scammer get scammed part 2

[Dillonhebist]

Sorry everyone this should have come since but I wasn't too well that was why I wasn't online.
About my story scammer get scammed I saw all sort of comments and questions and even almost everyone who commented labelled me a scammer and even a lier, someone even give me a neutral trust, but I only have Two questions for everyone.

1__What if I was the one who made payment first  do you guys think I will be able to get it back?
2__what if I was the one who got scammed what will you guys think of me?
               Reading and understanding
They are two categories of people
1__people who read but don't understand ( these are the people who go to read the comments of others and reply the same way to the comments without reading the threads or think if the person understand what he or she read)
2__people who read and understand (these are the people who read through what ever is given making sure they understand every bit of it. this set of people do not only make use of reading and understanding they also make use of thinking).

They are different people in this world, ones who thinks they are perfect but they are the opposite of what they think and those who thinks they are worst but they are opposite of what they think.

[BIT-BENDER]

Mate no one is a criminal until proven guilty, as it stands you have nothing to rope in the person of being a scammer all you have is your assumptions which in the honest truth is right because it will save you from being scammed, but the fact you still carried on the conversation and accepted this person terms and conditions and he played his own part and you refusing to play yours and also refusing to refund the person makes you a clear scammer,

the best you would have done when you noticed that this fellow was suspicious you end the conversation, it isn’t right being exactly what we don’t want in crypto which is a scammer

[SatoPrincess]

You can’t blame anyone for how they interpreted your post. I thought the thread was for merits sake, I asked before in that thread for the transaction ids so we can all see the bitcoins you claim you received and later returned to the person. Your response was a flimsy excuse and I think that raised more suspicions. A neutral tag isn’t so bad Claiming to be a scammer

[Despairo]

1__What if I was the one who made payment first  do you guys think I will be able to get it back?

No one know, you shouldn't trust random stranger with your money. Don't trust, verify.

2__what if I was the one who got scammed what will you guys think of me?

Then you become a victim, nothing less and nothing more. If you beg to any users because you've got scammed, that's against forum rules.

1__people who read but don't understand ( these are the people who go to read the comments of others and reply the same way to the comments without reading the threads or think if the person understand what he or she read)

2__people who read and understand (these are the people who read through what ever is given making sure they understand every bit of it. this set of people do not only make use of reading and understanding they also make use of thinking).

Which users you're refers to? I believe anyone who read your stories are understand what you're talking about. I've read you story and you seems to be like a scammer on your post, however you've been send the money back to him. But on some people perspective, your act depends on the users suggest to you. Most people suggest to send back the money, you've send it back. What if many users suggest to not send it back?

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

My question is, why on earth will you want to make a transaction on a non Escrow service? Most especially Facebook, the bedroom of major online scams, if you are not a scammer yourself. You would have stick to your saying "No", but rather you went further sending your Ethereum wallet address which he sent you $300, you confirm it, and for you not to continue what you started, you came up with a careless excuse. That's not fair my guy, because at least you should have shown him that actually, there still exist some good people on Facebook, but you failed.

And there is one statement you made in your previous post, which has been bothering me and i will like you to explain better what you mean by that.. and it says...👇👇

Code:

after the presentation I came online, I was seeing all sorts of pidgin local Nigeria insultive words.
that caught my attention how can an Indonesia citizen speak and write a pigeon local Nigeria insultive words then I decided not to refund him his Etherume for him to feel how others feel when they are being scammed.

So please, i have got just two questions to ask you base on what you said above, and please do well toanswer them.


1st.. How does he speaking the Nigerian pidgin makes you not to continue your transaction, are you trying to say all Nigerians are scammers?....( Please answer)

2. Why send your Ethereum wallet address if you knew you won't finish the transaction you just started?.


And, i hope you have sent back his $300 Ethereum??  Because who knows if your sickness is not because of your refuser to send back his money.

[noorman0]

1__What if I was the one who made payment first  do you guys think I will be able to get it back?

I think you will, you just need to make additional fraud prevention procedures because you are dealing with social networks.

2__what if I was the one who got scammed what will you guys think of me?

