rank may be up to the bounty, it's a small loss to enjoy the signature payoff plus projects that you say won't all hit the market quickly, making the bounty look not worth working on.

worthy or not a bounty project I think depends on how we choose the project.
some people may be more familiar with the project from a certain bounty manager. which of course has a good reputation. so no need to do more research and register immediately.
especially for the signature campaign, I think we should choose a good project. especially for altcoin payments. If we choose the wrong project, of course, we will be harmed by many things if our orientation is on what we produce.

[southerngentuk]

I am looking to try out a bounty campaign using signature but I don't see anyone worth my time right now, I do have a question about this, does it make more sense to promote projects that are already trading over those that are not listed on exchange yet? I see so many that aren't listed like whsiperMSG, Valore, Elysian Finance, they don't look like they will be hitting an exchange any time soon.

What and what makes you promote a project?.

We can't be too demanding of good projects as you think or, like me, just need some criteria that they work and can pay us autographers. But honestly, it doesn't always go as planned, I've been through many projects that the community considers very potential, but for some goddamn reason, they can't keep growing as planned and it almost takes years of waiting to get what you've spent your time on. Remember one thing, we are not executives or bosses to give opportunities. The opportunity is because we seek and try every day to see that what you spend is never wasted. 

[sensimilia]

I am looking to try out a bounty campaign using signature but I don't see anyone worth my time right now, I do have a question about this, does it make more sense to promote projects that are already trading over those that are not listed on exchange yet? I see so many that aren't listed like whsiperMSG, Valore, Elysian Finance, they don't look like they will be hitting an exchange any time soon.

What and what makes you promote a project?.

The Chittagongs are seen here. If they are told here that you are not traded, if they are exchanged here and there is a big difference between them, but there is a lot of risk that they cannot sell them, then it will be seen that if they want, they will be very rich.  However, the projects that are not able to do here are considered to be a cause of a lot of risk

[firmino10]

there are some painful realities in life, uncertainty is one of it. sometime somethings don't go our way, what we plan might not be executed. the fact that sometimes we put effort in things that don't reward us or the reward doesn't compensate our effort. for a coin that is already in exchange can be a good project, though the reward might not be too high. couple with the fact that there is a lot of persons in the campaign. for new project, one just have to make his or her research, and also have it are the back of their mind that some project might not last and that there value can drop. we can also learn what makes those project to fail. our curious helps us to learn things as humans.

[vanesha]

It doesn't matter to me if they are listed or not. Why? Because this is crypto. There is no sure route. Those tokens that are listed could rug out tomorrow leaving you with worthless tokens, who the unlisted one could list tomorrow and pump handsomely for you. Be wise

right, we have no guarantee in following the bounty, even if we don't get paid for the token which is already high there is no penalty for that project. Cryptocurrencies route cannot be determined, it is better to choose bounties that are already listed on the exchange with less risk than tokens that are still unclear about when their listings will be, at least that is more certain.

[diminizio]

If you are not comfortable with a long-running project to list their token on an exchange it is better to follow a project that is already listed or have them listed on the exchange immediately. I think it also has its drawbacks, if you want to follow the bounty with immediate pay they will only allocate a small amount of funds for it, not as big as where you followed it before it was listed on the market.

Although there are drawbacks but we already know the estimated USDT allocated in the bounty campaign, so big or small the bounty allocation will make a different decision to join or ignore the low allocation bounty, but sometimes projects that have not been listed are also profitable but must ensure project details and rarely there is a potential project that has a bounty campaign program.

Well, if I had a choice, when market conditions are positive I'd prefer to participate in bounties with token payments even if they weren't listed on the exchange at that time. Opportunities to get results many times more real than having to follow a bounty that has a predetermined pay like USDT, but I don't criticise that, if the market is negative I always take a bounty with a payout that can be sold instantly.