Depends on how far you verify it, at least you made an effort for it. In fact, the value of a transaction can turn good intentions into bad, like you when you get $300 eth and need someone else's advice to return it.

[SatoPrincess]

Complete opposite of EZ0010 who was very honest and returned the bitcoins sent to him by accident. I’m using EZ0010 as a reference because he was a newbie at the time and could have kept the bitcoins for himself and abandon his bitcointalk account. But he returned the money without creating a thread asking if he should return the bitcoins. His honesty was rewarded with merits and positive trust which earned him respect. That’s the difference between you two

[Adbitco]

First, I know for such case most users mostly upload some proof of discussion and transaction.
Secondly, this story is too fake to be true.
Reasons " why would you just go offline after several discussion with someone who chatted you for help on FB without a notice".
My question; what if you were the one who needs the help and you started all the processes he went through and lastly you sent first and he went offline without your notice don't you think you would also behaved like him?
You don't need to question him for anything rather than returning back his funds even if it was me and I didn't trust him I would only send back to him the amount he sent me.
Then I will only tell him that he gat to pay all the transaction fees via in every single payment I will deduct the fee from the one sending to him if he refused to send all ones.
That would have been the best, he trusted you that was why you were chatted up or asked him to used and escrow account this must from you because he can get his alt account as an escrow.
To cut the long story short. Return back his funds and as well show us txt id that you made a refund this is the only way to show;
1. You are free
2. Isn't a cooked story
3. Transaction refunded.

Note: If all this is not done then you are likely to be called a scammer as well and you should be tag for not being transparent.

Here got all the answers to your post and when all things are done we can see all are said to be true and not force story.

[Rockstarguy]

For you to be honest you are not a scammer, but you wouldn't have gone to extend of making transaction with him since you already know he is a scammer, you would have ignored him. After he made his payment you would have sent him back what he payed for just to prove to him how sincere you are and not like his type. I know you will be thinking if he had successfully gotten you, you would have lost your money which is painful that is why you made decision not to return his own exchange, even if he is a scammer you didn't do right thing by getting him back. The best thing you would have done is to ignored him or give him back what be longs to him.

[KingsDen]

Op, what really is the essence of "scammer get scammed part 2"
1. Are you trying to let us know that we couldn't read well and didn't understand you in your part one.
2. Are you here to justify your act and want every member of the community to be as brave as you are?
3. Are you here to explain to us that you don't deserve a neutral tag, that you rather needed a red tag?
4. Are you here to present the evidence of the refund that the community demanded?
5. You go another scammer that you scammed?
6. Are we expecting "scammer get scammed part 3?

[lovesmayfamilis]

Complete opposite of EZ0010 who was very honest and returned the bitcoins sent to him by accident. I’m using EZ0010 as a reference because he was a newbie at the time and could have kept the bitcoins for himself and abandon his bitcointalk account. But he returned the money without creating a thread asking if he should return the bitcoins. His honesty was rewarded with merits and positive trust which earned him respect. That’s the difference between you two

I completely agree. You shouldn't have created your stupid topic at all. And after you questioned whether it was worthwhile to return the money to a person, you proved yourself completely.Other people's money will remain someone else's, and you are not a judge to talk about a person as a fraudster until you are personally deceived. But you showed everyone that you did not want to return, thereby showing yourself no better than scammers.

And what are those "what if" questions? It's too much. So far, you have been, and remain, a person who cannot be trusted. And yes, unfortunately, you don't have a negative tag. But you, I'm sure, will prove yourself in the future.

[Jawhead999]

3. Are you here to explain to us that you don't deserve a neutral tag, that you rather needed a red tag?

Lol
I was about to give him negative tag before, but I think twice giving negative tag to him might be to harsh since I don't have any proof except his words. So I'd give him neutral tag instead, I think it's fair enough since he don't have any reputation yet and have such scammer mindset, so anyone who want to trade with him will need to be careful of this.

6. Are we expecting "scammer get scammed part 3?

Yep, after he got negative trust.

[Oluwa-btc]

All of those where simply framed up mate. The writings has no emotions attached, and my intuitions telling they're all fat lie's.
Level up mate! You can do better than preaching crap!

You don't need too convince anyone, as your previous post tells me you received he's payment first.