[Dervish doff]

I am looking to try out a bounty campaign using signature but I don't see anyone worth my time right now, I do have a question about this, does it make more sense to promote projects that are already trading over those that are not listed on exchange yet? I see so many that aren't listed like whsiperMSG, Valore, Elysian Finance, they don't look like they will be hitting an exchange any time soon.

What and what makes you promote a project?.

Regarding this matter, the decision is in your hands, sometimes a campaign, campaign tokens have been blocked in exchange, there are also still in the ICO stage, and listings after that, gradually, Valore and Elysian Finance and Whispermsg, I think so, the right advice, it's good Before you promote the campaign, first examine the road map of a campaign project, which ones are more confident and make decisions, everything makes sense if you are sure in promoting, if in terms of questions, what is expected, all will answer income, none other than, Campaign promotion, can be coin, then sell or not, it's up to the promotion, want to hold the token first, want or hope the price is more expensive, so the point is income.

[Rasa nanas]

bounties with altcoin payments that can be directly exchanged usually have a much smaller allocation when compared to new project bounties or cannot be directly exchanged.
but if you participate in a new project bounty you have to wait for the altcoins you get to be exchanged, and once they can be exchanged it is possible that the price of the altcoins you get from the bounty is far below the price at the token sale. The decision is yours, but I think it is better to participate in the bounty that pays using altcoins that can be exchanged directly.

[Desscount]

It doesn't matter to me if they are listed or not. Why? Because this is crypto. There is no sure route. Those tokens that are listed could rug out tomorrow leaving you with worthless tokens, who the unlisted one could list tomorrow and pump handsomely for you. Be wise

right, we have no guarantee in following the bounty, even if we don't get paid for the token which is already high there is no penalty for that project. Cryptocurrencies route cannot be determined, it is better to choose bounties that are already listed on the exchange with less risk than tokens that are still unclear about when their listings will be, at least that is more certain.

That's right, at least choosing a bounty that is already listed on the exchange can minimize the risk,
considering there are some unclear projects we should really consider before joining the bounty,
but it comes back again depends on each person's decision

[Z390]

If I have to promote any project it must be escrowed, I know how hard it can be for team members to release tokens to bounty hunters once the token has a very high value on the listed exchange so that's why I said that escrow makes more sense in this case, the token doesn't have to be listed before promoting.

[tygeade]

If the project is honest, it does not matter who holds rewards, manager or project. Project will distribute rewards as promised. If the project is shady, escrow funds wont help. I took a part in a bounty with reputed manager, he held bounty reward. When bounty has ended, project locked contract and escrowed tokens became untransferable. Also I was in a situation, when manager escrowed rewards, but the project did not send him funds for distribution. This all ended with waiting for distribution funds. Project can always create another contract and issue new tokens, making escrowed bounty reward useless.

I would say that there is an unknown trust going around at the very early days. It means that if you work with a bounty manager who is trusted and pay him upfront 2 months worth of money and he declares this, then everyone will trust the bounty and it will not become a problem.

However, assuming that you wouldn't do something like that, and you want to do it yourself then you could be shady or legit and we wouldn't know it. How would people know if you are shady or not? They wouldn't be able to know it and that is why they would be worried about their money. This is why bounty places should work with bounty managers to get rid of that part.

[Maestro75]

does it make more sense to promote projects that are already trading over those that are not listed on exchange yet?

It makes more sense to do that than promoting projects not listed. What if the projects does not list after you have finished promoting them, what happens? There is the danger of the managers of this projects not releasing rewards to those who helped them promote it. This projects often turn to scam because they do not have anything to loose. After all they are not real and not also in the market.

[blackbold]

If I have to promote any project it must be escrowed, I know how hard it can be for team members to release tokens to bounty hunters once the token has a very high value on the listed exchange so that's why I said that escrow makes more sense in this case, the token doesn't have to be listed before promoting.

I think the escrow fund does not guarantee also the success of the project. there are also projects for which escrow tokens have been distributed as escrow but are worthless. and conversely there are projects that are not in escrow but when distributed and traded the price is high.
bottom line Always do personal research on any bounty campaigns on this forum, don't join all bounty campaigns if you haven't researched them first unless there is more free time to apply for all projects.

[adzino]

I am looking to try out a bounty campaign using signature but I don't see anyone worth my time right now, I do have a question about this, does it make more sense to promote projects that are already trading over those that are not listed on exchange yet? I see so many that aren't listed like whsiperMSG, Valore, Elysian Finance, they don't look like they will be hitting an exchange any time soon.

What and what makes you promote a project?.

You would be only wasting your time if you join a random project and they pay using their own token. But the time you will receive the tokens and be able to sell, they will worth peanuts. Almost nothing. If they pay in some well known currency, then yeah, you can take it. Not sure what you think it is "not worth your time". Just add it to the signature, and make contribute to the forum by making posts as usual. You don't lose anything here.

[Kimonoe]

If I have to promote any project it must be escrowed, I know how hard it can be for team members to release tokens to bounty hunters once the token has a very high value on the listed exchange so that's why I said that escrow makes more sense in this case, the token doesn't have to be listed before promoting.

I think the escrow fund does not guarantee also the success of the project. there are also projects for which escrow tokens have been distributed as escrow but are worthless. and conversely there are projects that are not in escrow but when distributed and traded the price is high.
bottom line Always do personal research on any bounty campaigns on this forum, don't join all bounty campaigns if you haven't researched them first unless there is more free time to apply for all projects.

there are so many projects that are present every day, and currently there are many choices of bounties with an escrow system, considering that many of the projects are absent at the end, so that bounty hunters do not receive anything, although they have not guaranteed the exchange and price, at least bounty participants can receive the promised tokens , because the bounty is undeniable luck in a project

[Wildwest]

Every project we promote must have a difference in carrying out their mission and success sometimes we cannot predict, projects that have been listed on the exchange are certainly more convincing for us in promoting because such projects often get profits but there are also some projects that have not been listed on the exchange we can rely on and depend on the team that manages, The reason for promoting a project is of course we want to make a profit.

[adiebitsler]

If I have to promote any project it must be escrowed, I know how hard it can be for team members to release tokens to bounty hunters once the token has a very high value on the listed exchange so that's why I said that escrow makes more sense in this case, the token doesn't have to be listed before promoting.

In this case, I completely agree with you, because now many teams are also unaware of the current bounty program, so for the safety of the bounty participants, the determination of Escrow is a proper and good thing for everyone so that no one is harmed.

[dwminer1]

Nowadays, I definitely prefer to participate in bounties that pay out rewards in cryptocurrencies available on the market, and preferably in stable coins. I know in advance what conditions I agree to and for how much I am working for. Unfortunately, the golden times of bounties in the ICO era, where it was possible to earn tens of thousands of dollars on one campaign, are gone and will probably never come back.

[blackbold]

If I have to promote any project it must be escrowed, I know how hard it can be for team members to release tokens to bounty hunters once the token has a very high value on the listed exchange so that's why I said that escrow makes more sense in this case, the token doesn't have to be listed before promoting.

I think the escrow fund does not guarantee also the success of the project. there are also projects for which escrow tokens have been distributed as escrow but are worthless. and conversely there are projects that are not in escrow but when distributed and traded the price is high.
bottom line Always do personal research on any bounty campaigns on this forum, don't join all bounty campaigns if you haven't researched them first unless there is more free time to apply for all projects.

there are so many projects that are present every day, and currently there are many choices of bounties with an escrow system, considering that many of the projects are absent at the end, so that bounty hunters do not receive anything, although they have not guaranteed the exchange and price, at least bounty participants can receive the promised tokens , because the bounty is undeniable luck in a project

yes, I also think so bro, at least we join the bounty escrow we already have tokens even though there is no price on the exchange at least that has made us satisfied.
The point is that before joining a project we have to do our own research so we don't waste time. I myself still believe that there are still many projects that have potential and produce.